Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

Nominations

Due to changes in the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures are only working on this page if you have Javascript enabled. If you do not have Javascript enabled please manually sign with

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 02:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Please note to open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC). Thank you.

May 18, 2011

• 
  • Nomination: Donetsk. Pushkin Boulevard. Festival of Orthodox Culture "Red Easter" - 2011. -- Raghith 11:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: St. Othmar Church in Mödling, Lower Austria --Hendric Stattmann 10:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
    bracketed images that are used for the HDR not optimal chosen but for QI it is ok IMO, but please correct the perspective --Taxiarchos228 10:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Berlin, Schiller monument at the Gendarmenmarkt --Berthold Werner 09:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline monument not sharp --Taxiarchos228 09:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Weil am Rhein: pylons of the Three Country Bridge --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Weil am Rhein-Märkt: bell tower of protestant church --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grand Hotel Veliko Tarnovo. --MrPanyGoff 08:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, nice shot and very interessting architecture --Taxiarchos228 08:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein-Ötlingen: Main street with view on Saint Gallus Church --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The rear ends of the car and the large shadow in the foreground detract from what is otherwise a good picture --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Freedom Church in Weil am Rhein --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Organ at Germanus Church --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Part of the organ is obscured by the chandelier. Perhaps a different perspective --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: head-figure at Germanus Church --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice detail, good exposure --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Germanus Church --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent all round --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Church of Saint Fridolin (choir with altar) --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Catholic Church Saint Peter (Bell tower) --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 08:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Victory Day.-- Raghith 05:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A touch soft perhaps, but otherwise a wonderful picture --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

May 17, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Panorama over the eastern side of Nørresø, the northern lake situated near Viborg, Denmark. The photo is stiched from five or so photos taken with a Sony α 300 using PTGui. Cropped using GIMP. --Slaunger 19:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Tremendous work --Saffron Blaze 08:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aglia tau --Tlusťa 18:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pantocrator in Chora church, Istanbul. --Eusebius 17:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice, however on both sides the image is overexposed --Chmee2 18:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC) It's not possible to do otherwise, they thought that restoring medieval mosaics should include powerful halogens just in front of them. --Eusebius 06:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC) Comment I see, however this is the case (for me) showing that not all taken image can be QI. Somewhere is not possible make technical well image and we are judging here technical quality not difficulty during photographing. Anyway, if you not agree with me, feel free make discussion to this image and wait for another reviewer(s). --Chmee2 09:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-fronted terns. --Avenue 17:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Not one part of the image appears in focus...perhaps motion blur issues. --Saffron Blaze 08:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clipper on Mexican Butterfly Weed. --Quartl 17:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 18:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Comment I really don't know it accepted or not. It is wonderfull shot and it was obviously hard to take it, however the head (the main center of image) is not sharp, focus plane is going trough the butterfly body... --Chmee2 18:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    I think the focus plane is ok and this is slight motion blur (see the proboscis), but feel free to put the image up for discussion. --Quartl 19:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
    Thanks :) But how I wrote, I really like the image and I see a lot of work which is behinde. I keep fingers cross for you to have QI, but I just only tried to be objective and note this fact about unsharp head :) --Chmee2 19:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flower of Chelidonium majus. --Bff 15:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wonderful detail and DOF Saffron Blaze 18:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salamander fountain Stuttgart-East --MSeses 15:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The salamander in the salamander foundation is not sharp --Saffron Blaze 08:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ickenham Hall -- Harrison49 14:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I hate cars in photos but in this case the mini at least adds to a good photo --Saffron Blaze 08:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scene of deluge, by Joseph Désiré Court. -- Rama 14:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good quality. --Saffron Blaze 08:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 360° panorama seen from the fort du Mont Vaudois, Héricourt, France --ComputerHotline 14:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Happy with this now. --Saffron Blaze 18:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inside the fort du Mont Vaudois, Héricourt, France --ComputerHotline 14:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Technically sound in a difficult lighting situation --Saffron Blaze 08:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hausen im Wiesental: catholic church, side altar with Saint Boniface --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice and sharp --Saffron Blaze 08:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hausen im Wiesental: catholic church, bell tower --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good enough.--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein-Ötlingen: Saint Gallus Church, stained glass --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    What noise reduction was applied to this photo?--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    no one, is this necessary here? --Taxiarchos228 19:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    See the colour noise inflows on the bottom.--PereslavlFoto 20:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    done --Taxiarchos228 20:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    Fine now! You may try to add sharpness with unsharp mask tool, anyway :-).--PereslavlFoto 21:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    I have --Taxiarchos228 21:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    That's why I didn't insist! :-) --PereslavlFoto 21:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein-Ötlingen: Organ at Saint Gallus Church --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Lighting is bothersome especially the dark pulpit --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein-Ötlingen: Interior of Saint Gallus Church --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Colour noise, check the walls for example.--PereslavlFoto 18:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    I have reduced the noise --Taxiarchos228 19:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    Next step is to make it sharper, try "unsharp mask" filter.--PereslavlFoto 20:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    done --Taxiarchos228 20:53, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    On the one hand, I cannot oppose now, the image is fine. On the other, I am against resampling and I advice you to combine sharpness and large size. Thanks.--PereslavlFoto 21:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: choir stalls at Church of Rötteln --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Just needs levelling --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berlin, Französischer Dom --Berthold Werner 12:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline All the statues, especially on top are not sharp. --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berlin, Gendarmenmarkt, Schillerdenkmal vor dem Konzerthaus --Berthold Werner 12:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Min-Amon. Late New Empire (ca 1200 BCE) -- Rama 10:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient detail --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden statue of a cat. Egypt, Old Empire or Middle Empire. -- Rama 10:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Insufficient detail. --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden statue of a cat. Egypt, Old Empire or Middle Empire. -- Rama 10:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• * Nomination A Swan found in a abandoned themepark close to Berlin Delay 08:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC) * Decline Strange colours? Oversharped, see the swan's neck.--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination A Swan found in a abandoned themepark close to Berlin Delay 08:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Strange colours? Oversharped, see the swan's neck.--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Crypt in the city Antwerp Belgium Delay 09:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Sorry, no sharpness is here...--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

• Aufgezählter Listeneintrag

May 16, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Festung Krakau (Fortress Cracow) - Fort 2 Kosciuszko --Pudelek 21:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Crop and lighting issues (too dark) --Saffron Blaze 09:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Festung Krakau (Fortress Cracow) - Fort 2 Kosciuszko --Pudelek 21:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Philippe Almosnino (Les Wampas) at Balelec 2011. -- Rama 21:32, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Not sharp, colour noise.--PereslavlFoto 18:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Didier Wampas (Les Wampas) at Balelec 2011 -- Rama 21:27, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Not sharp, colour noise.--PereslavlFoto 21:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Salzach Tower of Castle Hohenwerfen in Austria. --High Contrast 21:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Château de la Bourbansais. --Eusebius 19:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination Sand Lizard male (Lacerta agilis) -- George Chernilevsky 19:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Orange Tip. --Quartl 19:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Atlas Moth with cocoon. --Quartl 19:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 06:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Julia Butterfly. --Quartl 19:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Orange Tip. --Quartl 19:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 06:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gatehouse with Saint Peter delivered. By David Teniers the Younger. -- Rama 19:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lower Slaughter, Cotswolds -- Saffron Blaze 19:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: St Barnabas Church, Snowshill Village -- Saffron Blaze 19:00, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tyndale Monument, North Nibley -- Saffron Blaze 18:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mystical marriage of Saint Catherine. Attributed to Simone Pignoni. -- Rama 18:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 11:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter 2010, Weckschnapp-Tower and Neighbor Buildings in Cologne --Rolf H. 16:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River cruise ship Serenade 2 --Rolf H. 16:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palladian Bridge and Prior Park--Saffron Blaze 15:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St Nikolay Sofiyski church, Sofia, fragment. --MrPanyGoff 14:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 17:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)

  • Nomination: Horse Guards in London with the parliament building in the background. --Oile11 (msg)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Berlin, Alexanderplatz, world clock --Berthold Werner 13:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Berlin, Alexanderplatz, Station --Berthold Werner 13:01, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sofia Seminary, main entrance. --MrPanyGoff 12:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Berlin, "Red Townhall", clock tower --Berthold Werner 12:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Olg gate, Aarberg, Switzerland. Ludo29 11:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Play equipment in Avonmouth. Mattbuck 11:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Needs more DOF. Dark.--PereslavlFoto 19:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: CWS Flour Mills in Avonmouth. Mattbuck 11:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Richmond Terrace. Mattbuck 11:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marmot. -- Raghith 10:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 16:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luxemb. City, World War II Memorial. --Cayambe 07:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Orge river near Paris. --Pline 10:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pont Eiffel and river Onyar in Girona, Catalonia, Spain. -- Florent Pécassou 10:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Footbridge and high voltage power lines near Paris. --Pline 09:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Giant Grasshopper/Hedge Grasshopper (Valanga irregularis). -- Raghith 09:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Can I decline my own image? Well, I'll just do it: too short dof, noisy and many other issues. --Quartl 16:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Railway bridge over the River Parrett at Langport, Somerset, England. --Geof Sheppard 07:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hausen im Wiesental: catholic church (two keystones of the vault ) --Taxiarchos228 06:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hausen im Wiesental: catholic church (altar and vault ) --Taxiarchos228 06:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hausen im Wiesental: catholic church (pulpit) --Taxiarchos228 06:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein: Vitra house --Taxiarchos228 06:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 16:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Weil am Rhein: Peter-and-Pauls-Church --Taxiarchos228 06:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed

May 15, 2011

• 
  • Nomination: Former drinking fountain with bear in Berndorf --Herzi Pinki 23:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Buildings of the Berndorfer Metallwarenfabrik in Berndorf --Herzi Pinki 23:14, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Remarkable oak and environs in Bridel, Luxemb. --Cayambe 16:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 09:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Danae, by Jacques Blanchard (1600–1638) -- Rama 19:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review the crop looks too tight left and right...--Jebulon 09:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
    Now that's interesting. I've uploaded my raw file here for reference; either there are two copies of the painting, or the framing is odd. Rama 14:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Drinking water.Nuremberg --Vitold Muratov 21:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Green Fairy at Balelec 2011 -- Rama 19:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great action shot - love the hair! Lots of CA, though, and the mike at upper left and bright front leg could be distracting, so I am torn. The foreground bass player (Julien Waroux?) should be named, since he's the most visible. --Avenue 15:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
    Thank you, corrected. -- Rama 09:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    Thanks, much better without the mike. QI now IMO. --Avenue 13:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination YuMZ-6KL tractor. -- George Chernilevsky 19:35, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 19:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination larve of Erannis defoliaria. -- Raghith 17:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Too noisy. --Quartl 16:20, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Palace Hotel build in Kharkov in winter.--Vizu 15:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Detail of the motorway-bridge in Pratteln, Switzerland --Taxiarchos228 14:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Solothurn: Fountain in front of cathedral --Taxiarchos228 14:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Varusha quarter east, Veliko Tarnovo. --MrPanyGoff 14:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Front part of MiG 21 in Peenemümnde, Germany --Chmee2 14:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Castle gate of Burg Dinslaken (NRW/GER) --Carschten 13:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Castle gate of Burg Dinslaken (NRW/GER) --Carschten 13:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bridge in Nymphenburg park, Munich --Schlaier 13:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Abydos' fiancee, Delacroix. -- Rama 12:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Germany, Berlin, Deutscher Dom from south --Berthold Werner 12:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed

May 14, 2011

• 
  • Nomination: Historical place for the greek flag, flight here for the first time in 1947, when Dodecanese joined Greece.--Jebulon 23:07, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Not a building, but some decks of the ship "Mariner of the Seas", from below !--Jebulon 22:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 19:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Monk making fried chicken --Vitold Muratov 23:05, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Gymnich, cemetary by User:Achim Raschka --Mbdortmund 19:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: portable Geiger counter --Przykuta 17:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Simple laboratory scales for balancing tubes --Przykuta 17:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Glass tissue Dounce homogenizers --Przykuta 17:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Vacuum 24 manifold for miniprep columns --Przykuta 17:13, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cattle on the mountain "Nebelhorn" in the Allgäu. --High Contrast 17:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ambulance GAZelle.--Vizu 17:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 3 matzot --Jonathunder 14:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Jerusalem, Dome of the rock at night from the Austrian Hospice --Berthold Werner 08:42, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The cave city of Vardzia Georgia. --Geagea 00:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed

May 13, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Frauenkirche in Dresden --Schlaier 21:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 19:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Inside the Palace of Justice, Munich --Schlaier 21:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Festicultores group. Activity in defense of the Galician language "Correlingua". A Estrada, Galicia (Spain). 2011--Lmbuga 12:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Libellula depressa --ComputerHotline 19:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Quartl 17:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orthetrum albistylum --ComputerHotline 19:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Very distracting background, otherwise good. --Quartl 17:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orthetrum albistylum --ComputerHotline 19:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Subject partially obscured. --Quartl 17:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fish market, Panxón, Nigrán, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 18:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 17:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Artist Korovin's house in Okhotino village, Pereslavl district. --PereslavlFoto 17:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 17:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint John the Baptist, by Mino da Fiesole (please click on image, the thumbnail may not be up to date) -- Rama 16:30, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination: Plowing, Middle Empire, 12th Dynasty (1990-1786 BCE), Sycomore wood, lacquered and painted. -- Rama 16:19, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Ray-traced image of lines on nested hyperboloids. —David Eppstein 16:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Quartl 17:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Planty Park in Cracow by night --Pudelek 13:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lüneburg: Organ at Saint Johannis Chruch --Taxiarchos228 09:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion As at the first attempt, I like this picture very much, but I'm worried about the colors, looking unnatural. How could I be convinced ?...--Jebulon 15:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
    Look at the other picture of this Organ (of Andreas Praefcke), nearly same view and same colours --Taxiarchos228 15:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)OK. And yours is better, IMO.--Jebulon 15:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lüneburg: Saint Nicolai Church --Taxiarchos228 09:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: bell tower of Saint Peters Church --Taxiarchos228 09:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: Catholic Church Saint Peter at winter --Taxiarchos228 09:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Double decker bus beneath a low bridge.--Geof Sheppard 07:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Diadem. Gold. Greek, probably made in Alexandria, Egypt, 220 - 100 B.C. The piece probably belonged to a noble woman of the Ptolemaic dynasty in Egypt. -- Raghith 06:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Zeus by Clérion, Versailles. --Coyau 04:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Hera by Clérion, Versailles. --Coyau 04:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Horus as a child. Lower era, 26th-30th Dynasty (c. 664-332 BCE) -- Rama 04:27, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed

May 12, 2011

• 
  • Nomination: Water tower and chapel in Tilbeck, Westphalia. --Elektroschreiber 22:31, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bridleway in Hillingdon --Harrison49 20:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 17:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ickenham tube station --Harrison49 20:37, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Three tercets of the Divina Comedia at the Arsenal's entrance of Venice. --M0tty 20:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A difficult picture (for me). I think it is good enough but I'm open to the critique... --Eusebius 20:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Foundation figurine featuring a god kneeling and setting a nail, with remains of a dedication by Gudea to Ningirsu. -- Rama 17:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Boeing 747-475 (Aerolíneas Argentinas) --Kadellar 13:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Weil am Rhein: Saint George Church --Taxiarchos228 12:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Weil am Rhein: Stations of cross at Saint Maria Church --Taxiarchos228 12:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Dawlish Warren station. Mattbuck 11:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 357037 at Upminster. Mattbuck 11:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 455863 at Guildford. Mattbuck 11:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cervus timorensis in Sir Seewoosagur Ramgoolam Botanical Garden. -- Raghith 10:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Pazo los Escudos main bulding. -- Raghith 09:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    Many troubles. Strong distortion of a wide-angle lens. Dark spots on the sky. Chromatic aberrations.--PereslavlFoto 19:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

May 11, 2011

• 
  • Nomination: Day trip ship RheinEnergie --Rolf H. 20:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: River Cruise ship Bellissima on tour --Rolf H. 19:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: River Cruise ship Vista Prima in winter 2010 --Rolf H. 19:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Passenger ship Asbach in winter 2010 --Rolf H. 19:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Passenger ship Wappen von Köln --Rolf H. 19:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Henriksdalshamnen --Ankara 19:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Historic Methodist Church, Ceylon, Minnesota --Jonathunder 19:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Too strong chromatic aberration (tree at left, weather vane), sorry. --Jebulon 15:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The ancient theatre at Rhodes, Greece. --Jebulon 17:34, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review New version uploaded--Jebulon 09:38, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Good; would be better with barrel distortion corrected. --Avenue 10:49, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Laboratory peristaltic pump --Przykuta 16:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Igor Alexandrovich Kruchinin, teacher and local historian from Pereslavl. --PereslavlFoto 14:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Random shot: River cruise ship Prinses Christina on tour in cologne --Rolf H. 12:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Toronto: view from Sky Pod down to the roof of the Main Pod --Taxiarchos228 12:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Good and interesting.--PereslavlFoto 19:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: High School main entrance, Austin, Minnesota --Jonathunder 11:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rheinfelden: Working farm at Beuggen Castle --Taxiarchos228 08:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rheinfelden-Herten: statue of the Virgin Mary at Saint Josephs church --Taxiarchos228 08:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rheinfelden-Herten: Interior of Saint Josephs church --Taxiarchos228 08:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Opium poppy (Papaver somniferum), near Castromonte (Valladolid, Spain). --David Perez 06:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed

May 10, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Small metal paperclip --Broc 19:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline
    I don't like the composition. Maybe a tighter right crop?--Ankara 12:41, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
    Not sharp.--PereslavlFoto 19:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A red red rose with dewdrops on it. --Broc 19:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support Good quality. Harrison49 23:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)  Oppose Bad background. --Elekhh 13:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Berlin, Entrance of the Humboldt University --Berthold Werner 17:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Harrison49 23:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A snowy path in Southern Germany --Harke 16:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Crane KrAZ-257. By Artemka.--Vizu 15:50, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pszczyna (Pless) Palace - the Oak Parlour (ground floor) --Pudelek 13:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Dactylorhiza majalis in natural monument Chvalšovické pastviny, Czech Republic--Chmee2 12:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Harrison49 23:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oracle HQ building 300. --King of Hearts 10:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion The technical quality of the building is very good. --Slaunger 20:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Water tower in Münster, Westphalia. --Elektroschreiber 06:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Something looks wrong, tilt oder perspective...--Jebulon 14:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
    Image has a CCW tilt of about 1.2° Moreover, there are some distracting foreground elements. --Slaunger 20:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

May 9, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Mythical beasts on Ci En Pagoda, Taiwan --Bgag 22:20, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swakeleys House, Ickenham --Harrison49 19:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 16:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

May 8, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Hirsau monastery - lady chapel. -- MSeses 07:23, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.

