Nevera
Nevera je pojam koji je nastao negacijom vere i ima ogroman dijapazon upotrebe. Nevera se upotrebljavala i kao izraz za neposlušnost, izdaju, uskraćivanje dužne službe, ogrešenje o istinu ali i gaženje bračne vernosti (preljube). Izraz se koristio i za izražavanje jeresi i paganstva. Takođe, to je jedan od najtežih zločina u srpskom srednjovekovnom krivičnom pravu.
Srbija
[uredi | uredi izvor]O neveri svedoče činjenice pre i nakon Dušanovog zakonika i postoje tri vrste takvih podataka.[1] Plemićki stalež (vlastela) je imao beneficiju u da neposredno vrši službu za vladara. Ta privilegija se sastojala od vojne ali i drugih funkcija koje bi im vladar poverio. Nevera je bila krivično delo namenjeno za vlastelu. Kao takvo, ona je značila neposlušnost prema vladaru odnosno uskraćivanje poverene službe. To je bio zločin koji od polovine XIII veka pripada redu carskih dugova za koje se odgovara pred vladarevim ili državnim sudom. Glavna kazna koja je bila zastupljena za takvu vrstu nevere bila je konfiskacija celokupne imovine krivca. U težim slučajevima, krivca bi pogađala i lična kazna (najčešće smrtna).[2] Druga vrsta podataka govori o tome da su se često izricale kazne za druge zločine koje su bile iste kao i one predviđene za neveru. Često se mogao čuti izraz „da se raspe i i nakaže po zakonu kako i nevernik“. Treći indikator jesu kazne konfiskacije imovine koje su se najverovatnije primenjivale ali nažalost nema podataka da su se stvarno koristile i lične kazne.[3]
Dušanov zakonik je zadržao osnove običajnog prava u slučaju nevere. U njemu je propisano kako se tretiraju ljudi koji prime nečijeg čoveka bez carevog pisma ili oni koji bi grabili imovinu pobeglog vlastelina ili vlastelića. Najvažnija novina koju je uveo je ograničenje odgovornosti isključivo na nevernikovu kuću, a ne na čitav rod. Krivica se utvrđivala individualno, nije odgovarao brat za brata ni otac za sina ako su odeljeni, ali je materijalno bila odgovorna kuća kojoj je nevernik pripadao. [3]
Bosna
[uredi | uredi izvor]U srednjovekovnoj Bosni najteža „krivina“ (protivpravna radnja) protiv države i vladara jeste bila nevera. To je delo koje je mogao da izvrši samo vlastelin. Krivicu nevernika bi utvrđivao stanak odnosno od druge polovine XIV veka članovi Crkve bosanske. Za razliku od srednjovekovne Srbije, ovde je vladar imao mogućnost samo da optuži krivca ali ne i da mu sudi. Kada bi vlastelin počinio neveru sve garantije koje je dobio „vjerom gospodskom“ bi prestale da postoje. Kazna za postupak su naizmenično bile globa i smrtna kazna. Sama sankcija je zavisila od političkog odnosa snaga između vladara i vlastele, pogotovo velike vlastele. Konfiskacija imovine i smrtna kazna su bile blaže u odnosu na srpsku verziju. [2]
Reference
[uredi | uredi izvor]- ^ Mihaljčić, Rade (28. 4. 2017). Leksikon srpskog srednjeg veka. str. 449.
- ^ a b Mirković, Zoran (2019). Srpska pravna istorija (III izd.). Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Pravni fakultet. str. 63.
- ^ a b Taranovski, Teodor (2002). Istorija srpskog prava u Nemanjićkoj državi (XIII izd.). Beograd: Lirika. str. 366—367.
Literatura
[uredi | uredi izvor]- Bailey, J. M.; Gaulin, S.; Agyei, Y.; Gladue, B. A. (1994). „Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66 (6): 1081—1093. PMID 8046578. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1081.
- Fletcher, G. J.; Kerr, P. S. (2010). „Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships”. Psychological Bulletin. 136 (4): 627—658. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.385.4128
. PMID 20565171. doi:10.1037/a0019792.
- Hankin, B. L.; Abramson, L. Y. (2001). „Development of gender differences in depression: An elaborated cognitive vulnerability–transactional stress theory”. Psychological Bulletin. 127 (6): 773—796. PMID 11726071. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.773.
- Hazan, C.; Shaver, P. R. (1994). „Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships”. Psychological Inquiry. 5 (1): 1—22. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1.
- Kobak, R. R.; Hazan, C. (1991). „Attachment in marriage: Effects of security and accuracy of working models”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (6): 861—869. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.861.
- Palson, R (1972). „Swinging in wedlock”. Society. 9 (4): 28—37. doi:10.1007/bf02695912.
- Sagarin, B. J.; Vaughn Becker, D.; Guadagno, R. E.; Nicastle, L. D.; Millevoi, A. (2003). „Sex differences (and similarities) in jealousy: The moderating influence of infidelity experience and sexual orientation of the infidelity”. Evolution and Human Behavior. 24 (1): 17—23. doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00106-x.
- Whitty, M. T. (2003). „Pushing the wrong buttons: Men's and women's attitudes toward online and offline infidelity” (PDF). CyberPsychology & Behavior. 6 (6): 569—579. PMID 14756923. doi:10.1089/109493103322725342.
- Moultrup, David J. (1990). Husbands, Wives & Lovers. New York: Guilford Press.
- Pittman, F. (1989). Private Lies . New York: W. W. Norton Co.
- Rubin, A. M.; Adams, J. R. (1986). „Outcomes of sexually open marriages”. Journal of Sex Research. 22 (3): 311—319. doi:10.1080/00224498609551311.
