Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/11/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 17th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission by the (unknown) author otrs:8836376, and not below TOO, esp for COM:TOO#France. .js ((())) 08:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:COPYVIO. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:PrayForParis.svg (or should we redirect this DR to there?) --.js ((())) 08:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info. The OTRS ticket quoted as nothing to do with a permission or not for the picture. It is a shame that it is presented in a way that we might think it is a complaint from the author, since it's not. --Scoopfinder(d) 08:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. The uploader is the original author, the licence need to be adapted though, but I can't remember what was the original putted licence. --Scoopfinder(d) 08:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC) + 08:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your answers, I'm still trying to fully understand, if this is all for privacy reasons that's one more reason for speedying. Please feel free to revert or suppress any of my edits if required. Sorry if misunderstood. --.js ((())) 08:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you have access to the OTRS ticket, the oversight cases and if you understand french, but what I can tell according to the privacy policy is that there is no reason here to delete the file. The file should just have a proper licence since it's not COM:TOO but was released under a free licence (and the help of the author would be appreciated, since the previous edits are hard-hidden). --Scoopfinder(d) 10:16, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, je comprends fondamentalement le français et non, je ne suis pas participant d'OTRS. But I have read a good part of xxx's contributions before they were hidden and it sounded doubtful from the beginning, if he really was the (only) original author/inventor. He repeatedly told the creation/vectorisation was not his own work. And what he now wrote on your fr.talk page sounds serious: « Notification Scoopfinder : J'ai simplement uploadé le logo vectorisé par un ami et l'auteur est non confirmé. Je demande à ce qu'un modérateur procède au retrait des auteurs mentionnés car l'auteur original est non prouvé. Demande urgente. — Le message qui précède, non signé, a été déposé par xxx (discuter), le 5 décembre 2015 à 22:23 (CET). » If the Username really was the omly issue then just fwd the otrs to one of the stewards, they can operate a global rename very fast. But keeping files with unknown author is not acceptable. Deletion is no harm and will also hide the user who wants to be hidden, we can upload it again in no-time when we get reliable, publicizeable infos. --.js ((())) 03:06, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the author is afraid and I can understand that, that is why what he is publicly saying now is not reliable. The actual permission is enough and can be assimilated to CC-BY-SA (since the author don't want it to get used under another licence). It is also getting sorted out right now on OTRS.
Please stop using fake (or at least wrong) pretextes that actually complicate even more the actual proceeding made via OTRS, the case is being taken care of and is complicated enough. --Scoopfinder(d) 11:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info. The file has received a permission to be released as PD by the author and uploader. --Scoopfinder(d) 13:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well I think we can speedy keep then. Even though I think no permission was necessary since the Eiffel Tower is below COM:TOO, but whatever. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, pls read COM:TOO#France as already linked previously. --.js ((())) 06:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New evidence: the included Eiffel Tower icon is copyrighted: http://www.iconarchive.com/show/windows-8-icons-by-icons8/Travel-Eiffel-Tower-icon.html and although released under a CC BY-ND 3.0 license, this is not applicable on Commons. Furthermore the "original" twitter publisher did not give this legal information, he cannot publish this work as PD unless he gives written confirmation by the original author of the Eiffel Tower icon. Thus  Delete per COM:COPYVIO. --.js ((())) 06:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. The eiffel tower is clearly PD-shape (and is from USA, so under TOO). Please let this procedure end and stop this POV-pushing. --Scoopfinder(d) 08:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-ineligible. French (c) comes from "original creation which shows author's personality". Yann (talk) 09:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

terrfjkb,mn Byyao (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Simple copyright violation. Changed deletion request to copyvio speedy delete. Uploader strangely enough nominates all their own uploads for deletion immediately after the upload. - Takeaway (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by User:Dharmadhyaksha. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poruqe hay mucho reclamos asía mi persona Vallicopampa (talk) 23:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion given Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

borrar todo es urgente Vallicopampa (talk) 07:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

borrar todo Vallicopampa (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 11:49, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No les gusta al pueblo que se publique estas fotos Vallicopampa (talk) 02:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep Again, that is not a valid reason for deletion. If you continue posting DRs without valid reasons you will be blocked from editing on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derechos de Autor Vallicopampa (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep Again, that is not a valid reason for deletion. Blocked for a week. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por derechos de autor Vallicopampa (talk) 23:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Do not give invalid reasons for deletion. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hola se tiene que borrar porque tengo reclamos de derecho de autor. Vallicopampa (talk) 06:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Speedy close. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

borrar todo Vallicopampa (talk) 03:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

borrar todo Vallicopampa (talk) 03:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derechos de Autor Vallicopampa (talk) 02:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept The license cannot be revoked. Please do not nominate this again or you will be blocked. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:07, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por derechos de autor Vallicopampa (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Do not give invalid reasons for deletion. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hola se tiene que borrar porque tengo reclamos de derecho de autor. Vallicopampa (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Speedy close. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

borrar todo Vallicopampa (talk) 03:53, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derechos de Autor Vallicopampa (talk) 02:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept The license cannot be revoked. Please do not nominate this again or you will be blocked. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por derechos de autor Vallicopampa (talk) 23:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Do not give invalid reasons for deletion. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hola se tiene que borrar porque tengo reclamos de derecho de autor. Vallicopampa (talk) 06:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Speedy close. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mzajmi (talk · contribs) has uploaded a lot of copyright violations and this is his/her last remaining upload. Small photo without metadata, own work is unlikely, probably also copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, sorry, found in http://deadline.com/2014/03/r-i-p-alain-resnais-692010/ Taivo (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a copyright violation NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Denniss (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

who gave the uploader the right to upload a file from the external source mentioned in the description? Arnd (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image from http://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/reset/embed.php?File=WP2.html . If it is yours please upload the original. Jarekt (talk) 13:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior and incorrect duplicate of File:Finnish air force roundel.svg Correct roundel is light blue with black border. See an official FAF web site. --Kwasura (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a duplicate, and this file has been here since 2006 where as Jetijones file was only uploaded in 2011. Fry1989 eh? 22:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I know, mate. It been here for the long time. But from the three files only one is correct and need to be kept. I am waiting for the FAF HQ to respond to my letter about the colour code of the blue and the thickness of the black border. After that we can create a 100% correct insignia without arguing about the shades. --Kwasura (talk) 00:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Disputed so kept Natuur12 (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation of images owned by http://www.baa.org/utilities/privacy-legal-policy.aspx Takeaway (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use and wasn't in use by any known magazine from Israel (in Hebrew) - Out of scope and has no place in the Commons. Useless. Ldorfman (talk) 23:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple table which should converted to source codes on local wiki. Mys_721tx (talk) 23:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 04:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 04:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of a user, out of project scope with no foreseeable use ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 08:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because i dont want this picture. 186.77.206.119 01:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Senseisensei1792 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of a band deleted on the local project (ru:Потерянное Поколение). Out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KP Tajpuriya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KP Tajpuriya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All photos are personal images mostly of same subject. Commons is not a personal photo gallery of self, that's facebook or other social media.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samsungartik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flexonlive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images/spam