May 5, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Jean Hatzfeld at the 2011 Geneva book fair. -- Rama 20:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Raghith 17:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road accident in Säter, Sweden. --V-wolf 12:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Judging by how the emergency workers are standing, this seems tilted CCW to me. Otherwise fine. --Avenue 08:25, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
    Good quality. --Raghith 17:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

May 3, 2011

• 
  • Nomination Tower of Bonvouloir, Normandy, France --~Pyb 08:24, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The picture has some chromatic aberrations (those unnatural green-red things) atleast on top of the tower and some at left side of the building. They should be desaturated I'd say. Other problem is the perspective in the building because, I know, many people in Commons would like a corrected perspective in building photos. --Ximonic 14:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
    Another issue is the very tight crop above.--Jebulon 15:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
    Tight crop, distortion, CA. Sorry, we cannot promote this photo. Seems that your lens works bad with f/16.--PereslavlFoto 19:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

• To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.

• You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".

• The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision - Promoted or Not promoted - will be registered at the end of the text and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

• In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the image will stay in Consensual Review for a maximum period of 8 days, counted from its entry.
• Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
• Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
• Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
  

Consensual Review

File:Montreal_-_QC_-_Sendemast_Mont_Real2.jpg

• Nomination Montreal, Canada: Tower on Mont Royal --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Top third of tower is out of focus --Saffron Blaze 09:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  sharp enough for QI IMO, more than ever because of this difficult angle --Taxiarchos228 09:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  I just wondered if you had shot at a smaller apereature would you have got the whole tower. As it is even on page resolution you can see the top is out of focus. Saffron Blaze 09:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Eichsel_-_St._Gallus_Chorseite.jpg

• Nomination Rheinfelden-Eichsel: Saint Gallus Church --Taxiarchos228 07:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Over exposed in parts --Saffron Blaze 08:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
  not to deny, but is this here really significant for the quality of this picture? --Taxiarchos228 08:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Roman Weidenfeller 2011.jpg

• Nomination Roman Weidenfeller -- Pro2 21:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Hair is not sharp.--PereslavlFoto 22:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Gm-lampost-6629.jpg

• Nomination Lampost in Pereslavl museum--PereslavlFoto 14:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion unfortunate lighting --Mbdortmund 17:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  What do you mean? How does it make the quality of this photo worse?--PereslavlFoto 17:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)  Oppose Top of the lamp is unsharp. Sorry --Chmee2 18:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  The upper left part of the picture is overexposured. --Mbdortmund 22:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  Chmee2, please check again, I made it sharper.--PereslavlFoto 12:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-05-15-mt-vaudois-2.jpg

• Nomination Inside the fort du Mont Vaudois, Héricourt, France --ComputerHotline 14:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion distortion imoi acceptable --Mbdortmund 15:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Wide angle distortions are not less than mine with a winter night photo; that one was rejected, so this one may be rejected also.--PereslavlFoto 18:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-05-15-mt-vaudois-1.jpg

• Nomination Inside the fort du Mont Vaudois, Héricourt, France --ComputerHotline 14:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
   OpposeTwo light glares. Also, when I did the same night photo, Mbdortmund said "blown lights, white balance off". Completely the same is here.--PereslavlFoto 18:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hausen_im_Wiesental_-_Evangelische_Kirche1.jpg

• Nomination Hausen im Wiesental: protestant church --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
  Needs more sharpness!--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  this picture is sharp --Taxiarchos228 19:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  It's as sharp as my lampost, and they say it is not sharp enough. Same with the top of your building.--PereslavlFoto 21:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  He's on a mission to take revenge because I voted against one of his pictures... --Mbdortmund 22:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  Not polite from yours. Compare this photo to the Hausen im Wiesental bell tower photo, then compare it to my lampost. It looks as sharp as a lampost, less sharp than a belltower. This is my logic, and if I am not right, I beg you to tell me the reason (this is a discussion). Thanks.--PereslavlFoto 22:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:The mad woman-Theodore Gericault-MBA Lyon B825-IMG 0477.jpg

• Nomination Portrait of a demented woman, by Géricault. -- Rama 12:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion There are numerous "hot pixel" like artefacts. Fix those and its good. --Saffron Blaze 18:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Hot spots, numerous dust. Needs to pass the "unsharp mask" filter.--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  Tried to clean up a bit. Thank you for your input. Rama 21:42, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  There is no need to crop. Thanks for hot pixels fixing. Next steps are: remove dust, add sharpness with "unsharp mask" tool.--PereslavlFoto 22:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Berlin_Konzerthaus_BW_1.jpg

• Nomination Berlin, Konzerthaus --Berthold Werner 12:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Please sharpen image first. --Saffron Blaze 18:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
   Support Imo QI --Mbdortmund 23:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Sainte-Sophie - vierge à l'enfant.jpg

• Nomination The Virgin and Child mosaic in Hagia Sophia. I know the windows are blown, but they're too close to be cropped out and the light in the apse is very dim. --Eusebius 06:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
  Maybe add some crop at the bottom, and defringe blue windows?--PereslavlFoto 18:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Magistrat krakowski (noc).jpg

• Nomination Wielopolski Palace in Cracow, Poland --Pudelek 21:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
  Not sharp, hot spots, colour noise.--PereslavlFoto 18:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  On second regard I have to agree. This photo could be improved with some processing. --Saffron Blaze 12:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Tony Truant IMG 4598.jpg

• Nomination Tony Truant (Les Wampas) at Balelec 2011 -- Rama 21:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion good stage picture --Mbdortmund 05:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  Not sharp.--PereslavlFoto 18:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Captain Simmi on saxophone.jpg

• Nomination Heimaey's Captain Simmi. --Avenue 15:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Good quality. --Raghith 17:47, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Small depth of focus, only small foreground part of the beard is sharp, and the eyes and the nose are not.--PereslavlFoto 23:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Puffin taking off from sea.jpg

• Nomination Puffin about to take off from the water. --Avenue 08:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Good... for a difficult take off. :-) --Cayambe 19:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)  Oppose Unsharp due to moving, also splashing water is disturbing. Sorry --Chmee2 18:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  No need to be sorry. But I do think all the splashing helps demonstrate how hard the little guy has to work to take off, and the photo would not be nearly as useful without it. --Avenue 00:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Fluffed-up tui, side view.jpg

• Nomination Tui displaying fluffed-up feathers. --Avenue 01:12, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Lack of contrast, imo overexposured --Mbdortmund 06:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
  Curves adjusted to increase contrast; probably hasn't helped the overexposure though. --Avenue 10:28, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
   Support Good exposition, the bird is well visible. Maybe you can add some contrast with "unsharp mask" tool, but please be accurate :-).--PereslavlFoto 19:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Ötlingen_-_Rathaus.jpg

• Nomination Weil am Rhein-Ötlingen: town hall --Taxiarchos228 12:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion  Support Fine photo. I support ONLY if you add geocode!--PereslavlFoto 19:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  now with geocode --Taxiarchos228 12:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hausen_im_Wiesental_-_Evangelische_Kirche8.jpg

• Nomination Hausen im Wiesental: protestant church --Taxiarchos228 08:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion The technical quality is good, but I think the view to the church is too obstructed by trees. --Slaunger 20:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  this picture is showing the surrounding of the church, other picture without trees of this church I have made too --Taxiarchos228 20:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Pierre-Auguste Renoir Portrait of a Young Woman 1876 Neue Pinakothek Munich München.JPG

• Nomination Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Portrait of a Young Woman, 1876, Neue Pinakothek, Munich --Schlaier 13:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
• Good detail. (See image note for possible stuck pixel.) Colours differ somewhat from the gallery's photo, not in a bad way IMO. But the crop, while okay below, seems a little too tight on the other three sides (compare shot with frame), and this troubles me near the hands. Any chance of a wider crop? --Avenue 17:10, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

• Unfortunately I don't have a different version at hand. I will have to make another picture and make a new crop. --Schlaier 15:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Raghith 06:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, I agree the technical quality is good, but I still feel too much has been cropped off for this to be a QI. --Avenue 13:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Avenue (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Lacerta_agilis_male_2011_G2.jpg

• Nomination Sand Lizard male (Lacerta agilis) -- George Chernilevsky 19:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Eye not in focus -- Saffron Blaze 21:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC))
•  Support--Jebulon 14:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good photograph. Harrison49 16:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez 19:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 22:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Jean-Marie Roland de La Platière-Joseph Chinard-MBA Lyon B1490-IMG 0442.jpg

