User talk:Bawbenhousen

Post questions for me here.

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make useful changes to Wikipedia. However, at least one of your changes, such as the one you made to "Saint-Martin national football team", did not appear to be useful and has been automatically reverted by ChenzwBot. If you want to try out changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --ChenzwBot (talk ▪ changes) 17:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to sun was funny. But what if someone came here to learn about the sun and went away with the wrong idea that it is part of our cereal? O_O --Chem ical int er est (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make changes to Wikipedia, as you did to "Metroid (series)", that are not useful. The changes you made seem to be vandalism and have been automatically reverted by ChenzwBot. If you want to try changing Wikipedia to learn more about how it works, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Bad warning? Please report it here then remove this warning. --ChenzwBot (talk ▪ changes) 18:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-productive edits

Would like to notify you that if you don't make a productive edit (something that adds good stuff to articles), you may be blocked. Look at Wikipedia:Requested articles for ideas of things to work on. --Chem ical int er est (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes are vandalism, and this shows that you want to harm Wikipedia. This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. P.S. This is not funny anymore. --Chem ical int er est (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you to WP:AIV and you will be blocked by the next admin who comes around if you don't stop. --Chem ical int er est (talk) 18:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked as it says in Wikipedia's blocking policy for 1 day for breaking the policy against Adding nonsense to articles (like Sun). If you do not agree with this block, please reply on your talk page by adding {{unblock|reason}}, replacing reason with why you think the block is wrong. If you cannot do this or the reason is private, please send an e-mail to [email protected] and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. Eptalon (talk) 18:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Because of the reverting of vandalism/nonsense and continuing to edit war on Sun, I have blocked your account for 31 hours. --Bsa dow ski1 18:43, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been blocked for 1 week for continuing to make those changes to Sun. Your next block could be indefinite if this continues. Kansan (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

This is the only warning you will get for the bad changes you made. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to LOL, you will be blocked from editing. Mr. Berty (seasons greetings!) ^talk/_stalk 16:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from changing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful changes after the block expires. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private please send an e-mail to [email protected] and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.

Kansan (talk) 16:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry old bean, but your edits are not good enough. You're trying, but to our eyes all your edits are vandalism. As Kansan said, your next block could be an indef one. Mr. Berty (seasons greetings!) ^talk/_stalk 16:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]