Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 26th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Motopark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: facebook copyrighted Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Oops, wrong button. Copyvio of course Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Virgil Earp.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nellie Jane Earp.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freddrick0987 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Freddrick0987 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence in own work for these images, all apparently related to performance/musical artists.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 106.187.88.122 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Improper license. The photograph was used by NASA courtesy of a third party (SSEP) and is not free. No fair-use rational given.
Converted by me to DR to allow for a bit of discussion. However, the deletion-rationale seems to be correct. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Delete by uploader (me), to redirect to file with photo cropped out. -- Cirt (talk) 16:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Eglises d'Ivry sur Seine

[edit]

2 hours of churches! That's enough for the year. --Kumkum (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Internet_images Dereckson (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the current revision is a textlogo, the initial revision is not, so that revision (and only that revision) should be deleted. Stefan4 (talk) 20:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted first file version: copyvio. Wdwd (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation [1] Austriantraveler (talk) 10:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 22:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HAMARDEEN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Etarlyn De La Cruz

[edit]

"Google" as the source is useless; it is hardly better that no source at all and the subject is given as the author which is also suspicious as they don't look like selfies. Those I searched with tineye produced no returns at all. Several are low resolution images but most have metadata so they smell of being copied from an internet website without any evidence of permission from the author. --Ww2censor (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alex Meran Debut Promo.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonioaguero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per request PierreSelim (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nudepaulc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality, out of scope, as per COM:NUDE.

Yann (talk) 20:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 23:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anton Maier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See w:de:Kathrein-Werke. Not that notable that we have to have three logos of the same kind, tho. :-)

Deleted: keeping one Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a recent selfie picture of a probably living person, which is out of the scope of the Encyclopedie project. Do not follow (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:52, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO in UK? Amitie 10g (talk) 04:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 05:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Kirshenbaum herzog shilon1.jpg - not in use and definitely not needed in the Commons. There's actually a slight difference, really tiny one, that doesn't make it worthwhile keeping both files Ldorfman (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate file. Wdwd (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 01:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: compilation of different logos, background; To complex for COM:TOO -> copyvio. Wdwd (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably (c)vio as all other uploads have been so far. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbed from (example) https://twitter.com/deibysmanuel/status/626003274697732096 (07.2015), author of http://www.larazon.co/web/2015/07/luciano-angulo-el-eterno-cantinflas-de-monteria/ (07.2015, © Copyright 2015 - LARAZON.CO), which (considering Google cache) carried the photo for a while). Gunnex (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Wdwd (talk) 14:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 02:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Wdwd (talk) 14:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of license given. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wrong date, unknown author, no proof for PD-old. Wdwd (talk) 14:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, out of scope. Wdwd (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Utter nonsense. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wdwd (talk) 14:56, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mire Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Wdwd (talk) 14:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't tell what this says but see Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wdwd (talk) 14:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope Wdwd (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, just some text Liliana-60 (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hakeld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Response

[edit]

Theese files are used in a course on Wikiversity. They are very useful for the students.

Could you please explain more about your reasoning behind the deletion request.

The files are used on this page: https://sv.wikiversity.org/wiki/Arduino/Lektion_1.4 It is a peculiar fact that it is not shown in the upload file info. --Hakeld (talk) 21:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please use [[File:example.jpg]] to include images on pages. -Mys_721tx (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, also questionable copyright status due to screenshots of copyrighted software Liliana-60 (talk) 20:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, just some text Liliana-60 (talk) 20:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 20:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per DR Mys_721tx (talk) 20:18, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistakely uploaded Dominikmatus (talk) 22:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per request Mormegil (talk) 13:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by user:Denniss // Mass deletion of pages added by Enock oglair Rillke(q?) 19:47, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by user:Denniss // Mass deletion of pages added by Enock oglair Rillke(q?) 19:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Unfortunately, there's no freedom of panorama in France, so we probably can't host this. Could possibly be used on en-wiki with a Fair use rationale, if shrunk down. The same problems apply to all other images in Category:Danse de la fontaine émergente. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own? original here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VIT_Aerial_1.png Motopark (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request to cancel the deletion nomination for file File:VIT Campus 1.jpg

[edit]

it was my mistake again. I just do not know how to describe an image in Wikimedia. Now I have included source of the image.

