User talk:Kadellar/2012
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2012 |
Re:Uploading
Feliz año. No sé que decirte. Normalmente aprovecho que tengo que hacer algún otro trabajo para subir imágenes. A veces incorporo los datos de las imágenes el día siguiente (con upload wizard). Mi conexión es de 6 megas, por lo que tengo menos de un mega de subida. No noto diferencia grande con Flickr seguramente porque las imágenes que subo a Flickr no pesan nunca más de 10 megas y las de Commons pueden llegar a pesar 21.
Hubo un tiempo en que tenía serios problemas, hasta se me colgaba la subida. Tengo conexión mediante R (creo que solamente la hay en Galicia y que es algo así como ONO). Después de cambiar la contraseña y el tipo de contraseña, pues un vecino estaba pirateando la conexión inalámbrica, me pusieron un pequeño aparato al final del cable para no tener tanta intensidad de señal (o algo así), desde ese momento no siento nada extraño y no se me cuelga.
Cuando suba la próxima imagen, miraré lo que pesa y contaré el tiempo que tarda, así tendrás una referencia; pero ojo, yo tengo -creo- solamente 600 y pico kbs de subida y me conecto inalámbricamente. Un abrazo--Miguel Bugallo 01:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Subir una imagen de 14,1 MB me ha llevado tres minutos y quince segundos--Miguel Bugallo 12:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Biblioteca de Celso - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Charing Cross railway station - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pergamon - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! İzmir Saat Kulesi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vara de Asclepio - Éfeso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St George the Martyr, Borough, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta de Domiciano - Hiérapolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! İsa Bey Camii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! İzmir Saat Kulesi - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Blue and yellow CA? It's a usual problem with shift lens, it gives horrible CA. I will fix the spire next week and inform you. Thanks for the idea.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Info In two languages, for you know Russian and will like the comparison
--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Concerning the hardships of language, one Russian scientist said: «It's a shame not to speak English, even the most stupid Englishman speaks it fluently». Your phrases are correct, but sometimes you mess Latin and Cyrillic letters. Say, Latin p (pi) differs from Cyrillic р (ar), or Latin B (bi) differs from Cyrillic В (ve). The Greek alphabet had alpha, beta, gamma. In Cyrillics there's an addition between beta and gamma: a, be, ve, ge. Finally, here's a funny fact for you. Near my town Pereslavl there is a small chapel, there was a wooden cross centuries ago, so its name is Chapel Cross now. In Russian it is Часовня Крест. There's a road sign near the place, it is some kind of bilingual. The 1st line says, «Часовня Крест», and it is for Russian-speakers. The 2nd line says, «Chasovnya Krest», and it is for those knowing the words but missing the alphabet. The previous sign said «Часовня Крест | Chapel Krest», but it was changed for some reason. I think that's because the old sign looked too obvious...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Éfeso - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hola Kadellar, ya hacía unos días que no hablábamos. Al ver que nadie se animaba a juzgar la imagen decidí inspecionarla de nuevo con un ojo crítico y me pareció que algunas áreas estaban sobreexpuestas, por lo que apliqué un filtro para disminuir el contraste, eliminando así la sobreexposición. Al terminar vi que la habías dado por buena, ¿podrías echar un ojo a la versión actual y decirme si está mejor así o si, por lo contrario, me la acabo de cargar (creo que no)?. Tampoco he entendido el comentario que dejaste al revisarla, ¿la ves torcida?. También he subido una nueva versión de la imagen contigua de La Catedral de Petra, ¿qué te parece esa imagen? te mando un saludo, Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Acabo de subir una nueva versión de la tumba del Obelisco, yo esa foto no la veo torcida, fíjate en la línea principal sobre la puerta, está recta ¿o me quieres decir que la torcida es la otra, la del Monasterio?. El caso es que tampoco esa la veo torcida, dado que la foto fue desde un ángulo, no sé que hacer. En cualquier caso acabo de subir una nueva versión siguiendo tus consejos para el contraste, ¿qué te parecen las dos fotos? saludos y buenas noches! Poco a poco (talk) 22:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC) PD: Acabo de subir otra del Monasterio, la versión anterior no me convencía. Ahora sí, hasta mañana!
