You have not been banned. You have only been warned. You may continue contributing to the project, but only with your own photos (photos taken by yourself), not those taken from the web. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted some others speedily. Not sure about the rest of them. One can nominate them for deletion or tag for speedy deletion if eligible. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
4nn1l2 то есть я не могу загружать фотографии с лицензией даже в свободном доступе вообще? Или мне вот нужна фотографии, что бы использовать её в статью, как мне проверить могу ли это сделать, если сайт с которого я это брал, показывает в низу своём только (c) и всё, что я должен делать? Iliya Kushkin Official (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can upload freely-licensed files and those in the public domain, but you should provide their source and determine the license properly. Please read COM:L/ru before uploading any other files. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
درود لطفا اول این ردهرا یک نگاه بیندازید؛ بنده تصاویری باکیفیت و هم بیکیفیت ارائهدادم و ترجیحمیدم تصاویر بیکیفیت حذفشوند اما نمیدانم چطور میشه اینکارو کرد! آیا میتوانید راهنماییمکنید؟ تصاویر در تاریخ 2021-06-08 ضعیف اما 2021-07-18 بهتر هستند. POS78 (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
سلام. دسترسی گشت خودکار (autopatrol) بهتان دادم. الان باید بتوانید در ترجیحات Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets گزینهٔ VisualFileChange را فعال کنید. بعد به ردهٔ مورد نظر بروید و برای آن تصویرهایی که بیکیفیت میدانید درخواست حذف گروهی بدهید. یک هفته صبر کنید اگر کسی مخالفت نکرد یادآوری کنید تا حذفشان کنم. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:14, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
پس از فعال کردن ابزار به ردهٔ مورد نظر بروید، از نوار کناری گزینهٔ Perform batch task را انتخاب کنید. سپس دکمهٔ proceed را بزنید. سپس از قسمت action در بالای صفحه nominate for deletion را انتخاب کنید. دلیل حذف (بیکیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین) را در جعبهٔ زیرش بنویسید و آن تصاویری که میخواهید حذف شوند را تیک بزنید. در نهایت روی دکمهٔ execute بزنید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
جسارتا میتوانید مقاله زنده جان در ویکیانگیسی را بررسی کنید؟ بنظرم فتوکلاژ نیاز ندارد ولی صدر تصاویر قلعه بزنجرد مربوط بهشهرستان خلیلآباد، دو تصویر کهدرخواست حذف آنهارا دادم، گورستان و یک درب معمولی بهصورت فتوکلاژ! این تصویر کفایت میکند. سپاسگذارم POS78 (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
این قطع دسترسی خودکار آیپی است. بهتر است دیگر وارد حساب کاربری قدیم خود نشوید. مودم خود را خاموش و روشن کنید تا آیپی جدید بگیرید و مشکلتان حل شود. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
آها! والا وارد آن اکانتم گشتم تا ببینم فردی به بندهٔ کهتر اشاره نکردهاست :( میتوانم با همین اکانت؛ درخواست بازگشایی آن اکانت را دهم تا دیگر تکرار نشود؟!
راستی برخی از تصاویر آثار بردسکن مربوط به پروندهٔ ثبتیست که با موبایل اسکرینشات گرفته شدهاست! حجم اسکرین پیسی حداقل ۲ مگابایت و دوربینهای عکاسی بسیار بیشتر. مثل این! POS78 (talk) 17:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
بلاشک مدیران بیکفایت ویکیپدیای فارسی درخواستتان را رد خواهند کرد تا ازتان آتو داشته باشند و اگر به مشکل برخوردند علیهتان اقدام کنند!
بنابراین توصیه میکنم خودتان را کوچک نکنید و اصلاً درخواست ندهید. البته هر جور خودتان صلاح میدانید.
