Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/09
May 9
Solely used to vandalize Buzz Lightyear Air on White (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment edited nom to list two files proposed for deletion. Air on White (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
AI-generated Bremps... 01:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete as generation issues of anatomy and proportion and out of scope. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 07:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC); edited: 11:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - user has 7 edits on home Wiki. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
flag of fictional country, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
No license and no clear reason why this could be PD Jarekt (talk) 03:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Image of character from The Conjuring movies; no evidence of permission and seems unlikely to be uploader's own work, especially in the webp format. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
{{Duplicate|Flag of Tanintharyi Region (2010-2021).svg}} Lthar854 (talk) 04:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, images are not really duplicates. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Hindustan Times newspaper doesnt provide free CC license. Gpkp (talk) 05:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused banner for a student concert Omphalographer (talk) 05:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal Photo - out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 05:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: Per Commons:Project scope#File in use in another Wikimedia project, "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." —Halvorsen brian (talk) 23:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy F10. Last deletion request claimed it was in use; it is no longer in use, and the user is not an active/constructive contributor. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Likely AI generated. "Unknown author" and origin, but various borders do not align with any historical borders at all. The borders of Africa and the former Soviet Union and Russia are dead giveaways of either AI generation or a custom map design. The size of this PNG suggests it is not the original file either. Yue🌙 06:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Book cover not under free licence --Abalg (talk) 06:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Author is Niels Ackermann / Lundi13, not uploader. See EXIF shizhao (talk) 06:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Was planned as new version, user-mistake (Wikisympathisant (talk) 07:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Romania FOP in Romania doesn't allow for commercial usage, which isn't compatible with Commons, and there's no other reason the poster would be PD. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in source country. VRT-permission from artist (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Second Imperium"
Out of scope: unused symbols of an unofficial, fan-created faction within the Star Wars fictional universe. Official symbols from this fictional universe can be in scope, but unofficial ones, such as these, are not.
Omphalographer (talk) 08:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? and blurry. Xocolatl (talk) 08:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- no source. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
missing link (source) Xocolatl (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep Now fixed. --RAN (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 08:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Moheen. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 08:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Moheen. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
low quality, probably not own work Xocolatl (talk) 08:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Instagram image, serial copyio person. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation. 32 kb, no metadata, no proper source Xocolatl (talk) 08:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably NOT own work... Xocolatl (talk) 08:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, missing source link Xocolatl (talk) 08:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, missing source link Xocolatl (talk) 08:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, missing source link Xocolatl (talk) 08:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, low quality, no source link Xocolatl (talk) 08:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- This photo is official from the account of the presidential candidate of Venezuela. What recommendation do you give me to modify the photo so that it is not deleted and to be able to comply with the principles and not have the photo deleted? I need help and guidance. Catp3105 (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - As note, you must provide a specific source so that the license can be verified. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
probably NOT own work Xocolatl (talk) 08:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
wrong license Xocolatl (talk) 08:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
probably NOT own work Xocolatl (talk) 08:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment The source:https://impuestospedrazabar.guiriri.com.ve/contactus (logo of SEAMAT) AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Question @Taivo which policy states that files in the public domain must be deleted if they are unsourced? I recognize that allowing unsourced files here would allow hoaxes to pass, but is there something concrete in that regard? RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
https://www.instagram.com/p/CvnFOBSORV3/?ref=flujo_portada&hl=ne Xocolatl (talk) 08:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
no source link, no categories, probably copyright violation (like many uploads of this user) Xocolatl (talk) 08:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
missing link (source), probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? no source link. Xocolatl (talk) 08:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krashaon19 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: -g7 Yann (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's totally unnecessary, as it's trivially easy to copy and paste the correct information from one file page to the other, nor is renaming a problem. That applies to different file types. If one JPG is clearly superior to another, that's another question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. I was just pointing out that there is conflicting information out there about what's in the photograph that needs to be resolved. I can't access the provided source to see what it should be. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- That's totally unnecessary, as it's trivially easy to copy and paste the correct information from one file page to the other, nor is renaming a problem. That applies to different file types. If one JPG is clearly superior to another, that's another question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality duplicate, if it cannot be merged it should be deleted as it bloats the Wikimedia library Bathwelshman19 (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
