Wikipedia:WikiProject Archaeology/Assessment
Main | Discussion | Monitoring | Outline | Participants | Project organization | Assessment | Resources | Showcase |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Archaeology WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Archaeology articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{ArchaeologyWikiProject}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Archaeology articles by quality and Category:Archaeology articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
This is a bot generated table of the assessment process of WikiProject Archaeology supported articles. It is updated automatically every 2-3 days.
Index · Statistics · Log
Archaeology articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
9 | 23 | 49 | 81 | ||||
3 | 15 | 18 | |||||
6 | 17 | 46 | 150 | 2 | 221 | ||
B | 23 | 82 | 186 | 462 | 386 | 1,139 | |
C | 31 | 150 | 376 | 1,395 | 2 | 947 | 2,901 |
Start | 28 | 154 | 564 | 4,440 | 2,789 | 7,975 | |
Stub | 1 | 19 | 173 | 2,669 | 1 | 1,319 | 4,182 |
List | 4 | 15 | 44 | 424 | 71 | 558 | |
Category | 1 | 3,287 | 3,288 | ||||
Disambig | 16 | 16 | |||||
File | 68 | 68 | |||||
Project | 1 | 14 | 15 | ||||
Template | 2 | 215 | 217 | ||||
NA | 2 | 6 | 16 | 135 | 362 | 521 | |
Other | 1 | 50 | 51 | ||||
Assessed | 95 | 453 | 1,433 | 9,741 | 4,015 | 5,514 | 21,251 |
Unassessed | 25 | 25 | |||||
Total | 95 | 453 | 1,433 | 9,741 | 4,015 | 5,539 | 21,276 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 80,426 | Ω = 4.87 |
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Archaeology WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
[edit]An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Archaeology}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Archaeology
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
|peer-review=
|old-peer-review=
|living=
|needs-infobox=
}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Archaeology articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Archaeology articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Archaeology articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Archaeology articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Archaeology articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Archaeology articles)
- NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Archaeology pages)
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Archaeology articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Archaeology articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Archaeology articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Archaeology articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Archaeology articles)
- Unknown - any article which isn't designated by importance is automatically added to the Category:Unknown-importance Archaeology articles.
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Quality scale
[edit]Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The article has attained featured article status by passing an official review. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Water fluoridation (as of August 2014) |
|||
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
|||
The article has attained good article status by passing an official review. More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | YouTube (as of August 2014) |
|||
B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Apple Inc. (as of August 2014) |
||
C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Bishop (chess) (as of August 2014) |
||
Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as BLP. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Interval vector (as of February 2014) |
||
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category. More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article all together.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Crescent Falls (as of February 2013) |
||
The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of National Basketball Association season assists leaders (as of April 2014) |
|||
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of January 2013) |
Importance scale
[edit]Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is of crucial importance to Wikipedia's coverage of archaeology. Would be mentioned in any basic encyclopaedia. |
|
High | Subject is highly notable globally or within the field of archaeology as a whole. Would be mentioned in any introductory archaeology textbook. |
|
Mid | Subject is highly notable within a specific region or subfield of archaeology. Would probably be mentioned in general texts in the relevant subfield. |
|
Low | Subject is notable, but not particularly so. Is likely to primarily be mentioned in specialist literature. |
|
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | - |
??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | - |
Requesting an assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for it, please feel free to edit this page and list it below.