INeverCry 07:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 14:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flexonlive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A promotional gallery of probably copyrighted images, I only searched a couple and both were found on google search older and larger. There is no indication of user's own work on any of these variably sized promotional images. Please also read the descriptions. Commons is not for promotion/self-promotion.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabrielgarciatgi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS - low quality, and the uploader's edits to the file descriptions/pages have been inappropriate and childish

INeverCry 08:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion ~ Moheen (talk) 08:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 11:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Photo used only in deleted attack page en:User:Sakarega/sandbox JohnCD (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, of no use to this project This, that and the other (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blacked-out image, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot without educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (unused logo) Kopiersperre (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. Plenty of adverting-free t-shirt images at Category:T-shirts. P 1 9 9   20:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unspecified student board. Basvb (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal image Basvb (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal/vacation image. Basvb (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal graph Basvb (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal logo Basvb (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunnii 1

[edit]

Unused Korean text-only image, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious licensing. The author died in 1968. Probably copyright violation.

Sealle (talk) 04:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This book was published in Kiev and Prague in 1919, 96 years ago. Check your information. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 03:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: for publication in Pragues (Czech Republik) life+70years, in Kiev Ukraine (since 2001 (it was still copyrighted (life+50)) thus become also life+70years. It is not yet in the PD --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal poem, text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pfe byya

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request --Byyao (talk) 23:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


, Thuresson (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This file "この画像は…" (same as w:ja:File:Sakujo-note.png) is used for DR (article for deletion) on jawiki (see w:ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼#STEP.1.1 権利侵害部分を除去), not logo. BTW, as per a description, the first version uploaded on 2015-11-17 01:30 (UTC) seems copied from this book published in 1987, thus (c)vio. --KurodaSho (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 00:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo Quenhitran (talk) 07:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 23:29, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.

To simple to be copyrighted? Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: still no license at all. JuTa 23:28, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. Atlasowa (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Infowebseology. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ceci est une insulte au pays libre qui est l'Algérie, cette image porte atteinte au symboles nationaux 105.100.45.8 18:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

L'image concerne le temps quand l'Algérie était sous le gouvernement de la France. Pas de raison pour supprimer l'image.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 22:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag does not exist, Algeria has it's official map and it's official Flag Riad Salih (talk) 23:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: You misinterpret the previous DR. Nobody said this had anything to do with an actual flag that existed. Only that this file of imaginary personal artwork of the uploader is supposed to somehow evoke French Algeria. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This flag has never existed it's a map of algeria with a french map color there is no source for this flag at all Riad Salih (talk) 13:30, 9 February 2023 (UTC) Riad Salih (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, make-believe flag which trys to assert that one country is property of another. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

este no es el escudo correcto, el correcto es el que aparece en la web oficial del ayuntamiento de trescasasas www.aytotrescasas.es Lavandera10 (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It fits the blazon.

«Escudo partido y medio cortado: 1.º campo de gules tres casas de plata mazonadas de sable puestas en palo 2.º en campo de sinople oveja paciendo de plata 3.º en campo de azur anagrama del rey Carlos III de plata. Al timbre corona real cerrada»

It is correct. The gazillion time a user asks for the deletion of a coat of arms claiming it is not the exact design the city council uses, unaware that design is most probably non-free.--Asqueladd (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 22:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty, duplication of Category:Wikimedia meetups in the Czech Republic Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with Category:Wikimedia meetups in the Czech Republic. Thuresson (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the uploader, Dblzro, is the claimed copyright holder, Natalie Burn; and no evidence that the copyright does not belong to the (uncredited) photographer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Published on WordPress 21 February 2015[2], uploaded here 16 October. --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
IMDB credits the image to Ian Fisher. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be cropped from here: http://arch.cahiers-du-rugby.info/site/divertissement.php?iddivertissement=55. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque quiero usar esta imagen en el wiki original Anthony lopez el astro (talk) 01:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: La razón no es válida Alan (talk) 14:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ww2censor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the NASA source webpage specifically attributes the image to "© 2005 Mattias Malmer as NASA do for images that are not their own. Huntster (t @ c) 01:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. This is not an obvious copyright violation case, so I have converted the speedy to a DR. I do not believe this would be a copyright violation as (I believe) only insignificant image processing was performed by Mattias Malmer to make the image "prettier" than the original Mariner 10 image. Such work would not confer a new copyright, and the original PD-USGov-NASA license tag would suffice. Huntster (t @ c) 01:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: As I had stated in the "copyvio" speedy this is a copyright image. NASA does not normally attribute its own images but does attribute those that are not its own images. This NASA media usage webpage specifically states NASA occasionally uses copyrighted material by permission on its website. Those images will be marked copyright with the name of the copyright holder. NASA's use does not convey any rights to others to use the same material. Those wishing to use copyrighted material must contact the copyright holder directly. That statement is clear enough for me. Ww2censor (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except that this is an image taken by Mariner 10, a NASA mission, and simply modified by this individual. I do not believe that such changes would be enough to warrant a new copyright. Huntster (t @ c) 03:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is your point but then why do some images get attributed like this image: NASA/Mattias Malmer? Ww2censor (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Since it was originally the work of NASA, making it public domain, shouldn't the work, not matter how modified by a third party, stay in the public domain, legally speaking under US copyright law? User:PhilipTerryGraham 01:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So all you need to do is provide a link to an original NASA produced image and we can dismiss this nomination but I can't find one. Can you? Ww2censor (talk) 10:51, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Derivative files of public domain files can be copyrighted if the additional work is sufficiently involved and detailed to merit recognition as a substantial change. It doesn't apply to trivial alterations of color that can be done in moments, but if the work involves intense processing that creates a file substantially different from the original then a new work is created. DrKay (talk) 08:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pic is copyrighted. Obviously the autor is Juan Gyenes, died in 1995 Macucal (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo Quenhitran (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo Quenhitran (talk) 07:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - non-free banner Quenhitran (talk) 07:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, no exif data, low res Quenhitran (talk) 07:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly from geomaps.com.au, copyrighted. Thuresson (talk) 22:27, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, see [3] Quenhitran (talk) 07:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake Lic. - logo can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 07:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", film poster Beyond My Ken (talk) 08:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Ellin B Alan (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same picture as File:Ali and Nino (2).jpg, see EXIF Queryzo (talk) 09:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