The image is extremely poor quality and has been edited considerably, as I have been told by the up-loader. Bloats commons and should be deleted. Bathwelshman19 (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Ложные сведения об авторстве и дате съемки: объект умер в сентябре 2023; фото из семейного архива, автор неизвестен, свободной лицензии нет. -- Tomasina (talk) 09:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Innacruate League performance which is misleading to viewers. The creator has since made an accurate graph dating from 1979-present, as Bath joined the English football pyramid system in 1979. Bath City were never in tier 4 and the entire section of the chart previous to this date is wrong. The graph illustrates nothing but inaccurate information, and thus should be deleted as quickly as possible. Bathwelshman19 (talk) 09:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Because it's a personal photo. PhilippeAthos (talk) 11:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
{{Delete}} reason=This file is verified source. PhilippeAthos (talk) 06:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by sock. --Эlcobbola talk 11:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Not appropriate and suitable to use into Infobox or anywhere. Pretty Baxon (talk) 13:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Not appropriate for infobox Pretty Baxon (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept as before. Probably sock nomination. (Non-admin closure) 186.174.134.132 12:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 09:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
no evidence that the image is free from copyright? DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Not used in any Wikipedia page and I as the owner of the picture want to delete it due to privacy reasons N niyaz (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I see nothing personal here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Director Fritz Lang died in 1976, so the 70-year copyright term in the country of origin has not ended hinnk (talk) 11:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Corporations which produce movies are the copyright holders, and not the directors. Bluerasberry (talk) 20:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even if the copyright holder were a corporation, the copyright term in Germany would last for 70 years after the death of the director(s), writer(s), and composer(s) who made it. hinnk (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Director Fritz Lang died in 1976, so the 70-year copyright term in the country of origin has not ended hinnk (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The description of the source says that the image was a "Screen capture." — doclys (❀) 12:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caylawithers (talk · contribs)
articles, out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Author is in the image. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 12:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- This file also should be deleted for the same reason. Author is in the images. So this is clear copyright violation. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 12:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging the uploader @ইউনুছ মিঞা, are you the copyright holder (photographer) of these files? Because the images look like you are in them. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 22:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be "own work". See for instance https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3031819283707848&set=a.1878209569068831&paipv=0&eav=AfacAF4C4n1mGoDb_vQbocCLN3vrSPT9qyDFApg1DPQD5ZOMBU884QxdiH9GsB4-XcU Py4nf (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Logotipo de uma empresa privada. Esta marca não deveria estar aqui. Liutecristian (talk) 13:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
OP uploaded the images from ajunews.com (watermarked) as a compilation video and marking it as licensed under Creative Commons hence Commons:License laundering. Ajunews website's copyright page (Korean) and (English) stated clearly their copyright stands in which is incompatible with Commons. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
There is no metro in Saratov. Sigwald (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. apparently a hoax and unused file. --Bedivere (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)
Derivative of modern sculpture. No FoP in Russia.
- File:Tomb Orlov.JPG
- File:Tomb Shkadov.jpg
- File:Tomb Enn Kaarma.jpg
- File:Memorial to the crew of the Superjet 100 that crashed May 9, 2012.JPG
- File:Gudkov's grave.JPG
- File:Mikhailovs grave.JPG
- File:Grave Znamensky.JPG
- File:Grave Shkadov.JPG
- File:Fedotov's grave.JPG
- File:Grave Krasilschikova.JPG
- File:Grave Pugaev.JPG
- File:Bykovsky cemetery.JPG
A.Savin 19:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Peredelkino 20180812 194227.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180811 172907.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180806 134525.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180808 200826.jpg
- This is a building--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 05:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- File:Peredelkino 20180812 192112.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180806 135104.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180806 140430.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 102739.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104250.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 105040.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180802 101125.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 105056.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180805 165501.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180804 140232.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 095241.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 094633.jpg
- File:Kazan 20180804 152842.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 100558.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104004.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 103815.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 100018.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180802 104256.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180802 105218.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104110.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 093614.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180802 185234.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180802 184741.jpg
- File:Peredelkino cemetery 20180802 105827.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 103643.jpg
- File:Peredelkino cemetery 20180801 104306.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104348.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104611.jpg
- Where is a sculpture???--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 102353.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104503.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 104403.jpg
- File:Peredelkino Cemetery 20180801 105439.jpg
- File:Novosibirsk 20180306 190955.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 21:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- No sculptures--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: I kept a mausoleum which is a building and one photo which is de minimis. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)
Derivatives of non-free posters, no FoP in Russia for those.