• Nomination Jean-Marie Roland de La Platière, by Jean-Baptiste Stouf. -- Rama 18:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion Good quality. --Raghith 06:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Sorry, it needs a correction of the masking over the head, near the upper edge --Jebulon 07:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
  Thank you, corrected. -- Rama 10:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
   Support Thank you, corrected too. I like this "vénérable vieillard" que sa femme aimait "comme un père"--Jebulon 14:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
•  Support --Mbdortmund 22:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 22:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Villingen Rathaus Münsterplatz7.jpg

• Nomination Town hall of Villingen, Germany, during carnival (with three ladies in traditional local local costume as passers-by). --AndreasPraefcke 23:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion

 Support Good quality. --Raghith 08:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 Comment please correct the perspective first --Taxiarchos228 06:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 Support not the best time and angle for making a good photography of this building but good enough now for QI -Taxiarchos228 20:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 Oppose Extremely strong contrast.--PereslavlFoto 21:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 22:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Allegory of theological dispute-Abraham van der Eyk-MBA Lyon H1151-IMG 0428.jpg

• Nomination Allegory of the theological dispute between the Arminianists and their opponents. Abraham van der Eyk, 1721. -- Rama 12:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
• I like this picture very much, but it seems to me that something is missing below. I think the crop of the feet looks strange. May we have a certainty before promotion ? --Jebulon 09:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and sorry for the delay in my reply, I though it made no sense answering without the backups of the raw material. I've uploaded the original file, before post-processing, at File:Allegory of theological dispute-Abraham van der Eyk-MBA Lyon H1151-IMG 0428-original.jpg. It seems to me that the feet are indeed cut in the original, but it is possible that we'd had lost some more due to post-processing. The chap in fancy suit is the Stadtholder ; since the dispute occurred in 1618, it should be Maurice of Nassau, Prince of Orange (consistent with the mugshot that we already have). Cheers ! Rama 17:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

•  SupportJe remballe mes remontrances.--Jebulon 21:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Quartl 17:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Berlin_Potsdamer_Platz_BW_1.jpg

• Nomination Berlin, Building at Potsdamer Platz --Berthold Werner 12:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:49, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose not QI for me: too dark and bad perpective --Taxiarchos228 09:53, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Opposezu stark verzerrt, für mich kein QI --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
  • The building has really a flat iron form (as you can see in G**** maps, follow the link at objekt location). --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The photo has no noise. It transfers the early morning lighting, but this looks innatural for 15:xx, so I think you have to fix the contrast, to chahge the "gamma" value. The picture shows me an ugly building, and if it's really ugly, I do support. If the building is not of this kind, I will reject my vote.--PereslavlFoto 23:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The camera was set to utc, time was 16:35 (early evening ;-) --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Fine then, it does show the early evening lightning.--PereslavlFoto 12:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Tucker's Genus Two Group.jpg

File:Tucker's Genus Two Group.jpg

• Nomination Mathematical sculpture of a genus two group. —David Eppstein 14:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Nice subject and composition. Significant noise in the shadows, though, and shallow DOF. Lumpy looking background on the left, and two possible dust spots near the sculpture upper centre and mid right. Some of these problems are fixable, but I suspect not enough. --Avenue 08:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

• Um, can you try looking again? the "lumpy background" and "dust spots" are not technical flaws, but part of the scene: they are both actually the plaster wall immediately behind the sculpture. —David Eppstein 15:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

• Okay, if the "dust spots" are features of the wall, then that adds to the distracting nature of the background. However the noise and DOF were more important reasons for declining it. Having looked again, I still feel that despite its strengths, it's not a QI. But let's get some more opinions. --Avenue 04:26, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

• I'm sure it would be possible to reduce the noise, if that were the only issue, but dof is not something that can be changed later. So I agree, let's get some more opinions. —David Eppstein 15:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose I don't mind the dof, but the noise is an issue, especially in the shadows. --Quartl 17:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Quartl (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Kids_in_Rishikesh,_India.jpg

• Nomination Kids on a road near Rishikesh, India. They are probably siblings and hanging around while their parents are busy building the road. --Broc 21:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Jovianeye 22:31, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposure between the two heads, as in the december 2010 discussion in FPC.--Jebulon 10:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  SupportI like this image. And maybe this is not a featured picture, I think it is a quality image. I read the discussion for the featured picture candidates in December 2010. I find the overexposure between the heads not so distracting. --Elektroschreiber 21:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Harrison49 22:58, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose interesting topic but the area is overexposed too strong --Archaeodontosaurus 17:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose where is the permission of the parents? --Ralf Roletschek 12:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Without permission from the parents this image should be deleted instead. --Niabot 12:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Elekhh 13:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:KRAZ 257 front.jpg