NOTE: NO ASSESSMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE HERE SINCE 2010
- Series of articles on Hadrian's Wall Milecastles Milecastle 0 to Milecastle 13 (so far). Sammy_r (talk) 05:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Vinča-Belo Brdo —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 09:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Henge Aarghdvaark (talk) 09:54, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- Southeastern Ceremonial Complex Assessed as C while working on WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America backlog; but it's probably at least a B, with potential to become a GA. Djembayz (talk) 00:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Nordic Stone Age No references for nearly 4 years; eligible for sweeping text deletion. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Wade's Causeway been working on this for about 2 weeks, taking it from a basic stub article, want to get it ready for GA/FA eventually but it needs a preliminary rating from the project -PocklingtonDan (talk) 20:41, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
- There is now a peer review page for this at [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Wade's_Causeway/archive1]] - PocklingtonDan (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Romano-Celtic Temple - I've made this and been adding to it over this month. I'd appreciate a review to see if we are at 'Start' or 'C' class yet. Work in progress. Zakhx150 (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Tel Kabri - new addition to the project. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 1 Tevet 5774 20:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Balangoda_Man - This is rated 'Top-importance' on Wikiproject Sri Lanka but only 'Low-importance' on Wikiproject Archeology. After having made substantial changes to this article to take it up to GA-class, the existing peer-reviewed literature on the subject seems to indicate that the topic (surrounding the earliest prehistoric homo sapiens in Sri Lanka, and South Asia in general) is of much higher importance to Archeology in general. Therefore I would greatly appreciate it if someone could take a second look. Many thanks. Ldesilva (talk) 04:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- List of Scheduled Monuments in Bath and North East Somerset currently at FLC any help or advice appreciated.— Rod talk 18:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Xerxes Canal Review for B or C class would be great! Cotopaxi5897 (talk) 09:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thessaloniki Metro (Archaeology section). Would appreciate a review for classification. Thanks! --Michail (blah) 16:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Bodzia Cemetery Would appreciate a review for classification, thank you! Alixthö (talk) 05:10, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Magnet fishing Requesting a complete review on this article, not even sure if it really pertains to archeology as most people seem to do this trying to find treasures in rivers and other bodies of water, not necessarily for documentation, research, or an archeological purpose. The scale lists it as High importance and even if it was to stay within the project I would significantly dissent on it being High, based on your scales this does not compare to other High importance articles. Cheers OfficerManatee (talk) 07:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Cueva de las Manos Lots of content has been added. Requesting review for reclassification. Tyrone Madera (talk) 04:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Subneolithic - Been developing the article (and will continue to do so) over the past couple weeks, would appreciate a review regarding its quality scale. Thanks in advance! OK872 (talk) 01:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Prehistoric Archaeology Requesting that this stub be reviewed to see if the classification can be upgraded to article or if further revisions need to be made. Thank you in advance! Neeks 3 (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Lawrence H. Keeley — Requesting that this currently start-class article be reviewed for a higher quality classification and receive an importance class as well. Nmarshall25 (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hilly Flanks — Requesting that this currently stub-class article be reviewed if possible, would appreciate some input and feedback. Redherring22 (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I've changed the rating to C and made some comments on the talk page. Great work so far pulling it up from a Stub! UndercoverClassicist (talk) 11:42, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Assessment log
[edit]- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
August 17, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Adab (city) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Archaeogaming (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Calceology (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Cowboy Wash (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Crotal bell (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Dark Canyon Ruins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Degradation of Mayan archeological sites (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Greifensee–Storen/Wildsberg (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Hydraulis of Dion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Tel Qana (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Treasure of Begram (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Tell Abu al-Kharaz (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- The Goddess and the Bull (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- File:The Goddess and the Bull cover.jpg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
August 16, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Chantuto Archaeological Site (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Citânia de Santa Luzia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Clach a' Charridh (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Clay drum (archaeology) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Comerford Crown (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Coneybury Henge (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Conjunctive archaeology (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Cord rig (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Country of Towns (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Thuburbo Majus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Tall Sulaymānī (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
August 15, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Category:Ancient Iranian peoples (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Category-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Chunqiu shiyu (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Church Rockshelter No. 2 Site (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Citânia de Sanfins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Cuneiform (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Deir el-Medina (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Kenneth Kitchen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Mesoamerica (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- San Miguel Ixtapan (archaeological site) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Shaft tomb (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Tel Haror (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Thanatos Painter (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Theban Treasury (Delphi) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Thirupparankundram Rock-cut Cave and Inscription (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Greifensee–Storen/Wildsberg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Olivier Picard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Philip Piper (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Simbahang Bato (Naujan) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- U-shaped courtyard house in Vieux-la-Romaine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
August 14, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Cades Pond culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Chantuto Archaeological Site (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Chao Samartín (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Chebaki Fortress (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Dyuktai Cave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Kurush Dalal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Owl Cave (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Rajesh S. V. (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Tanda pits (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Temple of Flora (Cerreto Sannita) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Terreaux Hoard (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Veternica (cave) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Couze (Dordogne) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
August 13, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Corraghy head renamed to Corraghy Heads.