It's my work. It's my handmade. Therefore it's free poster Bogdanov-62 (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC) VLu (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Very funny. --VLu (talk) 13:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- I do not see anything funny. Poster of the study-museum of academician G.G. Cherny was created by the curator of the cabinet-museum and provided for free use--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Bogdanov-62, do me a favor, show the definition of that free use on the Commons:Licensing page. --VLu (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- catch:{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} Bogdanov-62 (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
It's worse than I thought . Thank you. --VLu (talk) 16:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- catch:{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} Bogdanov-62 (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bogdanov-62, do me a favor, show the definition of that free use on the Commons:Licensing page. --VLu (talk) 11:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- I do not see anything funny. Poster of the study-museum of academician G.G. Cherny was created by the curator of the cabinet-museum and provided for free use--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Don't think. Remove your label for delete. Thank you.--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg,_G7){kind=link}
![1.19 File:Parcul Copou (hartă pentru "Festivalul Luminii", Cercetasii României, 2016).jpg](#File:Parcul_Copou_(hartă_pentru_"Festivalul_Luminii",_Cercetasii_României,_2016).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(17246976045).jpg){kind=link}
_(17039546207).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Devils_Tower.jpg){kind=link}
_Am_Stadion_mit_Stadtbahn_889.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg,_G7){kind=link}
.jpg,_G7){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)
No FoP in Russia for sculpture.
- File:Plaque to Orlov.jpg
- File:Khabarovsk 20221003 123555 edit 84621187812607.jpg
- File:Kaluga 20220920 122425.jpg
Xunks (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)
No evidence of early enough publication to be PD as per COM:Russia.
- File:Krivtsov SS.jpg
- File:Terebenyov P.jpg
- File:T. Tess.jpg
- File:Kekcheev KX.jpg
- File:Aleshkov S.jpg
- File:Bachinsky AI.jpg
- File:Bedarev O. 1945.jpg
- File:Shimkevich AP.jpg
- File:Пеэгель ЮМ.jpg
- File:Artur Vallner.jpg
- File:Lominsky G.jpg
- File:Bolshakov MN.jpg
- File:Yakovlev V. G.jpg
- File:Тимковский Н. И.jpg
- File:Ansis Daumanis.jpg
- File:Aleksander Paldrok2.jpg
- File:Babushkin Iv.jpg
- File:Баранский Н.jpg
- File:Sturua Iv.jpg
- File:Пичугин Е.jpg
- File:Dzhikiya Serge.jpg
- File:Lalajants I.jpg
- File:Valter Petr.jpg
- File:Zourabichvili I.jpg
- File:Gudiashvili & Mayakovsky.jpg
Xunks (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bogdanov-62 (talk · contribs)
Derivatives of copyrighted 2D and 3D artworks. No FoP in Russia except architecture.
- File:Tomb of Lykov.jpg
- File:Tomb of Mugalev.jpg
- File:Tomb of A Solovyev.jpg
- File:Tomb of Nikolsky AA.jpg
- File:Tomb of Bode.jpg
- File:Tomb of Enn Kaarma.jpg
- File:Tomb of Kononov.jpg
- File:Tomb of Sichkin.jpg
- File:Tomb of Bogunova.jpg
- File:Tomb of George Vinogradov.jpg
- File:Exlibris of Ivan Artobolevsky.jpg
- File:Konenkov-museum 20231216 132002.jpg
- File:Tomb of Targh.jpg
- File:Ryazan 20230930 142348.jpg
- File:Plaque to R. Manukovskaya.jpg
- File:Presentation of Nilin's book.jpg
Quick1984 (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Это не есть произведения искусства, охраняемые авторским правом. Размещение на Викискладе правомерно--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 14:28, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Masahiro007 (talk · contribs)
User globally locked, small files without EXIF data, dubious copyright.