POS عزیز، متوجه هستم. شاید شخصی که گزارش را تهیه کرده و عکسها را انداخته بخواهد آن را در ویکیپدیا هم منتشر کند. البته احتمالاً کپیرایت کاری که در ازای دستمزد کرده متعلق به کارفرمایش هست و ما اطلاعات کافی نداریم. خواستم صحبتی با کاربر کرده باشم تا اطلاعات بیشتری کسب کنیم. دلیل ندارد نسبت به کسی که هیچ شناختی از او نداریم سریع فرض حسن نیت را از دست بدهیم. ممنون 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
والا ایشان از قدیمیهای انبار هستند! (Rezaheydari71) و بسیاری از تصاویر ویکی را مدیون ایشان هستیم (مثلاً قلعهٔ مهم رحمانیه که هنوز سعادت بازدید از این اثر باارزش را نداشتهام). در ویکیفا نیز رسماً ازشان تشکر کردهام. دستوپنجش درد نکند! POS78 (talk) 17:51, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. That short statement is ambiguous and unacceptable. It does not say anything about 1) derivative works; 2) commercial use. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No FoP in Iran
Hi, 4nn1l2, and thanks for your help, but since lack of FoP in Iran wasn't given as a deletion reason at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tabriz Terminal.jpg, I figured the deletion request would fail and didn't download the photo to use locally in en.Wikipedia/Tabriz, based on en.Wikivoyage's fair-use exception rules, thereby leaving a hole in the article. Would it have been possible to give us a little notice before deleting the file, since the deletion reason was not mentioned by anyone in the thread? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you're welcome.
The DR was more than one month old and could be closed. Copyright rules trump consensus at DRs. Anyway, I undeleted the file temporarily, so that it can be transferred to other projects. I will delete it again 48 hours later. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Super! Thank you very much. And that was long enough for one of my colleagues to upload it locally. Of course I understand that copyright rules trump consensus; I wouldn't have asked you not to delete the file from Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MGA73: Fawiki has a strange rule that it has no policies or guidelines of its own and instead follows the English Wikipedia, so in absence of any explicit consensus to reject the English Wikipedia's consensus, fawiki follows enwiki regarding the new GFDL policy.
I reviewed the files in the list, fixed many of them, tagged some of them for speedy deletion (which may take months to be resolved there, considering that most of its admins know almost nothing about copyright), and nominated some others for regular deletion. I also asked three users to relicense their works under CC, two of which responded positively very quickly!
Thank you. That is super fast response! If there are any other wikis where you understand the language you are very welcome to have a look at them too.:-)
Do you know anyone on fa.wiki that could work on the license migration? On fa:کاربر:MGA73/Status I made a link so it is possible to see who uploaded the license migration candidates. Active users could relicense their files but many have to be fixed by someone who volunteer to help out. I do not have a bot flag on fa.wiki and right-to-left is not easy for me. --MGA73 (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MGA73: In my early days as a Wikipedian, I was patrolling all images of fawiki and I really intended to sort things out, but some ignorant admin bited me, declined my speedy tags, ... and the ensuing drama left a bad taste in my mouth. Since then I have tried hard to avoid any activities regarding images on that project. Today, I almost made an exception following your comment.
Why did I say this? I saw this question of yours on fa:کاربر:MGA73/Status: "It seems that license migration is not implemented. Why?" There is a bigger problem. Today, Fawiki is a haven for all kinds of copyvios.
I can't (or don't want to) name anyone, but I may be able to do the task myself.
But I have a question about dual-licensing images. Commons:License Migration Task Force/Migration states that "Must have been uploaded to Commons or to some other Wikimedia project before August 1, 2009." It means that, for example, fa:پرونده:Golfam.JPG — which has been uploaded to fawiki in 2011 — is not eligible to be dual-licensed under CC by me (a third party). Is this correct? 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Copyvios have to be checked one by one so that takes a lot of time. And I do not read the language so I need to use google translate. That is why I focused on GFDL first. It sux when you try to clean up and you are turned down. But I think it is important to keep trying. I talked to Huji and it seems that Huji want to get things fixed too. See fa:بحث_کاربر:Huji#Files. I try to find files without a license first. But I need a little help updating the license templates.
You are correct that fa:پرونده:Golfam.JPG can't be relicensed. Except by the uploader. What makes it a bit tricky is that if a file is uploaded in 2008 and cropped in 2010 then the file is still eligible for relicense but if you make list of files uploaded before August 2009 then it may not be on the list. Depending on how you make the list. --MGA73 (talk) 13:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[4]: "boohoo cry me a river" "useless admins"; apparently officially considered civil.
[5]: Editing other people's comments in an issue they're involved in.
Meanwhile, I've been revdeled or summary-deleted twice for the vicious crime of using bad words oh no scary wavy hands aaaaaaah
Maybe I wouldn't be so over you people if y'all had treated everyone equally instead of acting like 3rd graders and screaming ooooOOOOOOOO at someone saying the forbidden words scary
I just can't believe someone loses their admin bit per inactivity policy, then asks the 'crats to make an exception for him, when refused starts to say "f*** off", "go f*** yourself", "sh**", "b**ch", and finally call the editors here children multiple times asking them to grow the "f***" up. It's not just a matter of civility, but also attacking users.
