User talk:Krdbot/archive/2014
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
User Shriya Pai: I don't know how to delete the upload. So please tell me how to do it or will it get deleted automatically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shriya Pai (talk • contribs)
- I deleted the file. --Krd 16:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyvio - external source, no license.
I am confused about this edit replacing "{{No license since|month=November|day=13|year=2014}}" with "{{Copyvio|external source, no license. --[[User:Krdbot|Krdbot]] 15:39, 13 November 2014 (UTC)}}" which lead to immediate deletion. Usually we allow people 7 days to provide license after they have been notified. --Jarekt (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jarekt. It was tried yesterday to reduce the number of files in the "No license since" daily category for which obviously no permission is achievable, by tagging them a copyvio and get rid of them immediately, being able to spent a part of the won time on the files which might need help.
- Affected habe been those files which had no license _and_ also an external source, i.e. no permission regardless which license the uploader could have chosen, with the small drawback that pd-old, pd-textlogo, etc. had to be catched by the copyvio processing admin.
- Although I think the experiment was a plain success, I agree that this should be discussed somewhere before activated in production mode. --Krd 13:05, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am all for more automatic processes, but once user is alerted and told that ha has 7 days to straighten things out we should give him this time. For example in case of the file I noticed it, the user did not add a license template but used a sentence phrase used by the website to explain the license which was very close to {{Attribution}}. See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#.7B.7BAttribution.7D.7D_with_constraints. No license and external source does not mean that it is a copyvio. --Jarekt (talk) 14:24, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- By the way, every few days I run a manual procedure:
- Use CatScan3 to find files uploaded in last 7 days without a license.
- I copy them to User:Jarekt/a and use VisualFileChanges to add {{No license since}} with a friendly note inviting people to "check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page" if they are confused.
- You can see in Category:Media without a license the days I run it because there are much more files in "No license since" daily category. It would be easier if this process could be automatically run daily. --Jarekt (talk) 14:48, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Jarekt: The issue I see is that quite a number of copyvios are imported, and not deleted for days, altough it seems easy to tag and delete them speedily. I don't understand that when so many people shout about minor copyright issues. We need to do something. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- By the way, every few days I run a manual procedure:
- The number of pending copyvios is reduced, that's good. But the bot needs to inform the uploader. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- Is there any example case where it did not? --Krd 15:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am not sure how that is related to the problem of no licenses at all, that I often work on. The bad file transfers are a separate issue, unless they end up with no valid license templates. My post was only meant to improve the procedure of the one narrow process. --Jarekt (talk) 02:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Is there any example case where it did not? --Krd 15:35, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- The number of pending copyvios is reduced, that's good. But the bot needs to inform the uploader. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:11, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
No signature
@Krd: Not sure if you're not adding a signature on purpose.[1] However, it also means there is no timestamp. Would you be open to amending your signature to omit the link to the bot's userpage? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if I get you right. Is adding as signature after {{subst:copyvionote|...}} sufficient? If yes, this is changed now accordingly. --Krd 16:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah that's fine. I just don't want to have to go into the history to see who made the warning and (especially) when. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:21, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)