Wrong author and perhaps wrong licence--Motopark (talk) 14:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 04:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misuse of wikimedia projects for self promotion : the only contributions have been to upload personal image and to create a user page for to show the image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   20:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sikandar.awan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : no quite notable people/unused personal image for one and for the other it's an unused logo of a not enough notable company

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   20:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork (out of scope) or copyrighted 2d artwork --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like derivative, copyvio. P 1 9 9   20:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siljas Gourmet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused (personal?) logo of a not enough notable company. And unused personal image : out of scope for both images

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   17:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Similarobjects (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   17:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that uploader created the base image from which this was de-contrasted in photoshop. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that uploader created the base image from which this was de-contrasted in photoshop. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on either part of this montage: the photo face and/or the outline body, head and hair. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pruxo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that uploader is creator of these images, small sizes, no metadata, too many head shots of famous people, band members etc. Looks more like an internet collection than personal works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of band member unlikely to be user's own work, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal photo used in deleted autobio en:Dilawer Ahmed JohnCD (talk) 18:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio Kumkum (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joy-historian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that these images all claimed "self" are actually created by uploader. One has Hassleblad metadata the remainder have no metadata at all. Four pictures look like trading cards, at least three look like copies from publications.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, appears to be someone's school homework Liliana-60 (talk) 19:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but montage is missing links to media used from Wikimedia Commons, hence DR started, pls see also File:Nair Collage for Wikipedia.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, appears to be advertising Liliana-60 (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violacion del copyright desde http://www.pucmm.edu.do/biblioteca/dominicanos-destacados/primeras-damas Tarawa1943 (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image-of-text replaced by semantic wikimarkup for nested list at es:Estudio clínico DMacks (talk) 20:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the copyright holder (unless User:Itworxteam has identified to the Foundation as the official representative of the company?) Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work 46.38.62.124 22:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laserland (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work, other (c) violation already deleted.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:00, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal img. Saqib (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:29, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoope. Saqib (talk) 15:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per UDR. Yann (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Commons:Derivative works from screenshots. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted software (wallpaper) visible. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted software visible. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free software, also doubtful own work claim ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of either the person or the bull head. Composite, no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the terrible cut lines at the top of the chair, I doubt "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The small size and really bad cut out job on this picture of a designer chair from the 1960s suggest that neither the photo nor the chair is the own work of the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Print ad, derivative work ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that user created the base photograph altered in photoshop. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no public domain. Austriantraveler (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by HiW Alan (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (logos) Austriantraveler (talk) 10:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the camera image is from here. --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:39, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam. Austriantraveler (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. spam. Austriantraveler (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. no use at Wikipedia Austriantraveler (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. no use on Wikimedia projects Austriantraveler (talk) 10:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful decription. personal image. no use on Wikimedia projects. Austriantraveler (talk) 10:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Austriantraveler (talk) 10:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from tv. copyright violation. Austriantraveler (talk) 10:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. Per Commons:Fair use, I'll move this to Wikipedia.Anythingyouwant (talk) 10:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Probably also a vopyvio. Ies (talk) 11:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small size .. not really useful Saqib (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free image Stryn (talk) 16:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fel rubrik Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 16:41, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Ja, det står Kungaholms kyrka istf Kungsholms kyrka. Jag har fan i mig inte tid att forska fram sättet är göra ändringar, så ta bort hela skiten! Please delete![reply]

