User talk:Lucarelli
Image deletion notification | Image:Comunisti Italiani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Cnyborg 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion notification | Image:Lega Nord 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Cnyborg 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Squadristi.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Squadristi.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Phrood 20:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Alleanza Nazionale.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Forza Italia 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Italia dei Valori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:L'Ulivo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Rifondazione comunista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Rosa nel pugno.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Unione dei Democratici Cristiani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Verdi Italiani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
—xyzzyn 14:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Copyvio
[edit]Pay attention to copyright | Image:Pooh italian music group.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Elitre 21:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 16:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I have forgotten the tag, now resolved. -Lucarelli 17:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Livornp-Sinagoga.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
User:G.dallorto 16:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 17:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC) Done. Thanks, -- Lucarelli
Trippa
[edit]Ciao, ho caricato l'immagine Trippa.jpg, ma commons non mi ha avvertito che c'era gia una altro file, quello che avevi caricato. Ho provato ripristinare ma l'immagine si è solo distorta. Non so più cosa fare per ripristinare.--Lissen 17:06, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Si adesso va bene, ma come mai sulla pagina appariva la mia immagine distorta, metre se invece la ingrandivi, veniva l'originale, nonostante abbia fatto anch'io il revert? Ma sopratutto perchè commons non mi ha avvertito del file già esistente (anche perchè ho riprovato dopo e me lo segnalava)? C'era un problema al server? Ah, l'ho (ri)caricata l'immagine e l'ho chiamata Trippa2.jpg, e l'ho anche proposta per il quality image, ma ho paura per i riflessi del flash...--Lissen 19:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Strano, anch'io ho visto una cosa del genere per la prima volta, e volevo già avvertire un admin; poi il revert è andato bene. Ora però ho quasi voglia di mangiare una bel piatto di trippa :-).- --Lucarelli 16:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Si adesso va bene, ma come mai sulla pagina appariva la mia immagine distorta, metre se invece la ingrandivi, veniva l'originale, nonostante abbia fatto anch'io il revert? Ma sopratutto perchè commons non mi ha avvertito del file già esistente (anche perchè ho riprovato dopo e me lo segnalava)? C'era un problema al server? Ah, l'ho (ri)caricata l'immagine e l'ho chiamata Trippa2.jpg, e l'ho anche proposta per il quality image, ma ho paura per i riflessi del flash...--Lissen 19:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Complimenti
[edit]Ciao, complimenti per le foto che hai caricato su Livorno: sono veramente molto belle e nitide. Le ho inserite qua e là nelle pagine di Wikipedia, alternandole con altre già presenti, così da creare un quadro d'insieme il più vario possibile. Ciao :) --Etienne (Li) 15:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Diritto di panorama
[edit]Il cambiamento è stato proposto, ma non mi risulta che sia stato approvata causa caduta del governo. Se hai notizie diverse fammi sapere e mi comporterò di conseguenza. Come regola prudenziale al posto tuo io eviterei cmq opere di architetti contemporanei. Ma personalmente non intendo ricominciare un ulteriore ciclo di discussioni sul diritto di panorama o no. Ne sono esausto e non si arriva da nessuna parte. E' il lato che mi piace di meno di Wikedia... :-( --User:G.dallorto 22:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cappella Spedali Riuniti, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Madonna del Soccorso, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gelateria Lungomare Livono.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Caterina, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Venezia Nuova, Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Giorgio Vasari, Pala, Santa Caterina, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Duomo di Pisa, detail 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gatta randagia Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Livorno, Panorama dalla Fortezza Vecchia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bitte porto Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palazzo Carovana Pisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisa Duomo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mega Smeralda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Porta San Marco, dettaglio, Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Containers Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Non capisco per quale motivo...
[edit]hai caricato foto di Livorno scattate da me (utente Shezarainbow di wikipedia) a tuo nome. Finora ne ho trovate almeno tre, 2 della fortezza vecchia ed 1 della terrazza Mascagni con gazebo. Caro concittadino, gradirei spiegazioni. Magari ci sono dei meccanismi che non conosco, visto che sono via da Wikipedia da un po'. Non so. Ovviamente non ho diritti da far valere, le foto erano di pubblico dominio, ma non capisco il perchè non lasciare il mio nome come autrice della foto. Una semplice curiosità. Shez, 15 ottobre 2008.
Uncategorized
[edit]Hallo Lucarelli, ist ja nett was du einkategorisierst, aber möchtest du dann bitte auch die Zeile 'Uncategorized...' löschen, damit andere auch wissen, dass das Bild kategorisiert ist und das Bild auch nicht mehr in den unkat. auftaucht? Danke. --Ayacop (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- Tschuldigung, daran habe ich gar nicht gedacht, da ich dachte, ein Bot würde die dann entfernen. Werde die Zeile von nun an löschen. Grüße, ---Lucarelli (talk) 11:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
File deletion warning | File:Carnevale_venezia_maschere_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
~/w /Talk 20:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa Santa Caterina, Livorno, cupola.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisa Arno Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Livorno Monumento Leopoldo II Piazza XX Settembre 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Livorno Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Moby Aki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calafuria Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Livorno Monumento Garibaldi, Piazza Garibaldi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Featured Picture Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Livorno Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Livorno Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
--Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 09:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paesaggio Parrana San Martino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa di San Lorenzo, Fauglia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
PH-3
[edit]Hello.
You can add it PH-3 in your babel box on your profile page.