Yann (talk) 14:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright Gianluca Congi, need ticket permission Caulfield (talk) 14:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Serve l'autorizzazione di che tipo se Gianluca ha inviato a me il jpg per caricarlo su Commons? Beppeveltri (talk) 14:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The actual photographer must send a license directly using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 14:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by OddHerring as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1. Author request, unused. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily by Yann. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Katasterplan-Ausschnitt wird nicht mehr gebraucht, da er von mir durch einen besseren Plan ersetzt wurde. Foxxy199 (Foxy5) (talk) 15:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Higher resolution version available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Turner,_Alberta_1916.jpg Bixly777 (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused on any actual articles, and superseded by superior SVG version. Snow Lion Fenian (talk) 16:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
All other 'own works' of the uploader were blatant copyvios, this low resolution photo belongs to a pretty well known photo session (cf. [1]), probably not own work. Quick1984 (talk) 16:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Looks like wrong license. "news reports on events and facts, which have a purely informational character"? Should every photo be regarded as such? Manyareasexpert (talk) 16:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I think the copyright law refers to information itself, not actual works like the photograph in this case. --Bedivere (talk) 22:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
better version at File:The works of John Sheffield, Earl of Mulgrave, Marquis of Normanby, and Duke of Buckingham Fleuron T086946-18.png F (talk) 16:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Let's turn this into a redirect to that better version. I agree there is no reason anyone would prefer this. - Jmabel ! talk 17:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
In my opinion the tourist spoils the photo. We have for example file:ES Navas de Tolosa 1105 (4) (17059202888).jpg. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
_(17246976045).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
_(17246976045).jpg){kind=link}
In my opinion the tourist spoils the photo. We have for example file:ES Navas de Tolosa 1105 (3) (17221001986).jpg. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
_(17039546207).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
_(17039546207).jpg){kind=link}
This is an old logo for the KFF organization. New logo has been added to wikimedia in PNG format. Rsidel (talk) 17:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The source gives the impression that this image was added so as to sell related merchandise. StefenTower (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also, this image was made to supersede an existing, adequate image for the use in a couple Wikipedia articles. Therefore, it was unnecessary to create. StefenTower (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot change the file to this image in the original file
Tgbsww (talk) 04:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- File overwriting not allowed Tgbsww (talk) 04:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- My point is why do we need to? The original was acceptable for its narrow use. It didn't need to be displayed as a large image anywhere. And it's probably mislabeled as "public domain" in both cases, but that's a separate matter. StefenTower (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I personally think we need more high-quality PNG images of some flags, as it can be much easier to vectorize if need be. IndysNotHere (talk) 01:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's a useful thought, but going back to whether this is actually public domain or not, if it's not, we may be going beyond fair use to maintain a high-quality, high-res version. StefenTower (talk) 02:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I personally think we need more high-quality PNG images of some flags, as it can be much easier to vectorize if need be. IndysNotHere (talk) 01:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- My point is why do we need to? The original was acceptable for its narrow use. It didn't need to be displayed as a large image anywhere. And it's probably mislabeled as "public domain" in both cases, but that's a separate matter. StefenTower (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- File overwriting not allowed Tgbsww (talk) 04:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot change the file to this image in the original file
No freedom of panorama for public art works in USA Whpq (talk) 17:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Then please move a copy to English Wikipedia, where it is used as the main photograph of an article and easily meets critera for use on that page. Why doesn't Commons have a policy that images should be placed on English Wikipedia when deletion is probable here? Please add that policy if it's not yet suggested, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is non-free on the English Wikipedia and would not meet the non-free usage criteria (#8) for the two mainspace articles. It's use in the draft is also not allowed as non-free content is can only be used in article space on not drafts. If the draft is moved to article space, you could request this image be undeleted on Commons temporarily for transfer to the English Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 02:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: QR code containing a dead link. Omphalographer (talk) 17:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 22:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Blurry, grainy low quality image for which we have plenty of better photographs. at Category:West Coast Express Whpq (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Aesthetically it's a far superior image to many others taken in perfect lighting conditions. It captures all the melancholy of those big landscapes. No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No indication what educational use this photo would provided. It's just some unknown people on a boat who got wet. Out of COM:SCOPE. Whpq (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Innecesario, fue actualizado ChileanPolitiks (talk) 18:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 22:03, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal "artwork" that seems to just be paint thrown on a wall Seawolf35 (talk) 18:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nestafaya666 (talk · contribs)
Unused logos without categories or context, out of scope. User has 10 deleted contributions on frwiki, so whatever the logos refer to is likely not notable.
