Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/06/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 17th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site. Also Google is not a valid source. Please stop reuploading this content (previously deleted as File:Andi Taranik.jpg three times). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily COM:CSD#F1. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like the flag of Poland 114.10.5.21 07:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Different ratio and different red color. --Achim55 (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vítor Manuel Lapa Fernandes (talk) 08:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|Trying out Wikipedia.}} Vítor Manuel Lapa Fernandes (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The girls of Avignon 103.138.75.119 11:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Test or vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 11:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have deleted this images a couple of times before and I am not sure whether the lengthy rational stated in the image description actually justifies keeping the image. This request (at least) also applies to:

ALE! ¿…? 12:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions:
--ALE! ¿…? 12:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment See also en:Che Guevara (photo)#Current legal status. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Question What is the argument for deletion? I see a lengthy, detailed and well-reasoned rationale for its use. What, in the opinion of the nominator, is wrong with this rationale? 216.14.252.123 17:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Why is this nominated for deletion? Does wikipedia just hate Che Guevara? 69.161.78.31 02:17, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The question is whether the photo is free in Cuba and the US (copyright). We do NOT apply political arguments here. --ALE! ¿…? 07:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So you can't articulate any reason why the lengthy, detailed and well-reasoned rationale for its use is in error? Thanks for clearing that up. 216.14.252.123 03:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. PD-Cuba and PD in USA according to detailed explanation here: File:CheHigh.jpg. Copyright status elsewhere is not relevant to Commons. Yann (talk) 10:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

René Burri/Magnum Photos holds a copyright is on this image. Photo information can be found at http://www.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2S5RYD1PEVR4.html 70.50.219.231 04:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright information provided by the uploader is probably incorrect, likely copied from another Che photo. Uploader was requested to provide corrected info, but they did not respond for over a week while still bing active. I suggest deletion as there is no evidence the photo was indeed published in Cuba, especially as original upload information is unreliable. Moreover the ticket:2016042710014497 suggests that the photo may be copyrighted by Magnum Photos. Ankry (talk) 09:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Note The previous DR above concerns absolutely diffrent image that was renamed, redirect deleted and that another image was uploaded under its name. Ankry (talk) 10:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (changed from having actually deleted the file)... It was first published in in 1963 and in the US, so copyright-wise is a US work. That issue of Look is present in the 1963 copyright records (p. 107), and Look appear to have renewed copyrights to issues post-1937. However, I can find no renewals for any 1963 Look issues on http://www.copyright.gov/records . I can also not find any renewals for René Burri or Magnum Photos works in the database from the relative time period, but have found registrations (e.g. TX0001719719, TX0004777415, VA0000092056). I find that database extremely difficult to search, however, so me not finding it does not equate to it not being there. The entries that I found may or may not include this photo, but even if they do, I don't know whether that counts as a renewal... All in all, I think I closed this prematurely. Thanks Ankry for bringing it to my attention! Storkk (talk) 17:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So I have changed the invalid {{PD-Cuba}} to likely valid {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. And let's wait for more comments, if any. Ankry (talk) 17:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly is the ticket 2016042710014497 you refer to? -- Asclepias (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: I'd also be curious to the extent that you can divulge what it relates to -- it's not in a permissions queue or any other queue I have access to. Storkk (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Storkk and Asclepias: It is in the Sister project::Commons queue; the ticket is a third party suggestion that the image may be copyrighted. It contains nothing more than has been written here. I started this DR basing on COM:PRP as information provided by uploader was unreliable. But now, after Storkk's investigatioons (thanks to him) I do not consider COM:PRP a valid deletion reason in this case any longer. So I suggest  Keep unless more info is available or a renewal is found. Ankry (talk) 06:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ctruongngoc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: René Burry, photographe de nationalité suisse est mort en 2014. En aucun cas ses photographies ne sont dans le domaine public. Converting to DR due to several previous DRs. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 12:36, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

et43t43 4t3 The WikiBalls (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 11:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like the flag of Indonesia 182.4.101.162 13:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Different ratio, different red color. --Achim55 (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gampe as no permission (No permission since), but I don't see any read flags that VRT confirmation is needed. The file has metadata, clearly it's not a professional photograph. Ciell (talk) 18:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nvrmind, I now notice the author field in the metadata. --Ciell (talk) 18:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reklama KolegaMichal (talk) 20:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense, clear case of de minimis. --Achim55 (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake (double use with a similar photo) Jonuscumgi (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 14:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:174th. Street Station, The Bronx, New York, 12 Feb. 2008 - 2262221324.jpg Vcohen (talk) 07:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted as dupe Юрий Д.К 21:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:173rd St 2 train NYC subway.jpg Vcohen (talk) 07:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted as dupe Юрий Д.К 21:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:3 Av 149 St vc.jpg Vcohen (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted as dupe Юрий Д.К 21:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:63rd Street IND 2266007422 644534ffc2.jpg Vcohen (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted Юрий Д.К 00:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free. Akishima Yuka (talk) 02:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to copyvio, this can be closed. Akishima Yuka (talk) 07:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 10:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lemonaka as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. But it is in use by idwiki. DaB. (talk) 09:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Not a really case of F10, enough notability. Lemonaka (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cipyright of apgovernment P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image is under PD-India.--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 12:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, same as Gopi. I have taken this from en.WP, where it was replaced by the commons wikimedia see : [1]. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 16:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Denniss (talk) 10:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio| see the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emblem of Andhra Pradesh.svg }} Arjunaraoc (talk) 10:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete}} omyl Kuba Turek (talk) 23:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Emu (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

globally locked account, out of scope Emu (talk) 15:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UmutcanKaptan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality pictures of a non-contributor (only usage on tr.wikibooks, apparently no other contributions there)