Not very interesting Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinsam felstavning i rubriken, och för övrigt finns det redan en massa bilder av kyrkan, så den här bilden är onödig. Lars (Lon) Olsson (talk) 08:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previously deleted by another admin Alan (talk) 23:15, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep passes PDF scope. Specifically it is "a scan of a document of historic or other external significance (e.g. scans of existing copyright-free or licensed books, reports, newspapers etc.)." In addition, it is used by other wikis. Lastly, using "text" as scope of deletion is specifically prohibited for "scans of ... reports ... of historic or other external significance ... even if they contain no images" --DHeyward (talk) 07:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use and seems to be a historical document Natuur12 (talk) 17:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license used. Unfortunately, NOT a work of a US Federal employee. Work of author David Coombs, copyright retained by him. No evidence he transferred his copyright to any federal employee. Requires COM:OTRS confirmation. -- Cirt (talk) 19:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in W. Alan (talk) 23:28, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlexTheWhovian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No educational use. These ribbons were prepared (with much care and ingenuity) for use with a set of templates associated with a proposed expansion of the Service Award scheme on en:wp. However, there was no consensus to introduce the additional 42 levels of service award, and the templates were deleted at en:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 14#Service award templates.

JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. AlexTheWhovian (talk) 05:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In scope per local policies Alan (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

rather blurry, we have much better . --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC) Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Moldova; FOP not ok for photographs Brackenheim (talk) 22:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contains copyrighted preface by Viktar Kovalenko (Russian: Виктор Коваленко; 1929-2001) on pages 8 through 21 Jarash (talk) 22:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 23:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kvjovzvjjpv Aimen djeddi (talk) 23:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PS Alan (talk) 23:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Gallery pages with broken file links Tomoji Tomoji NAKAMURA (talk) 22:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted bu Whym Alan (talk) 17:07, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file name Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}} template Alan (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taggen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PRP: Quite unlikey that Taggen (talk · contributions · Statistics) is the creator of all these official symbols (coats of arms = escudo) from 16 Colombian municipalities. There may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided. Most of them (if not all) can be found earlier on official sites or elsewhere = grabbed from Internet without caring copyrights. Per COM:EVID the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that these files are in the public domain or that the copyright owners has released them under a suitable licence.

Living examples:


Gunnex (talk) 07:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of a copyrighted logo : http://www.sit.ac.in/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo of a not enough company, band or what?? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

He subido una versión vectorial de la firma en formato SVG, disponible aquí https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Firma-Danilo-Medina.svg Henryhidalgoarias (talk) 08:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alberto nelson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alberto nelson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images / no quite notable peoples : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:48, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naserim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC) I don't understand what is the problem with this picture. It's a personal picture.[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mareiladelcarmen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlike own work of the uploader as claimed. Looks more like a newspaper scan or similar. JuTa 13:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncategorized, small size, no exifs : certainly not an own work --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional image of a not enough notable band, also maybe not an own work. Out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrummerWallace (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image and/or self promotion : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused peronal image : out of scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Via Bariloche (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional images : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EstephanSoop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images and/or no quite notable people : out of scope

