Jump to content

Talk:Spam blacklist

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Beetstra (talk | contribs) at 04:17, 21 May 2023 (→‎wikirank.net: reply). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Beetstra in topic Proposed removals
Shortcut:
WM:SPAM
WM:SBL
The associated page is used by the MediaWiki Spam Blacklist extension, and lists regular expressions which cannot be used in URLs in any page in Wikimedia Foundation projects (as well as many external wikis). Any Meta administrator can edit the spam blacklist; either manually or with SBHandler. For more information on what the spam blacklist is for, and the processes used here, please see Spam blacklist/About.

Proposed additions
Please provide evidence of spamming on several wikis. Spam that only affects a single project should go to that project's local blacklist. Exceptions include malicious domains and URL redirector/shortener services. Please follow this format. Please check back after submitting your report, there could be questions regarding your request.
Proposed removals
Please check our list of requests which repeatedly get declined. Typically, we do not remove domains from the spam blacklist in response to site-owners' requests. Instead, we de-blacklist sites when trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their value in support of our projects. Please consider whether requesting whitelisting on a specific wiki for a specific use is more appropriate - that is very often the case.
Other discussion
Troubleshooting and problems - If there is an error in the blacklist (i.e. a regex error) which is causing problems, please raise the issue here.
Discussion - Meta-discussion concerning the operation of the blacklist and related pages, and communication among the spam blacklist team.
#wikimedia-external-linksconnect - Real-time IRC chat for co-ordination of activities related to maintenance of the blacklist.
Whitelists
There is no global whitelist, so if you are seeking a whitelisting of a url at a wiki then please address such matters via use of the respective Mediawiki talk:Spam-whitelist page at that wiki, and you should consider the use of the template {{edit protected}} or its local equivalent to get attention to your edit.

Please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment. This leaves a signature and timestamp so conversations are easier to follow.


Completed requests are marked as {{added}}/{{removed}} or {{declined}}, and are generally archived quickly. Additions and removals are logged · current log 2024/07.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 7 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 15 days.

Proposed additions

This section is for proposing that a website be blacklisted; add new entries at the bottom of the section, using the basic URL so that there is no link (example.com, not http://www.example.com). Provide links demonstrating widespread spamming by multiple users on multiple wikis. Completed requests will be marked as {{added}} or {{declined}} and archived.

spambots 2023-5-6









Added Added to Spam blacklist. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

fun88on.com



requested by Fumikas Sagisavas [1]

@Fumikas Sagisavas please provide evidence of spamming on several wikis next time you request global blacklisting. Looking at your global contributions I saw you requested local blacklisting at zh:MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#fun88on.com as well. As far as I can see, there are these three spambots involved [2][3][4], am I missing some? --Johannnes89 (talk) 07:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The three spambots are known so far, and the reason for requesting a global ban is that someone added the link to the Finnish Wikipedia, not just the Chinese Wikipedia. The link is currently blacklisted on Vietnamese Wikipedia. СлаваУкраїні! 07:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Fumikas Sagisavas: Added Added to Spam blacklist. We can get the rest as we progress. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 12:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

More SEO spam







See ip edits. Wutsje (talk) 04:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Wutsje: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Daniuu (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

pc.evony.com



See it.[5] --СлаваУкраїні! 03:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 Declined If pc.evony.com was just spammed by this one account (which is now globally locked), I think global blacklisting is not needed for now. Johannnes89 (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

spambots 2023-05-12







 — billinghurst sDrewth 11:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Billinghurst: Added Added to Spam blacklist. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 11:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

bajrangitandoor.co.in



see latest spambots [6] --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Johannnes89: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

thewikibasic.com







See also https://xtools.wmcloud.org/globalcontribs/Kalanaz and https://xtools.wmcloud.org/globalcontribs/Kalanazu

Wutsje (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


my website gives 200 internal links to Wikipedia now Wikimedia was spam and blacklisted my thewikibasic.com website.
Why are you spam blacklisting my website I made it for 1.5 years. my website has gaming wiki articles but I can't cite to add Wikipedia but IGN, GamesRadar, polygon, . GameSpot, Game Informer, and Metacritic only can add Wikipedia. (racism Wikipedia) Sunosaw (talk) 06:55, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Wutsje: Added Added to Spam blacklist. --Daniuu (talk) 12:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

IGN.com



this pages has same IGN link https://www.ign.com/games/grand-theft-auto-v ( crosswiki linkspam ) Spam blacklisted IGN from Wikipedia

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sunosaw (talk) 05:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Declined seems to be used across multiple wikis by multiple users in good standing [7], see en:IGN as well. Request seems to be related to declined removal request for the users own website. --Johannnes89 (talk) 06:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
en:WP:External links.
WP:ELPOINT
4.In the "External links" section, try to avoid separate links to multiple pages in the same website, as if to provide a portal to that website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site.
Why this Rule not valid for IGN and this rule valid for Thewikibasic Sunosaw (talk) 06:39, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
One is an established media company, the other one is your own private website. One link has been used by many established wikipedia contributors, the other one has been spammed by your previous accounts. Johannnes89 (talk) 06:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
IGN and Thewikibasic do the same thing WP: ELPOINT 4. Then Thewikibasic you added to the Spam blacklist. and you told to me we don't remove links at the owner's request, and my account used to not add these links. Sunosaw (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's very obvious that you are the same person as Kalanaz, Kalanazu and Rekerom [8], therefore you are responsible for crosswiki spam of thewikibasic.com. Please read Spam blacklist/About, IGN is not considered spam, as it is used by many established contributors across various projects and will therefore not be blacklisted. There is no point in further arguing, request  Declined Johannnes89 (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
this pages has same links http://www.computerandvideogames.com/423020/gta-v-interview-rockstar-north-president-leslie-benzies-on-gta-online/
en:WP:External links. WP:ELPOINT 4.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E4%BF%A0%E7%9B%9C%E7%8D%B5%E8%BB%8A%E6%89%8BV
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto:_San_Andreas
https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
www.computerandvideogames.com not established company wikipedia referece add this site's company owner is Future.plc but wikipedia Future.plc article website name is www.futureplc.com and www.computerandvideogames.com redirect to https://www.gamesradar.com/
give me another reason why Thewikibasic.com spam blacklisted Sunosaw (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
computerandvideogames.com ist not a private website either and used 5.000+ times across all wikis [9] -> seems like a trusted source (certainly not a case for global blacklisting), unlike your own website. --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply








@Sunosaw: These domains have been determined by the communities to be suitably reliable sources for citing as references. That you are here complaining about these domains being used is the completely wrong approach here, that is an argument for the individual sites as they have made that decision which we are looking at collectively. I am wondering whether I should be pointing you to pages about vested and conflict of interest editing, as it seems you have an association with the sites that you mention. Please do seek that out at one of the language wikipedias.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:08, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

investormoney.com



Cross-wiki spam. Already blocked on enwiki. Warwiki and tlwiki got spammed pretty hard, so there's lots of them open there still. - XXBlackburnXx (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@XXBlackburnXx: Added Added to Spam blacklist. Definitely a well-conceived and undertaken spam initiative that has true elements of paid-editing. Multiple names adding same references on each wiki, no obvious account crossovers. Editors themselves are not pop-ups, so interesting if someone get can get to the bottom of the issue. In the meanwhile, let us stop further problematic additions. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 00:22, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

more domains same set of paid editing





























The same editors adding investormoney also collectively spammed these domains between themselves across multiple wikis. Truly smells like paid editing. Also noting someone reverting removal edits.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Billinghurst: Added Added to Spam blacklist. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 03:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

a3logics.com



Continued low level spam over many years.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Billinghurst: Added Added to Spam blacklist. -- — billinghurst sDrewth 23:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

gursoydevelopment.com



Added to Turkey-related articles cross-wiki, right now by different IPs simultaneously. Most of the times it doesn't verify the statement it's used for. [10], [11], [12]. Also a few dating back to last year: [13], [14]. ~StyyxTalk? 23:26, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

xoilac69.tv



Cross-wiki spam as external link or random source by multiple IPs: [15], [16], [17], [18] + many more on eswiki and enwiki. Currently rolling back. ~StyyxTalk? 23:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

mohamedaasik.com



Cross-wiki spam. --Ocelot (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed additions (Bot reported)

This section is for domains which have been added to multiple wikis as observed by a bot.

These are automated reports, please check the records and the link thoroughly, it may report good links! For some more info, see Spam blacklist/Help#COIBot_reports. Reports will automatically be archived by the bot when they get stale (less than 5 links reported, which have not been edited in the last 7 days, and where the last editor is COIBot).

Sysops
  • If the report contains links to less than 5 wikis, then only add it when it is really spam
  • Otherwise just revert the link-additions, and close the report; closed reports will be reopened when spamming continues
  • To close a report, change the LinkStatus template to closed ({{LinkStatus|closed}})
  • Please place any notes in the discussion section below the HTML comment

COIBot

The LinkWatchers report domains meeting the following criteria:

  • When a user mainly adds this link, and the link has not been used too much, and this user adds the link to more than 2 wikis
  • When a user mainly adds links on one server, and links on the server have not been used too much, and this user adds the links to more than 2 wikis
  • If ALL links are added by IPs, and the link is added to more than 1 wiki
  • If a small range of IPs have a preference for this link (but it may also have been added by other users), and the link is added to more than 1 wiki.
COIBot's currently open XWiki reports
List Last update By Site IP R Last user Last link addition User Link User - Link User - Link - Wikis Link - Wikis
vrsystems.ru 2023-06-27 15:51:16 COIBot 195.24.68.17 192.36.57.94
193.46.56.178
194.71.126.227
93.99.104.93
2070-01-01 05:00:00 4 4

Proposed removals

This section is for proposing that a website be unlisted; please add new entries at the bottom of the section. Use a suitable 3rd level heading and display the domain name as per this example {{LinkSummary|targetdomain.com}}.

Remember to provide the specific domain blacklisted, links to the articles they are used in or useful to, and arguments in favour of unlisting. Completed requests will be marked as {{removed}} or {{declined}} and archived.

See also recurring requests for repeatedly proposed (and refused) removals.

Notes:

  • The addition or removal of a domain from the blacklist is not a vote; please do not bold the first words in statements.
  • This page is for the removal of domains from the global blacklist, not for removal of domains from the blacklists of individual wikis. For those requests please take your discussion to the pertinent wiki, where such requests would be made at Mediawiki talk:Spam-blacklist at that wiki. Search spamlists — remember to enter any relevant language code

thewikibasic.com



My website has gaming wiki articles but I can't cite to add Wikipedia IGN, GamesRadar, polygon, GameSpot, Game Informer, and Metacritic only can add Wikipedia. I don't know how Wikipedia chooses admins for each article but I saw Wikipedia each article adds links to each webpage for any domain that is only from America or UK and Wikipedia's admins don't add any Asian country's website and I see that has racism on Wikipedia. Wikipedia backlink is worth and it tried to give American and UK domains for support earn money Wikipedia admins can ban any account without any reason I advise you to don't donate to Wikipedia — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sunosaw (talk) 05:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Declined see request above, it was blacklisted du to your crosswiki linkspam with multiple accounts, likely by yourself, considering [19]. thewikibasic.com does not comply with en:WP:Reliable sources and en:WP:External links. Note: Per Spam blacklist/About#Requests for delisting we usually do not remove links from the spam blacklist per site owners request. --Johannnes89 (talk) 05:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
this pages has same IGN link https://www.ign.com/games/grand-theft-auto-v ( Cross Wiki )
Spam blacklisted IGN from wikipedia
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V
https://an.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Theft_Auto_V Sunosaw (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

thewikibasic.com



removed reasons

1.en:WP:External links. WP:ELPOINT 4. IGN and Thewikibasic do the same thing and IGN didn't Spam blacklisted ( IGN is used by many established contributors across various projects) -WP:ELPOINT 4-https://www.ign.com/games/grand-theft-auto-v

2.en:WP: External links. WP:ELPOINT 4. www.computerandvideogames.com and thewikibasic.com do the same thing and there are private websites and www.computerandvideogames.com didn't Spam blacklisted( www.computerandvideogames.com is not used by many established contributors across various projects)-WP:ELPOINT 4-http://www.computerandvideogames.com/423020/gta-v-interview-rockstar-north-president-leslie-benzies-on-gta-online/ — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sunosaw (talk) 08:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Declined please do not add new requests as the first one has just been declined hours ago. The existence of other links which you don't like does not justify removal of your website. Per Spam blacklist/About#Requests for delisting thewikibasic.com will only be removed if trusted, high-volume editors request the use of blacklisted links because of their value in support of our projects. --Johannnes89 (talk) 11:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

wikirank.net



Czeva approached me directly, stating she wanted to link Wikirank from cs:Wikipedie:Klub/České Budějovice/2023 to record a related discussion. However, this was not possible due to the tool being listed on the blacklist. It was added based on [20] and "Cross-wiki refspamming by multiple throwaway socks", but I don't quite understand how could eg. wikirank.net/en/%C4%8Cesk%C3%A9%20Bud%C4%9Bjovice be interpreted as refspamming. Can this be clarified? Ping JzG as the requestor and Beetstra as the admin performing the blacklisting. Thanks! --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:00, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

It was a spam campaign by a sockpuppeteer. See Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2020-08. JzG (talk) 17:50, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think Wikipedia has chosen 1000cs domains for internal linking to Wikipedia and they don't take domains other than their own. They instead spam blacklist any domain that they try to enter and they falsely claim to be free online encyclopedias and get donations so they can't be seen doing business. Sunosaw (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Martin Urbanec it is not that a link content is refspamming, it is the collective behaviour of editors we consider refspamming. Spamming is a behaviour that needs to be stopped, we don’t blacklist material that many people consider spam if it has not been spammed. I see this is related to mdpi, which we have seen more in campaigns solely aimed at putting their links wherever they want, and that is not how we build an encyclopedia. Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 04:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comment Comment Typically we say to manage it locally first through whitelisting and we can see how it progresses. To me, this looks like a case where a subdomain of the whole may be whitelisted, or the regex for the specific allowed subdomain may suffice.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Troubleshooting and problems

This section is for comments related to problems with the blacklist (such as incorrect syntax or entries not being blocked), or problems saving a page because of a blacklisted link. This is not the section to request that an entry be unlisted (see Proposed removals above).

Discussion

This section is for discussion of Spam blacklist issues among other users.