Commons:Deletion requests/File:DrinkPouch Backpack (14292644375).jpg
The backpack pictured here is a derivative work of copyrighted packaging that is obviously above COM:TOO USA and COM:TOO Canada. There is no plausible claim to freedom of panorama for this sort of packaging in the the United States and COM:TOO Canada (one of which this photo was taken per the branding being "Capri Sun" rather than "Capri-Sun"), so this photograph would only plausibly be free if the use of the Capri Sun were de-minimus. The use of the packaging in the work is significanly greater-than-de minimus, as the packaging is the central focus of the image. As such, this photograph should be deleted as depicting a derivative work of non-free copyrighted packaging. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Red-tailed hawk: , is it a question of the permission granted on Flickr? I see it was uploaded to Flickr by an account named "TerraCycle" and granted CC 2.0. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. There's (plausible) permission for the thin copyright of the photograph. This is a question is about whether or not the underlying backback, which itself is a COM:DW of the Capri Sun packages, is available under a valid free license. Because the backpack is a derivative work of the packages, and the packages are extremely prominent in the photograph (the point of the photograph is to show the backpack's design, which is composed of a tessellation of Capri Sun packages), we need permission from the copyright holder of the design of those Capri Sun packages. We currently lack such permission, even if we have permission for the photograph. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for making me feel dumber than I already did after reading your first comment. lol. I can't get my head around it but seems logical. Cheers! --CNMall41 (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. There's (plausible) permission for the thin copyright of the photograph. This is a question is about whether or not the underlying backback, which itself is a COM:DW of the Capri Sun packages, is available under a valid free license. Because the backpack is a derivative work of the packages, and the packages are extremely prominent in the photograph (the point of the photograph is to show the backpack's design, which is composed of a tessellation of Capri Sun packages), we need permission from the copyright holder of the design of those Capri Sun packages. We currently lack such permission, even if we have permission for the photograph. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:DW, flickr user does not have rights to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}