Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vostok1patch.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Agastya (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Patches of Soviet manned space missions
[edit]- File:Vostok1patch.png
- File:Vostok-1 patch.svg
- File:Vostok-2 mission patch.svg
- File:Vostok 3 4 Mission Patch.svg
- File:Vostok-4 mission patch.jpg
- File:Vostok 5-6 mission patch.jpg
- File:Vostok 5-6 mission patch.svg
- File:Voskhod-1 mission patch.svg
- File:Voskhod-2 patch.svg
- File:Voskhod1 patch.jpg
- File:Voskhod2patch.png
- File:Soyuz 9 patch logo.svg
- File:Soyuz 9 patch.png
- File:Soyuz 10 mission patch.png
- File:Soyuz 11 mission patch.gif
- File:Soyuz 18 mission patch logo.svg
- File:Soyuz 18 mission patch.png
- File:Soyuz 32 mission patch.png
- File:Soyuz T-9 mission patch.png
- File:Soyuz TM-8 mission patch.svg
- File:Soyuz-tm8.jpg
See also - another deletion request for Patches of Soviet manned space missions - there was not any special patch before en:Apollo–Soyuz progamm (see for example https://web.archive.org/web/20120922000810/http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/213/47.shtml). After that and until en:Soyuz TM-12 "Juno" flight (1992) mission patches had been designed only for international missions. Soviet only mission had just general patches - like COA or flag of USSR, or logo of en:NPP Zvezda, and etc. These files are more like usual badges/pins for commercial sale to citizens. Alex Spade (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason for deletion. If you think that the descriptions are incorrect, then change them. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 04:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- The problem is not the descriptions of files. The problem is license of files. They are not free. These files are not PD-RU-exempt or they are COM:DW from files/works, which are not PD-RU-exempt. Alex Spade (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Then why the reason for the nomination is "There was not any official patch before Soyuz-Apollo program."?
- And, since these files are very widely used, it would be, so to say, polite to start a discussion at space-related portal/project pages (at least in Russian and English Wikipedias) instead of just nominating them here for deletion. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 09:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Only official signs can be {{PD-RU-exempt}} (tag used for files under discussion).
If you like to inform some projects about this and that another discussions - fill free to do it. Alex Spade (talk) 17:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)- These loges were fabricated? By whom und whereto? --Ras67 (talk) 23:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Commons:Precautionary principle - it is unimportant, who has fabricated/created and/or uploaded unofficial signs but have marked them as official signs (as {{PD-RU-exempt}}). So, we do not have to prove non-free status of these works, but we have to proved free status (the official status in these cases). Several sources about history of the Soviet space missions (one of them I have mentioned above) confirm that 1st official patch had been created for en:Apollo–Soyuz program, not early. After that and until en:Soyuz TM-12 "Juno" flight (1992) mission patches had been designed only for international missions. So these works are not {{PD-RU-exempt}} or based on works, which are not {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Alex Spade (talk) 08:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- These loges were fabricated? By whom und whereto? --Ras67 (talk) 23:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Only official signs can be {{PD-RU-exempt}} (tag used for files under discussion).
- The problem is not the descriptions of files. The problem is license of files. They are not free. These files are not PD-RU-exempt or they are COM:DW from files/works, which are not PD-RU-exempt. Alex Spade (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Many files are below ToO.
Agastya (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: most per nomination, kept one for being below TOO and in use. --Jcb (talk) 09:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)