User talk:Rosart
Bienvenue sur cette page "UNE CATHEDRALE SE DEVOILE" Vos contributions à la manifestation de la "VERITE POPULAIRE" seront des plus utiles à la compréhension de notre environnement culturel. MERCI.
Image Tagging Image:P95.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:P95.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonidebest Ω Talk 12:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Ce document est de l'auteur du livre dont il est extrait, c'est-à-dire moi-même. Rosart 11:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
File:La_Rosace_Initiatique.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm11671 07:58, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:CCI21122010 00001.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:CCI21122010 00000.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:CCI21122010 00001.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:CCI21122010 00001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CCI21122010 00001.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:CCI21122010 00000.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:CCI21122010 00000.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CCI21122010 00000.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Rosenzweig τ 18:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour Rosenzweig, J'ai mis sur Commons les deux images que tu signales pour illustrer la discussion qui se développait sur ma page. Voir: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Rosart#Rayon_vert L'article concerné est de Louis Tschaen. Ce scientifique est un Monsieur âgé qui n'a pas internet et qui m'a demandé de citer ses travaux et publications sur le Rayon Vert de la cathédrale de Strasbourg. Il faut donc maintenir ces deux images pour que les lecteurs puissent s'y référer en cas de besoin. Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Maurice Rosart
-- This e-mail was sent by Rosart to Rosenzweig by the "E-mail user" function at Wikimedia Commons. Rosart (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Maurice,
- I'll have to reply in English, my French is not good enough for me to write a text. Wikimedia Commons has to respect copyrights. Even if the text of the magazine article you uploaded is by someone (Louis Tschaen) who actually asked you to upload this, the photographs on the magazine cover and illustatring the article are not by him. They are quite recent, so they must be assumed to be still protected by copyright. I do not see any evidence of a permission to upload them here under the license used (FAL), so I must assume they violate copyright and will have to be deleted, unless a proper permission by the copyright owner is provided. Which is doubtful considering your explanation why you uploaded them. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Traduction: Bonjour Maurice, Je vais devoir répondre en anglais, mon français n'est pas assez bon pour moi d'écrire un texte. Wikimedia Commons a de respecter les droits d'auteur. Même si le texte de l'article du magazine que vous avez téléchargé est par quelqu'un (Louis Tschaen) qui ont effectivement vous avez demandé de télécharger cela, les photographies sur la couverture de magazines et illustatring l'article ne sont pas par lui. Ils sont assez récents, ils doivent donc être supposé être toujours protégés par copyright. Je ne vois aucune preuve d'une permission de les télécharger ici sous la licence utilisée (FAL), donc je suppose qu'ils violent les droits d'auteur et devront être supprimées, sauf si une autorisation appropriée par le détenteur du copyright est fourni. Ce qui est douteux compte tenu de vos explications pourquoi vous les avez téléchargées. Cordialement - Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 28 Janvier 2012 (UTC)
Merci pour ta réponse rapide. Je me procure les documents nécessaires et je les produis. A bientôt. Rosart (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Traduction: Thank you for your quick response. I obtain the necessary documents and I produce. See you soon. Rosart (d) 2:08 p.m., 28 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Juda-Strasbourg.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leyo 00:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Bonjour Leyo, Je ne comprends pas l'Anglais. Alors je te réponds " also the photograph." Cela veut dire que la photo aussi est concernée. Cordialement. M. Rosart Rosart (talk) 06:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- Écris ta résponse là: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juda-Strasbourg.pdf --Leyo 16:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Interprétation de la fresque - Le Péché originel - de la Chapelle Sixtine.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pippobuono (talk) 10:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour, Je peux vous donner les précisions suivantes qui montrent qu'il n'y a pas de problème de Copyright. - Je suis l'auteur de l'analyse de la fresque - Je suis l'auteur du livre "Une cathédrale se dévoile" - Je suis l'auteur du dessin publié sur Wikimédia Commons. Cordialement. Maurice Rosart Rosart (talk) 15:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Ernest THOMAS dans Le Lorrain du 03.05.1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Lomita (talk) 06:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour, c'est le seul article parlant de la fin de la saline trouvé dans la presse. J'avoue que je ne suis pas allé aux Archives Départementales où d'autres, plus complets, peuvent exister. La discussion en présentera peut-être. --Rosart (talk) 07:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)