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:31, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Organisational logo above threshold of originality, Duplicate at enwiki non-free Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The words contained in this template is a deliberate part-creative, part-selective misinterpretation [2][3] of the copyright law of Hong Kong (The Copyright Ordinance, Chapter 528) [4][5] in an attempt to justify otherwise obvious infringement of copyright of the works of the Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region or of the British Government in Hong Kong, called the Government of Hong Kong, which are by default, by local law (by local legislative ordinance), protected [6][7][8][9], and their copyright have not been automatically disclaimed whilst being automatically released into the public domain free of copyright. Unless Section 182 of the Copyright Ordinance were repealed, the Ordinance and the term "public records" therein obviously cannot be construed as meaning, or, interpreted to mean, all works of the Government of Hongkong Special Administrative Region or of the British Government in Hong Kong (the Government of Hong Kong), and most works thereof presently found in Wikimedia Commons would certainly fall foul of the words and the provisions of Section 182. Urquhartnite (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep. The words in the template are almost entirely verbatim quotation of Chap. 528 Section 58's two subsections. As such they cannot simultaneously be an intepretation or mis-interpretation. Any individual misapplication of a template does not invalidate the template and all other uses of it. –84.92.129.87 22:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I originally Deleted this but have reverted it to give more time to examine the photographs to which it was attached. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete While copying public records is not copyright infringement, that is not the same thing as public domain. There are no implied commercial rights or in particular derivative rights. The scope of fair use or fair dealing on such works would therefore be pretty wide, but it is still not public domain. That is basically like a section in copyright law which allows libraries to use and copy works for limited purposes; this is a somewhat limited exception to allow anyone from the public to view and inspect public records (and copy them to allow others to do the same), but not necessarily use such works for any use they want. Note that public records often come from material outside the government (evidence in court cases etc.) and use of such works would definitely be restricted to uses related to their public record status. Even in the U.S., there are only a couple of states whose public record laws have been considered broad enough to basically defeat copyright protection; for most states we assume state government works are still copyrighted even though most are public records. Hong Kong basically inherited Crown Copyright for government works from UK law; other than bills which become law, it looks like, governments usually own copyright for 50 years from creation or publication depending on the circumstance. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Just another instance of conflating public access and public domain. If the premise of the template were to be true, the evidence from copyright lawsuits would be in the public domain, making such lawsuits rather pointless. LX (talk, contribs) 08:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per cmts Alan (talk) 11:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Alan: There are now several hundreds files without a license. What to do? Yann (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files using Template:PD-HK-PR

[edit]

Files using Template:PD-HK-PR which no longer have a license. If any can be relicensed please relicense.--Jarekt (talk) 11:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are several files ending in "Pressure.gif", "Pressure.png", and "Wind.png" and a number of others which look like simple line graphs -- I think those are PD-ineligible. The related radar, wind, and precipitation files might be more based on the underlying map copyright. There are a lot of road signs... many of those may also be PD-ineligible, though probably not all of them. The flag and emblem ones (File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg, File:P Hong Kong.png, File:Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg, File:Hong Kong Bauhinia Flag (Navy Blue).svg) look to be vectorizations made by a Commons contributor following a specification provided by the government... that gets into idea/expression divide territory, and I don't think I would delete those. The original license (on File:Hong Kong SAR Regional Emblem.svg, the source of the others) was marked as PD-author by User:Zscout370, and that should probably be restored. There may well be a copyright on the vectorization in some countries and that tag should not have been removed. The bulk of the files though are those radar maps and the road signs. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep The Hong Kong road signs are mostly derivatives from British road signs (as former Coloniser) which are under OGL, or PD-shape, or a combination of both. I ask they be speedily kept and any that may be ineligible for those licenses be reconsidered individually. I have no comment on the other images listed here, except the national emblem. It's loss would be inexcusable. Fry1989 eh? 15:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have no idea which (if any) of these files I ever uploaded, but the road signs and File:Flag_of_Hong_Kong.svg would appear to be special cases... AnonMoos (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suggest that we close this as an unsuitable mass nomination and split it into several individual nominations based on what the image shows:
  1. Maps.
  2. Satellite photos.
  3. Data plots. Most probably PD-ineligible.
  4. Road signs. Fry says that many can be kept under OGL by virtue of the signs being very similar to British signs. If so, fine. A few signs also seem to be below the threshold of originality.
  5. Bauhinia × blakeana symbols (such as the flag). I hope that we can keep these as some of the files are heavily used.
  6. Other images probably nominated individually.
Also, can some images be migrated to PRC tags? I note that File:Cover of HKSAR e-Passport.jpg is very similar to File:People's Republic of China Biometric passport.jpg. However, I'm not sure if the PRC tag covers anything which is not a textual document. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added better template to some simple road signs, crossed them in the list and removed them from gallery. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am fine with closing this one and starting several smaller ones, or reorganizing this one into several separate DR's. I was trying to prevent the files being tagged individually with {{No license}} and deleted after a week. --Jarekt (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why File:Hong Kong Stop Sign.gif was deleted -- superseded files are not grounds for deletion, in particular a bitmap superseded by a vector. That used to be made more clear at Commons talk:Superseded images policy though now it is buried in the deletion policy. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Restored. --Jarekt (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Even the File:Flag of Hong Kong.svg is deleted now, which means an estimated number of 1,000+ articles is now affected by the deletion. --Lmmnhn (talk) 15:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the deletions seem botched. The flag/emblem SVGs were created by Commons contributors and should be kept under their original license. File:Hong Kong Stop Sign.gif was deleted again even though it's PD-ineligible; I should have fixed that before. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most as having no license. Kept some where another valid license was applied. --JuTa 17:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal img. not in scoope Saqib (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal img Saqib (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal img. not in scoope Saqib (talk) 14:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khansag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