- Deir Alla Inscription renamed to Deir Alla inscription.
- Destruction of cultural heritage during the 2023–2024 Israeli invasion of Gaza renamed to Destruction of cultural heritage during the Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip.
- Draft:Irish sweathouse renamed to Irish sweathouse.
- Kyrenia ship renamed to Kyrenia (ship).
- Maya city renamed to Mayan cities.
- Orca Shipwreck renamed to Canaanite shipwreck.
- Silver Deer of Bilge Khan renamed to Silver Deer of Bilge Qaghan.
Reassessed
[edit]- Archaeological area of Poggio Sommavilla (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Archaeology of Azerbaijan (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class. (rev · t)
- Aşvan Kale (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Basavanagudi (Bengaluru) Inscriptions (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Beglik Tash (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Bonn–Oberkassel dog (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to FA-Class. (rev · t)
- Bothros (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Bridge-spouted vessel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Burghead Bulls (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Cangnan Stele (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Cantius Stele (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Carmona Wine Urn (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Carsington Roman Villa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Castelluccio culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Castro de Leceia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Castro of Vieito (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Cave of the Warrior (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Centum Cellas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Chao Hu Lake Archaeological Sites (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Contra Latopolis (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Corleck Head (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- Dehistan/Mishrian (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Deriivka (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Dish with epigraphic decoration (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Dominion Land Company Site (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Double Pyramid (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Drâa-El-Gamra (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Dyuktai Cave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Dzhetyasar culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- El-Jai cave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Ephorate of Antiquities of Karditsa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Epigraphia 3D (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Ercavica (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Eriosh Petroglyphs (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Esperanza Stone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Estampage (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Europae Archaeologiae Consilium (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Fig Springs mission site (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Human history (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- Jebel Sahaba (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Martin Henig (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mika Lavento (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Pliska rosette (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Role of Christianity in civilization (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Sa Cudia Cremada (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Sagalassos (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Samus culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- San Jose de Moro (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- San Miguel Ixtapan (archaeological site) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Sant'Omobono Area (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Sargat culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Sebakh (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Segobriga (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Semliki harpoon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Shelomit seal (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Siba culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Sitabhinji Group of Rock Shelters (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Situla of the Pania (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Soro Mik'aya Patjxa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Stabian Baths (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Stone of Terpon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Stonehenge Avenue (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Tabula clesiana (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Talagan copper scroll (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Tei culture (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- Tessera lusoria (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Walter Abel Heurtley (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to GA-Class. (rev · t)
- Đống Đa Mound (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Draft:Aarne Äyräpää (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Ali Bonner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Animated television series set in prehistory (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Antikensammlung Kiel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Aphrodite Rhithymnia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Argos Theater (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Arturo Montero (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Canaanite shipwreck (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Corraghy Heads (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Coso Rock Art District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Deir Alla inscription (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- Destruction of cultural heritage during the Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Dolmen Losa de la Mora (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Fordington mosaic (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Former populated places in Saudi Arabia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Freienbach–Hurden Rosshorn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Freienbach–Hurden Seefeld (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Hekatompedon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Hydraulis of Dion (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Iulia Valentia Banasa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Ketef Hinnom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Kurush Dalal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Kyrenia (ship) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- Lothar von Falkenhausen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Mahdia Museum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Marazanae (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Mayan cities (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Meilen–Rorenhaab (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Protection of Native American sites in Florida (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- PutoMikel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Rajesh S. V. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Ravenswood standing stone (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert Henry Forster (archaeologist) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert Pinchon (naturalist) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Rock art of the Figuig region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Rock shelter of Solhapa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Rossville points (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Sechin Alto (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Silver Deer of Bilge Qaghan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Tatul Sanctuary (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Yumruk Kaya (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Desert fortresses of Judaea (talk) removed.
- Draft:Kafr Hassan Dawood (talk) removed.
- List of archaeological sites by continent and age (talk) removed.
- Robert Pinchon (talk) removed.