Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/04/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files uploaded by Alejolopezortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not uploader's own work (e.g., File:Palacio del Ayuntamiento.jpg and File:Julio arboleda.jpg), low res, lacking camera EXIF, uploaded among blatant copyvios of same person (e.g. File:Elkin Jaramillo Andes.jpg. Quack.
- File:Palacio del Ayuntamiento.jpg
- File:Palacio Municipal Andes.jpg
- File:Julio arboleda.jpg
- File:Alcalde andes con niños.jpg
- File:Alcalde andes recortando cinta udea.jpg
- File:Alcalde de Andes con el Gobernador de Antioquia.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejolopezortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not uploader's own work; no evidence of free license
- File:Atletico Nacional de Medellín.gif
- File:Escudo verdadero de Andes.jpg
- File:Escudo de Andes (Antioquia).svg.png
- File:Escudo de Andes, Antioquia.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as copyvios per nomination Krd 19:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejolopezortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blatant Flickrwashing. Flickr account owned by 'Alejandro López Ortiz" and Commons user is "Alejolopezortiz". Images were uploaded to Flickr on 29/30 July and uploaded to Commons on 29/30 July. Images appeared elsewhere on the web well before upload to Flickr. For example, File:Simon Gaviria.jpg is here as of May 2014; File:Musa Besaile.png is here, etc. Even some are fully copyrighted on the bogus Flickr side (!)
- File:Simon Gaviria.jpg
- File:Andes Iglesia.jpg
- File:Germán Hoyos 1.jpg
- File:Musa Besaile.png
- File:Senador Lizcano.jpg
- File:Victor Correa 1.jpg
- File:Horacio Gallón 1.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 13:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejolopezortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Gabriel Hernan Gaviria Betancur.jpg
- File:MIO Javier Araque.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Gallego P Liberal.jpg
- File:Rodolfo Tobón Tobón.jpg
- File:Alcalde Julio Arboleda Andes.jpg
- File:H. Toro Rivas Andes.jpg
- File:Luz Helena Gaviria Andes.jpg
- File:J. Arbelaez Andes.jpg
- File:Mejía Aramburo, JJ Partido de la U Andes.jpg
- File:Lemos Uribe JF Congresista.jpg
- File:Elkin Jaramillo Jaramillo alcalde de andes.jpg
- File:Álvaro Pareja Jaramillo Andes.jpg
- File:Horacio Gallón Arango Congresista.jpg
- File:Carlos Alfonso Castro Beltrán Candidato alcaldía Andes.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejolopezortiz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of official photos. Some could be found on other web sites.
- File:SenadoraPaolaHolguin1.JPG
- File:GabrielJaimeRico1.JPG
- File:Senador Daniel Cabrales 1.jpg
- File:Nohora Stella Tovar 1.jpg
- File:Alfredo Rangel 1.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted as blatant copyvios. File:GabrielJaimeRico1.JPG is here; File:SenadoraPaolaHolguin1.JPG is here; etc. Эlcobbola talk 14:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Unmantained gallery; its uses are much better served by Category:Castelo de Alenquer. -- Tuválkin ✉ 05:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: single image gallery. JuTa 07:10, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fernsehturm St. Chrischona - Dreibeinkonstrultion.jpg
[edit]no need, typing error Wladyslaw (talk) 11:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: accidental creation. JuTa 07:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Seite wurde versehentlich angelegt Oberlausitzerin64 (talk) 13:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: accidental creation JuTa 07:11, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
my own work just for testing upload wizard features Mahitgar (talk) 04:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- CSDed as CSD G1 (test file). —George8211 / T 20:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Jianhui67. JuTa 19:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work Ymblanter (talk) 06:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Jianhui67. JuTa 19:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Based on the file format (PNG), and the uploader's deletion history, which includes copyright violations. I have reason to believe this is a screenshot taken from official Iglesia ni Cristo media. wL <speak·creatively> 09:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Krd. JuTa 19:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
http://thefilipinoaustralian.com/blogs/?attachment_id=4529 wL <speak·creatively> 09:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Krd. JuTa 19:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:05, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Source google Gemeingut im Foto (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Didym. JuTa 19:09, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio, not probable that it is own work, see this website where it has been available since 2009. Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
A series of images of members of the Birrenbach family. No indication of user's own work; variety of camera styles, white balances, composition styles suggest that images in this group belong to series (one is b&w) another features a white hat, another is pictures of the couple in Russian fur hats, etc. Likely all COM:COPYVIOs like the others of this user which were previously deleted.