map is google map have copyright 地图是谷歌地图的截图,有版权的。 Qa003qa003 (talk) 09:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CD cover. Image taken from the internet. Possible copyright violation. Senapa (talk) 09:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Natuur12 Alan (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creator's will 최광모 (talk) 09:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated with another gallery 최광모 (talk) 09:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Taivo Alan (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, unused personal image of an user with no significant edits to any project. Revent (talk) 10:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del on DE Nolispanmo 10:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Natuur12 Alan (talk) 15:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nudité absolue Byyao (talk) 11:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use on fawiki Alan (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - license laundering from Indian media outlet Quenhitran (talk) 07:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks very much like this one, with a (c) just below Sander1453 (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete These are not CC-licensed photos... the stated source expressly claims an ARR copyright, and they are of 3D works. Even if the badges themselves were in the PD due to age, they are copyrightable photos, and the uploaded does not have the right to license them. Delete, and warn (or possibly block, at this point) the uploader for copyfraud. Revent (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Please delete File:I30165.jpg as well. Uploader states that Galerie d´Histoire(=huesken.com) was its source. 82.174.116.230 13:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source is copyrighted http://www.ufc.com/fighter/Fabricio-Camoes --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Nahid Alan (talk) 15:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo have not the "hungama" watermark and was certainly not taken by one of their photographer as it can be found in other website ex : [4] or [5] --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright vio Dr-Taher (talk) 05:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, due to the file's low resolution. probably taken from instagram given the filter in use. Glorious 93 (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a faithfull reproduction of a 2D work, so, there should be no issue if it was photographed by the uploader or not, but if the original work (ticket) is copyrighted. --C messier (talk) 14:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a library card. Stefan2 (talk) 13:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded for a Hoax article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Admiral_Jachimov). This person does not exist. Green Cardamom (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's very probably a capture from a video of France Inter. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's very probably a capture from a video of France Inter. No proof of authorization. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Italo Camargo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also (all files uploaded in a row on 11.04.2015 for pt:Kelly Key (Brazilian singer):


Gunnex (talk) 14:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

States both all rights reserved and PD; scanned work, own work looks unlikely. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samantha J (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Samantha J / logs (serial copyright violator for pt:Kelly Key, a Brazilian singer).

Gunnex (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and replaced by superior File: DEU Landkreis Cloppenburg COA.svgUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is no official source known, that this version was in use. It is a try of vectorisation of a Stadler version with smaller contours.--Jürgen Krause (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No educational purpose. - TalkingToTurtles (talk) 10:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviolation Meerdervoort (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Taivo Alan (talk) 15:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerd Leibrock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are images from the 1920s - 1940s, presumably from Germany. That is far too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. Please remember that the template requires that the author never disclosed his identity. That must be proven -- merely being unknown to Commons does not satisfy the requirement of the law.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When the copyright notice is missing on the front side of collector cards it is impossible to determine the originator with a tolerable effort. If you look for „Zigarettenbilder“ and „cigarette card“ in Wikimedia you will find a big lot of such cards, for example:

I think therefore, that this file should not be deleted.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to determine the originator of this photograph because the copyright notice is missing in the newspaper „12-Uhr-Blatt“ of 12. September 1932. The file should therefore be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is a newspaper clip of unknown source as Alan Lareau states in his book. It is therefore impossible to determine the originator of the photograph. The file should be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Melodie Hollander, daughter of Friedrich Hollaender.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to determine the originator of this photograph because the copyright notice is missing in the exile magazine „Aufbau“ of 5. Janauar 1945 [6]. The file should therefore be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand Kahn emigrated 1939 to the US and died unmarried in 1951 in Hollywood. There is nobody whom one could ask who was the author of the passport photograph. The file should be kept.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will contact Hans Muggli, author ot the website where I found the photograph.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gerd Leibrock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Work of Ursula Stock, who is living. No evidence of permission.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We have received a message at OTRS #2016021010017368 which purports to be a license from Ursula Stock. However, it is not from her public domain, so it may or may not be authentic. I have requested a license sent from an address at her public domain. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, for files in ticket:2016021010017368. Jim, please take a look on my note in the OTRS.--Wdwd (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC). Forget to @Jameslwoodward: . --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Permission from the artist via OTRS, address verified.Wdwd (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this doll died in 1981. It is not clear whether German or USA law applies -- she was born in the former and died in the latter, but in either case the image infringes on the copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt very much that this is the "own work" of the uploader as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt very much that this is the "own work" of the uploader as claimed. The file description says it's from 1947, so it is almost certainly under copyright. It is possible that it is PD_US no notice or not renewed, but that would require considerable research to establish. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt very much that this is the "own work" of the uploader as claimed. The file description says it's from 1949, so it is almost certainly under copyright. It is possible that it is PD_US no notice or not renewed, but that would require considerable research to establish. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete the image as used on the enwiki is claimed to be own work but the caption says it is a still from a 1956 Indian movie. Which is the truth? Ww2censor (talk) 18:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per other DR Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible license conflict with Google Maps API W.Strickling (talk) 18:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible license conflict with Google Maps API W.Strickling (talk) 18:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See many earlier DRs, no indication the logo is free. FunkMonk (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywright violation Skivsamlare (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete non-free book cover image without any evidence of permission Ww2censor (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We do not know the author and the picture was taken 1941. According to this guideline/example the picture is not old enough. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We do not know the author and the picture was taken 1941. According to this guideline/example the picture is not old enough. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We do not know the author and the picture was taken 1941. According to this guideline/example the picture is not old enough. Druschba 4 (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrakashP4u (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Very mall size; no exif-data,...