very likely these are copyvio. no meta data and small sizes.. i suspect two of the images uploaded last year WLM.

Saqib (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal img Saqib (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FSLuftrettung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: useful, in scope Alan (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scoope Saqib (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted software visible. Description indicates intent to show software. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:14, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW Alan (talk) 11:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of South Korea.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available as File:Flag of South Korea.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-GermanGov only covers literary works, but not works of art like this one. Liliana-60 (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-GermanGov only covers literary works, but not works of art like this one. Liliana-60 (talk) 19:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-GermanGov only covers literary works, but not works of art like this one. Liliana-60 (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-GermanGov only covers literary works, but not works of art like this one. Liliana-60 (talk) 20:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the same rational as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plastinated Human Body Worlds San Diego.jpg

Natuur12 (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One would have to look into the copyright situation for each individual file as these are taken from different places around the world–with different degrees of freedom of panorama. Arguably including these is not different from including images such as File:Magnavox-Odyssey-Console-Set.jpg
CFCF (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can't think of any country where there is a FOP provision for non permanent artworks. And you cannot compare those images with an image of an utility object. There is no reason why we should start individual DR's while the cases are similar. Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 11:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per all other BW-related deletion requests -- unfortunately Von Hagens claims copyright on the objects. This applies to their reproductions (such as the car advertising) too.

A.Savin 18:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and previous section.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation

Dronebogus (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Licensed with {{PD-USGov}} and sourced with http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/pix/b/62375.htm (404). Per archive (see also http://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ei/pix/b/62375.htm) credited with "[AP/WWP file photo]". "AP" stands most likely for es:Associated Press and "WWP" for en:World Press Photo = most likely NOT a work by an officer or employee of the United States Government, needing permission. Gunnex (talk) 22:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright EEIM (talk) 04:40, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

file from NASA NO own work--EEIM (talk) 04:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep There's nothing unclear about this. The file is not from NASA. User:Hjhornbeck took various files from NASA and combined them, with manual retouching to cover up seams and contrasts and stuff. I'm pretty sure that it would exceed thresholds of copyrightability in several parts of the world, and I don't know about the US. In any case, neither it nor any trivial variant could be found at the page EEIM moved from the description to the source.--Prosfilaes (talk) 08:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Alan (talk) 11:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Italy: non-free information board. Eleassar (t/p) 06:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Italian copyright law (diritto d'autore) which is found in Law no. 633 of 22 April 1941 says:

  1. Art. 1 requires only that the work be "of the intellect" and "of creative character", Italian courts and scholars have interpreted the provision as conditioning copyright protection on four elements: (1) a particular (not high) degree of creativity; (2) novelty; (3) the work's objectification or externalization; (4) affiliation to art or culture.[1]
  2. Art. 2 lists non-exhaustive examples of protected subject matter ("In particular are protected..."): literary, dramatic, scientific, education, and religious works (whether in written or oral form); musical compositions with or without words; choreographic works and pantomimes; computer programs and databases.
  3. Official acts of the State are not entitled to copyright protection (Art. 5).

This ist an official act of the state (Art. 5) and therefore not entitled to be copyright protected. Everything else on it is absolutely de minimis.