Emu (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-contributor, out of scope? Emu (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an invalid request with the reasoning not making sense. 411badderthan (talk) 13:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Info: d:Q105636912 has been deleted per lack of notability. --Achim55 (talk) 14:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It’s actually a reason for speedy deletion (F10). The only reason why it can’t be speedily deleted is the VRT permission. --Emu (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RcAmAr78 (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RcAmAr78 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RcAmAr78 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RcAmAr78 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RcAmAr78 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RcAmAr78 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Roxy Paine is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Michigan Defense Force is not part of the federal armed forces, they are completely run by the Michigan state government. Michigan is not one of the states that makes their works public domain https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/michigan/ If the patch and seal were created before 1989, the copyright on them may be expired due to formalities. Also these are very low resolution. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 16:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Forgot to @ShakespeareFan00: which I'm doing now. Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:43, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality video screenshot. Out of scope Юрий Д.К 17:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file. Was my own upload. My modofications are not visible. SVG is not prcessed by my PSP V7.0. Please delete. Akela (talk) 19:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Museo8bits (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COmputer boxes or cases with original copyrighted designs.

Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:41, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dark Photo of a random person, no real use, out of COM:SCOPE Oxyman (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. I've already gone ahead and removed it from Category:Trooping the Colour as it is obviously not a useful image of that, or of anything at all. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Nothing can be seen at all. Extremely poor quality. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:40, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo internet" in the Flickr description indicates that the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder. License laundering. Gyrostat (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination, and because the image is an a webpage archive dated before the upload to Flickr.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 21:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:39, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 22:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katyanpltd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal documents (resume, certificates) outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 17:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katyanpltd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope company documents and logo.

Omphalographer (talk) 01:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map, and no FOP in the Philippines. Missing commercial license clearance from the artist of the work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Artwork yet no indication that the artists provided permission for uploader's use of commercial license. Mural's country of origin does not have FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Myanmar A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Myanmar A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Myanmar A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Alfred Tibor died in 2017 A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC) .[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Not eligible for enwiki fair use, not used in article space. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Stephen Canneto is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Beth Sahagian is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Alan LeQuire is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 08:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iraq A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. The statue was revealed in 2014 A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Massotou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FJoseVF (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Post-1972 architecture in a country that does not provide freedom of panorama. Contributions by a suspected sockpuppet of Judgefloro.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Philippines TheNileRex (talk) 06:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Jim Brothers died in 2013

A1Cafel (talk) 07:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. Artist Burl Jones is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post-1989 sculpture by Doris Shlayn, no FoP in USA for 3D works A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The caption below the bust indicates that the man who is depicted in the bust died in 1967, which is less than 70 years ago, so that bust raised some suspicition about whether it is subject to copyright protection in Italy. While we have evidence that the photograph itself was made available under a free license, Italy is unfortunately a country where there is no freedom of panorama. As such even if we have permission from the photographer, we'd still need permission from the copyright owner of the bust (the creator of which is listed as "Don Enrico Smaldone", who appears to have died in 1966, so his estate/heir owns the copyright). As such, this should be deleting as a derivative work of a non-free work in light of COM:CARES and COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in USA. The statue was revealed in 2005 A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING; derivative work of the photo on the box. Rosenzweig τ 05:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:47, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explanatory text on the lower plaque is clearly readable; date on the upper plaque suggest the text was authored in 2015, thus a possible infringement of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple hits on TinEye in higher resolution prior to upload to Commons. Earth artwork itself appears to date from 2012. https://www.deviantart.com/markydman/art/It-s-like-earth-but-not-1080p-Wallpaper-291572057 Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata shows source is Facebook. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution photograph that looks like it was taken from a web page. Abzeronow (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems not a true photo but an "image of an image" (therefore, photo of a photo). Note the seemingly-low quality of the subject as well as a horizontal white line at leftmost edge. The Panoramio user Botchock has only 9 photos in their Panoramio profile, all photos of the establishment with varied qualities, so I suspect the Panoramio user is not the photographer. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Copyrighted public artwork, and no freedom of panorama in source country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptural copyright violation since there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines for commercial exploitations of public art and arhitecture. Per this site, the copyrighted artwork Uygon was unveiled in 2014 and authored by sculptor Arel Zambarrano. Needs commercial license permit from the sculptor. Or, RA 8293 must be reformed to allow freedom of panorama for commercial uses of public art of the Philippines without licensing permits from architects, sculptors, or muralists. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image in PNG format of a personality. Sole upload of this account, so I doubt this is own work. Either upload the original picture with full EXIF data, or send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 22:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken off web, copyright protected Poliocretes (talk) 06:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hajizadegan y (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lareina.wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PERSONAL