No Golbez, you act wisely and calmly, and the problem is magically solved. No need for us to lower ourselves to such low levels of behaviour and getting used to crude language. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't ask for anything. I believe my exact words were "I'd rather you didn't". And when it was done, I responded appropriately, pointing out how bad the policy was. Then I was met with rudeness and insults. I responded in kind. One of us got sanctioned; the other did not. You've made your choice, so have I. There is no problem to solve except the childish attitude that saying "fuck" is worse than everything else that was said. So, continue being children. Good day. --Golbez (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't care less about the word f*** itself (not aiming it towards others), but I find calling male editors b**ch utterly insulting (calling female editors b**ch is also insulting but at least it does not mess with their gender). This is definitely a personal attack and you're lucky you didn't get blocked over it. In my opinion, you crossed certain red lines and you are responsible for your own behavior, no matter how much you have been taunted. The other party had already been told twice[6][7] to discontinue and defuse the situation and they were doing so, but you were doubling down. At last, don't forget here is an international community and you can't take it for granted that all people around the world be okay with profanities. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 4nn1l2, Hope all is well, I don't entirely know if this'll work but if the Maintenance bot is doing your head in you can add {{bots|deny=CommonsMaintenanceBot}} to your talkpage which hopefully should stop any further messages from this specific bot :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk11:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mitsumori.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now!
If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Gameposo.
This looks like the same kind of abusive deletion requests Rohalamin engaged in, but this time, it's from an admin. You're a fair-minded admin who doesn't believe that mere file size is evidence of copyvio. Please look at this set of deletion requests and give your opinion about it when you have a chance, and thanks!
Nevermind, A.Savin found one of the images in a larger size on Facebook. So the deletion nominations are justified, but I still don't like mere size and absence of EXIF as argued by EugeneZelenko as deletion reasons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Translation completed
Hello! 4nn1l2 This page ꯃꯔꯨꯑꯣꯏꯕ ꯂꯃꯥꯏ is a preparation for mni language (Meitei language/Manipuri language) started by someone, but I completed it. Can it be linked to the general main page for Commons?
Another thing, if I want to translate a new page (not file) of Commons like others are translating into their respective languages, what shall I do? Any steps or permission (if any), please tell me. Haoreima (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding translations, if a page has already marked for translation such as Commons:Licensing, you can simply click on the "translate this page" link and start translating it into Meitei/Manipuri language. But this is the new method. Many pages on Commons still use the old method and have not been marked for translation such as Commons:Community portal. In this case, you can put the name of the page in the search box, press Enter, click on the red link that appears, and finally create the page. It's like creating any other page on a wiki. Then the translated page should be manually added to respective English page via Template:Lang-CP, in this case. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Neveselbert (mobile), Done, but I did not understand why this file would need a license review. It's a governmental work and I think the British government is more trustworthy regarding copyright than Wikimedia Commons or the entire WMF which is a charity. Is there something that I may have overlooked? 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'm just erring on the side of the caution, since the National Portrait Gallery tends to claim their own copyright on all the works they currently hold. This is the first exception I've encountered, so I think it's worth noting. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Roozitaa: سلام. از سال ۲۰۱۸ ویکیانبار دیگر پروانه GFDL را به تنهایی نمیپذیرد و شما باید پروانهٔ دیگری انتخاب کنید. برای اصلاح این فایل هم کافی است به حالت ویرایش بروید و GFDL را پاک کنید و مجوز دیگری به جایش بنویسید، مثلاً {{CC BY-SA 4.0}}. برچسب قرمزرنگ هشدار را هم خودتان میتوانید بردارید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.
Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Template:Abna has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hello, As you are already aware all photos uploaded by me hae been serially flagged and deleted due to alleged copyright violations.
however the sources used are all top-tier and reputable iranian news agencies, with their own watermarks on the pictures. Iran is not a member state of the WTO and copyrights simply do not apply to 90+% of intellectual properties in iran, that is the reason for all the reputable news agencies using the same photographs. as most of my edits and contributions relate to the aerospace sector in iran, you can understand why the pictures are from iranian sources, and why there is no copyright information on theri website, SINCE COPYRIGHT LAWS DONT APPLY to such photographs.
