Commons:Deletion requests/File:Super heavy-lift launch vehicles.png
The image of the N1 in this composite is by me, and used without permission. Nick-Starbase1 (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is irrelevant. You released an image and the fact you made a better one does not justifies deleting a legal image that use as part of it another image you created. You are welcome to create a better version of this image with the better depiction of the N9. אילן שמעוני (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
The Saturn V in this composite image looks remarkably like one I did for comparison with the N1 - I am less sore of this than the N1 as there are many more renders of the Saturn V, but given it is next to the N1 and same scale, I am suspicious. Nick-Starbase1 (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is irrelevant. You released an image and the fact you made a better one does not justifies deleting a legal image that use as part of it another image you created. You are welcome to create a better version of this image with the better depiction of the Saturn V. אילן שמעוני (talk) 14:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: sources, licenses and authors have to be named. --JuTa 09:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
SpaceX Falcon Heavy and Starship renderings are not own work. They are official renderings which are not found in the public domain. Xingyzt (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Derivation? 186.172.178.231 13:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- I do not see how this would be grounds for deletion. -- Scjessey (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- The nominator is asserting that the image includes copies of copyrighted material. That would make the image a "derived work" under copyright law, and would thus require the image creator to acknowledge the copyrights of the included images. Even if the copied images are all PD, we still need provenance (a description of there they came from) both to answer this copyright challenge and because it's the right right thing to do: attribute the original image creators instead of plagiarizing their work. -Arch dude (talk) 17:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, except we have no proof that the original uploader did not, in fact, create the work on their own and upload it. Perhaps @Thorenn: would care to give us their position? -- Scjessey (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- Compare the two SLS elements of this image with any of a long line of NASA graphics over the last ten years (e.g., File:SLS Configuration.jpg). They are either cut-and-paste copies or are so close as to be the equivalent of "close paraphrasing" of a PD work, for which we require attribution. I am fairly sure the other rockets are the same, and if they do not come from a NASA source then they are surely copyrighted. -Arch dude (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, except we have no proof that the original uploader did not, in fact, create the work on their own and upload it. Perhaps @Thorenn: would care to give us their position? -- Scjessey (talk) 13:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- The nominator is asserting that the image includes copies of copyrighted material. That would make the image a "derived work" under copyright law, and would thus require the image creator to acknowledge the copyrights of the included images. Even if the copied images are all PD, we still need provenance (a description of there they came from) both to answer this copyright challenge and because it's the right right thing to do: attribute the original image creators instead of plagiarizing their work. -Arch dude (talk) 17:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Delete: described as "own work", but has unattributed elements from other sources. -Arch dude (talk) 17:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Arch dude. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)