Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg

Out of scope: tourist photo; there is a better one without a tourist: File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (17) (44143076332).jpg JopkeB (talk) 08:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

 Keep Again the same reashed "rationale" taken from and rejected in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (365) (8174906415).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nederlands openlucht museum arnhem (324) (8175144634).jpg. In scope and being (or not) a tourist photo is indifferent to it being in scope or not. Tm (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

 Keep No valid reason given in nomination. A subjective claim that a "tourist photo" (whatever that is) is "worse", and sufficiently worse that it justifies deletion is to ignore the scale given added by having a figure there. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

 Keep - No valid reason, not out of scope. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

---

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 17:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)