I hope that this explantion is adequate and I would appreaciate any guidance on whether there is any procedures so the pictures can be re-uploaded, as I dont believe their deletion was appropriate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohdafshar2000 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but this is not true. Please read COM:IRAN. We respect the Iranian copyright law here on Commons. In fact, we always respect the copyright law of the origin country for all works, whether to be Iran ("an enemy of the US") or the UK ("the 51st state of the US"). 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ما این عادت زشت و غیردموکراتیک ویکیفا را اینجا نداریم که برخی برای اعمال نظرشان بحث را بهزور میبندند (مخصوصاً در تام) و اگر کسی خواست بحث را ادامه دهد تهدیدش کنند!
خواهش میکنم. پروژهها هرچند خواهر هم هستند و به هم کمک میکنند و به یکدیگر سرویس میدهند (کما اینکه ویکیانبار همهٔ تصاویریش را در اختیار همهٔ ویکیها از جمله ویکی فارسی میگذارد)، ولی کاملاً از هم مستقلند. یکی از عجیبترین جنبههای ویکیپدیای فارسی (که همزمان هوشمندانه هم هست!) این است آن پروژه از خودش سیاست ندارد و سعی میکند از سیاستهای ویکی انگلیسی تبعیت کند. همین باعث شده سیاستها در آن پروژه به صورت سطحی رعایت شوند. بسیاری از کاربران و مدیران آن پروژه نمیدانند فلان سیاست کجا کاربرد دارد و کجا ندارد، چون سیاست از درون خود اجتماع نجوشیده، کامل درک و مفهوم نشده و برعکس به صورت طوطیوار از روی ویکی انگلیسی تقلید شده. آن پروژه مشکلات عمیق و به نظر من لاینحل دارد. ولی در حالت فعلی هم هنوز بسیار ارزشمند است.
سیاستهای ویکیفا روی کاغذ خوب هستند ولی وقتی به مرحلهٔ اجرا میرسد، به نحوی بسیار ایراددار و ضعیف اجرا میشوند.
حالا این کجایش هوشمندانه است؟ اینکه اگر قرار بود ویکیفا از خودش سیاست بنویسید، احتمالاً همین میزان موفقیت روی کاغذ را هم نمیداشت. مثلاً سیاست ویکیبانی را ببینید که چطور به صورت بند بند نوشته شده است، انگار لایحه یا قانون است :)
یک نفر ممکن است آمار ویکیفا را ببینید و از دور فکر کند آن پروژه موفق است (مثلاً در حال رشد است یا تعداد کاربران ریزش ندارد)، ولی اینها عمدتاً ناشی از افزایش دسترسی به اینترنت در ایران است، نه عملکرد خود ویکیفا. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
POTY - thanks
Thanks for actioning the translation requests for POTY - I don't suppose you've got a moment to look at this at COM:AN as well for us? No worries if not. Thanks! firefly ( t · c ) 17:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Автор фото Aeou, інфографіка AnastasiaPetrova (WMUA), CC BY-SA 4.0Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0
Привіт!
Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!
Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:
Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:
«Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
«Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Приєднуйтеся!
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
سوال دارم راجب نحوه ی بارگذاری تصویر
سلام خسته نباشید ببخشید شما به بنده اخطار دادید که عکس غیر مجاز اپلود کردم و اگر ادامه بدم بلاک میشوم . من نحوه ی صحیح بارگذاری تصویر رو بلد نیستم هر مدلی تصویر بارگذاری کردم باز شما اخطار دادید و تصویر رو حذف کردید . میشه راهنمایی کنید پس من چطور میتونم یک عکس اپلود کنم و از اون برای مقاله ها استفاده کنم من تمامی بخش هارو مطالعه کردم ولی شما مجددا اخطار دادی . لطفا اگه میشه راهنمایی کنید . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik.security (talk • contribs) 23:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Erik.security: سلام. اینجا در اصل باید فقط تصاویری را بارگذاری کنید که خودتان با دوربین انداختهانید یعنی عکاسش خودتان هستید. نباید از اینترنت به اینجا عکس منتقل کنید، چون ۹۹ درصد تصاویر اینترنت مشکل کپیرایت دارند. یک درصد سایتها (از جمله خبرگزاری فارس، تسنیم، مهر) اوکی هستند. پیشنهاد میکنم fa:راهنما:انبار را مطالعه کنید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ممنون می شوم برای احیای فایل و یا بارگذاری مجدد به بنده یاری برسانید. من می توانم جهت اخذ کپی رایت از صاحب اثر هم اخذ ایمیل و اجازه نماییم.