• Nomination Automixer KrAZ-257 front.--Vizu 15:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support sky overexp. but main object very good --Ralf Roletschek 17:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposure, tight framing, busy composition, graininess - Not QI for me. --Elekhh 07:59, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crop is too tight on both sides. The sky overexposed. Not a QI for me. But I like the subject. --Elektroschreiber 21:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ralf --Archaeodontosaurus 08:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Elekhh --Chmee2 18:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The shadows tell us that the sky was white because of colourless clouds. May be cropped at the top. Needs denoise procedure, and after that denoise I support the image. Please, please denoise it.--PereslavlFoto 19:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Elekhh --Tlusťa 09:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Chmee2 12:39, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Den Haag Pellenaerstraat 4.jpg

• Nomination Paviljoen von Wied - Pellenaerstraat 4, The Hague, the Netherlands. - Basvb 16:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Comment Good... but needs a strong perspective correction. --Cayambe 11:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support QI - but only without correction --Ralf Roletschek 11:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but it seems to me that there's a consensus here that perspective distortions should be corrected. So, let's discuss. --Cayambe 11:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

  well, I think it's a bad style, desperately distorting everything --Ralf Roletschek 16:44, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Support I think we must keep our minds open. The evident distortion, as it is not a lack of care, is in this specific case a part of the quality of this image (IMO).--Jebulon 09:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like the image as it is. And for me this is also a quality image. --Elektroschreiber 20:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop on both sides to tight, distortion imo too strong --Mbdortmund 20:51, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support In this case I believe that the lack of perspective correction is a valid compositional choice. It pulls the viewer into the scene, whereas if it were corrected it would look more static. —David Eppstein 22:32, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality as it is. Harrison49 23:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Aberrant perspective. --Archaeodontosaurus 08:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose massive CA and zigzag lamp poles. Too strong distortion for neoclassical architecture. Barrel distortion. --Elekhh 13:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --Bgag 11:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is a very vivid example of distortions. And it needs more sharpness.--PereslavlFoto 19:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the perspective distortion plays a useful role here, per David Eppstein. The barrel distortion does detract, though, and it seems too tightly cropped at the sides. --Avenue 03:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Decline?   --Avenue (talk) 03:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Bridleway sign Hillingdon.JPG

• Nomination Bridleway sign in Hillingdon --Harrison49 21:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Poor lighting. --King of Hearts 22:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like the lighting, everything is visible --Taxiarchos228 06:25, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - As per King of Hearts --Sreejithk2000 10:43, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support everything is visible --Ralf Roletschek 20:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor lighting --Archaeodontosaurus 08:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment It's natural lighting. The other side would have had the sun obstructing the view. Harrison49 12:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Like Archaeodontosaurus. --Chmee2 18:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose If the sign is soooo dark, could you please make it a bit lighter for we could see its details? Also, perspective distortion.--PereslavlFoto 19:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Chmee2 18:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Bessa Myftiu IMG 2859.jpg

• Nomination Bessa Myftiu at the Salon du Livre 2011 in Geneva -- Rama 12:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Oppose Lot of chromatic noise due to the high ISO, shallow DoF, dead pixels not corrected. I think it will be a great picture if you improve the noise problem and reduce its size to 60 or 50% to hide the lack of focus, while it will still remain a big picture. Sting 13:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Reducing the size only makes files smaller and information lesser, not quality better. --Coyau 15:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Of course it doesn't improve the quality but the problems are less visible. Sting 15:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support If it is a QI at half size, logically (quality is not what one see on a screen), if someone needs to reduce size to juge quality, let him do it, no need to downsize files here.--Coyau 10:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support for me QI --Ralf Roletschek 10:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Ankara 10:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like this picture very much. QI --Schlaier 16:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose eyes not in focus, poor composition --Carschten 12:18, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hot pixels (hair), wrong focus (nose and one eye, not both eyes), shining nose (has to be retouched), colour noise (in shadows). Possibly wrong balance (too yellow skin), useless foreground (something unsharp in the bottom of the image). ISO 3200 images can hardly be quality images because of the noise, but you could make serial shooting and take more sharp picture. Generally speaking, with 1/200 in this situation, you could set 1 step underexposure, get less ISO, and make correct colours with RAW converting program.--PereslavlFoto 23:19, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 22:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Butterfly unnamed.JPG

• Nomination Caligo eurilochus, -- Pro2 18:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
• Discussion
•  Support Good quality. --Schlaier 19:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed hindwing. --Quartl 06:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good view of the butterfly. -- Harrison49 20:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Quartl --Mbdortmund 06:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support QI imo. --David Perez 10:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. -- Raghith 01:41, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Cannot see overexposure anywhere. -- PereslavlFoto 21:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Pro2 15:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)