- Vaughan, P. (1989). The Monogamy Myth. New York: New Market Press.
- Adult attachment and patterns of extradyadic involvement Family Process, Dec 2004 by Elizabeth S. Allen, Donald H. Baucom
- AN INTEGRATIVE INTERVENTION FOR PROMOTING RECOVERY FROM EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, April 2004 by Gordon, Kristina Coop, Baucom, Donald H, Snyder, Douglas K
- Managing Infidelity: A Cross-Cultural Perspective by Anne Buckmaster, William Jankowiak, M. Diane Nell; Ethnology, Vol. 41, PART 1, pages 85–100 2002
- Infidelity: The Lessons Children Learn by Jennifer Harley Chalmers, PhD
- Professor Kristina Gordon's research into infidelity and betrayal
- Cybersex and Infidelity Online: Implications for Evaluation and Treatment by Kimberly S. Young, Alvin Cooper, Eric Griffiths-Shelley, James O'Mara, and Jennifer Buchanan Paper Published in Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7 (10, 59–74, 200
- DeSteno, D. A.; Salovey, P. (1996). „Evolutionary origins of sex differences in jealousy? Questioning the fitness of the model”. Psychological Science. 7 (6): 367—372. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00391.x.
- Harris, C. R. (2000). „Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: The specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 78 (6): 1082—1091. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1082.
- Roughgarden, J.; Akcay, E. (2010). „Do We Need a Sexual Selection 2.0?”. Animal Behaviour. 79 (3): E1—E4. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.006.
- Hirsch, Jennifer S.; Meneses, Sergio; Thompson, Brenda; Negroni, Mirka; Pelcastre, Blanca; Del Rio, Carlos (2007). „The Inevitability of Infidelity: Sexual Reputation, Social Geographies, and Marital HIV Risk in Rural Mexico”. American Journal of Public Health. 97 (6): 986—96. PMC 1874214
. PMID 17463368. doi:10.2105/ajph.2006.088492.
- Hupka, Ralph B.; Buunk, Bram; Falus, Gábor; Fulgosi, Ante; Ortega, Elsa; Swain, Ronny; Tarabrina, Nadia (1985). „Romantic Jealousy and Romantic Envy: A Seven-Nation Study”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 16 (4): 423—46. doi:10.1177/0022002185016004002.
- Vandello, Joseph A.; Cohen, Dov (2003). „Male Honor and Female Fidelity: Implicit Cultural Scripts That Perpetuate Domestic Violence”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 84 (5): 997—1010. PMID 12757144. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997.
- Barta, W. D.; Kiene, S. M. (2005). „Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation”. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 22 (3): 339—360. doi:10.1177/0265407505052440.
- Donovan, S.; Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2012). „Attachment style and gender as predictors of communicative responses to infidelity”. Marriage & Family Review. 48 (2): 125—149. doi:10.1080/01494929.2011.626670.
- Lalasz, C. B.; Weigel, D. J. (2011). „Understanding the relationship between gender and extradyadic relations: The mediating role of sensation seeking on intentions to engage in sexual infidelity”. Personality and Individual Differences. 50 (7): 1079—1083. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.029.
- Lammers, J.; Stoker, J. I.; Jordan, J.; Pollmann, M.; Stapel, D. A. (2011). „Power increases infidelity among men and women”. Psychological Science. 22 (9): 1191—1197. PMID 21771963. doi:10.1177/0956797611416252.
- Leeker, O.; Carlozzi, A. (2012). „Effects of sex, sexual orientation, infidelity expectations, and love on distress related to emotional and sexual infidelity” (PDF). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 40 (1): 68—91. PMID 25059413. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00331.x. hdl:11244/7190.
- Shackelford, T. K.; LeBlanc, G. J.; Drass, E. (2000). „Emotional reactions to infidelity”. Cognition & Emotion. 14 (5): 643—659. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.564.1918
. doi:10.1080/02699930050117657.
- McCracken, Peggy (1998). The romance of adultery: queenship and sexual transgression in Old French literature. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 0-8122-3432-4.
- Mathews, J. Dating a Married Man: Memoirs from the "Other Women. (2008) ISBN 1-4404-5004-8.
- Best Practices: Progressive Family Laws in Muslim Countries (August 2005)
- Moultrup, David J. (1990). Husbands, Wives & Lovers. New York: Guilford Press.
- Glass, S. P.; Wright, T. L. (1992). „Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender”. Journal of Sex Research. 29 (3): 361—387. doi:10.1080/00224499209551654.
- Goody, Jack (1956). „A Comparative Approach to Incest and Adultery”. The British Journal of Sociology. 7 (4): 286—305. JSTOR 586694. doi:10.2307/586694.
- Pittman, F. (1989). Private Lies. New York: W. W. Norton Co.
- Rubin, A. M.; Adams, J. R. (1986). „Outcomes of sexually open marriages”. Journal of Sex Research. 22 (3): 311—319. doi:10.1080/00224498609551311.
- Vaughan, P. (1989). The Monogamy Myth. New York: New Market Press.
- Blow, Adrian J.; Hartnett, Kelley (April 2005). Infidelity in Committed Relationships I: A Methodological Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. INFIDELITY IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIPS I: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW | Journal of Marital & Family Therapy | Find Articles at BNET at www.findarticles.com
- Blow, Adrian J; Hartnett, Kelley (April 2005). Infidelity in Committed Relationships II: A Substantive Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. INFIDELITY IN COMMITTED RELATIONSHIPS II: A SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW | Journal of Marital and Family Therapy | Find Articles at BNET at www.findarticles.com