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach 21.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach and Christiane Amanpour in Georgetown, Washington, D.C..jpg
- File:Thomas Birrenbach and Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach at Great Wall, Peking.jpg
- File:Thomas Birrenbach and Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach in Moscow.jpg
- File:Tina Fey and Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach.jpg
- File:Thomas Birrenbach, Southampton.jpg
- File:Kaye Ballard, Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach, and Shirley MacLaine in LA..jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach and Shirley MacLaine in L.A..jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach 19.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach and Sister.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach 17.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach 15.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach 16.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach 14.jpg
- File:Thomas Birrenbach and Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach in Moscow, Red Square.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach, The Forbidden City, Peking.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach and Thomas Birrenbach in Moscow.jpg
- File:Cleopatra Broumand Birrenbach in St. Petersburg.jpg
- File:Thomas Birrenbach in China, Great Wall.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Spam with no educational value. The image contains a watermark in the middle so we can't just crop out the text at the top and bottom. This renders it useless on any Wikimedia project for any purpose other than to advertise the contributor's services. UserB (talk) 21:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Spam with no educational value. The image contains a watermark in the middle so we can't just crop out the text at the top and bottom. This renders it useless on any Wikimedia project for any purpose other than to advertise the contributor's services. (Also, there's no evidence of permission, which is required for previously published images.) UserB (talk) 21:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
unused image of an unknown but identifiable woman, uploaded in 2013. this image is the only contribution of the uploader all over WMF projects. i think: out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 22:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 22:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pinkichandrani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 22:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
don’t even ask my why this exists (1. Author request) ♥ Kelvinsong talk 22:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HasmukhPatelDesigner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hatemabdallah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company INeverCry 23:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Terbismanterbisman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 23:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
possible copyvio - scan of 1949 photo - uploader may be author of scan but likely not author of original photo INeverCry 00:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal art -- out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Faux, faux, et faux ! Cette image est utilisée à juste titre sur l'article Théorie ondulatoire de la Vikidia francophone, veuillez vous renseigner de manière convenable. --CRH (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Not at all wrong. "Unused", as we use it on Commons, means that it is not in use on any WMF project. Our rules of scope depend on the quality of editing done on WMF projects. We cannot track and are not responsible for use on other web sites. If we allowed uploaders to cite use off-WMF, then we would have to keep anything uploaded here if it appeared anywhere.
- Note, also, that using a file on a single editor article, such as the one you cite on Vikidia, would not qualify it to be kept on Commons. It is not unusual for someone to upload an image and then attempt to get it kept by using it in an article he wrote. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khumbo Lewanika Phiri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded here so that user could misuse en.wikipedia as his personal webspace (en:Special:Contributions/Khumbo_Lewanika_Phiri). User page over there now blanked, these images are almost all offtopic. The Beckham drawing is pretty good, but it appears in lots of other places, so I can't be 100% sure that this is his work to license to us in the first place anyway.
- File:Becks03.jpg
- File:Drawing by Khumbo..jpg
- File:Sam and Khumbo the beggining.jpg
- File:Khumbo and Sam at Lilongwe Nazarene.jpg
- File:Faith and Khumbo in Che Mussa (Blantyre).jpg
- File:Khumbo ball juggling at the age of 13..jpg
- File:Sam and Khumbo at the lake (School trip)..jpg
- File:Mikhy LFC.jpg
- File:Mikhy Smile.jpg
- File:Omikhy.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This is clearly not "own work". No way of verifying copyright status. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused and unusable tiny personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I doubt very much that this art is actually "own work" as claimed. The style suggests that is from the 20th century, far too late to assume that it is out of copyright without further information. The quality of the reproduction is also marginal. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal doodle, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This looks like a scan of a halftone. I doubt very much that it is "own work" as claimed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishanbinda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal image and pointless watermarked copy of another image.
- File:Ratanpura navratra.png - Out of scope, or at least not useful beyond the original (and now past) purpose
- File:Literacy day on ratanpura.jpg - Out of scope, or at least not useful beyond the original (and now past) purpose
- File:Ratanpura cover.jpg - Out of scope, or at least not useful beyond the original (and now past) purpose
- File:Krishan Binda.png - Unused personal image
- File:Ratanpura.jpg - Pointless watermarked copy of File:Sand dunes of thar desert.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 19:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal vanity photo, out of scope. Used out of context on id.wiktionary. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haba credo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images. Commons is not a free personal web host.
- File:La vie mo cher.jpg
- File:Haba cre.jpg
- File:Adriel.jpg
- File:Mamama.jpg
- File:Famille de ....jpg
- File:Ma famille mlp.jpg
- File:Papa katete.jpg
- File:Ma mère et mon frère.jpg
- File:Moi et moi.jpg
- File:Ma famille pmp.jpg
- File:Ma soeur.jpg
- File:Mon p.jpg
- File:Sarah ma.jpg
- File:Haba.jpg
- File:Ma famille.jpg
- File:Haba et tresors.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 19:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksenia Koneva 1
[edit]Unused personal vanity photos, out of scope.
- File:Ksenia Koneva doll.jpg
- File:Ksenia Koneva for magazine.jpg
- File:Ksenia Koneva snow.jpg
- File:Ksenia Koneva.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, presumably of uploader going by name. Ubcule (talk) 19:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/iamzahwa http://www.galafemmeafricaine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/nominees_ecrivains_zahwadjennad.png Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Apparent copy (thumbnail) of http://www.mywebappointment.net/uploads/3/5/1/6/3516803/5718673.jpg?311 on http://www.mywebappointment.net/museums.html Generic1139 (talk) 20:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Author requests its removal from the commons Proctris (talk) 20:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Keep, as licences are irrevokable. However would Proctris be satisfied with a cropped version that frames only the fox on a grass background? -- Tuválkin ✉ 22:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Author requests its removal from the Commons Proctris (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted album art posted under the (presumably deliberate) false claim of "created by NASA". WikiDan61 (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete Motopark (talk) 06:30, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion requested. The uploader of this file kindly asked that the file not be transferred to Commons. While the license requirements do allow such a transfer, the image scope would be rather limited. See file at Meta-Wiki for more information (Ping Ralf Roletschek and Church of emacs). Thank you. -- M\A 15:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, please delete. --Tobias (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
COM:LL, the Flickr user has copied both the image and the text in the description from [1] (credited "PHOTOGRAPH BY PEDRO UGARTE/AFP/GETTY"), image also previously published at [2][3] and others with press agency credits. January (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Victor Turov (1936—1996) as a young man, i would say in the sixties. It is improbable, that Nicoff (Мікалай Яцкоў), born in 1959, is the copyright holder, COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 15:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Photo taken by staff, but Vaccaro is the author? Vaccaro is the copyright holder, but it's public domain? Note the uploader has previous form for uploading this exact picture with a spurious rationale, and it's still marked explicitly copyright at www.donvaccaro.org. Pinkbeast (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: permission via OTRS needed Didym (talk) 00:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ermanon as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|Cynicht and Moelwyn (cattle study), Wales-LCCN2001703469.jpg Didym (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: own upload, unused Didym (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 17:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Higher resolution version available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:West_End_of_Old_Amersham_High_Street-geograph-3655963-by-Des-Blenkinsopp.jpg Judithcomm (talk) 17:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 18:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file and wrong file name cannot be used. VOliviertjie (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. (Translation of description:"Love turns out to be a feeling among beings which results in actions, experiences and attitudes that might change your expectation that being ... But parental love, but rather love a pure and sincere father turns out to be challenging and confusing for those who have the privilege of enjoying it, for the simple fact that you never know they are capable for your love. That love is so pure that could about spending limits, these limits could be jeopardized. A father with his children is the most jealous,") Ubcule (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Probably above "PD simple" threshold (and I don't believe for a second this is uploader's own work or that he/she has the right to it as claimed) Ubcule (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
unused, no cat, useless, no encyclopedic value, just a test, etc F (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry, I try not to let these slip through, but testing UploadWizard is a full-time job. Delete away. --MarkTraceur (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC) (uploader)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philotanus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images of (from what I can tell) relatively non-notable band, and hence probably out of scope, though whether a case could be made for keeping some under some criteria is open to question...?
- File:Hephaestus Bajista Actual.jpg
- File:Philotanus Actual ..jpg
- File:Formacion actual Philotanus Live in island.jpg
- File:Guitarrista oficial Asmodeus.jpg
- File:Philotanus live in Bunker ( Itzcoatl,Klauss,Hephaestus).jpg
- File:Baterista Oficial Ek Xib Chacc.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 18:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope company logo. Ubcule (talk) 19:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Obviously uploaded for spam reasons. The image itself is decent quality, but given the tendency of spammers to use copyrighted images- or derivatives of copyrighted stock images- I'm not sure if this is worth the risk in keeping. Ubcule (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image, apparently of uploader. Ubcule (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Very poor quality and pointless image, had been used in abandoned article on en.wikipedia (>6 months old) which has been tagged and is likely to be removed ASAP. Ubcule (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Please don't remove my logo, I am currently planning on using it soon. Hazzy6000 (talk) 22:28, 2 April 2015 (BST)
- That's no reason to keep it here. Commons isn't an image repository for your personal or business use, and the abandoned draft article that you used it in (the only plausible excuse for the image's existence here) would certainly have been rejected had it been submitted in that form.
- It's not even clear from the site that this is a "proper" company- which isn't up to me to judge- but it's clearly not remotely notable enough to warrant its logo being useful for Commons' project scope. Ubcule (talk) 22:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SuzanneJanssen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam, out of scope and/or possible copyright violations.
- File:WUA!AwardBelvilla.png
- File:ZooverAwardBelvilla.png
- File:Uitzicht vanuit vakantiehuis.png - Several copies of this online dating back to 2012, possible copyvio.
- File:Vakantiehuis Nederland.png - Copies online from 2013, with one (Google claiming) going back to 2009
- File:WUA!Award.jpg
- File:ZooverAward.jpg
- File:ChaletOostenrijk.png - Other copies online predating this one
- File:Vakantieboerderij in Nederland.png - Duplicate of Vakantiehuis Nederland.png, same probable copyvio
- File:Hangmat3.png - Duplicate of Uitzicht vanuit vakantiehuis.png above, same probable copyvio
- File:Hangmat2.png - Duplicate of Uitzicht vanuit vakantiehuis.png above, same probable copyvio
- File:Hangmat1.png - Duplicate of Uitzicht vanuit vakantiehuis.png above, same probable copyvio
- File:Hangmat.png - Duplicate of Uitzicht vanuit vakantiehuis.png above, same probable copyvio
- File:Uitzichthangmat.png - Duplicate of Uitzicht vanuit vakantiehuis.png above, same probable copyvio
- File:Vakantieboerderij Het Witte Huis.jpg - Duplicate of Vakantiehuis Nederland.png, same probable copyvio
- File:Belvilla.jpg - Spam logo
Ubcule (talk) 19:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 08:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Image seems to be missing permission, as the uploader has identified himself as Rick Maxwell (see File:St Peter's College, Auckland; Bro O'Driscoll Building.JPG), not as Pierre J David. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
The logo is copyrighted to the Eastourne Military Museum, and no evidence is provided that it has been released by the institution under the licence described. Hchc2009 (talk) 09:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
A valid permission has never been received for this image[4]. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Isn't it derivative work of copyrighted art? Probably violates sculptor's copyright. Who is sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 10:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded in error Amandaisom (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elintongeremias (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work considering the heavily watermarked photos including credits to photographer "Marcelo Sokal" who appeared as author also in an already deleted file where the source was "Balneário Piçarras" = a Brazilian municipalitiy. Most likely taken from official site like also the 2 official symbols (flag / bandeira and coat of arms / brasão), taken from http://www.picarras.sc.gov.br/cms/pagina/ver/codMapaItem/10397#.VR0cu44nOBo (btw, identical file names: 18707_Brasao_Municipal.jpg + 18705_Bandeira_Municipal.jpg)
- File:17picarrass.jpg
- File:16picarrass.jpg
- File:12picarrass.jpg
- File:18707 Brasao Municipal.jpg
- File:18705 Bandeira Municipal.jpg
- File:10picarrass.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali neymetov (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all copyrighted publicity shots. Invalid license for all.
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Promotional watermarks, which go significantly beyond asserting authorship/copyright - maiharcity.com Sumanch (talk) 13:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
File:President Pranab Mukherjee Inaugurating Mughal Gardens in front of Rashtrapati Bhavan 2015.jpg
[edit]Copyright violation. This picture has been cropped from this photograph. The photograph cannot be found on pib.nic.in, which is cited in the image info. Full article from which photograph was taken. The image is possibly owned by Getty Image. On Getty, the image is credited to Prakash Singh who is an AFP photographer. Kenfyre (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
No use. Out of scope. -βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 13:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by André Luis Felix (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Promo photos and video. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Promo of Gusev's 858.webm
- File:Day desert.JPG
- File:Две сестры.JPG
- File:Letrilla.jpg
- File:SHOT009.JPG
- File:Алексей Гусев.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear EugeneZelenko, as a newcomer, I'm afraid I didn't get the point exactly. I'm sure, from my part, that all of them are clear with copyrights. So could you be so kind to explain the possible problems with my files in more detail? Sincerely yours, Izikson (talk)
- I answered on my talk page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS needed Didym (talk) 00:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket:2015040910023791. Natuur12 (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/logo INeverCry 00:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused rudimentary drawing INeverCry 00:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 00:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Madhabdi 06.jpg
- File:Madhabdi 05.jpg
- File:Madhabdi 04.jpg
- File:Madhabdi 03.jpg
- File:Madhabdi 02.jpg
- File:Madhabdi 01.jpg
INeverCry 00:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Violates "fair use" laws. Totally non-free. George Ho (talk) 00:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 00:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 00:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 00:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli ⟡ 00:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 00:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Not educationally useful. · Favalli ⟡ 00:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
File:Con el regidor Juan Carlos García viendo las necesidades de los ciudadanos Damián garcia.jpg
[edit]this is not own work · Favalli ⟡ 00:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos without any informative value of non notable person. · Favalli ⟡ 00:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos without any informative value of non notable person. · Favalli ⟡ 00:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli ⟡ 00:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos without any informative value of non notable person. Very low resolution · Favalli ⟡ 00:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos without any informative value of non notable person. Very low resolution · Favalli ⟡ 00:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope · Favalli ⟡ 01:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 01:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
can't find its source, the source may be removed. Wikisay (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos without any informative value of non notable person. · Favalli ⟡ 01:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos without any informative value of non notable person. · Favalli ⟡ 01:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
I dispute that this is the uploader's own work. His other uploads are all material copied from the internet. This image is labelled as being a killer, and we have no way of knowing whether or not this is actually true without a source. Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli ⟡ 01:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli ⟡ 01:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. · Favalli ⟡ 01:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. Low resolution. · Favalli ⟡ 01:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not an ownwork -- Christian Ferrer 05:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
suspicous source, high likely download from offical site and upload it Matthew hk (talk) 06:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sangmeshwar sakhare (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of scope.
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karen Fabian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text documents of questionable notability, out of scope, should be converted to wikitext and transferred to relevant project if useful.
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted render. Felviper (talk) 00:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but the depicted building is surely creative architecture and still in copyright. Regrettably, Quatar has no Freedom_of_panorama exception. Either we get a permisison from the architect(s) or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Umm Salal Stadium.jpg
- File:Al-Wakrah Stadium.jpg
- File:Al Shamal.jpg
- File:Education City Stadium.jpg
- File:Sports City Stadium.jpg
- File:Doha-port-stadium.jpg
--Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
这是维基百科英文版的图，公开的，不存在侵权行为，是世界杯的图，而且我没有盈利行为，只是因为创建维基百科计划的图太麻烦，我才用自己的名义建图
This is the English version of Wikipedia, open to the public, there is no infringement, is the world cup, and I have no profit, just create Wikipedia plan too much trouble, mapping I give my name — Preceding unsigned comment added by 李建兴 (talk • contribs)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bbikram123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bbikram123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 00:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Belarus for sculptures. Ras67 (talk) 15:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Можете быстро удалить, я его уже давно в рувики перенёс. --SerSem (talk) 16:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 19:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 00:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I have made and uploaded a new and improved version of this image which shows the same information. Killbright (talk) 07:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I have made and uploaded a new and improved version of this image which shows the same information. Killbright (talk) 07:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Not for Commons. Under copyright. Not own work. It's by Picasso Coldcreation (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC) I have downloaded my original file before editting: As you can see, due to the wide angle MANUAL lens Samyang 14mm f2.8, some distortions are present and the focus length is mot given in the metadata. I have derived the proposed for deletion file by means of additional edition, like "lens correction" and removing the "empty" area... So, the painting is, of course, Picasso's and is 114 years old, but the FILE is my own. And when I uploaded the MY file, I honestly stated that THE FILE IS MINE (not the PAINTing!) If I am wrong, please make the Automatic Upload ask not for FILE being my own, but ask for the ownership, or authorship of the OBJECT, depicted in the file!.. Then almost all photography should be considered prohibited hereabouts, I presume... Edal (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
PS I have just checked what does Upload Wizard say: o This file is my own work. o This file is not my own work.
So how can we say that a 2010 Canon EOS 450D file is Picasso's, or that "It's by Picasso"???? Alas, Picasso has not been alive in 2010!!! Or, maybe, you will insist that digital photo FILES of the Giza Pyramids are a work of the Pharaohs?-)) Thanks for paying attention to this controversy in Upload Wizard! Sincerely, Edal (talk) 10:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- There is no controversy. It's very simple. You photographed a painting by Picasso. The image of that painting (no matter who's photographs) will be out of copyright 1 January 2044. If it has been published before 1923 you can upload it to English Wikipedia. Coldcreation (talk) 13:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative of a copyrighted work, Picasso died in 1973 Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Córdova (província da Argentina) Unlikely authorship. Low resolution, lack of metadata. Favalli ⟡ 01:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably copyvio (http://twadl.com/Peru/Uruguay/ full version?) -- Geagea (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PsichoPuzo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of images from sites with All rights reserved boilerplate.
- File:СM Grom 1.jpg
- File:СM Grom 2.jpg
- File:СM Grom.jpg
- File:T-84 BM-Oplot and T-84-120 Yatagan.jpg
- File:T84U Oplot 9.jpg
- File:T-84-120 Yatagan.jpg
- File:Monument to Ukrainian intelligence officers.jpg
- File:FIS of Ukraine Kyiv Office.jpg
- File:FIS of Ukraine Kyiv oblast office.jpg
- File:FIS of Ukraine main office hall.jpg
- File:Oplot M 06.jpg
- File:Oplot M 07.jpg
- File:Oplot M 04.jpg
- File:Oplot M 05.jpg
- File:Oplot M 01.jpg
- File:Oplot M 02.jpg
- File:Oplot M 03.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 8.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 7.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 5.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 6.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 4.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 3.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 1.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot 2.jpg
- File:T-84U oplot.jpg
- File:KrAZ Hurricane.jpg
- File:KrAZ Feona.jpg
- File:Kraz Panther ASV.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus many.jpg
- File:T-64BM2.jpg
- File:BTR-7.jpg
- File:BTR-4MV 1.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus 5.jpg
- File:BTR-4MV.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus 3.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus 4.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus 2.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus 1.jpg
- File:BTR-4 Bucephalus.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
If image is from gallery of such source it was put there exactly for that purpose. PsichoPuzo (talk) 15:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment the boilerplate is irrelevant. You statement about open sources or govermental organization is nonsense, there is no such copyright exemption in the copyright law. Required is a clear statement from the copyright holder that the files are published under a free license, see Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain. You claim on the file description pages that the copyright holder did publish the files under a free license ({{Cc-by-3.0}}), there is however no evidence that this is true. The files are obviously unfree files grabbed from various websites, therefore this media files completely fail our inclusion criteria of free content. --Martin H. (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyC9ssBaRtA90MqzBoA9FKAwDvABUntXzMqzYnqPHwA91MqPUL3vHuq1ZajaObAXQnQ%3D%3D##File:Michel_Bouillot_Img032.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: All files from non-free sites. Maybe you can use them in the local wikipedia as Commons:Fair use. -- Geagea (talk) 23:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by a svg Dianakc (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Abbelen Logo.svg. Yann (talk) 17:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by a svg Dianakc (talk) 00:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:BKK24 logo.svg. Yann (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by svg Dianakc (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Logo Sigma Zentrum-svg.svg. Yann (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by svg Dianakc (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Atmel logo svg.svg. Yann (talk) 17:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by svg Dianakc (talk) 01:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Just add a link to it. --Leyo 07:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:ICS logo svg.svg. Yann (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DroEsperanto as Fair use (logo fur) and the most recent rationale was: |Article= Institute for Medical Imaging and Sciences|Use=Org|Source= http://imes.mit.edu/sites/default/files/IMES-logo-for-website.jpg%7CUsed_for= Depict logo in article infobox|Owner= The Massachusetts Institute of Technology|Website= http://www.imes.mit.edu%7CHistory=%7CCommentary=%7CDescription=%7CPortion= Whole logo|Low_resolution=|Purpose=|Replaceability= No free replacement exists and none can conceivably be created.|other_information= pulled from IMES website Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 02:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by svg Dianakc (talk) 04:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Serpro.svg. Yann (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by svg Dianakc (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:ANP.svg. Yann (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
replaced by svg Dianakc (talk) 04:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Jardim Botanico (RJ).svg. Yann (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
la partie concernant le cristalin est fausse 193.55.29.169 07:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 17:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- This logo is a relatively complex shaded illustration, so I think it does go beyond the threshold of originality.
- Are ‘graphical representations of Unicode’ include emojis?
- That’s what Category:Unicode seems to say…?
- Not what Category:PD Unicode says however: ‘not-free fonts may belong to private property’.
- I would like to add
{{citation needed}}to all theses ‘Unicode = PD’ sentences: I’m genuinely very curious about all this! :) - Anyway, the picture is clearly from Apple emoji font, which isn’t free.
~ nicolas (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I just got the picture from the social network's website emoj.li so surely if there is an issue with copyright then Apple will contact the developers.
- --Lbenjamin293 (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, it’s curious that they are using this as an icon. As emojis are fairly spread, it possibly falls into fair-use. Or maybe since an emoji set is technically a font, if you buy a computer with that emoji set you can use it for your projects, as with all the other fonts included. Anyway, I think it should be better to move the file to Wikipedia, as it’s not really a free media. ~ nicolas (talk) 21:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Complex, no permission. Yann (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
hay tres versiones, dejar una solo roigbalterra (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use, no reason to delete. Yann (talk) 17:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
This is not the Hezbollah flag, only a personal creation to fill in infoboxes and do as if this was the real flag. Looking at File:Hizbollah flag.jpg shows this is far from reality. Moumou82 (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- No copyrighted material here. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- weak
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Copyright claim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikrobølgeovn (talk • contribs) 22:07, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
duplication CHK46 (talk) 20:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Good quality, in use. Yann (talk) 17:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Personal picture without educational use. · Favalli ⟡ 00:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
This church was built in 1998 and consecrated in 2000 (see here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthodoxe_Kathedrale_%28Shkodra%29). According to that information and no-FoP in Albania, image should be deleted. Halavar (talk) 01:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Fake logo, there's no references or sources that this was the logo of ARENA Sfs90 (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
CC-BY-SA but unkown Author?!?! Benedictus Levita (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Despite the description: this a logo and not a flag. As the source says, it comes from the website of the New Caledonia government. With a bit of resarch, it's easy to find that copyright applies:
“L'ensemble de ce site relève de la législation française et internationale sur le droit d'auteur et la propriété intellectuelle. Tous les droits de reproduction sont réservés, y compris pour les documents téléchargeables et les représentations iconographiques et photographiques.”
(The entire site is covered by French and international legislation on copyright and intellectual property. All rights are reserved, including downloadable documents and iconographic and photographic representations.)
Superbenjamin (talk) 14:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Photo is credited by USGS [5] [6] to Matthew Rowe, whose CV does not show any indication of being a US Federal employee at any time; photo is therefore not reliably PD-USGS. MPF (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
It isn't (from the description) that Flickr user's own work to license as CC in the first place, so it's mislicensed. But the description also makes obvious that the image's origins aren't clear and whether it's usable under a free license due to its age. Ubcule (talk) 18:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence provided that this could be a Tibetan flag. The author is providing a link to another image in commons that he has edited himself as evidence, so he is his own source. No historical record existing about this flag. 6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 09:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- On the card used as reference, there are two flags, one of the Qing Dynasty (6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 removed the information on description, and [ at the same time, in discussion page recognised that's the flag of Qing dynasty], so this is not a fair edit. The Qing Dynasty ended in 1912, so The picture depcit the well documented Qing protectorat on Tibet (1720 – 1912). Qing dynasty era ended in 1912 (the information with removed by the user too). If the flag at the right is the flag of China under Tibetan Rul, the picture describe Lhassa, the capital of the Tibet protectorat (so semi-independant state), the flag is probably from Tibet. Either Lhassa area, Central Tibet, Whole Tibet, or represent the power ruling the Tibet, but a Tibetan flag for sure. The same way, the publisher of this picture depicted Hongkong with only the Qing flag at the top, and Korea with the pre-1905 korean flag. There is really no way to think the flag could be from elsewhere with these informations ? Is there a mean to ask a debate to now if this user should be or not blocked due to non-fair edits ? In tree months he removed lot of information, published pictures with truncated EXIF fields, in what looks lika a POV-push purpose (see his contributions).Popolon (talk) 10:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Your assumptions based on an illustration from a chocolate producer does not make this flag a historic evidence. By following your logic, the red disc on a white background should be listed under British flags based on the chocolate collector cards as HK used to be under British rule at that time.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 10:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- This is not in the symbol section, but on the picture itself, flags with round is used by several people in central and eastern asia, Japan, Korea and several Khanates and Khaganates, There is pictures with similar flags on battles between mandchus, mongols and tibetans in some battles depctions, in the kind of Category:Ten_Great_Campaigns (didn't found it here). Flags of mongols during japan attacks under Yuan Dynasty, see also File:Takezaki_suenaga_ekotoba3.jpg, the flag could be used during the used by Mongols (Khoshuts and Dzoungars) during their reign on Tibet. Popolon (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Not a valid argument for deletion, based on Commons policy. Unless the image is a copyright infringement or violates laws on libel, I don't see this image breaking any rules here. Commons is not Wikipedia, and there are no rules which state that images that may not be factual need to be deleted. If you would like to dispute the degree of correctness that this image has, feel free to bring that dispute over to Wikipedia, and remove the image from articles over there once you've established consensus. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 12:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I understand your point, but this image violates Commons:File naming ("Names should be accurate"), and also seems to be outside the project scope ("Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content. The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"") The educational value of an unknown flag created by a Common user based on a chocolate manufacturer collector card is hard to be seen, and Commons is not flickr or a personal dropbox. I don't think that we should discuss its accuracy in each Wikipedia project where this file is currently used, as I am talking about Commons policies and recommendations. If not deleted, this file should at least be rename to something like "Unknown flag featured on a chocolate manufacturer collector card" to prevent the current misleading naming--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 13:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I've been a little skeptical of this claimed flag since 2012, as you can see on Popolon's user talk page. At the very least, a {{fictitious flag}} declaration should be added, unless some solid Tibet-specific historical information can be provided outside of the century-old colonial collector card context. Unfortunately, some old non-official sources on flags printed by reputable publishers (such as the Flag chart from Nouveau Petit Larousse Illustré, 1924) have notorious errors. AnonMoos (talk) 22:42, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the file move. With the new name and the current fictitious warning template, we should be able to make it clear to anyone that the flag shouldn't be used in encyclopedia mainspace. --benlisquareTalk•Contribs 12:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Abd -- If there's a legitimate dispute between opposing views in the real world (Morocco vs. Western Sahara or whatever), then it's Commons policy to allow maps etc. expressing both points of view to be uploaded here, and then we leave it up to the individual Wikipedias to decide which images to use. However, that's not really the situation here. One individual person claims that a flag existed, but the evidence provided is hardly conclusive, and not of such a nature as to overcome the suspicions of several other individuals. The name "TibetanFlag-before1912" makes a decisive claim which is controversial. In any case, "Claimed" is greatly preferable to "Alleged" as neutral wording... P.S. Did you know your username means "slave" in Arabic? AnonMoos (talk) 00:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, alternate images or the like are allowed. We handle controversy over educational materials similarly on Wikiversity, they may be forked, and presented within a neutral context. We will avoid what could be misleading, by adding notes, not by deleting (assuming that something is within scope). The name made a decisive claim, and there was proper objection to that. I agree that "Claimed" would be better. That chocolate manufacturer would use what was available to them, then, and I would argue that such are reliable source, being independently published, so there is prima facie evidence of this being a Tibetan flag. Not conclusive, to be sure. Probably adequate to use with an explanatory note on enwiki. More research is needed, but not needed to Keep the image, and I do suggest renaming to avoid the unsubstantiated conclusion that the flag is fictitious. As to my name, I hope it is not misleading, I am ^abdun min ^ibaadu r-raHmAn. Abd may be translated as slave, servant, worshipper, lover. --Abd (talk) 12:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- As mentioned above, a renaming is also fine, but "fictitious" is more appropriate than "claimed" as the author is not claiming that this would be a Tibetan flag and that this flag would relate to the pre-1912 period. A better renaming could be "Unidentified flag appearing on a collector card featuring the palace of the Dalai Lama in Lhasa in the early 20th century". In the same collection, the illustrator has included a Qing dynasty and a Japanese flag on British ruled Hong Kong. This does not mean HK was a Japanese or Qing protectorate in the early 20th century...