ممنونم که مثل همیشه به من یاری میرسانید..
In last several days I passed mosques and other buildings in Semnan Province so now categorization precision is 100%, but there's one problem – many files have wrong file names:
And one small good info: few minutes ago I finished with checking photos in Images from Wiki Loves Monuments in Semnan Province (Western Greater Khorasan): 100% categorized and referenced, >99% identified (a handful of ruins are exceptions). It was a deep check, which means no mistakes. I saw you've been opening new categories in Razavi Khorasan, based on uploaders' data, which are unfortunately inaccurate in some cases. But no worry, I'll check it all soon. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks. Good news about your future work on Razavi Khorasan categories. By the way, not a fan of Semnan at all. Too disrespectful towards the inhabitants of the real Khorasan; not to mention territorial disputes over Farumad and the vicinity. These lands should be given back to Sabzevar :) Semnanis do not look like Khorasanis these days. They have become too powerful (two presidents and many more ministers) and I consider them part of the center of Iran. Here is a table on the budget of Iranian municipalities. Shahroud with a population of about 150 thousands people (⅗ of Sabzevar) has a budget more than Sabzevar (500 vs. 480). And Sabzever is relatively well-off in Khorasan. Look at poor Birjand, a provincial capital: 203,636 people and just 350 billion toman. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm familiar about it, I was writing about that president twelve years ago, as well as about theirspace center(s) six years ago. Probably they've been arguing "we are rocket scientists and we deserve more tomans than Sabzevaris." :) Don't worry, when Iran colonizes Moon and Mars, they'll add few extraterrestrial valleys to Semnan Province, and give Farumad back to Sabzevar. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
LOL. People of center are too greedy and cheeky to give up land, even if they have their hands on Mars itself. We, Khorasanis, better to think about how to prevent their further invasions and plundering :)
سلام. عکس قبلاً وجود داشته ولی بعداً از کلکسیون تسنیم حذف شده. اینجا را ببینید.
گذشته از آن یک بازبین آن را بازبینی کرده و تیک سبز به آن داده است (زیر پروانه). کل پروسهٔ بازبینی برای همین است که اگر احیاناً اصل فایل از منبع حذف شد، از انبار حذف نشود. چون پروانههای کریتیو کامنز فسخناپذیر هستند. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
صاحب اثر، خبرگزاری تسنیم است. آیا این درخواست از جانب خبرگزاری تسنیم است؟ اگر آری، باید با ایمیل رسمی با info-commonswikimedia.org تماس بگیرند. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
اگر اشتباه میکنم بفرمایید. ایشان همان fa:علی لهراسبی خواننده هستند که در این عکس دارند فوتسال بازی میکنند. درست است؟
اگر عکس جایگزین خوب داشته باشیم (که ظاهراً داریم: File:Ali Lohrasbi snn.jpg) احتمال اینکه به درخواست ایشان احترام گذاشته شود و تصویر حذف شود هست ولی باید مطمئن شویم این درخواست واقعاً از جانب خودشان هست. فعلاً ما با یک آیپی طرفیم و هیچ نمیدانیم پشت این آیپی کیست ولی اگر با ایمیل رسمی درخواست دهند، نظرخواهی حذف تشکیل خواهد شد و اجتماع نظرش را اعلام میکند. همینجا بگویم که نظرخواهی ممکن است مدت زمان بسیار طولانی (گاه تا یک سال) طول بکشد و هیچ تضمینی هم نیست که به نتیجه برسد.
اگر درخواست از جانب کارگزار تسنیم هم به دست انبار برسد که چه بهتر، چون صاحب قانونی اثر (کپیرایت) خبرگزاری تسنیم است و سوژهٔ عکس (علی لهراسبی) جز fa:حق شهرت، حقوق دیگری ندارد. و چون این عکس به شهرت او آسیب نمیرساند و در مکان عمومی گرفته شده، سخت بتوان تصویر را حذف کرد. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
بله، جواب خواهند داد. اگر دو ماه زودتر میگفتید خودم جواب میدادم ولی دیگر دسترسی ندارم. ولی فکر کنم از میان فارسیزبانان user:Ahmad252 دسترسی داشته باشد. بد نیست با او صحبت کنید. در کل فارسی یا انگلیسی مهم نیست. فوقش فردی که پاسخ میدهد از گوگل ترنسلیت استفاده میکند و پاسخش را به انگلیسی مینویسد و آقای لهراسبی -- اگر لازم شد پاسخ دهد -- میتوانند به فارسی بنویسند. از لحاظ زبان هیچ مشکلی نیست. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
اگر درخواست فقط از سمت بارگذار باشد، احتمال حذف شدنش ناچیز است چون بارگذار در این قضیه مهم نیست و این عکس را هرکس میتوانست و حتی در آینده میتواند[!] بارگذاری کند، مگر اینکه اجتماع پروژه صراحتاً در نظرخواهی بگوید دیگر نمیخواهد از این عکس میزبانی کند.
Morning,
This vandalism report needs to be taking care by a moderator who has high level of persian language and being familiar with Iranian copyright rules. Thank you:
Yes, many of them violate our policies. I have talked to one of the uploaders here: fa:بحث کاربر:Rizorius. I'm going to wait and give them enough time to transfer them to fawiki.
One question: why don't you nominate them for deletion yourself?
Start from the most obvious one. Don't nominate all of them at once. Do that one by one, and wait to see which one gets deleted and which one does not. Based on that, you can build a good judgement over time. This is how I found my way in this project. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware it's bizarre to ask such things, but... First of all, it's Khorasan. Do we want flaws and mistakes there? A big NO. And it's frustrating for me to find proper coords of virtually everything else, except one building. It's like a nice shining dome, with one tile missing. Yeah, it just one tile, one dot, but hurts your eye! :) --Orijentolog (talk) 20:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know, my plan is to solve that ones in Isfahan and South Khorasan also, I remember that one person was opening various CR churches which I categorized, and I don't want to lose cats, so I'll make sketches. That's also the reason why I adviced POS not to open new cats fast, as he did earlier. First CR check & verification, then opening.
Regarding the opening new cats, I suggest you to wait, because I would like to check it and verify all first. For the beginning already opened cats by you and POS, and then images you speak about. The best solution is that if you notice some new photos, you put it in Cultural heritage monuments in Razavi Khorasan Province. I can not annoy you to verify all yourself, or ask you why you didn't understand difference between Mahi & Sharaf Caravanserai, Malek & Dokhtar Malek House, namesake imamzadehs Yahya ibn Zayd, and so on. Not everyone is "expert" or idiot savant to remember all details. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 23:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In this category (as well as in three subcategories) files are variously named as bathroom, mosque, howz anbar or ribat. It's all wrong. There's zero file which give proper name. Trust me on this, five days ago I've made all six sites in that ruined village ([8][9][10][11][12][13]), found their proper locations and strictly checked Commons photos. I suggest renaming files according to current three categories, while all others as "buildings" or something else. Otherwise there's gonna be more mess in future. To illustrate the issue: for example this file has a wrong name of Q5888303, it had wrong ID of Q5900198, and actually shows Q5887448. My God! --Orijentolog (talk) 23:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done I also gave you the filemover right. You are clearly an expert in this filed and the fact that you should ask some novice like me to move files does not make sense. You should be able to do that by yourself. Please just remember not to change the language of filenames, i.e., Farsi filenames should remain Farsi. Thanks 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ذکر منبع تصویر
سلام و خسته نباشید ، من این تصویر را بر اساس این تصویر رسم کردم و به این تصویر شباهت دارد، آیا لازم هست که در بخش مشخصات تصویر ذکر کنم که بر اساس این رسم شده یا لازم نیست؟ گفتم بپرسم تا یک موقع از لحاظ کپی رایتی مشکلی پیش نیاید.Parsa 2au (talk) 10:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
سلام. سلامت باشید. بستگی به پروانهٔ فایل منبع File:Shomal-Iran.png دارد. این تصویر چون با پروانهٔ CC0 منتشر شده بود نیازی به ذکر منبع نبود. اما در اکثر مواقع که فایلها با مجوز CC BY یا CC BY-SA منتشر میشوند باید حتماً از منبع و مؤلف اصلی یاد کرد (معنی BY همین است). به هر حال، من این فایل را به عنوان مثال منبعدهی کردم. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]