--ComputerHotline (talk) 13:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment; but for the moment I will add only PH-2, I am still trying. Greetings, ---Lucarelli (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dead Squirrel 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pesce al mercato 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa di Sant'Agata alla Fornace, Catania, interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Elefante, Catania.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Fiat 1100
[edit]I have been trying to make sense of the pictures of the Fiat 1100 on commons. I think I may have wrongly named one (very fuzzy) one that I took myself. (I have been going through old anglophone motor magazines from the 1960s.)
But my purpose here concerns one of your pictures. This one. I THINK this is a Fiat 1100D (1962 - 1966). When you uploaded it, you thought it was an 1100 103 (<1962). Please, are you sure? or do you also think 'your' picture might have been of an 1100D? Any source info on why you believe what you believe?
Mit Dank im Voraus und best greetings. Charles01 (talk) 07:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
(Viele von deine Bilder sind fantastich, meine Meinung nach. Es tut mir Leid das war aber nicht meine Thema heirmit!) |
- Dear Charles, I have to admit that I am not an expert of Fiat models. For me it looks like a 1100-103 "D", someone on the Italian Wikipedia has classified it as 1100-103 D, II Series, beginning '60 Fiat_1100. But maybe it could be cleared also on the Italian discussion site for Transport: Discussioni_progetto:Trasporti. Greetings, --Lucarelli (talk) 20:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your thoughts on this. I will wait and see if any kind Italian knows the answer more securely than I can manage! Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Proserpinus proserpina, Livorno 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fiat truck blue.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neoscona adianta 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi, Livorno 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi Cornacchiaia 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alpi Apuane Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torre Guinigi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eriosoma lanuginosum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cheiracanthium punctorium 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Pisa 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Chiesa San Giovanni al Gatano, Pisa.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--User:G.dallorto (talk) 02:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Un petit plaisir
[edit]S'il te plais : un petit plaisir. Toi qui fait de si belles photos, mets la légende aussi en Italien, pour tout les italophiles. Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Casa Alberto.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Papilio machaon, Livorno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisa ponte ferrovia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Araneus diadematus, Livorno 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Argiope bruennichi detail spinneret.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maria Grazia On.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palazzo Agostini, Pisa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sympetrum fonscolombii, female 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lampascioni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dolomedes fimbriatus 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thomisus onustus, female, Livorrno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zerynthia cassandra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Melanargia galathea 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Poggio a Caiano Fregio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Podarcis muralis, Livorno.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Poggio_a_Caiano_Fregio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pratoprovincia 22:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your work on my birth places! (Pisa and province) DnaX (talk) 10:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC) |
URV durch Straubinger Wochenblatt?
[edit]Das Bild https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Araneus_diadematus,_Livorno_1.JPG wurde in der Ausgabe 35 vom 29. August 2012 im Straubinger Wochenblatt auf Seite 2 verwendet mit dem Zusatz "Lucarelli/wikipedia". Da ich nicht weiß, ob die Redakteure des Straubinger Wochenblatts eine gesonderte Vereinbarung mit dir haben und das Bild sonst ja CC-BY-SA ist, melde ich das mal lieber. Falls erwünscht, kann ich dazu auch noch eine Kopie anlegen und dir zukommen lassen. --Kreuvf (talk) 10:59, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
User:Lucarelli has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
83.152.112.228 15:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Agip.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Incontro a Cascina (PI)
[edit]Ciao, vedo dai tuoi contributi che eri in qualche modo legato alla zona della Toscana. Non so se tu vivi in zona o ci passi, ma sperando che tu legga in tempo volevo informarti che con Kaspo (coordinatore regionale WMI per la Toscana) abbiamo finito di impostare it:Wikipedia:Raduni/WikiGita all'abbazia di San Savino. Si tratta di un edificio normalmente chiuso al pubblico. Ne saranno fatte altre in zona toscana di gite soprattutto nel mese di Wiki Loves Monument quindi se si è interessati all'idea si accetta con piacere ogni feedback. Stiamo preparando una Mailing List per future escursioni. Contatta pure Kaspo se o quando vedrai questo messaggio.--Alexmar983 (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - preparazione
[edit]Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana
Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019. Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con largo anticipo. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso. Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse? Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile! per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista |
Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
La tua foto su Repubblica
[edit]La tua foto File:Nada Malanima.JPG è stata usata in https://www.repubblica.it/spettacoli/people/2014/01/16/foto/nada-76105680/1/#8 senza attribuzione. Nemo 19:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana sta per iniziare
[edit]Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana
L'organizzazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2019 ha proseguito e qua potete consultare il lavoro dei volontari. Qui potete valutare quanto è stato liberato finora. Nuove liberatorie arriveranno nei prossimi giorni. Il primo settembre inizia il concorso, ti preghiamo di informare le persone interessate vicino a te e, se puoi, anche di condividere i post sui vari canali sociali. Qui e qui e qui è possibile scaricare il volantino di promozione regionale in alcune delle lingue più comuni per i turisti. messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista |
Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--23:35, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Toscana sta per finire
[edit]Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana
Fra poco si chiuderà l'edizione 2021 di Wiki Loves Monuments. Ci teniamo a segnalare a chi avesse scorso le liste in precedenza, che negli ultimi giorni sono stati concessi a tempo indefinito nuovi beni da fotografare a Pontremoli, Volterra e San Giovanni Valdarno. Se hai delle foto di archivio da condividere, il bottone blu di caricamento su ogni riga in tabella sarà attivo fino alla mezzanotte di oggi. per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista Per informazioni:
Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2021 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2021 #WLM2021 |
Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, SCP-2000 10:31, 30 September 2021 (UTC)