User talk:INeverCry

{| style="width:100%; background:#E6E8FA; margin-top:1.2em; border:2px solid #000000; font-family: AR Cena; font-size: 17px;" |style="width:54%; color:black"|

Archives 2012–A • 2012–B • 2012–C • 2013–A

BSicons

Thanks for moving File:BSicon BHF 3399FF.svg. The thing is, there are seven more such files: File:BSicon exABZlg 339999.svg, File:BSicon exABZrf 339999.svg, File:BSicon exCPICIa 339999.svg, File:BSicon exKBFa 339999.svg, File:BSicon exKBFe 339999.svg, File:BSicon exKDSTa 339999.svg and File:BSicon exHLUECKE 339999.svg. These are not as much used as BHF, so performance would not be an issue. The only reason why they could be moved is to follow the suit of other icons in Category:Icons for railway descriptions/set 3399FF. In your opinion, is it worth it? If so, could you please move them from "exXXX 339999" to "XXX 3399FF"? Sorry for bothering... YLSS (talk) 22:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I have no problem with doing these moves, if you think they're worthwhile and necessary, but you'll have to do the {{Rename}} tagging. INeverCry 23:04, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Crown_of_Creation_album_Real_Life,_1994.gif

"Removing "Crown_of_Creation_album_Real_Life,_1994.gif", it has been deleted from Commons by INeverCry because: missing permission as of 3 January 2013."

I don't remember that there was a discussion on 3 January, 2013. I have all the rights for the photos on the front page (not only the scan). What do I have to do now, please? Can we otherwise use the German file?--Matthias Blazek (talk) 14:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed before the file can be restored. INeverCry 17:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Alexandros_of_Thessaloniki_Letter_to_Ion_Dragoumis_18_June_1909_01.jpg

Hi, INeverCry. Couild you please tell me why you have deleted a scan of a letter of a man - Alexandros Rigopoulos (Αλέξανδρος Ρηγόπουλος) who has died in 1928 and PD-old is a true license? Thanks. --Мико (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

My mistake. Sorry Miko. I've restored the file. INeverCry 19:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. The mistake was mine cause I haven't mentioned the years which I will now. --Мико (talk) 07:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

COM:AN/V

In case you haven't noticed, there is a user who is complaining about an action done by you at COM:AN/V#INeverCry. --Stefan4 (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I hate over riding fellow admin decision but this looks to me like a simple mistake and so I've restored it. I've made them in the past and will probably do so in the future. I hope you don't mind. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Herby. I've explained and apologized for this embarrasing mistake at AN/V. INeverCry 19:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

INevercry

Hellow my friend o/. I read this and thought it would be important to you to see that some people are talking about you :(. a hug --Wilfredor (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

 Thank you. INeverCry 20:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

File rename

I notice you moved the file File:Abraham ready to sacrifice his son, Isaac (top); Abraham cast into fire by Nimrod (bottom).jpg, which was originally entitled "Abraham ready to sacrifice his son, Ismael (top); Abraham cast into fire by Nimrod (bottom).jpg". This was at the request of Alan Leifting [1] who said it was an "obvious error". The only obvious error was Alan's, I'm afraid! Muslims believe that Ishmael was the child who was almost sacrificed. This is a Muslim, not a Jewish or Christian, image. What is more, it is only used on pages about the Muslim version of the story. The file should be moved back ASAP. I tried to request a move in the normal way, but only got a list of policies popping up in a separate window, which I couldn't edit, hence my "unofficial" request here. Paul Barlow (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

BTW, the source given for the file also give the correct subject [2]. Paul Barlow (talk) 20:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Paul. I think this should be brought to Alan's attention before any further action is taken so he can respond to your concerns. I try not to reverse good-faith actions without atleast allowing the user in question to address the issue. INeverCry 21:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm not suggesting there is was any kind of bad faith. He's just made a mistake, that's all. You can look up the details provided at the link or any other reliable source. However, I will notify Alan. Paul Barlow (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

He has been notified. Paul Barlow (talk) 21:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I suggested a simple spelling change but another editor suggested a more comprehensive change. I am not to concerned about the file name but it should be descriptive and not contain spelling errors. (In the case of this image there is a need to show that there are two parts to it, hence the new name.) I was discovering that editors on Wikipedia would correct the spelling in a file name not realising that it breaks the link. Alan Liefting (talk) 03:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

(Sorry for butting in) Alan, novice editors do copyedit image names anyway, with or without any obvious reason (have just reverted one), this does not mean we should rename images "for better prose flow". Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

I've asked DS to comment here. INeverCry 03:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

OK, I missed some of the details in my first message. Apologies to Alan (despite the other editor's intervention Alan's name still appeared on the request template as the editor who was requesting the move). The important point is that the file depicts Ishmael, not Isaac. The other changes to the name are improvements, so should probably stay. It would, I suggest, be best to have "File:Abraham ready to sacrifice his son, Ishmael (top); Abraham cast into fire by Nimrod (bottom).jpg" Paul Barlow (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh, didn't realize that Muslim tradition says Ishmael instead of Isaac; mea culpa for that detail and I'm fully okay with the filename being changed to correct that error. The other three details (spelling; the image has two sections; and Abraham may be ready to sacrifice his son in this image, but he is not sacrificing anyone) should stay. DS (talk) 14:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 Done INeverCry 17:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Pokrajine spodnja stajerska.png

Hi, per what has been said about maps (per [3] etc.), should this map be undeleted? --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps an undeletion request is in order? Also, I've closed Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maps of Slovenia with the suggestion that a new DR be started to avoid confusion. INeverCry 21:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I've been thinking about it, but don't have access to the deleted map. As to the closed request, I've just started separate requests for the files that need to be deleted. Thanks. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Since Yann closed the DR you linked to, maybe he could make a better-informed decision regarding the possible restoration of the above image? INeverCry 22:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

This has not much to do with that request. As you have deleted that image, I've expected you could say whether it is to be undeleted or not, based on this and the above-linked comment. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

You had actually tagged this as no source before the DR, and this is why I deleted it. The stated source is http://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slika:Pokrajine_spodnja_stajerska.png. INeverCry 00:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

We've later come to agree that in cases where no source map is identified, we assume good faith and keep the map. Like e.g. [4]. I apologise for the problem, but I think that this map should be undeleted. I'll take it to the Undeletion requests. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

See here. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

A deleted picture is reuploaded

Hi. You deleted that picture. It is written here (third edition by CommonsDelinker). Would you please delete it again? Re here Thanks Albertojuanse (talk) 21:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aquí hay tomate.jpg. INeverCry 22:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hey INeverCry i'm just want to ask of this picture http://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/3537575161/in/photostream/ i can upload it here in this project? nad thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jobas (talk • contribs) 15:32, January 23, 2013‎ (UTC)

Yes. That image can be uploaded because it's released under {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}}. INeverCry 23:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey i'm sorry i'm asking alot ... i uploaded the picture ... can u look a the picture http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Naguib.jpg and tell if i made in the rigth way?> thank you.Jobas (talk) 00:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Looks good. INeverCry 00:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Small fix

Thanks for the fix. It looks like a standard TOC was created after removing {{Tocrightwide}} from Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Dont remove warnings.

I must have created the additional subheadings after adding {{Tocrightwide}}. Otherwise I might have noticed the standard TOC showing up after I added enough subheadings. --Timeshifter (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Condor photo deletion

It appears that my e-mail trail for the permissions did not get posted to the appropriate person.

Can you just restore these photos or do I have to reload them, and in either case, to whom should I send the documentation so that this does not happen again? Please reply on my talk.

Thank you, Leonard G. (talk) 17:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)