JuTa 22:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallel's uploads

[edit]

In the past I did upload images, which were actually the work of other authors, and, of course, did not belong to me. Today I see the stupidity I did, and I request the removal of these images.

I do not know the real authors of the images, so I can not provide links to evidence.

I apologize to the community. I affirm that there are no other cases of copyright violation in my image uploads.

Sincerely, --HallelTalk 22:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uplader user other photos are copyright violation, and tihs photo is similar this one Sakhalinio (talk) 05:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 06:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by superrior PNG file:Wappen Sudheim.pngUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 03:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by superrior PNG file: Wappen Sudheim.pngUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 03:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Quenhitran (talk) 07:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Keep Inutile? Non. C'est la grandiose specialité: beaucoup de gens créent leurs dessins individuels. Chacun est précieux. --.js (talk) 23:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: wtf? in scope Alan (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linnanmäki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files uploaded by this user are suspected copyright violations. Files are about Linnanmäki amusement park, many are directly taken from official site, others are copied elsewhere (eg. File:Miniautot lintsi laite.jpg is from [7]). If the user has official permission to post these images an OTRS permission is required.

MKFI (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note uploader has been renamed: User:Rollepelle. MKFI (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{OTRS pending|year=2015|month=11|day=17}} --Rollepelle (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader has assured (in Finnish) that he/she is employed by Linnanmäki, the company owns the copyrights for the images and that the uploader is authorized to upload the images to Wikipedia. Presumably an OTRS permission is forthcoming. MKFI (talk) 12:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Wait We received a message on OTRS. Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per OTRS. Alan (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation Viceorganizecrime (talk) 11:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This picture licensed PD-USGov-Military, but source links are not working anymore. Regards, Sakhalinio (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whose copyright is being violated? Thuresson (talk) 21:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 11:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Music. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 11:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed unser CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 DE, see http://legacy.stoepel.net/de/Infos.aspx ("Nutzung und Urheberrecht"). тнояsтеn 15:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NC Alan (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed unser CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 DE, see http://legacy.stoepel.net/de/Infos.aspx ("Nutzung und Urheberrecht"). тнояsтеn 15:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NC Alan (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janvwirth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image combining FB and WP logos. These logos are already available on Commons, this combo serves no purpose, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: 1972 work by Jože Požauko. Eleassar (t/p) 20:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for such things. Probably surpasses threshold of originality.
Заявка на удаление сделано для проверки, превышает ли этот стенд порог оригинальности. Taivo (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seemaal3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF (especially for File:Amoud.University2.jpg: per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Seemaal3 and previous mass DR) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating (per above: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF) also further uploads:

Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image in the book may be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Virgen de la Asuncion quincenario.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Exedra atardecer 2.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Catedral Basilica de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Patio de las jacarandas.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Exedra Atardecer 1.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF, is found elsewhere (https://www.google.com.au/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivQ2NEckzGbRrSh7osBNDOG_1T4ToomLhD15QBmG8behJqdqBUZ3rinayaiRLGzRyf1s4n0-0mGwFSctb-GTjuFbU6JOH8fiqqWNOnZaK-WzlzRmcb63XFo8nCIR8nvud7r-9a12O-oWDlryoK_1IuWPEVfH7lkd0vvHXRA_1xfkh_10FeCG7VFaEQmvd6GHh_1w2vNGx4lwVhKk7Ct8NGZfJjsAVzKbR2GsIxxRV3LlFgVVSwVw6n7FBM2kl3M83Ry-hmc1FGSSqD4eJRodivEzGMfJbR3_1hhBD9VZ4hC9MYozdxMBsy9QdIZfsk5P0vNJ9wRLIsUU-yq76b0d0JeBRlaNQS-4c2ReZY9OvA02cCzFjSpctntM2y66oY-9KPkLkYfIFFpXolf3TMLADiYrwTaGheYf8jH3iM1oXXCGgi9IJ6ICSJX3yj0-vuop7jtycc3nj0_1MRqg6xhV7JZJ5g1eJrjwdkt_1prqNY-T7MoeZMcKZaHrUJindzN-zlQpemmvJuJzBSfT1Dd4skGdbkAh66sqHU35PdNIW8LXIAYqZHiOh_1XKVVtP30T9TXh_19C4q_1D_1NOTTbF_1qyqgHTJqkkG9O7K958FlWBXPX3r-6MUmuN0lFe7N4KANm_1jS8OdL6HKB6-s1JtfnbPe4GzLUMgA7f3XOOCUskp1c4HgzCNTmMC6zUwUf9qBL_1gF2YBi4Q3MpSOk6QjSLns9IWOcZoGLmrCssf5wriQ4_1wUqECNDl-a97bLlSKfUdCa_1_19lKfrr5rU1wFYAK6p_1W_18noIbioupREAXzUqVY_1KSgBu2tcezlViZylYRS8Hd9CehFE1bI1GgFcVM8Eei0mZRMB0NAc2AFck8XTmcLzwqQ5q7fp3bMLnq34MCwvqFY7fNwA6a2JVPXnp0qvJRqfDd_11s-cvmsiEc6SgUItGgqO7ngpRVuSqXTLHvzTzZD0zVY3rQ2W5TTWwSGOpVld_1Wx_1mU1dUadYwRIFCXCHAcsZCCTKPBzWxD8U8mU01CdYq8iO-uk6BK3xwKYeiHBGpAwkmQEVuwDGW_1jYtacQ0lCdPWaD54lpBksa27t0HEVWDg-OZQ-Ttvv0rKunRq8Um7th4C5pLITXwEtd-e5Mz_1pwxZnZQMh5a2TJE6W_1K9KafPhSAOnXrQu5_1C_1a1dfM4f0K2rZ6mvpy1ZbhPA7H50OcAv9kCRlUGGFrdsyrIrXdaWTRjmw1LU-dt45KNTMm6dpBXP4j0OGsh2zf7VuKcjfAjiEpa_1e6PwUyidGxGCZQrRmTD6vU1HGXpyZAQuTRa9IUYRReLzZWgSlYNMdv_179R1MuEm4EKJDi57Uy0pkKc98vmYwronb4HENWMm57d_1RYGGCLDSmCCXWDGFFyTpX_1oycHC_1_1tBmJ9482iaU1zJA9a9h2dwKtS1TDeaH-SM_1f5-cpTGNjtaalRV-Xd7JOp8ZBdPSlHfsv9fER7UUjrn1H3ypRqlZT1WI9na9VhrnSurDhMOl_1bstnscA1Fg8JnFNLJxDmWdsp7bFjI9TOzxrPT9cn5IokLyAMQAkDkNnG3-u4Ines3XMgK1qd1jsbVXkT1ZNnI5Og-RusUhZzOjJhxLAryXMFC8zX22jDW2glPbWwr8zA-hHpQqsSP7VgIfpF89zyR2wCpgfY)...unlikely own work B-5448 (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Published here one day before upload to Commons. Thuresson (talk) 21:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as imho assumably copyright-protected content, Roland zh (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poster, no permission. Yann (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, low quality chemical structure Kopiersperre (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kopiersperre: Hi, I'm curious. What do you mean by "quality" and why does whether it is used or unused matter now, since it could be needed later for educational/science/work reasons? Thank you. Rybkovich (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Rybkovich: Indeed you're right. But in chemistry we've come to an situation, that we have a big backlog of old, unused PNGs, which nobody needs. So we keep high-resolution files but delete low resolution structures due to the transition to SVG. Chemical stuctures can be drawn very quick. If you need a structure for any purpose, I will draw it for you.--Kopiersperre (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Kopiersperre: I see. Maybe you should upload a high resolution image if you are deleting a low resolution? As the low resolution of a chemistry related upload can be illustrative of the fact that some one else besides the original uploader may need it. Not in any way do I feel that you should do this, its just a thought popped into my head as I read your post. Rybkovich (talk) 19:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Rybkovich: It's not the hydrochloride, but here is an alternative: File:Chlordimeform vertical.svg--Kopiersperre (talk) 08:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Got it Rybkovich (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 21:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination. Low quality file, replaced by File:1999 Honda Accord VTi-L sedan (2015-07-14) 02.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We do not generally delete images that have been here for many years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self nomination. Low quality file, fully replaced by File:1999 Honda Accord VTi-L sedan (2015-07-14) 02.jpg. Wikipedia is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have 53 files of the same car in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is not a bad thing. OSX (talkcontributions) 00:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep I can see both of these images being in scope. In particular, this car looks like it has a tow hitch attached, which by itself is odd, and this makes it quite different. I agree that deleting poorer images is a good approach when they really show essentially the same thing, but these two don't show the same thing. Nyttend (talk) 23:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I won;t close this a second time, but please don;t nominate it again. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have had 100s of my old low quality photos deleted. Your assertion that we "do not generally delete images that have been here for many years" is simply false. We have Template:Blurry for a reason, and it states "This image is blurry. It might therefore qualify for deletion if an identical image of better quality is provided."
It is quite simple: the photo is terrible, no one will realistically use it given it has been fully replaced by many of other images of the same car in the same level of specification. Why are you against deleting junk? It is a self nomination as well. I'm only requesting my own file to be deleted. OSX (talkcontributions) 22:29, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to delete. Natuur12 (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was cropped from a delete image File:徐欣瑩.jpg which was "No permission".Hang9417 (talk) 03:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why not simply revert to this version which seems to be a cropped version of File:Hsin-Ying Hsu from VOA.jpg, which is public domain. I am a commons novice other than uploading, and may break things beyond my ability to repair. Vycl1994 (talk) 19:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think PNG should not be used for an image cropped from a jpeg file.--Hang9417 (talk) 09:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
User:Minkuotang, the original uploader of the image has previously been caught for advertising for the party Minkuotang on their wikipedia user page, although later removed this after warning by an administrator, so I would think that there is little doubt over whether they own the rights of the photo, although I do agree the licence may require verification on their behalf, of which I have notified them on the Chinese wikipedia project. --Sleepingstar (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Hang9417: It appears that old versions of the file were also in PNG format, see full urls. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/e/e1/20150523223137!MKT-Chair-cropped.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/e/e1/20150523231518!MKT-Chair-cropped.png. Can it still not be reverted if need be? Vycl1994 (talk) 01:16, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Vycl1994: The image was cropped from File:Hsin-Ying_Hsu_from_VOA.jpg, which is in jpeg format. The original source:[8] is also in in jpeg format.--Hang9417 (talk) 05:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Hang9417: But after the cropping it was directly uploaded to commons as a .PNG, which means, if reverted, it stays a .PNG, I think. At least on Macbooks, image files, JPG, PNG, SVG, etc. open in an application called Preview, and if I want to re-save it in any other image format, I can. So, download as .jpg from VOA article, crop, edit, etc. then upload as PNG.
For example, here is something I uploaded. File:Fsj2014janfeb jrciwt img01.png as a PNG. But the source, http://www.afsa.org/sites/default/files/Portals/0/afsa/fsj2014janfeb_jrciwt_img01.jpg via this article states that it is a original online version of file is JPG, which it is. Files are convertible from format to format, which is what happened here, as all above external links leading to this picture of Hsu-Hsin-ying have a .png extension. Vycl1994 (talk) 06:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

June0226 and myself wrote to Minkuotang's (民國黨) official facebook and email accounts, and we have received a positive reply from the contact people/ PR from the party themself saying that that they are willing to release the photograph which they own under the Creative Commons 4.0 licence. They will also be providing photographs of other legislative candidates which they will also happily release under the CC 3.0 licence. I will be uploading these in future when I receive them and will also attach their reply and permission under the CC 4.0 and put them under this licence. (Please the photo attached below) We specifically asked about the current photograph and they have kindly released it under CC4.0, so given that they are happy to do so, can the deletion request be reverted?


I have also tried to orphan the photos uploaded by other users for Tsai Ing-wen and James Soong of which there are copyright disputes by reverting their usage throughout the wikipedia projects to photos for which there is no copyright disputes.

--Sleepingstar (talk) 04:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All of this requires that the actual copyright holder send a free license to OTRS. Note, by the way, that VOA images after June 2103 are NC and therefore cannot be kept here, so the original version of this is not a valid fallback -- see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-USGov-VOA .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free screenshot Quenhitran (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from where? Who is it? Thuresson (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Maybe a screen shot, maybe not -- but if not, it is an unused personal image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status/{{Not-free-US-FOP}}, considering derivated from artworks by en:Russ Warren (1951—), an American contemporary figurative painter, needing permission. File:Russ Warren Texas Installation, Beaumont Art Museum, Beaumont, TX, 1974.jpg (uploaded 2012) fails IMHO also COM:DM and appears to be previously published (even as thumb) via http://www.c-ville.com/Magic_touch/#.Vksijr90wXU (2011, credit: "Courtesy Russ Warren") = http://www.c-ville.com/Image/%28%282332%29/Warren-Beaumont.jpg. All files uploaded in a row on 01.03.2012 by Sarafina22 (talk · contributions · Statistics).

Gunnex (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There have been several discussions in both Persian and English Wikipedia regarding this image. It seems Iranian government doesn't publish their works under public domian license. Amir (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Mr. ebrahim and Mr. Kasir, Please explain me why you candidate this image for deletion? MrInfo2012 (talk) 05:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually. I like these works and in case this would be going to be deleted I will try to reupload them locally as a fair use work in order to not lose your nice works. −ebrahimtalk 12:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The difference is obvious. These are works of US government which publishes everything in public domain and that means none of them does have copyright at all but it does not apply to works of Iranian government because Iranian copyright law doesn't include this, unlike US government. Is it clear or should I explain more? Amir (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright law, passed by the Iranian Parliament (Persian language):

نقاشی و تصویر و طرح و نقش و نقشه جغرافیایی ابتکاری و نوشته‌ها و خطهای تزیینی و هر گونه اثر تزیینی و اثر تجسمی که به هر طریق و‌روش به صورت ساده یا ترکیبی به وجود آمده باشد.

Translation: Painting, Image, design, Figure, Geographic map of initiatives, Decorative writ (Calligraphy)، And any decorative effect and visual arts (Simple or compound) --Kasir (talk) 10:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It belongs to Iranian army (legal personality), If its age is 30 years then keep otherwise delete.--Monfie (talk) 12:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the logo has changed several times, Date unknown logo design, That's why it can not be considered copyright has expired. --Kasir (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do according to probabilities in commons. If you know it has changed, you must give accurate information about it. BTW, if changes are not significant, it is not new work.Monfie (talk) 17:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We can only keep it if it is more than 30 years old, so we need information about the history of the picture. If we don't get that information, then the picture will have to be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No usable name, no source, no description, no category since 15 july 2013 => useless file, not in Commons scope. Sémhur (talk) 13:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No usable name, no category aren't reasons for deletion, sincerely Olivier LPB (talk) 11:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Actually, they are good reasons for deletion. With no name, no category, and no description, the image cannot be found or used for any purpose. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed unser CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 DE, see http://legacy.stoepel.net/de/Infos.aspx ("Nutzung und Urheberrecht"). тнояsтеn 15:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same for File:Geogen map rel.png. --тнояsтеn 15:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some of the widgets, separately, are certainly in public domain. But the design as a whole seems copyrighted. Dereckson (talk) 15:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Has the copyrighted Google logo. Epic Genius (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I think the logo is {{PD-textlogo}}. See File:Google 2015 logo.svg. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep With Robert. Tyseria (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gibsontom4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work:cropped images, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Gibsontom4 / [9] (serial copyright violator for Taiwanese politicians).

Hang9417 (talk) 16:59, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I believe that good faith should probably be assumed rather than by directly assuming copyright infringement. If you do believe that the photographs are copyrighted, please provide some evidence as to where the photographs have come from, or who you believe holds the copyright (although I doubt you will find any). Indeed, I personally work in the media field, and the photographs I have chosen to release under the CC4.0 would be photographs that I have not published in outlets, and which I have not waived rights to any third party. Please forgive me that I do not provide full sized photographs but only cropped, for my own personal reasons (i.e. whether I still want to use the full size photographs in future), furthermore, I believe only face/ identifiers should suffice for the purpose of wikimeida commons. I believe that I hold copyright to the photographs that I have personally taken (except for the accidental upload for a AP photograph from VOA, in which I admit, I tend to try to upload from the VOA before I consider digging into my own pockets). Finally, forgive me for sounding a little harsh, but uploading my own photographs to wikimedia commons under CC4.0, are things I voluntarily do, without pay. The whole situation would easily have been avoided if I simply stepped away and chose not to contribute. But to accuse me of copyright infringement without any evidence, and to make such a leap of faith, is a serious accusation. I would still like to re-upload photos that have been in use in the wikipedia projects (those that were previously deleted and not in use, I will not upload anymore), but would like advice on what to do to avoid future deletions, otherwise I'd really rather not deal with all the trouble again. --Gibsontom4 (talk) 04:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Gibsontom4: Do you really want to claim that all of the above images are your own work? I still find some of them were captured from several videos on YouTube.--Hang9417 (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tsai-Ing-Wen-Cropped-v72.png and File:Tsai-ing-wen-croppedv7.png are copyrighted by the Liberty Times. [10]
File:James-Soong-cropped-3.png:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AwG5esChSc 4:00--Hang9417 (talk) 12:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The fact that one of these images is cropped from a youtube video makes it clear that we cannot assume good faith -- rather the opposite. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The building shown in this photo is former "Rodina" cinema, reconstructed in 2003 by Oksana Tkachuk (Russian: Оксана Ткачева; b. 1933). Jarash (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure if this is kosher, seems to be drawn after diagrams in a book. FunkMonk (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They were not drawn after diagrams in a book but were drawn from pictures I've taken of such skulls at museums or collections or of casts in my own personal collection--Coluberssymbol (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, it should be clearly stated in the description. But what does "Images based off Mauricio Anton's Illustrations in The Big Cats and their Fossil Relatives written by Alan Turner (1997)" mean then? FunkMonk (talk) 02:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Comment above is contradicted by file description. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded locally in 2013 by fawiki user fa:user:فرارو the photo was previously published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/75762263 (2012, © All rights reserved by "Toofan Golkarian"). Permission needed.

The Wikimapia ({{WikiMapia}} file http://wikimapia.org/1448360/ru/%D0%93%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD#/photo/3737181 appears to be uploaded only in 2014. Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination : previously published in Panoramio and not free --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. MehdiTalk 09:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded locally in 05.2007 by no:user:Kimmam (who per local talk and logs already had some copyright conflicts) the photo was previously published via http://bbznet.pukpik.com/scripts2/view.php?user=korathub&board=2&id=22&c=1&order=numview (2006) = http://www.arrakeen.ch/thai4/016%20%20traffic%20at%20Siam%20Square.JPG. arrakeen.ch indicates to http://www.arrakeen.ch/thai4/thailand2004.html, a photo gallery of a 2004 Thailand trip. The gallery is archived since 2004. Permission needed.