Emu (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination +copyvio. --Kadı Message 16:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mpkgma12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Emu (talk) 15:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nurulaminshikder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nurulaminshikder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover likely to be copyrighted. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person (article is deleted), out of scope. 188.123.231.10 17:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 16:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't know the protection period of this picture before and uploaded it. This image is not currently owned by PD because it was not in the public domain in 1996, So it has 95 years of protection and will expire in 2058. Q28 (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The copyright of this image will not expire until 2058, so it can only be used as a fair use image on zhwiki and enwiki. But check to see if the image has been migrated to the corresponding wiki before deleting it. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 03:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deletd by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like derivative work of File:Varangian_routes.png with minimal changes, but claims to be own work. Original file is licensed with CC-BY-SA 3.0, so it violates the license. Katafrakt (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The user creating this images has made links to this image in many Wikipedias in the last days. I reverted for the dewiki. --Filzstift (talk) 06:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcquidditch as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: while a below-TOO version of the logo itself will probably surface eventually, the background of this particular image undoubtly is over TOO and hence copyright NBCUniversal. Probably above COM:TOO, but I want to float this because it's non-obvious. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I clearly assumed that this image uploaded by ReachJoyFan8394842948 is a PNG image, not SVG image, giving that the image clearly has a background which cannot properly vectorized. Additionally, ReachJoyFan8394842948 behavior is similar as socks of Jordanene7 regarding uploaded a poor quality of SVG or PNG and uploading an PNG image as SVG, which is fatal. So, unless any editor, either me or others can replace background image with below-TOO version of the logo, this image should be deleted. Yayan550 (talk) 10:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Puramyun31
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

This photo (and cropped version) is licensed as CC-BY-SA-2.0 on Flickr, but it is a magazine cover, so the files should probably be deleted due to improper licensing on Flickr, as the name of the uploader of the file on Flickr isn't even the same as the name of the person who performed the concert photography.

Logan Talk Contributions 22:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Béria Lima msg 20:59, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

Puramyun31 (talk) 03:10, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

5 photos of Asuka Nishi, Japanese voice actress.

These photos are taken without her consent. (see COM:BLP, COM:CSCR#Japan.) She is requesting they are deleted. (cf. her radio program Asuka Nishi's Delicate Zone #57 8m7s–; official tweets [3][4]) --Waiesu (talk) 13:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous discussions, photo of a public figure, taken in a public place during a public event, fall into the COM:CSCR#Japan exceptions. If there's really a legal problem with those pictures, the personality or the producer/agent should contact [email protected] instead with some proof. They're also welcome to send us an official picture, see COM:OTRS/ja for more information. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

Not in use, doubtful educational value.

— Racconish ☎ 20:55, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

COM:TOY issues. Lots of stuffed animals that would be copyrightable in the US. Part of a large batch upload. Most were fine or de minimus but these are a little too close for comfort so I'm bringing them here.

Majora (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This DR seems to be somewhat too speculative because the DR is opened for just the reason "a little too close for comfort", with regard to com:assume good faith. The photos are clearly not intended to depict the toys as main subjects. if really the images are deleted per the reason "a little too close for comfort", these images (which are introduced as examples of de minimis, the images include "copyrightable parts" even at the centers of these) will not also be survived at all. --Puramyun31 (talk) 11:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting something because it is a little too close to comfort is a Commons policy. In any case, I spent literally hours combing through this batch of uploads from this site eliminating dozens of images that had stuffed animals in them that were actually de minimis. Of course you think they are fine, you wouldn't have uploaded them if you didn't. However, if you seriously think that something like File:1월 21일 오마이걸 팬사인회 (90).jpg is de minimis we have a much larger issue. That is a copyrighted Cartoon Network cartoon character. Front and center in the image. In a location that would also render the image useless if removed. I'm willing to work with you here. Crop out some parts of the images if need be. But to call these all de minimis is reaching way too far. --Majora (talk) 21:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- Also note that I could not find a CC-BY icon on the source page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per UDR. I restored the files where the toy is only de minimis (half hidden, blurred, etc.). I cropped some files. Yann (talk) 07:31, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

No metadata, license laundering is suspected and/or the uploader on lofter is not the copyright owner. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Channel does not exist, unable to verify the official status. -Mys_721tx (talk) 18:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

partial  Keep @Mys 721tx: just "no metadata" is not simply a reason of deletion, since there is no real clue of first publishing of the images at other webpage(s) and the lofter blog(s) copied from the webpage(s)(per image search results, 160106 幻城媒体探班 最近好喜欢刘蕾啊 嘻嘻 (刘力菲 谢蕾蕾) imagecut search 1imagecut search 2 【一个脑洞】 跟之前写的菲蕾那篇连起来的 (郑丹妮 陈珂) imagecut search 1 imagecut search 2 and the youtube video 【TPE48一期生徵選形象歌曲】「向前走」★小花絮③★.webm has archived page (https://archive.fo/kxdSt) and license info HTML code (https://imgur.com/a/QJgDGeg).

except 啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊 无限循环播放 (秦岚), since the images are from http://peachring.com/weibo/user/5628148368/4283527518323172