Greetings --Hubertl 06:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Hubertl --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per cmts Alan (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Italy: non-free information board. Eleassar (t/p) 06:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Italian copyright law (diritto d'autore) which is found in Law no. 633 of 22 April 1941 says:

  1. Art. 1 requires only that the work be "of the intellect" and "of creative character", Italian courts and scholars have interpreted the provision as conditioning copyright protection on four elements: (1) a particular (not high) degree of creativity; (2) novelty; (3) the work's objectification or externalization; (4) affiliation to art or culture.[1]
  2. Art. 2 lists non-exhaustive examples of protected subject matter ("In particular are protected..."): literary, dramatic, scientific, education, and religious works (whether in written or oral form); musical compositions with or without words; choreographic works and pantomimes; computer programs and databases.
  3. Official acts of the State are not entitled to copyright protection (Art. 5).

This ist an official act of the state (Art. 5) and therefore not entitled to be copyright protected. Everything else on it is absolutely de minimis.

Greetings --Hubertl 06:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Hubertl --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 07:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per cmts Alan (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:PCP, other uploads copyvios. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Large resolution can be found here -> http://www.wallpapersonweb.com/image-197078.html. Probable copyvio. Takeaway (talk) 10:57, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many other occurrences on the Internet, also larger resolution. Probably a copyvio. Takeaway (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Curacao.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Juanpablobando / logs (2 uploads on 22.02.2013 = 1 x Flickrvio) and previously published (not in that size) via (example) http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=20782490&postcount=26 (2008, by "ESPINALEÑO") = http://img378.imageshack.us/img378/1196/8888888jx4.jpg (identical exif) Gunnex (talk) 11:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 11:50, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While en.wiki policies are not applicable here, this is a violation of en:BLP and Commons is sensitive to that. One of the subjects in this has explicitly disassociated from the caste tag and we should respect that. —SpacemanSpiff 04:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: While it was claimed that all these images were from wiki, no links were given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website from which this was taken doesn't mention that it can be used freely. Of unknown copyright status. Possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 11:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Appears be originally be from http://www.sernanp.gob.pe/sernanp/noticia.jsp?ID=933 with no explicit license given. Copyvio. Revent (talk) 03:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 01:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Fry Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 01:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per FRy Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:09, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free map and photographs. Eleassar (t/p) 06:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Eleassar, vor dem Fotografieren hatte ich mir die mündliche Erlaubnis von der Deutsch sprechenden Kassiererin (eine ältere Dame) geholt. Lösch es weg! --Hedwig Storch (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is very improbable that the clerk in the house is the copyright holder on the information board; her permission is therefore not sufficient. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by And1891 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:And1891/logs (a blocked serial copyright violator). File:PlazaLagloria.png (no exif) most likely grabbed from official site via http://lagloria-cesar.gov.co/apc-aa-files/66336239303635663265363832336236/019_2.JPG (higher res, exif available) as also File:Himno de Aguachica Cesar.ogg (official hymn of Colombian municipality es:Aguachica), most likely grabbed from http://www.aguachica-cesar.gov.co/informacion_general.shtml. These are the last critical files by this uploader.

Gunnex (talk) 10:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:10, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

burry, replace with Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and redirect per {{Blurry}}. Old file, but only external uses appear to be either Wikipedia mirrors or locally hosted. Revent (talk) 03:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per HerziPinki Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the given license {{PD-old}} was removed by User:SimonP with the comment: Not an image of Osei Tutu I, seems 20th century and likely unfree. I restore that license for the moment an raised a regurlar DR. JuTa 13:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, I didn't know how to initiate a deletion request. To add some more details, there are no contemporary images of Osei Tutu I. This seems to be a picture of Osei Tutu II, the current monarch. He was born in 1950, so unless the artist of this portrait has released it, any image would be copyrighted. - SimonP (talk) 23:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per SimonP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:13, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of File:Abdurrahman başkan ve Devlet Bahçeli.jpg (deleted, rights issues) Kumkum (talk) 15:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of File:Abdurrahman başkan ve Devlet Bahçeli.jpg (deleted, rights issues) Kumkum (talk) 15:01, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The 'source' entry translates to 'sent to me personally' Nub Cake (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by THAIRU VELASQUEZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lowest quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by THAIRU VELASQUEZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly uploaded Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongly uploaded Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 11:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andscatch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Own work doubtful, no exif. Not on the web, tho. Com:PCP or Com:AGF?