See also by this user File:MBK Centre BKK.jpg, uploaded locally in 05.2007 = false claim of authorship/license/etc. via File:MBK Bangkok 1.jpg (2006). Gunnex (talk) 12:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted Herby talk thyme 12:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a much higher quality version of the same image Heary uses on his Twitter profile, so probably originates from a press office, but is just attributed as the "own work" of a Commons user here. McGeddon (talk) 16:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Certainly no evidence of "own work" - OTRS if it is to be hosted here Herby talk thyme 12:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a reduced version of image here: http://www.procontra-online.de/artikel/date/2014/05/karsten-eichmann-neuer-gothaer-chef/ Ytoyoda (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom - no evidence that it is "own work" Herby talk thyme 12:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 1925 image, presumably from Germany. That is far too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. Please remember that the template requires that the author never disclosed his identity. That must be proven -- merely being unknown to Commons does not satisfy the requirement of the law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I have asked the author of the source [11] if he knows full particulars about any copyright holder.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the file, the publisher of the clip with the photograph doesn't grant permission.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per comment Herby talk thyme 12:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't it a derivative work (Commons:Screenshots)? Тилик-тилик (talk) 19:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you're right. I don't oppose deletion. Runner1928 (talk) 04:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. watermark, thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toby121 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubts about own work. File:Music Meeting Beeld.jpg has got a watermark (with a non-related name). Alle files are relatively small backstage images of high-quality without exif-data. One is a poster (needs permission).

Basvb (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started as source mentioned as "xxx Facebook Page", Roland zh (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense, but imho copyright-proteced content (film poster), hence DR started to verify, Roland zh (talk) 20:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy Herby talk thyme 12:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due the uploader´s contributions more evidences of the author may be necessary Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see any connection between "Molly Fitzpatrick" who is the author of this image and the uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not understand, what is depicted. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tilted blurry photo of a palm tree. No potential use in any wikimedia project. Thuresson (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of two photographs, no indication of user's own work Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 20:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of multiple images, no indication of user's own work on any of them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of free license at source http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/saints/ns_lit_doc_20011021_quattrocchi_photo.html, no author given, so not possible to say author has been dead 70 years ! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NSFW, we seem to have hundreds of images of erect human penises larger and less promotional than this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this small blurry image which is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 12:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so had its copyright extended in the US per the URAA. Please do not upload photos or film frames shot after 1975. Cavarrone (talk) 07:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This film was produced and released in 1980, and this relevant image was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so had its copyright extended in the US per the URAA. Please do not upload photos or film frames shot after 1975. Cavarrone (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This film was produced and released in 1980, and this relevant image was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so had its copyright extended in the US per the URAA. Please do not upload photos or film frames shot after 1975. Cavarrone (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This film was produced and released in 1980, and this relevant image was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so had its copyright extended in the US per the URAA. Please do not upload photos or film frames shot after 1975. Cavarrone (talk) 07:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Support. ~ Moheen (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Hi I would argue that this is a simple logo. If you look at Commons: Threshold of originality you compare to the "Arrows" logos are Simple shape within the large simple shape is not considered to be original. Per "Letter S" a swerve applied to a simple image - the arrow in this case - does not not produce originality. A simple combination between two rules (shape within shape and simple swerve) would not count as original. For example in the Best Western example the combination is more complex - the letters are colored, a common shape crown is above them and both are within the altered shape of a rectangle. Please let me know if and why we disagree, I am not trying do bicker just want to know what your decision was based on when you made your decision. Thank you Rybkovich (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. The logo is not made of simple figures (rings, ellipses, sinusoids, hyperboles). They are elaborate curves, they are not easy to redraw. The logos, which you mentioned, are simpler. Arrows logo consists of straight lines plus one word, Best Western logo is letters plus simple border (polygon with rounded corners). Taivo (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fair, agree to disagree Rybkovich (talk) 18:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: complex forms, no PD-textlogo Alan (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, bad composition. There exist better photos about the same building, for example, file:Edificio de la sociedad española de socorros mutuos.jpg. Also small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is Com:Packaging an issue here? Basvb (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I only uploaded this image to show the discussion in De Kroeg (the tavern) that there has been a Spa bottle with a green cap. Actually the image isn't in use anymore, so I don't mind if it would be deleted. Erik Wannee (talk) 20:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all rights reserved at source Basvb (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work of painting unlikely, looks old enough for PD but I can't find the painter. We need correct attribution. Basvb (talk) 20:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. format (moiré) and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. The images may be copyrighted Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this oddly scanned and bordered image, no metadata, small and low resolution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Flagicon (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion Alan (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of the File:Lentosotakoulun lippu.png Kwasura (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement: non-free logo Quenhitran (talk) 07:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Quenhitran: I would argue not copyrightable. Font is not copyrightable - see subway, best western, geek squad, arrows in Commons: Copyright of originality. Circular, swirling arrows are not considered original - Bruce Lee, Subway. Also one arrow being inside the other is also not considered copyrightable - see Arrows. If you disagree please state why (not trying to bicker only to make sure that the arguments are clear for when the deletion is decided). Thanks very much. Rybkovich (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you are saying that you can not copyright green pixels then I believe you are missing the point. Thuresson (talk) 22:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Thuresson: Hi. Is that directed at Quenhitran or me? I don't understand what you mean. Re above I meant to refer to non-copyrightable examples in the Commons:Threshold of originality article. Rybkovich (talk) 19:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom, complex design Alan (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Is not it simple enough for {{PD-simple}} or {{PD-ineligible}}? I think a regular RfC if better in this case. BrightRaven (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: IMHO complex design Alan (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Takeaway as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Possible copyright violation of Nintendo trademarked images.

We kept something similar as being below TOO if I remember correct. Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Novosel mushroom.svg. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per precedents Alan (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source provided for the component photos of this collage manipulation. Author has used copyrighted photos for backgrounds in other images. FunkMonk (talk) 22:29, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the comments at the bottom of this FAC:[12] FunkMonk (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme. Alan (talk) 15:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Objects in image are not own work, also see ghostly overprinting lower right corner, no permission on that derivative image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Photo of non-notable person used by members of persistent sock-farm, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbakahr. Deleted at least once before as File:Alhaji Bello Magaji 2015.jpeg JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: another copy has been added at File:Alhaji bello magaji.jpeg. JohnCD (talk) 18:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Com:DW of (c) background, toys, games, movie props.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

images of Star Wars characters and props. Copyright violation.