- File:Drapeau l'angoisse.png
- File:Logo l'angoisse color.png
- File:Logo l'angoisse couleur.png
- File:Logo ecriture l'angoisse.svg
- File:Logo smiley langoisse.svg
- File:Smiley l'angoisse.png
- File:Drapeau l'angoisse avec logo smiley.png
TheImaCow (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake JakobHosp (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadeln_(F%C3%BCrth)#Wappen - Erst vor wenigen Jahren aktualisiert und somit nicht historisch. Sehr wahrscheinlich kein "eigenes Werk". Weil es nicht offiziell ist, zieht Urheberrecht. GerritR (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Siehe verlinkten Artikel, für den gerade ein Löschantrag läuft: Out of scope (Eigengewächs eines Vereins, keineswegs offiziell) und zudem urheberrechtlich problematisch. GerritR (talk) 19:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Das Wappen wurde vom Verschönerungsverein erstellt und ist laut diesem gemeinfrei. (Siehe: Hohe Wappenrolle von Woltersdorf, 2021, S. 32) Ich habe eine Version dieser Wappen für Wikipedia erstellt. Das Wappen wird in der Nachbarschaft verwendet und ist im Heimatmuseum einsehbar. Mehlitz (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Siehe verlinkten Artikel, für den gerade ein Löschantrag läuft: Out of scope (Eigengewächs eines Vereins, keineswegs offiziell) und zudem urheberrechtlich problematisch. GerritR (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Das Wappen wurde vom Verschönerungsverein erstellt und ist laut diesem gemeinfrei. (Siehe: Hohe Wappenrolle von Woltersdorf, 2021, S. 32) Ich habe eine Version dieser Wappen für Wikipedia erstellt. Das Wappen wird in der Nachbarschaft verwendet und ist im Heimatmuseum einsehbar. Mehlitz (talk) 15:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 19:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The building dates to 2017, so still under architectural copyright. As the source country does not provide Freedom of Panorama, a commercial licensing authorization from the designers of the building is required.
- File:2692Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 29.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 01.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 02.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 03.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 04.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 05.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 06.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 07.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 08.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 09.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 10.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 11.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 12.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 13.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 16.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 17.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 18.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 20.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 22.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 23.jpg
- File:2724Manila Memorial Park Sucat Parañaque City 24.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
We don't know Gudoomiye cali baa (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Sensitive information on the computer screen(s). JoeK2033 (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. Jonteemil (talk) 20:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep. Per the threshold of originality page, "It is usually impossible to determine whether a specific image is within the threshold of originality without a judicial decision." A reasonable interpretation of the precautionary principle supports keeping the file, as there is not "significant doubt" about the file's freedom, other than Jonteemil's unexplained opinion that the file is "too complex." Respectfully, and while assuming good faith in the nominator, although the nominator may believe this to be to be the case, the nominator is not a judicial body. Nor is there a significant possibility that a judicial body would ever try a case; i.e., the copyright holder, Portside Associates Limited Partnership, is a dissolved corporation, and the company cancelled their trademark protection in 1993. --ConnorTextor (talk) 03:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- COM:TOO US is probably the most well-described TOO page of any country on Commons. Looking through it, there are several examples of logos that do, and don't, meet the threshold. Judging by that, I'd say that it's pretty evident that the logo in question belongs to the category of logos that are above the TOO. There are too many elements in this logo that even by their own are pretty complex, e.g. the ribbon at the bottom with its curls at either side of the middle part and of course the building in the middle. That said, of course we can't be 100% certain that a court of law would deem the logo above TOO but the precautionary principle would more often than not be an argument for deletion, rather than against.
- The argument in the end, that a court would never try a case, is invalid per the policy you yourself refereed to: COM:PCP.
- In the US copyright isn't, afaik, automatic, i.e. you have to apply for copyright protection. Given that, I don't know if the logo, regardless of the TOO, perhaps might be PD for reasons regarding a lack of a copyright application. But that I don't know. Jonteemil (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Epolk (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
_Devils_Tower.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
_Devils_Tower.jpg){kind=link}
uploaded wrong file - request from author Mkkagain (talk) 21:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
_Am_Stadion_mit_Stadtbahn_889.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
_Am_Stadion_mit_Stadtbahn_889.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Gérard Hermet
Unfortunately there's no FOP in France and the artist of these windows, Gérard Hermet, seems to still be alive. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.