Puramyun31 (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Per the precautionary principle, low resolution and the lack of metadata are sufficient to remove a file. Your example has perfectly demonstrated that the license declaration of some files from Lofter are untrustworthy. -Mys_721tx (talk) 02:49, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't say "where the images are from another website(s)" as seperately (image by image), but just repeatly said "low resolution and the lack of metadata". this is a speculation. there are many low resolution/no metadata files but the fact is not necessarily a reason of deletion. also the youtube video at this DR has archived page and license info as i said above, and the cc license of the video is irrevocable.Puramyun31 (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1. By your own words, four files in this DR alone are not licensed by their author. The previous DR on this page also shows files that have this problem. Taking those into account, Lofter is untrustworthy for its copyright declaration and metadata must be required for verification. The lack thereof also warrants deletion.
  1. The channel in question is not verified on Youtube. Merely having the word "official" does not mean this channel is indeed the copyright owner. There is at least one case the YouTube licensing is abused. Until the identity of the channel has been confirmed, the irrevocability of the CC license is irrelevant to the discussion.
  1. If you notice any editor that are importing resolution/no metadata files en masse from an untrustworthy source, feel free to start a separated DR. However, the existence of such files are not valid defense in this DR.
-Mys_721tx (talk) 05:23, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"By your own words, four files in this DR alone are not licensed by their author. The previous DR on this page also shows files that have this problem. Taking those into account, Lofter is untrustworthy for its copyright declaration and metadata must be required for verification. The lack thereof also warrants deletion." : the reason of "The previous DR" as you said is not related to the existance of metadata but I opened the DR just according to blog user's comment, as the reason that is screenshots from a TV program from another site. also don't make the mistake of blanket/hasty generalization of "trustworthiness" of lofter images without talking about "where the images are from another website(s)" for each lofter images.

"The channel in question is not verified on Youtube. Merely having the word "official" does not mean this channel is indeed the copyright owner. There is at least one case the YouTube licensing is abused. Until the identity of the channel has been confirmed, the irrevocability of the CC license is irrelevant to the discussion." : the youtube account (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCumoYG0Ijzya5vcry8szlzQ, "author" section of the file page) is official account, as per HTML Code of archived TPE48 official website Puramyun31 (talk) 10:58, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had no doubt that the blog owner is the copyright holder of the images in their posts, and no metadata is not sufficient grounds to argue deletion under COM:PCP, as I have an uploaded of a picture I took myself on the English Wikipedia with no metadata other than the program I used to edit it (en:File:FNC Entertainment entrance.jpg). So, as I searched for more conclusive evidence, I was led to a link which redirects to the user's Weibo account. There, I made the unfortunate discovery of the following text: "好多鱼【本博图禁止去logo、商用以及任何形式二改,转载请注明出处。】". Google Translate: "A lot of fish [This blog is forbidden to go to logo, commercial and any form of second change, please indicate the source. 】". I don't understand Chinese, but it seems pretty clear derivatives and commercial use is prohibited. I think this cements the user's credibility as the photographer, but not in the way we needed.

These pictures, as well as some others not found on the Lofter blog, are found on other webpages. COM:PCP can be applied here.

This is based on the blog contents. It is mostly fan art, with an occasional picture. This other photo has a second watermarked, but its unclear of what it says. This might be screenshot (is that a cropped logo in the upper left?). This is mostly a stab at the dark, really... I don't think there's sufficient evidence either way.

Lofter is a blog service, so scrutiny should be made by account rather than the site as a whole. We don't call Flickr untrustworthy based solely on the amount of license laudering that goes on there. xplicit 09:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: according to these searches (1 2 3), "160106 幻城媒体探班" photo themselves don't exist on the weibo blog https://www.weibo.com/rofs0712, so the weibo text does not applicable in this case. Puramyun31 ( talk) 07:22, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: Precisely because Lofter is made of user generated content, all images from it should not be viewed as freely-licensed by default. The same applies to images from Flickr. The lack of metadata and the low resolution certainly do not help the case. -05:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, all but 【TPE48一期生徵選形象歌曲】「向前走」★小花絮③★.webm. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puramyun31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Oops, sorry for my mistake. these are accidentally uploaded.

Puramyun31 (talk) 14:01, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permissions found at the source page; clearly other's work. Unnamelessness (talk) 03:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of 2d artwork, no FoP in Kazakhstan. Красный wanna talk? 04:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:04, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto tiene Copyright del Gobierno de Aragón Anamgil (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo of a political party of Venezuela, apparently recent (2017 or so), was uploaded with a CC license, but without any evidence that license actually applies. It is also too complex to be below the threshold of originality, even if we had any guidance on the TOO in Venezuela (which we don't). So the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I actually designed this logo at home in power point and downloaded the resolution, I also took into account the existing logo on the CNE web page. In venezuela, the logos of independent and ephemeral parties are not copyrighted, as long as the source of origin is respected, and therefore, in turn, that party no longer exists, it does not infringe any rule, and it is a miniature, it is not the electoral card, it is a logo designed by me to represent the party in the comparative table of mayors of the municipality rivas dávila, my father's native municipality. please consider it and do not delete it, thank you very much.Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk) 12:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So this is not an actual logo of a party, but something you made up? In that case, the file should be deleted because it is out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, if it exists but I did not do it quite the same, to respect rights, look at the CNE page, so you can see that it does exist. The only difference is that I recreated it as an SVG format, although it was uploaded as PNG.
http://www.cne.gob.ve/resultadosMunicipales2017/ Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wojciech Pędzich as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: album cover that is not proven to be under a free license It has EXIF data. Yann (talk) 08:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Still, check e.g. Empik a major Polish bookstore to confirm this is an album cover. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Solange du Part (talk · contribs)