--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that the proposed name "Unidentified flag" could also be appropriate. The name should also be simple, and doesn't have to be perfect, just not misleading. Without investigating that other card, reliable sources also make mistakes. ("Reliable" in enwiki usage does not carry the ordinary English meaning of "reliable." It's a term of art.) We should be done here. Change to the filename would be proposed and agreed to on File talk. --Abd (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Unidentified flag appearing on Potala illustration would be shorter and still accurate.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Let's not fill this page with stuff about the name. See File talk:Fictitious Tibetan Flag-before 1912.svg. --Abd (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Unidentified flag appearing on Potala illustration would be shorter and still accurate.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that the proposed name "Unidentified flag" could also be appropriate. The name should also be simple, and doesn't have to be perfect, just not misleading. Without investigating that other card, reliable sources also make mistakes. ("Reliable" in enwiki usage does not carry the ordinary English meaning of "reliable." It's a term of art.) We should be done here. Change to the filename would be proposed and agreed to on File talk. --Abd (talk) 22:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- As mentioned above, a renaming is also fine, but "fictitious" is more appropriate than "claimed" as the author is not claiming that this would be a Tibetan flag and that this flag would relate to the pre-1912 period. A better renaming could be "Unidentified flag appearing on a collector card featuring the palace of the Dalai Lama in Lhasa in the early 20th century". In the same collection, the illustrator has included a Qing dynasty and a Japanese flag on British ruled Hong Kong. This does not mean HK was a Japanese or Qing protectorate in the early 20th century...--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, alternate images or the like are allowed. We handle controversy over educational materials similarly on Wikiversity, they may be forked, and presented within a neutral context. We will avoid what could be misleading, by adding notes, not by deleting (assuming that something is within scope). The name made a decisive claim, and there was proper objection to that. I agree that "Claimed" would be better. That chocolate manufacturer would use what was available to them, then, and I would argue that such are reliable source, being independently published, so there is prima facie evidence of this being a Tibetan flag. Not conclusive, to be sure. Probably adequate to use with an explanatory note on enwiki. More research is needed, but not needed to Keep the image, and I do suggest renaming to avoid the unsubstantiated conclusion that the flag is fictitious. As to my name, I hope it is not misleading, I am ^abdun min ^ibaadu r-raHmAn. Abd may be translated as slave, servant, worshipper, lover. --Abd (talk) 12:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Abd -- If there's a legitimate dispute between opposing views in the real world (Morocco vs. Western Sahara or whatever), then it's Commons policy to allow maps etc. expressing both points of view to be uploaded here, and then we leave it up to the individual Wikipedias to decide which images to use. However, that's not really the situation here. One individual person claims that a flag existed, but the evidence provided is hardly conclusive, and not of such a nature as to overcome the suspicions of several other individuals. The name "TibetanFlag-before1912" makes a decisive claim which is controversial. In any case, "Claimed" is greatly preferable to "Alleged" as neutral wording... P.S. Did you know your username means "slave" in Arabic? AnonMoos (talk) 00:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Pleclown (talk) 11:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
This is not the named species. The true species can be seen directly above the sign in this photo by the same person: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geogenanthus_ciliatus_-_Denver_Botanic_Gardens_-_DSC00959.JPG Max Paxman (talk) 16:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi there! As uploader I definitely do get things wrong from time to time. Rather than delete this picture, however, I suggest that it be renamed and moved to an unidentified plant category. There are people in commons who are very good in accurately identifying plants (alas I am not one). cheers and best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Daderot: That is a good idea. Please also rename and move this photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geogenanthus_ciliatus_-_Denver_Botanic_Gardens_-_DSC00959.JPG. I cropped that photo, which may be seen here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Geogenanthus_ciliatus. By the way, the other plant may be Porphyrocoma pohliana. Cheers, Max Paxman (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: To be renamed. Pleclown (talk) 11:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Symbols of Sentinela do Sul
[edit]Coat of arms (brasão) and flag (bandeira) of Brazilian municipality pt:Sentinela do Sul emancipated in 1992 (see also http://www.sentineladosul.rs.gov.br/o-municipio/historia), failing {{PD-BrazilGov}} = "(...) published or commissioned (...) prior to 1983." No trivial text/shape logo, failing {{PD-textlogo}}/{{PD-shape}}. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. See also (as a working example) File:BrasaoValparaiso.png.
Gunnex (talk) 00:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Please update File:Brazilian Government's logo (Dilma Rousseff).svg with this version. (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Moving to older file. Green Giant (talk) 15:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Superbenjamin as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free logo|source=http://www.gouv.nc/portal/page/portal/gouv/mentions_legales This is not a logo, is an SVG Coat of arms. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- The coat of arm is a different image. This image is the logo used by the Governement of New Caledonia without the text “Gouvernement de Nouvelle-Calédonie”. The logo in full is visible on the government website (and signaled as copyrighted). --Superbenjamin (talk) 18:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Per Amitie, Fry and Cekli. I think this is right on the threshold, so it was worthwhile having a DR. Green Giant (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