- File:Paris Église Saint-Ferdinand-des-Ternes6774.JPG
- File:Paris Église Saint-Ferdinand-des-Ternes6775.JPG
Adamant1 (talk) 21:20, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored 70 years pma. --Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
As it states on the license, it only qualifies images made for the federal government under the license and "not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision." This shall include the office of the Governor as well as the fact that Wikimedia Commons has not yet recieved a email of any sort of permission being granted to this user to post this image on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons HistorianL (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
This file is an inferior version of c:File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 1952.svg. Mad Mismagius (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
"Own work" from 2015 doubtful: Image subject died in 2010. 87.150.8.223 21:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scan of something. Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio: Logos of radio stations
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fry1989. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this enough of a justifivation regarding the copyrights status of this file? I have to admit, at least regarding the obituary part, that such thing doesn't apply in general, unless this all is a matter of local law or interpretation, so I'm in the wrong. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 22:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
uploaded without permission. ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Check out File:Twinks4Trump J in White.jpg. It is released under CC-BY-SA 4.0. My derivative is within the terms of that license. Zanahary (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
![[2]](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJO9XLAvBIk5QMfm%2FJgB0Lgs9w29TLq9SKNXrLAvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0z1KZdBLZvHKArPJqrNJfaAoq1Qy29UngBCxtGNatGOzjKOaOzgMqPByB9sJ2BSM3a0rfd1LplHuB9XLB9pMgB0nr8Tp0FFJh90npF0p3dBLq92nqwSKg5Z##File:_Twinks4Trump_J_in_White_-_Hat_text_removed.png){kind=link}
An altered image from a set by Lucian Wintrich that was deleted (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jvander22). Wintrich, to my knowledge, never released photos under free licenses. gobonobo + c 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weren’t all those photos uploaded by Wintrich himself? 173.77.183.96 22:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, look at the nom: the nominator doesn’t understand that Lucian Wintrich is the photographer, not the subject. 173.77.183.96 22:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- G8, marked for SPEEDY. 186.174.134.132 13:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Even if Wintrich is Jvander22, there is no proof of this, so this should be deleted absent COM:VRT permission/confirmation. But this is not G8; and it was previously kept, so declining speedy. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- We need proof via VRT confirmation for every 'own work' upload? Zanahary (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, however, a VRT permission/confirmation is needed for this file. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why this one? Zanahary (talk) 07:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, however, a VRT permission/confirmation is needed for this file. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- We need proof via VRT confirmation for every 'own work' upload? Zanahary (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, look at the nom: the nominator doesn’t understand that Lucian Wintrich is the photographer, not the subject. 173.77.183.96 22:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann Previously undeleted - can you weigh in here? Gbawden (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
- In the UDR, people seem to agree that this license is valid. Anything new since then? Yann (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: I am deleting as the source file has been deleted. If this file is to be undeleted again we first need to undelete the source image from which this image was derived. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Picture taken most likely from an old manual or spare parts catalog, obviously no own work from 2024, can be found widely spread across the internet, for example here, published allready in 2013. Copyvio. Druschba 4 (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Can be found here dated to 2015 and in various other places across the internet, copyvio, user has several DR's and copyvios on the same topic. Druschba 4 (talk) 22:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
out of scope, only use was on a now-deleted spam page on en.wp Just Step Sideways (talk) 22:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Published here allready in 2020 and also in other places, copyvio, user has several simular problems on his talkpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 22:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio, published here allready in 2011, user has several simular requests on his talkpage. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio, published here allready in 2009 and also in several other places: [3]. User has several simular DR's. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Published here allready in 2023 with copyright, copyvio, user has several DR's on the same topic. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
While this person can license their photo under a CC-BY-SA 4.0, they do not have permission for the characters present in this work. Besides maybe Oswald, all of these characters are definitely under copyright and would not be considered de-minimis in my opinion. SDudley (talk) 23:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
published here allready in 2020 (and in various other places) with copyright claim, obviously copyvio like all the other uploads from the user. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Published here allready in 2022, user has several DR's and copyvios, no exif or quality, obvious case. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
undelete in 2025 as a derivative work of the still copyrighted 1929 novel. SDudley (talk) 23:16, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- See this deletion request for a different file version of the same film for more information. SDudley (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not that I'm saying the image shouldn't be deleted, but wouldn't a movie retain its own copyright from the book due to being in a different medium? Like a super hero movie based on a comic book character is still copyrighted by the film studio. Otherwise there's no reason they would produce the film to begin with. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Not PD yet, creator Hermann Junker (1877-1962) died less than 70 years ago Einsamer Schütze (talk) 23:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
