Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eleventh-place ribbon.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eleventh-place ribbon.jpg

Can't see any realistic use of this image. Some may even argument that it is a copyright violation. For me it is way to small and unimportant to be realisitically usefull. ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 署名の宣言 14:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Argument" isn't a verb. There is no copyright on the ribbon itself. The User:Niabot is antagonizing me by wiki-stalking my uploads. Note that just minutes before this nomination, he was trolling my Talk page. "Too", "realistically", and "useful" are spelled wrong. Size and importance are feeble reasons for deletion nominations. This is just an utterly sloppy nomination, and the nominator should be warned. -- Thekohser (talk) 14:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this image it is out of scope for two reasons:
  1. I can't imagine any realistic use for any purpose
  2. The resolution and quality is so bad that I can't think of a possible reuse for other purposes
PS: If my English sucks, then we can still discuss in German. --／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 署名の宣言 15:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Amusing, considering some of the work you do imagine to have purpose, such as this drawing that found zero use in any Wikimedia project, other than to draw attention to itself through the "picture of the day" program. -- Thekohser (talk) 15:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: "No use" is not an argument as long as the pic seems to be in scope SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eleventh-place ribbon.jpg

I was asked by the subject of the photo to take it down, because she was uncomfortable with her coracobrachialis muscle. Thekohser (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely, as the person is hardly identifiable (contrary to File:Lila Tretikov - Wikimedia ED - May 2014 01.jpg). More likely somebody here wants to make a POINT.[1] Anyway, this image could be deleted as being of little use due to its low resolution. However, there are a few external re-uses. --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral/weak delete: Ignoring the fact that Thekohser is trying to make a point, I think a courtesy deletion (even if it was uploaded just over two years ago and is being used on two other external websites) would be the right thing to do, since it isn't in use on any Wikimedia projects (COM:SCOPE could also apply) but as she isn't identifiable and looks to be in a public place, COM:IDENT doesn't apply but that would've been a different case if she was identifiable in a private place. Bidgee (talk) 13:36, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I note that on both the two external websites where the image is being used, attribution has not been documented, so the sites are in violation of the licensing terms. Another reason to delete, to help stem the tide of license abuse. -- Thekohser (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Thekohser: that other sites are using your image in violation of the licence you granted is not an issue for us on Commons. It is up to you, as the copyright holder, to enforce your copyright and seek redress with those are violating it. There are useful resources available on the internet that can help you with that. On the issue here,  Keep the image, it wasn't uploaded a "short time" ago, and the deletion request you are pointing to is not relevant here, as that DR was only raised because a WMF staff member used the tools when they shouldn't have. russavia (talk) 19:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Russavia: okay, okay. Maybe if someone at the WMF would provide me with the same tools that Florin possesses, then we could re-run the deletion process on this image? (evil grin) -- Thekohser (talk) 13:49, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Thekohser: no problem. I'll ping User:Eloquence to alert him to your request above, and I'll leave it in his capable hands as to whether he wishes to grant your request for the same tools as Florin. Then we can look at re-running the deletion process here so that you have a useful gauge as to whether others are given special treatment. Good luck. russavia (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept The fact that it is in use on two off site projects belies the claim that it is not useful. The reason given in the DR is absurd. The claim that we should delete it because it is used in violation of the license is also absurd -- we would have to delete many good images if we followed that policy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Eleventh-place_ribbon.jpg&oldid=136490944"