[edit]

An album cover and a crop of an album cover. Needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: both files already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 08:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sepehrchavoshi

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The model is marked as the author, Personal pictures--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 07:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by CaesarIran as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image does not belong to Moj news agency and it is from various internet images that Moj news agency has used |source=https://www.mojnews.com/%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B4-%D8%B9%DA%A9%D8%B3-95#gsc.tab=0 Yann (talk) 08:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In such cases, it is best to provide another source earlier than Moj news agency. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped from https://www.arthursimeon.com/ - I think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected CopyVio (three watermarks mark this as "UNEN.mn"); Very low resolution. Lacks a proper description: the map seems to show early modern Imperial China (Qing dynasty), is dated from 2014 (CCP dynasty) and claims to show Mongolia (Yuan dynasty). Unused. Enyavar (talk) 10:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement of the box design. Not sure it's worth cropping since File:2023 Corsair QL120 RGB (2).jpg is a stand-alone photo of the fan. Mike Peel (talk) 10:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Peel: (1) is the box design copyrighted (I don't see a (C)). (2) Where was the photo taken? Assuming this photo was taken in Poland from the language in the Description, according to Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Situation_in_different_countries Poland has FOP for commercial 2D/3D art and text. --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How is FOP relevant for a studio image of this box? --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tagooty: Those are questions best asked of the photographer, @Jacek Halicki: . Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike Peel@Tagooty I took the photo in Poland. Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In view of FOP in Poland for commercial graphic art and text --Tagooty (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Can you please explain why FOP should have any relevance here? AFAIK FOP is typically for photography in public places, usually for architecture and artwork that are on permanent public display. It is hard to imagine that this covers derivative work of a commercial box design of a computer cooling fan. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Artwork includes commercial graphics such as posters, etc. The design on the box is commercial graphic artwork in the form of a 3D poster. FOP applies if the artwork is displayed in public for its "natural lifetime". When Corsair displays the box in shops and sells it, the box is available to the public for its lifetime. Hence, I believe FOP applies. Tagooty (talk) 01:08, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but I disagree. I do not know the specific conditions for FOP in Poland, but if the box can be considered artwork (which I am not entirely sure about), then FOP would certainly not be applicable if the box had been photographed in Germany which appears to have similar FOP rules. Permanent public display does not mean that something is sold in shops. FOP is intended for buildings or murals that can be photographed in public places, mostly on the streets. Even short-term displays like Christo's wrapped buildings are not subject to FOP because they are temporary. --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 07:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While FOP was started in Germany to allow photography of buildings and statues outdoors, it has evolved since. In India, any artistic work that is in a "premises to which the public has access" is FOP. So, a product box, with graphic art on it, in a shop is covered. If a product box is not artistic then it has no copyright protection.
"Permanent" is for the "natural lifetime". For an ice sculpture or a sand castle, this may be only a few hours. For a product box, the natural lifetime is the time for which it is sold in shops.
I also am not familiar with Polish copyright laws. Hope some experts will opine. Tagooty (talk) 10:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PACKAGING. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that "it is published and distributed by the Government of Republic of Indonesia".   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that "it is published and distributed by the Government of Republic of Indonesia".   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW: This is not a free-licensed app, is it? Definitely not “own work by the uploader, licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0”. Mormegil (talk) 11:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found an image for the sake without permission, that inside a Spanish page. But it has already been loaded here!. 179.251.202.203 12:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictionnal + not in use = out of com:scope 82.124.119.228 12:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work since this is a screenshot of a Google made app. Megamanfan3 (talk) 12:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 12:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably taken from https://umno-online.my/2022/03/19/perwakilan-mahu-orang-muda-terus-diberi-peluang-pastikan-sasaran-remajakan-umno-tercapai/. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 12:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably taken from https://muafakatkedah.blogspot.com/2017/12/kenyataan-dato-hasmuni-kp-umno-kubang.html. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 17:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 12:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably taken from https://umno-online.my/2022/11/18/pru15-kebangkitan-bn-memuncak-gelombang-peralihan-rakyat/. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 17:43, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 12:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably taken from http://galeripdrm.blogspot.com/2010/04/ketua-polis-negara-keenam-tan-sri.html. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 17:44, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably taken from https://www.interpeace.org/member/razali-ismail/. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE image of a non-notable individual ro:Ovidiu Nedelea. Gikü (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an advertisement from a radio station, they are the owners of the copyright. Günther Frager (talk) 13:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder is Jade Sívori according to metadata. The user had several copyvios, and probably is not Jade Sívori. Günther Frager (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It`s not own work. The source is https://aktivist.in.ua/y-chernivciah-provylok-gotelnii-y-centri-mista-stav-pishohidnim-z-gromadskim-prostorom-novini-chernivciv/ Юровский Александр (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It`s not own work. The source is https://promin.cv.ua/2023/06/07/vulytsia-chaikovskoho-u-chernivtsiakh-stala-pishokhidna-na-nii-vidkrylys-litni-maidanchyky.html Юровский Александр (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 14:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:POSTER. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It`s not own work. The source is https://buktour.icu/chernivtsi/ekskursiji-chernivtsyami/224-promenad-starym-mistom.html Юровский Александр (talk) 14:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine page in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. Temporary display. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The text on the commemorative plaque provides pure information without any literary claim.
The photo (circa 1931 or earlier) is apparently anonymous Wurl-Berlin (talk) 23:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, copyvio (The text is most lokly coprighted, autor of photo unknown). --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dekrametr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

organization with very questionable notability, COM:SCOPE

Emu (talk) 15:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright situation of depicted book cover, low quality, probably out of scope Emu (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:25, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Obulreddy0846 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-notable. Maybe File:Obulreddy morapelly.jpg may be useful.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused private photos, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bogossito64 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mere screenshots, suggesting copyright violation.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube video thumbnail. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused private photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 13:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description is not very helpful and the image does not show clearly the main subject Nakna06 (talk) 17:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nakna06 Please stop your vandalistic deletion requests. Granpar (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it was a mistake. 2409:40E1:100B:CB0E:8000:0:0:0 18:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image uploaded to Union State for propaganda purposes (shows Crimea as part of Russia). — kashmīrī 07:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Yann (talk) 08:39, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Changed license to {{PD-US-no notice}}, inclined to  Keep. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unfortunately, neither publication date nor proof of the lack of notice is present. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Andy Warhol Yann (talk) 11:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The opinion is in the public domain, as are all of the constituent parts, including this image. Also, as all of the images have the same copyright, please keep them to one discussion. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Images of the bottles may be in the public domain, but this is obviously not. It is not because it is used in a court opinion that it looses its copyright. Yann (talk) 15:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The opinion of the Court is, as the licence template indicates, in the public domain. All portions of the opinion are, thus, also in the public domain. This includes otherwise copyrightable items, such as excerpts of text and images, which are used to illustrate the opinion. The same is true of the photographs in the Jack Daniel’s case. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover, certainly under a copyright. Used in a court case as fair use. Yann (talk) 11:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Images of the bottles may be in the public domain, but this is obviously not. It is not because it is used in a court opinion that it looses its copyright. Yann (talk) 15:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover, certainly under a copyright. Used in a court case as fair use. Yann (talk) 11:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Images of the bottles may be in the public domain, but this is obviously not. It is not because it is used in a court opinion that it looses its copyright. Yann (talk) 15:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that the cited author is the actual author of the work, which is not under WP:TOO. Nacaru (talk) 11:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 12:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. No freedom of panorama in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Appears on a news website that is dated before the upload to Commons and has the caption 'Image Credit: WAM',[5] presumably the Emirates News Agency (wam.ae).[6] Has the appearance of an official photograph of the politician Sultan bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan. Widely available on the Internet, including an uncropped version.[7] It is the uploader's only contribution to Commons. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source indicates that the photo belongs to the news agency Telam. Also the photo appear on a newspaper[8] crediting Don Rypka as author. The image is PD in Argentine, where photos have 25 years of protection, but it is not PD in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 14:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an album cover published in 1983 in Argentina and was still copyrighted in its country of origin at URAA time in 1996. Günther Frager (talk) 14:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to meet the threshold of originality. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems out of scope. Who is Nancy Karson and why is he called Nanoka Kiba here? RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo --> not free Ayack (talk) 17:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. See school website. 69.92.163.38 18:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Nakna06 (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Random photo from internet Nakna06 (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foto da internet? Non scherziamo: è opera mia fotografata 16 giugno, ieri, alle ore 19:29 durante mie esplorazioni liguri regione in cui risiedo dal 1968!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Al*from*Lig (talk • contribs)
 Keep, false/random claim N.Longo (talk) 08:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Nakna06 (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear notability of depicted person. Maybe even SD F10. Personal photos by non-contributors. Emu (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear notability of depicted person. Without VRT notice, this would maybe even be SD F10. Personal photos by non-contributors. Emu (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear notability of depicted person, probably out of scope

Emu (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonenight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Collection of personal photos. Files not in use, except in Wikidata self promotional entries.

Smooth O (talk) 16:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Smooth 0,

I hope you are doing well.

Please, I wish you can take a look at each file alone and judge it rather than grouping them all and request deletion for everything I contributed to.

I had to to open old hard drives and find photos that I took over the last 10 years. Then, name them & organize them to contribute here in this wiki.

It took from me too much time to publish all those photos, writing their names, description & summary. Also, add proper categories for each photo.

Some photos capture famous international actors/actresses or celebrities who all have wikipedia pages with many languages too. Here, I'm just adding their English Pages (for the sake of time): Giancarlo Esposito, Jessica Kahawaty, Sultan bin Muhammad Al-Qasimi Souad Abdullah, Mohammed_Al-Mansor Do You Know how hard it is to be able to capture photos by yourself of many celebrities (I managed this and it took me 10 years for that.

Also, Please Check out some of the authority Control IDs of Sultan bin Muhammad Al-Qasimi & NasserTone too. because the first file you submitted for deletion was about them:

H.H Dr Sheikh Sultan Al-Qasimi (Ruler of Sharjah) some Authority Control IDs: ISNI: https://isni.oclc.org/xslt/DB=1.2//CMD?ACT=SRCH&IKT=8006&TRM=ISN%3A0000000121180125&TERMS_OF_USE_AGREED=Y&terms_of_use_agree=send ISNI ID: 0000 0001 2118 0125 VIAF: https://viaf.org/viaf/2560099/ https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n85194394/ https://portal.dnb.de/opac.htm?method=simpleSearch&cqlMode=true&query=nid%3D13652317X https://www.idref.fr/033261563

Please check out some of NasserTone Authority Control IDs ISNI: https://isni.oclc.org/xslt/DB=1.2/CMD?ACT=SRCH&IKT=8006&TRM=ISN%3A0000%200005%200302%20112X ISNI: 0000 0005 0302 112X ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-9811 IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12085402/ https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q107171731 https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=107171731 Scholia: https://scholia.toolforge.org/author/Q107171731 ASIN: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0933H14Z3 ASIN (Amazon Standard Identification Number): B0933H14Z3

Tonenight (talk) 03:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment We don't made editorial decisions for Wikidata. As long as Wikidata self promotional entries exists, files are in scope here. If you feel it is self-promotion to have an item on Wikidata, feel free to participate on Wikidata to have such items deleted. It is the same as if they were in use on an article on small Wikipedia, we don't make their editorial decisions from here. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. These images are all of the same person, possibly the same person as the uploader. Some are amateur photo's, some are professional. I do seriously doubt the uploader is the photographer of at least a part of the photos. Therefore they have to be deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 21:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The ring around the title makes the logo copyrightable under UK law per COM:TOO UK, regardless of the logo's copyright status in the US. Furthermore, the logo is British-made and should be treated as a UK work. George Ho (talk) 21:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot: there's already a local copy at English Wikipedia: w:File:Red Dwarf logo.png. --George Ho (talk) 22:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in architectural artworks' source of country. Unsure if some can be dismissed as de minimis.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from 1944/45 with fake own work tag and thus invalid license Denniss (talk) 11:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

image is in public domain either way Blockhaj (talk) 11:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no its not. --Denniss (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was taken in a country which doesnt exist anymore, by an unknown photograph.--Blockhaj (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
image was taken in June/July 1944 according to Panzer Tracts 6-3, page 42, from which the image was stolen. The source there is tagged as "WJS" but I don't know who's behind this tag. Copyright or Copyright law does not end when a country is dissolved. German citizens still have german and EU copyright laws behind them. This image is not PD and not anonymous-EU. --Denniss (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to § 72 Abs. 3 UrhG, copyrights for most photographs and pictures expire fifty years after their first publication. If the picture is not published for a period of 50 years after production of the photograph, then the protection ends.[9] Copyright expired in 1994.--Blockhaj (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
your info is quite a bit outdated. Lichtbild regulation is for the type of family photos, for Lichtbildwerke Copyright is 70 Years pma (anonymous EU is only valid if there's really no known author or none can be found dispite attempts to do so). --Denniss (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a photographic work. It is a low quality image taking during testing. Either way. WJS stands for Walther J Spielberger, he died in 2005, he started publishing in 1965, and this image was most likely published in German reports during the war.--Blockhaj (talk) 18:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Updated the photo-description with a new license.--Blockhaj (talk) 21:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Denniss: --Blockhaj (talk) 20:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-EU-no author disclosure. --Yann (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is photo of Marco Verch. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is photo of Marco Verch. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per concerns raised in QIC, I doubt the permanency of this statue and it may not be OK under the freedom of panorama exception in Hong Kong 218.103.207.36 03:12, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, @218.103.207.36, you wrote, "I doubt the permanency of this statue ..." It is not permanent and is not OK under the freedom of panorama exception in Hong Kong.
The uploader @A1Cafel wrote, "A point could argue about the permanency is that the shop is out of business and the statue is removed subsequently." (emphasis added)
The uploader continues "... even though the shop is out of business, the statue is still "permanent" within the entire lifetime of the shop." (emphasis added)
Commons:FOP#Permanent vs temporary states:
"The exhibited objects must be exhibited in a permanent way. If a work is presented on a public place temporarily, one may be obliged to get the explicit permission to take its picture." (emphasis added)
This rabbit is probably made of painted plastic or perhaps clay. It is located close to the entrance (a metal security door). This is not a "public place." A small low-quality plastic or clay animal not anchored next to the entrance to a place of business and obscured by the exterior selling tables
"Whether a work is installed at a public place permanently or not is not a question of absolute time, but a question of what the intention was when the work was placed there. If it was put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work, then it is "permanent"." (emphasis added)
Again, COM:FOP states, "... the whole natural lifetime of the work, ..."- so, the meaning of "permanent" is related to the "lifetime of the work" of art.
The uploader wrote, "A point could argue about the permanency is that the shop is out of business ..."
The "permanence" of a commercial shop or business is NOT the same as the "permanence" of the "natural lifetime of the work" of art.
-- Ooligan (talk) 05:10, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; this appears to have been moved around the store, which by definition would make it not permanent. holly {chat} 21:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post-1989 sculptures, there is no FoP in USA for 3D works

A1Cafel (talk) 07:57, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous DR, Commons:Deletion requests/File:CouchSculpture.JPG. --Ellywa (talk) 21:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Bedivere as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted vinyl label
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether there is anything copyrightable on this cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, text only with standard fonts and as a consequence not eligable for copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta foto tiene Copyright de Gobierno de Aragón, no ha sido realizada por un usuario en las salas del Museo de Zaragoza Anamgil (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is a faithful reproduction of an out-of-copyright 2D work of art, and as such, no new copyright is created by taking a photo of it. holly {chat} 21:46, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text "起錨" is written in an artistic form, and it is likely to exceed COM:TOO Hong Kong (It is very low) A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep, Does not exceed COM:TOO Hong Kong. -- Ooligan (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, see this DR--A1Cafel (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text "起錨" is written in an artistic form, and it is likely to exceed COM:TOO Hong Kong (It is very low) A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep, Does not exceed COM:TOO Hong Kong. -- Ooligan (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, see this DR--A1Cafel (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely not pd. may have been created or published after 1989 OO 12:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source indicates the photo belongs to : publishing house "Fondo Editorial Sarmiento". The photo was taken in 1992, so it is PD in Argentina, but it is not PD in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo appeared in an Argentinian magazine in 1984, and it was not in the PD in 1996 at URAA time, thus it is still under copyright in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source indicates that the photo belongs to the news agency Telam. The image is PD in Argentine, where photos have 25 years of protection, but it is not PD in the United States. Günther Frager (talk) 13:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no valid licence Malvoört (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: comes from a CC-BY licensed video. holly {chat} 23:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid licence Malvoört (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: comes from a CC-BY licensed video. holly {chat} 23:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is copy from the webpage https://www.metropolitan.bg/shema/dejstvashto-metro and is copyrighted. It should be deleted to avoid copyright issues. Titikaka1 (talk) 18:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diese Datei enthält eine Darstellung aus der Webseite https://www.metropolitan.bg/shema/dejstvashto-metro und stellt somit eine Urheberrechtsverletzung dar. Die Datei ist nicht gemeindefrei und sollte entfernt werden. Titikaka1 (talk) 18:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wie angegeben handelt es sich um eine Übersetzung der Datei File:Sofia-metro-schema-01.svg. Das heißt eine mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung läge bereits dort vor. Der Plan wird jedoch mehrfach verwendet. --Siehe-auch-Löscher (talk) 17:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot - No valid licence Malvoört (talk) 18:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: comes from a CC-BY licensed video. holly {chat} 23:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this paper the jizo statue was set up in not earlier than 1980; meaning not in PD. Unfortunately, COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such copyrighted statues. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Written in Japanese) 「削除」を選択するのであれば、日本語版ウィキペディアに「屋外美術」扱いで移行させる代案はあるべきです。なぜされないのか、それとも不可能な案件なのでしょうか。また削除依頼者が出典として提示した論文には地蔵の設置年は記載していません(要は「不明」)です。この点でも削除依頼の手法に問題点があります。--Sanjo (talk) 01:15, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Written in Japanese) なお、「屋外美術扱いでの日本語版ウィキペディアへ移行」を選択する場合は、一連の作業を「削除を希望する側」がするべきと考えております。--Sanjo (talk) 01:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not public domain in Japan. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:27, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At the time of upload, these screenshots of videos were the best source of images available freely for the Starcruiser. However, I was able to upload the images in Category:Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser pictures from Sam Howzit, which are not blurry or screenshots of images. Each of the images nominated for deletion can easily be replaced by one in Category:Star Wars: Galactic Starcruiser pictures from Sam Howzit, including the ones that are not blurry.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It can still keep the screenshot, but not use it in Wikipedia Wpcpey (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Especially the ones that are blurry and we have nearly exact duplicates that are not blurry and high resolution, {{Blurry}} suggests deleting them. Elisfkc (talk) 16:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But I think that image of File:Star Wars Galactic Starcruiser lightsaber experience-1.png is better than by Sam Howzit. For the others, it is great to see those picture in commons. Wpcpey (talk) 12:37, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1 is COM:INUSE, the rest are of acceptable quality and would still have educational use. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe this can be considered depicted text but rather is a Malaysian government issued certificate - the Malaysian Copyright Act 1987 defines literary works to include " (e) letters, reports and memoranda" and the public domain exemption of government works (official texts, laws, judicial decisions) does not come into play. Goldsztajn (talk) 22:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This not a certificate, which has stated in the text above the QR code. A certificate looks more like this.
Individuals and schools across the country has printed out files of this kind, I do not think the copyright term is applicable in this case. The Examination Syndicate did not include copyright notice on this document page (as they do on every page of the exam papers to prevent unauthorized print) nor in this file metadata.
Please take a look at this letter and this mock-up also. This is unfair for me. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 06:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One can quibble over whether this serves as a "certificate", however, that's not the problem. The question is whether this falls under the exemptions of the Copyright Act 1987. The Act is clear on what is exempt (ie within public domain): "official texts of the Government or statutory bodies of a legislative or regulatory nature, or judicial decisions, or political speeches and political debates, or speeches delivered in the course of legal proceedings, and the official translation thereof;". Note: official texts here is defined under the Berne Convention and refers to laws and court decisions, not every single document issued by a state. In terms of the linked items, they also appear to me to not be in the public domain. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per {{PD-Malaysia}}, "the texts of laws, judicial opinions, and government reports are always free from copyright". This does not appear to fall into any of those categories. This could almost be {{PD-text}} if not for the coat of arms and the background image. holly {chat} 17:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]