- Puede que sí tengas razón, finalmente la he girado un poquito (0,4 grados), ¿te parece aceptable? Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Nerón y Agripina.jpg on QIC
Hi, sorry about my comment on the QIC, I hope it's not too harsh. What I mean is generally for statues and portraits I rather see pictures taken with long focale length (> 70mm in fullframe). The wide angle has generally a spherical distortion that is not aesthetics on people. Note that it's used a lot for landscape, city pictures, it also can be used for portaits but it really needs to use the distortion in the composition IMO. It's only my opinion, I might be wrong don't hesitate to answer and share your opinion. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like it will be a QI. So keep on the good work. :-D PierreSelim (talk) 22:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Topkapı - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tetrapilón - Afrodisias - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Galata Kulesi - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los portadores de la antorcha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estadio - Afrodisias - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bazilika Matere Usmiljenja - Maribor - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nerón y Agripina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Re; Imagen nueva, archivo viejo
Hola, por aquí todo bien, muy liado ¿y tu? ¿cómo va eso?. No he entendido nada de tu mensaje, pero si lo has solucionado, pues perfecto ;) hasta pronto, Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Hola,
¿My castellano es muy mal, podría lo has entiende mi traduccion, mas o menos? --Ralf Roleček 15:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
About the value
The photo shows 2 museum workers who organize the youth festival named «Crossing» in the town of Pereslavl. This festival started in 2007 and unites the young people from several towns of Yaroslavl region of Russia. In this very photo we see not only 2 people, but also a picturesque moment of the process, when they take the decorative bread (a traditional symbol of many countries) and invite the audience to share it. I think the image has some historical value. IMHO, we rarely mind the value of current events, yet they will be interesting in time.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
RetouchedImage
Hola Kadellar.
Antes de que la foto File:Enrique Bunbury - 17.jpg fuese promovida, la retoqué dos veces intentando mejorarla. No me gustó el resultado ninguna de las dos veces, pero al final me he decidido a subir la segunda de las variaciones (File:Enrique Bunbury - 17 Retouched.jpg), sobre todo por haber pasado el trabajo de retocarla.
He hecho mención en la página de propuestas de QI, pero no me atrevo a poner tu versión en discusión porque no tengo claro que lo que he hecho sea mejor que lo que tú has hecho: Tu versión es más natural... probablemente mejor.
Por otro lado, expresarte lo gratificante que resulta poder hablar con otro usuario en una lengua en la cual puedes expresarte y matizar las palabras: Encantado de que estés ahí, y gracias por tus fotos--Miguel Bugallo 14:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre de Cristal (Madrid) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Enrique Bunbury - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre de Cristal (Madrid) - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel Eurostars Madrid Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre de Cristal (Madrid) - 03b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Teatro de Aspendos - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! John Petrucci - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! John Petrucci - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Templo de Debod - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour Eiffel - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont des Invalides - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Los portadores de la antorcha - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Estación del Norte (Madrid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Charing Cross railway station - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Blue sky
Hi Kadellar
- According to your request, Emperor Francis II (I) has now a nice blue sky behind him. Would you please have a look ?
- Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palais de Justice de Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Manuel y San Benito - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Aberraciones cromáticas
Hola Kadellar, ¿qué tal va todo?. He visto que has comentado que en dos de mis últimas candidatas a QI hay problemas de CA, problemas que no termino de localizar, ¿dónde están los famosos halos? te mando un saludo, --Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hola, gracias por las inidicaciones, efectivamente he podido detectar algunos problemas de CA. He subido nuevas versiones con la esperanza de solventar el tema. Si sigues viendo problemas, te agradecería sobremanera que incluyas una nota, porque sino casi que me dejo los ojos :) un saludo! --Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sainte-Chapelle du Palais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cimetière du Père-Lachaise - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont des Invalides et Tour Eiffel - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Category:Panning of skaters
Hello,
I've made the change you reverted, because the Category:Skaters is a disambig category, where no subcats should exist. I suggest to remove Category:Skaters and add Category:Skating instead.--Funfood ␌ 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Austrian armour
¡Holà Kadellar!
- Thanks for reviewing "my" austrian armours. You were right regarding the flaws you saw on the "white-backgrounded" one.
- Therefore, I've withdrawn my nomination, completely reworked the original file, re-uploaded a new version of the same subject, and re-nominated it. It is far from perfection, but I think it is better. Dou you think you could be kind enough to have another look on it ? I'm very interested by your opinion. Thanks in advance.
- Cheers,--Jebulon (talk) 09:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks !--Jebulon (talk) 10:07, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
¡Holà Kadellar!
- Me again, and with an austrian armour again...(not the last, I'm afraid...)
- According to your suggestion, I've withdrawn my nomination, completely reworked the original file, provided another background (something between "vanilla" and "ivory" ;), good idea !), and re-uploaded the picture, then renominated.
- Again, it is far from perfection, but I think it is better. Dou you think you could be kind enough to have another look on it ? And again, I'm very interested by your opinion, very useful to me in many occasions. :Thanks in advance, and sorry for the conflict you were a witness of.
