Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karrer.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Enwiki Duplicate tagged as non-free Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Keep Are you a bot? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Comment User:MGA73/Possibly unfree says "If you think the license is not ok or if you are unsure, please nominate the image for deletion and tell why you think it is or might be unfree." It would be useful if the nominator would do the latter part of that and suggest why he thinks this isn't free. MGA73's bot has already identified that this file is a duplicate of one on en.wiki where it isn't tagged with a free licence. The next step is to consider whether it is in fact available under a free licence. The nominator hasn't said anything to suggest that has been done. Adambro (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- Nom withdrawn - It seems the report I'm using is being misleading. Would appreciate SOMEONE updating the tags at enwiki. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing to suggest that this photograph was a work of the Nobel Foundation. It is probably the work of some professional photographer, of whom we know nothing. The photograph could have been taken by a Swedish photograph for the award of the prize, but it could also be anything else. Assuming the Swedishness of the photographer in the present state of our knowledge is, I'm afraid, pure wishful thinking. Rama (talk) 07:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Published in "Les Prix Nobel", Stockholm - that is what counts. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- "That is what counts"? Why would that be? We don't claim images by Walter Frentz to be in the public domain simply because they get published in books. Rama (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- First published in Sweden, that is why Swedish copyright law applies to this photograph. Should be elementary. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- What is it that allows you to claim that this was the first publication? You don't even know who the photographer was! I find it frankly odd how you quietly slip from "Published in Les Prix Nobel" to "First published in Sweden" without bringing any element of fact. Rama (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Steinbeck 1962.jpg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- The discussion to which you link does not seem to contain any element suggesting that File:Karrer.jpg was first published in Sweden. Could you point precisely to it if it exists? Rama (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1937/karrer-bio.html. --emerson7 | Talk 05:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- The page to which you link does not seem to contain any element suggesting that File:Karrer.jpg was first published in Sweden or is otherwise Free. Rama (talk) 17:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- The discussion to which you link does not seem to contain any element suggesting that File:Karrer.jpg was first published in Sweden. Could you point precisely to it if it exists? Rama (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Steinbeck 1962.jpg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- What is it that allows you to claim that this was the first publication? You don't even know who the photographer was! I find it frankly odd how you quietly slip from "Published in Les Prix Nobel" to "First published in Sweden" without bringing any element of fact. Rama (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- First published in Sweden, that is why Swedish copyright law applies to this photograph. Should be elementary. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- "That is what counts"? Why would that be? We don't claim images by Walter Frentz to be in the public domain simply because they get published in books. Rama (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Published in "Les Prix Nobel", Stockholm - that is what counts. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing to suggest that this photograph was a work of the Nobel Foundation. It is probably the work of some professional photographer, of whom we know nothing. The photograph could have been taken by a Swedish photograph for the award of the prize, but it could also be anything else. Assuming the Swedishness of the photographer in the present state of our knowledge is, I'm afraid, pure wishful thinking. Rama (talk) 07:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence that the first publication was in Sweden, as required per {{PD-Sweden}}. Kameraad Pjotr 21:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Restored It is either {{Anonymous work}} or {{PD-Sweden}}. Even if first published in another European country, it would still be PD. Yann (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)