Takeaway (talk) 23:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some of these are taken in countries with freedom of panorama for 3D art (such as Germany). Also, some of them depict concept art, which is not final, and therefore there would not be copyright to their likeness alone. FunkMonk (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: part 1: By Materialscientist / Part 2: Per nominator. Alan (talk) 15:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derived work of a copyrighted work, i.e. the coin. This is not de minimis.

Emha (talk) 12:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out-of-scope files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these files appear out of scope as they are just photos of words, created from scrabble tiles, beans, or other items. Most of them are related to current events, probably in the hope that they will be used for blog postings etc. This is specialized stock photography which appears to be pretty useless in regard to our project aims.

AFBorchert (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derived work of a copyrighted work, i.e. the coin. This is not de minimis.

Emha (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these images show a tiny globe, usually with a finger pointing to a possible destination. These appear to be of the stock photo kind that are not really educational and thereby out of COM:SCOPE.

AFBorchert (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Arranged stock photos refering to online poker, of no educational value and thereby out of COM:SCOPE.

AFBorchert (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of the following pics are just stock pictures outside of COM:SCOPE, optimized for SEO, transferred from flickr, not used and not useful for our projects. None of them has a description. Some of them are duplicates, uploaded with a German and again with an English filename.

--Stepro (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an announcement for an event in New York City in 1930. It seems most likely that it is a newspaper clipping and that it is editorial, not advertising material. If that is correct, then it is probably still under copyright. In any event, the EU copyright tag is not applicable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is an advertisment (see http://archive.org/stream/aufbau5619391940germ#page/n5/mode/1up ) and thus {{PD-US-no notice}}. Even {{PD-ineligible}} might apply. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Ich teile die Meinung von Robert Weemeyer.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 06:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Good catch, thank you Robert. Withdrawn by nom. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture and It contains private information in the metadata of the file. I change it with the same picture (Tamukeyama Hachiman-gu entrada norte) but without that sensible information. Orestes 71 (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It would have been better to simply upload the new version over the old one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this german discussion on de.wp: Shown artwork and choreography of "Pauleta" may not be in accordance with de minimis. Wdwd (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It also infringes on the distinctive design of the stadium -- this was taken from inside the building, so FOP does not apply. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it's not a Lysmata wurdemanni but it's Lysmata seticauda Chprieur (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're right the file needs renaming not deleting. Mithril (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Please use {{Rename}} if necessary. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The OTRS ticket covers the image, not the dolls. This image infringes on the doll's copyright. Schoop died in 1996. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep the file for about 14 days. I will ask permission from Anthony Verebes, son of Hedi Schoop.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is a valid ticket Natuur12 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt very much that this is "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "own work" probably consists in the scanning. But who is the author of the painting depicted? Maybe it's PD. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I do not know.--Gerd Leibrock (talk) 13:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is the original, File:George Romney - Lady Hamilton (as a Bacchante) 3.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 21:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's PD, but do we really want to keep this small, fuzzy scan. See Hans Kafka for details above this Kafka, not related to Franz. The file is not in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No we do not. Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from fawiki user Mirasm

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering locally uploaded by blocked (part of sockfarm Category:Sockpuppets of Mazandiran) fawiki user fa:user:Mirasm between 21.08.2012 — 01.09.2012 using an arsenal of multiple digicams.

This page will also serve as a deletion request for fawiki (via local admin) --> Note for fawiki-admin: some high resolution images (3.648 pix) taken with a Panasonic DMC-FS42 are (considering the short time between taken and upload date) most likely own works (like fa:پرونده:قدمگاه خضر.JPG and fa:پرونده:تکیه شاهاندشت.JPG) and are NOT nominated.

Already transferred to Commons
Still at fawiki
At fawiki with no exif
Summary
  • +/- 30 digicams wasted between 11.2003 — 06.2012 = (+/-) each 3,5 months a new digicam.
  • 8 different digicams in use in 2010.

--Gunnex (talk) 18:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons files deleted Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: false source, false license (photo was taken in 1937). Anonymous Polish works from 1937 were not protected with copyright, but is it an anonymous work? Taivo (talk) 19:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We need some evidence that it is anonymous Natuur12 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Transferred from fawiki via fa:پرونده:Astara Buildings.jpg (locally uploaded in 2009) the photo was previously published (even in lower res) via (example) glk:پرونده:Astara.jpg (2008, no license info), needing further details/permission. Gunnex (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artikel ist nicht aktuell M. Schwendener (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seriously - not letting me delete my own picture is not ok. M. Schwendener (talk) 13:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The license you gave us is irrevocable. The image was in use until you removed it and is now in use again. If you nominate this for deletion again, you will be blocked from editing here. If you remove it from WP:DA again, you may be blocked from editing there. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not user:Lithium1989's own work, copyvio
from where is it then?
. Converting to DR due no source found in Google Image Search, and no source provided for suspected copyvio. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not user:Lithium1989's own work, copyvio
what is then the correct source?
. Converting to DR due no source found in Google Image Search, and no source provided for suspected copyvio. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reclosing as deleted per this message at my talk page. Natuur12 (talk) 15:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not user:Lithium1989's own work, copyvio
what is then the correct source?
. Converting to DR due no source found in Google Image Search, and no source provided for suspected copyvio. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not user:Lithium1989's own work, copyvio
what is then the correct source?
Amitie 10g (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not user:Lithium1989's own work, copyvio Amitie 10g (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aucun interet KA 15:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Uninteresting is in the eye of the beholder. James F. (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Хотел переимменовать файл, так как имя файла не несёт в себе смысловой нагрузки, а получилось перенаправление. Просьба администраторов удалить это перенаправление Dogad75 (talk) 16:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No need to have a false-redirect. James F. (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 31.174.248.226 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not user:Lithium1989's own work, copyvio
what is the correct source?
. Converting to DR due no source found in Google Image Search, and no source provided for suspected copyvio. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Credible that the uploader is the author. no evidence presented otherwise. James F. (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the statment "own". On the same day as the upload here, this pic but with an higher resolution was published here. It looks very much like an offical photo. ...Sicherlich talk 16:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC) |s[reply]


Deleted: Per nom Herby talk thyme 13:22, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]