Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tierra del Fuego stamp 1994.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright in Argentina for stamps is 50 years after the date of publication, which in this case hasn't passed yet. I don't think the licensing rational is valid either. Adamant1 (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- The only part of the stamp that is copyrightable is the emblem, which is not subject to copyright. The tag specifically says that emblems of municipalities are not subject to copyright in Argentina. Di (they-them) (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your saying. "The only part is copyrightable is the emblem, which is not subject copyright" doesn't make any sense. That said, assuming the emblem isn't copyrightable, it's only 10% of the image and I assume the rest of it is. Obviously just because an image contains an emblems of a municipality doesn't mean everything else in the image is then automatically in the public domain and this seems like a unique work to me. Although, I'm willing to be wrong the copyright rules for Argentina clearly state that ""The ownership of anonymous intellectual works belonging to institutions, corporations or legal persons shall last for 50 years from the date of publication of those works." The government of Argentina is an institution." I don't see why that wouldn't apply to stamps or this image in particular. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- The emblem is the only part that is necessarily able to be copyrighted on the grounds that it's sufficiently creative, but it is not copyrighted because it is the symbol of a municipality. Sorry for not being more clear with what I meant, I realize I came off confusingly. The rest of the stamp is simply text on a white background, which I don't believe is copyrightable. The only part of the stamp that can be considered part of the design is the emblem, which is in the public domain. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- OK. That makes more sense. It seems like the copyright rules contradict themselves or at least the copyright article does. So I'm not going to say your wrong, but I'm not going to say your right either. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- The emblem is the only part that is necessarily able to be copyrighted on the grounds that it's sufficiently creative, but it is not copyrighted because it is the symbol of a municipality. Sorry for not being more clear with what I meant, I realize I came off confusingly. The rest of the stamp is simply text on a white background, which I don't believe is copyrightable. The only part of the stamp that can be considered part of the design is the emblem, which is in the public domain. Di (they-them) (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your saying. "The only part is copyrightable is the emblem, which is not subject copyright" doesn't make any sense. That said, assuming the emblem isn't copyrightable, it's only 10% of the image and I assume the rest of it is. Obviously just because an image contains an emblems of a municipality doesn't mean everything else in the image is then automatically in the public domain and this seems like a unique work to me. Although, I'm willing to be wrong the copyright rules for Argentina clearly state that ""The ownership of anonymous intellectual works belonging to institutions, corporations or legal persons shall last for 50 years from the date of publication of those works." The government of Argentina is an institution." I don't see why that wouldn't apply to stamps or this image in particular. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file was previously kept because the tag said that emblems made by the Argentinian government aren't copyrighted, but that does not seem to be the case. Di (they-them) (talk) 00:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Delete Per the nominator and change in the guideline about emblems since I originally nominated the image for deletion. Also, thanks for renominating it. I hadn't actually noticed that the guideline had changed. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 16:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)