User talk:Siebrand/Archive03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
< User talk:Siebrand
Revision as of 15:17, 13 April 2007 by Werdnabot (talk | contribs) (Automated archival of 2 sections from User talk:Siebrand)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Banknotes

I've receive your notification requesting deletion of the banknotes i just uploaded. You say that maybe they are incorrect licensed. Well, i really don't know. Maybe i misundestanding the licenses but as far as i know that was a photo; i took the PHOTO and i am releasing the license of using THAT photo, so: ¿can you indicate me what is the correct license for that pictures instead of marking all of them for deletion????? thanks. --Jyon 16:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I just looking similar banknotes like this, that have GDFL license; that are wrong too??? it was posted two years ago and anybody says anything. Thanks. --Jyon 16:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Jyon, you cannot license something only because you are the author of a derivative work. There is also an original author or copyright owner (the bank that printed the bank note). You shold provide clarity on the copyright status for that copyright holder also. See Commons:Licensing for all the details. Siebrand 17:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Of course i know i can't own a copyrighted bill and then release the rights; i just only want to know why other banknotes images has GDFL license and what else i can choose. thanks. --Jyon 13:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
As far as I know, there is nothing you can choose that falls within our licensing policy. You could ask in Commons:Village Pump, because I know very little outside basic US and Dutch licenses. Siebrand 14:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely not a copyvio

Image:Norvegia 142.jpg was shot by me. Maybe it was the site which copied it. Bye and good work. --Attilios 22:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Attilios, see Commons:Derivative works. Mr. Vigeland's sculptures are protected by copyright until 2012, and Norway has only a noncommercial freedom of panorama. Your photo is therefore not a copyvio, but nevertheless against policy. I will delete it. Kjetil_r 23:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Delmerensmolen

Wat heb je in vredesnaam hier uitgespookt Image:Delmerensmolen.JPG ?? Misschien ligt het aan mij, maar daar zie ik alvast geen MOLEN in ? Dit daarentegen nl:Afbeelding:Delmerensmolen.jpg lijkt me WEL een molen? Wat is dat schoolgebouw dan ? --LimoWreck 18:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ik heb de afbeelding verplaatst zoals die op nl.wp onder de naam nl:Afbeelding:P1010041.JPG (logboek) bekend was en met de bij de afbeelding aanwezige beschijving. Ik vermoed dat Delmerensmolen de naam van een wijk of iets dergelijks is... Je zou uitleg kunnen vragen aan de uploader. P.s. ligt het aan hoe ik je vraag lees of was het je intentie me agressief te benaderen? Siebrand 20:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/COP Banknote images (2007-03-02)

Hi, I merged your 18 deletion requests to one page. --Cat Chi? 22:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Blokkendoos.jpg

Hey, I was wondering why that image shouldn't have been moved to commons. Also, would it be possible to make an adaptation of your bot for the Hebrew Wikipedia and how exactly does it check itself\choose which files to transfer, etc. Thanks, Yonatanh 14:18, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Yonatanh, the image should not have been moved because of insufficient source info. Because I'm uploading with the bot, I do miss some information now. Thus some of the uploaded images should be deleted again. As for the bot: it will probably be public. User:Orgullomoore and I are working on it. Have a little patience while we work out the quirks. I'll keep you posted. Siebrand 14:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Sure thing, thanks for the quick response. Yonatanh 14:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

CommonsHelper

Hello, what it is CommonsHelper? --Snek01 19:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

CommonsHelper is a tool that helps you retain all required information when transferring an image from another Wikimedia wiki to Wikimedia Commons. Siebrand 19:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you what is in number 3 at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Magnus_Manske/Commonshelper_interface/Help_en ? --Snek01 20:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
You mean the screenshot? It does not appear to work, but it's just a bunch of wiki text that'll be the image description on Commons... Or did you mean something else? Siebrand 21:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

blok

Sorry voor de omslachtige manier van communicatie, maar zou je mij (Phidias) even kunnen de-blokkeren op nl.wiki. Galwaygirl heeft per ongeluk een verkeerde blokkade gedaan op het ip-adres van 't unief. Ik heb ook een mail gestuurd naar de nl.wiki mailcentrale. Groet - PhidiasNL 22:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Ik heb niet zo vaak met dit soort dingen te maken. Volgens mij heb ik ook je IP-adres nodig. Kan je me dat geven (als de IP-blokkade niet al verlopen is)? Siebrand 06:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

welcome.py

Hi, i'm an italian user of Wikipedia and i've heard that you have written a script to welcome the new users. We also use another one script, now fixed and upgraded by me, and i would like to see your script to mix them togheter in a better and useful script :) You can find the italian version hear. Our script put another template if the nick has a badword that is in one of 3 list (elencoaf, elencogz and elencovarie). Now i have only an italian versione but if you are interested i could translate it also in english :) (but i would like to see your script before :D ) Bye, Filnik P.S. This version has only 2 bad words (because it only explains the code)

Hi, I did not write the script, User:Orgullomoore wrote it and I'm just running it unmodified. I run a slightly modified version on the Dutch Wikipedia. PLease drop me an e-mail and I'll include both versions of the script. Cheers! Siebrand 17:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

nowcommons

Afbeeldingen verplaatsen naar commons, allemaal goed en wel, maar dan wat zorgvuldiger zijn met de categorieën graag ? --LimoWreck 22:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hoi Limo, op nl.wp hebben de afbeeldingen geen enkele cat. De cats worden met CommonsHelper automatisch toegewezen. Als er geen cats zijn, worden ze toegewezen aan Category:Files moved from nl.wikipedia to Commons requiring review. CommonsHelper gebruikt CommonSense voor de categorieselectie. Dat is niet altijd even goed (vaak grof), maar veel beter dan niets, het alternatief. Als je wilt kan je af en toe wat afbeeldingen sorteren als je ze tegenkomt en ze op de verkeerde of een te hoge plaats in de boomstructuur staan... Groet, Siebrand 22:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Soms heel grof, soms ontbrekend, soms zelfs dubbelop... Zo commonsense is het blijkbaar niet ;-) In elk geval, dat ze in een aparte categorie terechtkomen is alvast uitstekend, dat verhindert inderdaad dat ze verdwijnen in het niets op commons. --LimoWreck 23:34, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Afbeedlingsbeschrijveningen als template:afbeeldinginfo zijn niet meteen verhelderend: graag ook zo'n gevallen opvangen; ik weet niet of er bij veel afbeeldingen zo info is weggegooid; anders moet dat toch gewoon kunnen overgenomen wordne ? [1] (of kan de bot daar nog geen weg mee, en moet dat manueel gecorrigeerd worden?) --LimoWreck 21:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Alle info wordt overgenomen, maar mogelijk niet juist weergegeven. Ik zal kijken of ik dat sjabloon hier kan aanmaken en vermoed dat alles dan in orde is. Handmatig corrigeren kan altijd en heeft de voorkeur. Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Afbeeldinginfo geeft een lijst met media waar het sjabloon wordt gebruikt. Siebrand 22:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Ik heb het sjabloon aangemaakt zoals het op nl.wp bestaat. Information staat nu in Information. Niet helemaal ideaal, maar in ieder geval wordt alle inforatie weergegeven. Siebrand 22:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
't is inderdaad dubbelop, maar 't is alleszins netjes leesbaar nu wat de beschrijving is. Een toevallig voorbijganger kan het wel eens aanpassen dan; maar dat zijn slechts esthetische detailtjes nu ;-) --LimoWreck 22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Yep. Had je die javascriptreut voor in je monobook.js nog bekeken? ERG handig, in het bijzonder voor {{Delete}}-nominaties: 4 edits met 1 klik en een zinnetje invullen. Siebrand 22:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Flag of the Byzantine Empire.svg

Hi, which aspect ratio is correct for this flag? --F l a n k e r 10:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I do not know :( I simply observed that they differed and thus the superseded that cannot be correct. I'm sorry I cannot help you further with this... Cheers! Siebrand 10:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix, Flanker! Siebrand 12:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Image Tagging Image:Niuhuru_Empress_Xiao_Quan_Cheng.jpg

This image is from the english Wikipedia, show you the site[2]. I'm from China, and my english isn't very well.Can you speak Chinese?——蘇州宇文宙武 10:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not speak, read or write any Chinese language. Please look at Commons:許可協議 for an explanation of how to license. Thanks, Siebrand 10:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
see "The two-dimensional work of art depicted in this image is in the public domain in the United States and in those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years. This photograph of the work is also in the public domain in the United States (see Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.)." (from english Wikipedia) You can talk to me in User talk:蘇州宇文宙武——蘇州宇文宙武 10:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I see that. I however see nowhere when the work of art was created. Name a year, century, or whatever, and a source so this could be verified. Siebrand 10:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
You meant that this image in the english Wikipedia also has to be verified, but it hasn't. In your opinion it also has to be deleted, but why not yet? So, how will you deal with it? Delete it?——蘇州宇文宙武 11:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I am not familiar with the deletion procedures on en.wp. I only know that with the information provided, the image cannot be accepted here on Commons. Another wiki of Wikimedia cannot be named as valid source for other things than own work. Siebrand 11:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
If I can find out the author of this image(of course he died a long time ago), does it mean that this image won't need to be deleted?--蘇州宇文宙武 12:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

PS:I've found that this image Image:Tongzhi.jpg also has to be deleted because its author wasn't right. It says that its author is 敬庄, but this man didn't exist. So the person who upload it lies. If I lie like him/her, the image I upload doesn't need to be deleted, is this the rule in the Commons?--蘇州宇文宙武 12:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm sure you are not lying :-). You require dating and a proper source before you can tag something PD-old. As long as that information is missing, the image is not allowed here. I'm sorry, that's just how it is... Siebrand 12:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
So, Image:Tongzhi.jpg also has to be deleted.--蘇州宇文宙武 13:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
And I have to tell you that there're many Chinese artists that we can't find their names as the author of the image I uploaded, but they also died for more than 100y. Can we use their works in the Commons?--蘇州宇文宙武 13:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
You can also see Image:升仙太子碑拓片局部.jpg. That image is my work and someone copy it from the chinese Wikipedia, is this allowed?——蘇州宇文宙武 10:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
It depends. If the image has a free license and all source information was taken from the original location, it definately is. You can use CommonsHelper to transfer all relevant information. Siebrand 10:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Detail Guernica.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Detail Guernica.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

You might want to notify Wasily about this; unfortunately, I do not speak Dutch. grendel|khan 20:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Should have seen this before copying. Thanks for noticing. Siebrand 21:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

images deleted by ALE!

I am very sorry about that. I always replaced all usages before deletion. But is seems, that the check usage service now only displays usages in articles by default. I was not aware of that. Concerning the universal replace bot, I think that you refer to Orgullobot. That bot does not replace PNGs with SVGs for the moment. Unfortunately! Sorry for the hassle. I will try that this does not happen again! --ALE! ¿…? 09:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Siebrand 09:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Siebrand/Archive03&oldid=5207222"