Commons:Deletion requests/File:Moscow, Rubtsovskaya 4 Aug 2009 02.JPG
Looks like copyrighted П-44Т project. PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Info The «П-44Т» building project comes from Московский научно-исследовательский и проектный институт типологии и экспериментального проектирования (www.mniitep.ru). It was created by architects Юрий Пантелеймонович Григорьев, Александр Валентинович Надысев, Т. Принтц, А. П. Цыганкова. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- Keep Insufficient originality. Not a work by an architect per definitionem is protectable, but an architectural work. Whoever developed them, simplest Soviet-style apartment blocks aren't (and I don't mean luxury high-rises like this one). --A.Savin 13:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Insufficient originality, does not exceed threshold of originality FASTILY 08:32, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that these apartment block are below the "threshold of originality". There is even no evidence that such a threshold exists by apartment blocks in Russia. In the lack of evidence about such a threshold, we should consider all architecture copyrightable. Architecture is, by definition, creative and original by the very reason of its complexity. Eleassar (t/p) 10:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. No new arguments provided. Originality threshold is Common sense, not a law. --A.Savin 10:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't believe in common sense; everyone has his own. You should provide appropriate evidence that there is a "threshold of originality" and that these blocks fall below it. See also [1]. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Kept: as per Fastily and others. Yann (talk) 08:48, 3 November 2013 (UTC)