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept COM:AGF chosen. Ankry (talk) 09:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was taken by the NOAA, without proper attribution, from Schultz, Keyser and Bosart, The Effect of Large-Scale Flow on Low-Level Frontal Structure and Evolution in Midlatitude Cyclones, Monthly Weather Review 127, American Meteorological Society (1998), p. 1787. The 2013 NOAA report we took it from is irrelevant to whether an image first published in 1998 is in the Public Domain; this one isn't. Huon (talk) 11:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above Ankry (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted TouchWiz software - widgets are copyrighted and do not qualify for de minimis exception —Mono 00:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nope, the rationale is different. I consulted with the original DR before nominating. The closing admin noted the icons did qualify for de minimis, but I believe the clock/weather widgets do not. —Mono 17:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Unclear how this differs from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Krassotkin. Other than the icon, the Ear Spy graphics graphics do not meet the threshold of originality, and the icon is de minimis. Unclear what is meant by the "store layout" (the table top) - in any event, there is nothing copyrightable. Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:45, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Samsung copyrighted software visible. Not de minimis as it is main focus of image ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:20, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no new deletion reasons provided Ankry (talk) 09:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This comes from w:File:Quentin Meillassoux.jpg where there are two pictures with the same file name. The source, author and licensing information as indicated on Commons refers to the other file whereas this file has unknown source, author and licensing information. Stefan4 (talk) 18:00, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2015_September_26#File:Quentin_Meillassoux.jpg I wonder why it was not deleted just after transfer. Ankry (talk) 09:24, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this doesn't seem like it's simple enough to be below the threshold of originality. Liliana-60 (talk) 20:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about File:Gt-logo.JPG? It's a smaller version of the logo with the license template {{PD-GermanGov}}. --Marlus Gancher (talk) 19:59, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a bogus license, PD-GermanGov only applies to literary works but not to works of art like this logo. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Liliana-60: this license template clearly states about image. If you suggest it is not accurate, discuss it in Village pump, not here. Ankry (talk) 09:33, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted both, neither pd-textlogo nor pd-germangov does apply Krd 10:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-GermanGov only covers literary works, but not works of art like this one. Liliana-60 (talk) 20:08, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/urhg/__5.html See (2). --Stefan-Xp (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know it falls under case 2 (which is non-derivative and thus not acceptable for Commons anyway, by the way)? -- Liliana-60 (talk) 22:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette carte véhicule une délimitation personnelle de la Kabylie, sans l'appuyer sur aucune source. Fanfwah (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Map of apparently fictitious information. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Wappen ist falsch zugordnet. Lt. Alfred Waldstätten ist es nicht das Stammwappen. Sacha47 14:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Wie bekannt, hat Alfred Waldstätten, der bereits mehrere Artikel für die geneal. Zeitschrift Adler verfasst hat, darunter auch eine detaillierte zu seiner Familie, festgestellt, dass dies ein Wappen Hayek ist, jedoch nicht seinem Familienwappen zuzuordnen sei. Auslöser war ich, da ich ein s/w Hayekwappen versehentlich den einstigen Hayek-Waldstätten zugeordnet hatte. Dieses besagte Wappen kann natürlich auf Commons bleiben, aber unter der Bezeichnung „Hayek“. Gruß! -- Sacha47 (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2015 (CEST)

Kept: kein Löschgrund erkennbar Krd 17:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fanzuga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Modern postcards of Irkutsk (some +1960, mostly +1980) licensed with {{PD-RU-exempt}} which (considering also Template talk:PD-RU-exempt#Postcards) does not apply for this kind of works. They may be in public domain by other reasons, but relevant info must be provided. Permission, whoever the original photographer was (not indicated), needed

Special case

Gunnex (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not PD-RU-exempt. Sealle (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]