- Hope you will enjoy the new version,
- Cheers from Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Tilted
Por favor, respeto. Si pregunto donde está torcida una imagen mía, se me puede responder o no responder, pero no se puede actuar contra mi voluntad. Gracias--Miguel Bugallo 23:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont Alexandre III - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panthéon de Paris - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont des Invalides et Tour Eiffel - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westminster Abbey - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Los portadores de la antorcha.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Los portadores de la antorcha.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guard of Buckingham Palace - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente de las Conchas - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! London Eye - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Victoria Memorial and Buckingham Palace - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Buckingham Palace - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guard of Buckingham Palace - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monumento a Miguel de Cervantes - La Gitanilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Big Ben - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Real Casa de Correos - 2 de mayo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta del Sol - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta de San Vicente - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Wikimedia Foundation Blog Feature
Hi Kadellar,
My name is Jordan and I'm a communications intern with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We're starting a new feature on the Foundation blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on the Commons home page. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: http://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/
Given that your photo is scheduled for 20May 2012, we'd love to do a short interview with you either by phone, Skype, or email to discuss your work and your POTD. Please let me know if you think you'd be interested!
Thanks,
Jordan Hu Communications Intern Wikimedia Foundation
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Faro de la Moncloa - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta del Sol - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estadio Santiago Bernabéu - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arco de la victoria - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arco de la victoria - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raquel Bollo - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! María Teresa Campos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua de la Mariblanca - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Arco de la victoria - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isabel Pantoja - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isabel Pantoja - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua ecuestre de Carlos III - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Real Casa de Correos - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 4 BIC pens and lids.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 4 BIC pen caps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blue and red BIC Cristal pen caps.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hôtel de Ville de Paris - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hola
Hola Kadellar, ya le reduci los artefactos de compresión a File:AutoantiguoColoniadelSacramento2.jpg. fijate ahora. Saludos!!! Ezarateesteban 19:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Es que es medio díficil reducir los artefactos de compresión generados por una camara compacta Ezarateesteban 21:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
hice varias tomas de ese auto, podrás fijarte si hay alguna pasable? Gracias!!! --Ezarateesteban 21:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Kadellar,
the picture is now with a wider crop online. Thank you for your advice. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
{{Supported by Wikimedia ES}}
Gracias por crearla y gracias también por colocarla en las fotos de la Campus Party 2011 y en otras muchas más. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 19:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amaia Montero - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Filename
I would like to ask you about the filenames, why do you think it's unperfect? File:P-filatov-0422.jpg means p as person, filatov as surname, 0422 as unique file number.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gogol Bordello - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! El último vagón - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parroquia de santa Cristina - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calvin Harris - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Just a note
As soon as I don't speak Spanish, all your filenames tell nothing to me . I hope you won't rename them into Russian to make my life easier, for the traditional way is to add Russian descriptions.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Iglesia de Santa Cristina, Madrid, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Imágenes de Rock in Rio Madrid 2012
Hola Kadellar, me gustaría dar por buenas algunas de tus imágenes de los conciertos pero veo demasiado ruido (no es de extrañar a un ISO de 1600). El caso es que el ruido es una de las cosas que más pesan cuando reviso imágenes. ¿No hay formar de reducirlo con algún filtro? Yo los RAW con ruido suelo tratarlos con buenos resultados, por ejemplo aquí o aquí. Un abrazo, Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC) PD: A propósito, me ha surgido una duda, ¿ves posible que un miembro de un jurado de WLM puede ganar el concurso?
- No veo porque no ibas a poder ser parte del jurado, si tú no eres apto, yo menos. Tampoco entiendo lo que comentas de que no tienes fotos, joer, ¡pues coje la cámara y sal! :) abrazos, Poco a poco (talk) 13:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Real Casa de Correos - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monumento a los aviadores del Plus Ultra - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente de las Conchas - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua ecuestre de Carlos III - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de la Almudena y Palacio Real - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Incubus - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Procyon lotor - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Procyon lotor - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 1955-1957 Chevrolet Bel Air in the SunRice Festival parade in Pine Ave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
My answer
Hi, my answer is here --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puerta de la Latina - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - Jardines de Sabatini - Jaime I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Overdose in QIC ?
- ¡Holà Kadellar!
- Many thanks for your comments and support following my message in the QI discussion page. Reading the discussion, I was a bit dubious about the clarity of my arguments... But reading your opinion, I was at least at ease with it: you understood very well what I meant. So, I feel a bit less alone...
- As you can see, I spend some weeks in your country this summer, and I found it, again, very beautiful. Your pictures from Madrid are very nice !
- ¡Hasta pronto!,
--Jebulon (talk) 15:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Felipe III - Plaza Mayor de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Pediment cathedral of Seville in QIC
- ¡Holà Kadellar!
- Thank you for review and comments, always useful for me. I've corrected the perspective of the pediment you noticed too strong, you were right. Would you be kind enough to have a new look now ?
- Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 21:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Real Casa de la Aduana - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Linares, paseo de Recoletos y Torres de Colón.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Felipe III - Casa de la Panadería - Plaza Mayor de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San José - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Biblioteca Nacional de España - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tulum - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tulum - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erzherzog Karl Denkmal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
QIC comment and discussion
Hi Kadellar, hope you dont mind me contacting you, With regards to your comments left on my nominated picture of Longleat house, I found it to be a bit harsh. I am new to wiki commons and media and started to enjoy placing pictures on here for people to view and comment. I take on board what people say, but recently I have found people to be very rude and not being helpful with there comments they are leaving. This picture in particular I asked what was meant by your comment, I changed the decline to discuss as I feel when I am looking at the photo full screen it looks clear so wanted to ask for other opinions which is the whole point to dicussion, you can appreciate if one person declines, many others may not or they may agree.Your last comment of "Please stop changing decline to discuss, it's not you who should do that. It's the third time I write it!" there is nothing in the rules which says that the nominator cannot or shouldnt change decline to discuss as you have said, it does say "You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer" which I have done, so I see that I have done nothing wrong, simply changing it is denying me the option to a discussion. I am sorry if you disagree with me and I also appologise to you if I am in the wrong, I will hold my hands up and say sorry. I just feel a little disappointed and frustrated lately with peoples sharp comments or them leaving comments which I cannot learn from or worse, not even reviewing the pictures. I hope you dont feel that im having ago, thats not my intention. Kind regards --Danesman1 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Murallas de Ávila - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cobá - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua de Murillo y Puerta de Murillo del Museo del Prado - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rosendo - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Red Hot Chili Peppers - Rock in Rio Madrid 2012 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Washington Monument - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Círculo de Bellas Artes - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Tulum - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tulum - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Velázquez - Jardines del Retiro - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Templo de Debod - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Brooklyn Bridge - 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brooklyn Bridge - 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fitz-Greene Halleck - Central Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio Real de Madrid - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museo de América de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente del Ángel Caído - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Booooring facade
¡Holà Kadellar !
- Following your advice, I've tried [[2]] this.
- First comments are a bit...well...discouraging (to be polite) ?
--Jebulon (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Kadellar. Maybe it is a FP...only for those who know the place ! Let's wait...--Jebulon (talk) 20:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museo de América de Madrid - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Biblioteca Nacional de España - 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biblioteca Nacional de España - 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Naturhistorisches Museum Wien - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Edificio de las Cariátides - Instituto Cervantes - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Bonjour,
J'ai constaté que le 5 octobre 2012 tu avais apposé le bandeau {{Watermark}} sur cette image. Après avoir scruté – longuement – l'image, je ne vois rien. Pourrais-tu m'indiquer à quel endroit se trouve le marquage numérique ?-- Bertrand GRONDIN → (Talk) 14:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! El oso y el madroño - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skater - Barrido-Panning - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María la Real de la Almudena - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Kadellar, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 11:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ek' balam - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio de Comunicaciones - 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Creo que esto te corresponde...un saludo! Poco a poco (talk) 14:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Intento de arreglo
Lo siento, creo que no hice un buen trabajo, quería sorprenderte --The Photographer (talk) 17:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! El Capricho - Jardín Artístico de la Alameda de Osuna - 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Teatro Real de Madrid - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Cristal - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wall Street - New York Stock Exchange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! White House and Marine One - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porsche 911 Carrera S - Barrido.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fuente de Cibeles - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Cristal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plaza de la Villa - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
A barnstar for you!
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Здравствуйте! Мне очень понравились фотографии, которые вы сделали, они великолепны! Диана960 (talk) 21:50, 16 November 2012 (UTC) |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 11:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! El oso y el madroño - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calle Mayor de Madrid - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neue Burg vor Burggarten - Hofburg - Wien - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chichén Itzá - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ek' balam - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Segovia, Segovia, and... Segovia
¡Ola Kadellar!
Thank you very much for your reviews.
- First, I would like to congratulate you for your picture of the cathedral of Segovia (1) with the snowy mountains, I've found it really beautiful.
- I will check with a grid the straightness of the town hall of Segovia (2), but I'm not sure there is a so great problem. Would you please check again? Thanks.
- You are right with the aqueduct of Segovia (3), I've corrected the perspective, and I think it is good now. Would you be kind enough to have another look ? Again, thank you.
- Anyway, what a nice city !! I spend only one night there, and did not have enough time to visit the Alcázar ! Next time maybe...--Jebulon (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calle del Codo - Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casa de Cisneros - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palacio de Comunicaciones - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue of Liberty - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jardines de Sabatini - Torre de Madrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Junta Municipal del Distrito de Moncloa-Aravaca - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Estatua ecuestre de Carlos III - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de la Vera Cruz - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Merry Christmas
Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep Talk 17:59, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eva Hache - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Santa María de Segovia - 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |