Wikiproject

edit

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Igbo literature, would you be interested in joining a wikiproject on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Kowal2701, I’m sorry but I won’t be able to join at this time due to my schedule. Maybe, as days pass by, I could consider. Best, Reading Beans 01:37, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red August 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Srebrenica genocide RM

edit

I appreciate that reading through the Srebrenica Genocide was very time consuming and more tedious than most RMs, but rather than simply wait some amount of time "until due" to try and resolve the situation, it is probably time to escalate to WP:MR, because this merits as much attention as highly contentious article titles such as Gaza genocide. To that end I would like to have seen a much more robust rationale rationale for closure. What was the tally of votes for and against that you arrived at, and what did you assess was the strength and weakness of arguments on each side? 122141510 (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

You see, both parties !voted based on COMMONNAME but none weighed more than the other as you would agree with me. There was simply no consensus to move. You could initiate a MR. I have no prejudice. Best, Reading Beans 01:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Best to you as well! I do not blame you as such, rather this is a lapse in oversight and project accountability that is over a decade in the making. I remember at some point thinking if 3 members (at least 2 admins) could take the time to post a clear rationale and explain according to policy why a highly contentious dispute about the presence or absence of a middle name in an article about an politician resolves the way it does and put that argument to rest, and endorse as such, that at some point an article about a genocide(!) might deserve the same level of attention. 122141510 (talk) 04:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Forgot to explicitly mention that that move review is now live. I am obliged to properly provide you the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2024_July#Srebrenica_massacre --122141510 (talk) 05:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
All the best! Reading Beans 06:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Occult Grandmaster Now in Christ

edit
 

The article Occult Grandmaster Now in Christ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable novel.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply