User talk:Kiran Gopi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kiran_Gopi.

This is the user talk page of Kiran Gopi, where you can send messages and comments to Kiran Gopi.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kiran Gopi!

Verifing identity --Kiran Gopi (talk) 08:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blessed_Kunjachan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vssun (talk) 15:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 8b7b0b2674b1dbae48411da48c55b6a0

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:BG_verghese.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vssun (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

[edit]

You may wish to respond again to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aravana.JPG, where nominator did not respect my closure. Jcb (talk) 23:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What to do? Seriously tired with these kind of deletion requests. Everybody knows those images are in PD but still arguing. People think they are gaining something with mass deletion request. --Kiran Gopi (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sneha_Actress.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 17:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi,

I just applied an image Leopard_frog_in_green_surrounding.jpg for Featured_picture_candidates event. Will you help me out there. Thank you -- Raghith (talk) 08:26, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

file vs പ്രമാണം

[edit]

In the summary field (of commons translated in mal) "other versions" if a file is specified with the malayalam equivalent പ്രമാണം: it says the file doesnt exist. --Arayilpdas (talk) 03:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babu_M_Paliseery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 15:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Suresh Kurup.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 06:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:V. Muraleedharan.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

-- Dpkpm007 (talk) 02:30, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ഞാനല്ല ചിത്രം അപ്ലോഡ് ചെയ്തത്. പക്ഷെ അതിന്റെ അനുമതിയില്‍ പറഞ്ഞിരിക്കുന്നത് പ്രകാരം ചിത്രമെടുത്തിട്ട് 60 വര്‍ഷം കഴിഞ്ഞിരിക്കുന്നു. --Sivahari (talk) 05:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Sengai Podhuvan

[edit]

Kiran, Sengai Podhuvan is a known Tamil scholar and long time Tamil wikipedian. I have been helping him upload images from his published books to commons. You can check his global contributions and Tamil Wikipedia user page clearly show his identity - he uses his real name in contributions. He is known to the Tamil Wiki community and was recently honoured in the Mumbai wiki conference as a noteworthy wikipedian. He was interviewed by Victor Grigas from the WMF for the stories project. What i am saying is - his real life identity is well established and this is not an imposter uploading some one else's works. Asking him to send a OTRS confirmation mail is unnecessary.--Sodabottle (talk) 08:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi first of all sorry for the inconvenience caused, I am not at all aware of these things. But I believe any member of the community can come up with a DR again, since the work is first published outside commons. So I think it is better we have to get a ticket form the author as well as the publisher. --Kiran Gopi (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok will ask him to send a OTRS mail.--Sodabottle (talk) 11:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also please take care of the agreements with the author and the publisher:)--Kiran Gopi (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The publisher doesnt come into picture at all - the author owns the copyright of his work - not the publisher. --Sodabottle (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Remained for just keeping the relationship b/w the author and publisher.--Kiran Gopi (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry for the harsh words Kiran. You are absolutely right to remind about the possibility of such a contract. I spoke to Sengai podhuvan and he confirms there is no such contract and he owns the images exclusively. He will be sending a permissions mail to OTRS (in the prescribed format, listing his uploads) to confirm the same. I apologise again for being impolite and rude.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
LOL No issue, I also made mistake, didn't communicate the real issue earlier and straight forward :(. Kindly inform to Sengai that first upload all the images and then send an OTRS ticket. Sengai's willingness to give his work to commons is much appreciated. --Kiran Gopi (talk) 13:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Kiran, i see you have tagged them "the message was not sufficient". What else is required in the mail. I helped him write the mail and i thought the mail pretty explicitly states he is the sole owner and exclusive rights owner. What else is required here?--Sodabottle (talk) 13:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The permission was sufficient, and I asked some more info. If I get a proper reply, will successfully close it as early as possible. --Kiran Gopi (talk) 18:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Closed the ticket, will add the template soon. --Kiran Gopi (talk) 04:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added permission on Sengai Podhuvan's uploads except this one. Is it a derivative work? --Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's is your problem guy

[edit]

I have taken this photographs with my camera and you are telling me that i have copied it. Have you just waked from sleep? Remove the deletion tag from there. It is 100% photographed from me? Idiots.... Jpullokaran (talk) 14:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Malayalam Loves Wikimedia

[edit]

താങ്കളുടെ ചിത്രങ്ങൾ വളരെ നന്നായിട്ടുണ്ട്, മലയാളം വിക്കിമീഡിയയെ സ്നേഹിക്കുന്നു-2 എന്ന പദ്ധതിയിൽ അംഗമാകാൻ താങ്കളെ ക്ഷണിക്കുന്നു. അഭിപ്രായം അരിയിക്കുമല്ലോ? സസ്നേഹം --Kiran Gopi (talk) 10:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

തീര്‍ച്ചയായും ; പുതിയ അപലോടില്‍ {{MLW2}} എന്ന് ചേര്‍ത്താല്‍ മതിയോ? -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
നന്ദി -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for barnstar

[edit]

hi Kiran, Thanks for the barnstar :) --Rameshng (talk) 15:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jpullokaran's abusive language

[edit]

I really appreciate your generosity in forgiving his person. As individuals, we can differ in opinions but we need to use a language which is acceptable. After all, we live in a small world and can probably meet somewhere at some place. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment.--Kiran Gopi (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Plumeria from Kannur - Kerala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Vassil 13:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bixa orellana fruit opened.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

മ്യുറൽ പെയിന്റിംഗ്

[edit]

പ്രിയ കിരൺ...

ഗ്ലാസ് പ്രതലത്തിലെ മ്യൂറൽ പെയിന്റിംഗ് നീക്കം ചെയ്യുന്ന വിഭാഗത്തിൽ ഉൾപ്പെടുത്തിയതായി കാണുന്നു... കാരണം ഒന്നും കണ്ടില്ല... ഞാൻ വിക്കിയിൽ പുതിയതുമാണ്... എനിക്കൊന്നും മനസ്സിലായില്ല... വിശദമാക്കുമല്ലോ...

88.213.8.45 05:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ഒരു പക്ഷെ താങ്കൾ ഉദ്ദേശിച്ചത് ഈ ചിത്രത്തേ കുറിച്ചായിരിക്കും എന്നു കരുതുന്നു. പ്രശ്നം എന്തെന്ന് വച്ചാൽ ഗ്ലാസ് പ്രതലത്തിൽ ചിത്രം വരച്ചതല്ലെ?. മറ്റൊരാൾ വരച്ച ചിത്രങ്ങളുടെ ചിത്രം നമ്മൾ എടുത്താലും അതിന്റെ യഥാർത്ഥ പകർപ്പവകാശ ഉടമ ചിത്രം വരച്ച വ്യക്തി തന്നെയാണ്. ആയതിനാൽ ആണ് അത് ഡെറിവേറ്റീവ് വർക്ക് എന്നു പറഞ്ഞത്. കൂടുതൽ വിവരങ്ങൾ ഇവിടെ ലഭിക്കുന്നതാണ് ആശംസകളോടെ.--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 04:32, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Purshottam Trikamdas

[edit]

Dear Kiran Gopi, I have created a page on French Wiki fr:Purshottam Trikamdas. Do you know of any photo under PD-India of him? I only found this photo [1], but 1959 is too late... If you can also verify his Hindi name, and if you know or want to create interwiki link, it would be great. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chena poo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs an english file description. --NorbertNagel 21:30, 21 April 2012 (UTC)✓ Done--Kiran Gopi 00:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Good quality, best in this category. --NorbertNagel 07:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re:

[edit]

User_talk:Animeshkulkarni#File:AnandPatwardhan.JPG §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:മലബാറിലെ_നായർ_പെൺകുട്ടി_(1914).jpg

[edit]

There is actually NO discussion going on here. Seems like this gonna stay there till apocalypse. Can you do something?

This seems fairly obvious, but I am reluctant to close it as a delete without reading the comments -- Google doesn't help. Could you give a rough translation there, please? .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was a general discussion about the 2d works FOP and de-minimis. Any way Sreejith hide that image.--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 04:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:42, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

My images have been marked derivative by you.

[edit]

The images that you have marked as derivative are my own work, and do not have any copyright issues. Even the camera description is there. Please go through complete info before you take decisions. Please let me know what made you think, those images were derivative. రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 03:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

വയലാർ കൈയ്യക്ഷരം

[edit]

File:Vayalar handwriting DSCN0058.JPG - ഈ പടത്തിന്റെ പകർപ്പവകാശം വിലയിരുത്തുക. --Vssun (talk) 06:11, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

കയ്യക്ഷരത്തിനും ഒപ്പിനും പകർപ്പവകാശമില്ലങ്കിൽ പോലും കവിത പൊതു സഞ്ചയത്തിലല്ല, പകർപ്പവകാശം പ്രശ്നമാണന്ന് കരുതുന്നു.--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 09:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:NSS Logo Puliyannoor.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

കുമാര്‍ വൈക്കം (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Happy Diwali!"

[edit]
While Diwali is popularly known as the "festival of lights", the most significant spiritual meaning behind it is "the awareness of the inner light". It is the belief that there is something beyond the physical body and mind which is pure, infinite, and eternal, called the Atman. The celebration of Diwali as the "victory of good over evil” refers to the light of higher knowledge dispelling all ignorance, the ignorance that masks one's true nature, not as the body, but as the unchanging, infinite, immanent and transcendent reality. With this awakening come compassion and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). This brings Satcitananda (joy or peace). Just as we celebrate the birth of our physical being, Diwali is the celebration of this Inner Light. While the story behind Diwali and the manner of celebration varies from region to, the essence is the same – to rejoice in the Inner Light! And this year Diwali and All Souls' Day come together to fully defeat the Evil! "Happy Diwali!"JKadavoor Jee 06:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 18:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

[edit]

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  +/−


Hello Kiran Gopi, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Cycle sculpture jeddah.JPG

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Money of India

[edit]

Hi, I have restored all money of India: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of India. In the future, please use {{GODL-India}} as a dual license. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you add image notes to this photograph? How old is it? Name?--2409:4073:2011:E569:C010:6A6E:BCD0:453C 09:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please tell me how old is artifacts File:Artifacts of Wayanad Heritage Museum, Ambalavayal (173).jpg ?

Hi, sorry I don't know the exact age of those artifacts, some of the items are from BC 2nd century. Some information is available here. --Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 16:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]