Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/06/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 19th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sockpuppet of User:Yahadzija, copyrighted images C3r4 (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sock reupload of previously deleted content. --Эlcobbola talk 14:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per ticket:2017060610020701. ~ Rob13Talk 17:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

website copyright Pitpisit (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this image of a woman using a typewriter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement Tiger (Talk) 08:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, cross-wiki spam. --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 08:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

page created by mistake, instead of category Darekk2 (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty, should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 19:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE: holiday snap Takeaway (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, no possible usage Stolbovsky (talk) 09:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, no possible usage Stolbovsky (talk) 09:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this category is a major change from it's original "Roman Catholic churches in the United States." The change was also made unilaterally by one person. Farragutful (talk) 13:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: look like withdrawn. --JuTa 00:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurath Sabha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these files which contain figurative material, apparently prior publications (newspapers/magazines), posters, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafayelmanukyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photocopies from books or magazines are not "own work" of the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claimed source says on this page that: "Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." (emphasis mine) This is not same as CC-BY-SA license and we cannot host it here therefore. Rahul Bott (talk) 13:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Re-uploaded - was File:RNKovind.jpg. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, small personal image, not in use and unlikely to be used. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Re-uploaded was File:Fatimazarha.png. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

iOS (iPhone) emojis and operating system layout are copyright Apple Inc. Uploader has created a screenshot of his phone and uploaded to Commons under a false CC/GFDL license for an image he has no licensing rights over. --benlisquareTalkContribs 21:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting Keep on the font/emoji topic, expressing agnosticism on the UI elements (although they're quite minimal). Apple Color Emoji is a font (with colours) and it's completely normal to create CC-licensed images that contain images of copyrighted fonts. Indeed, there's many entire categories of them. A font is copyrighted, not an artistic work composed using it (unless the font has a very unusual licence). Blythwood (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A poor comparison, since emojis are not typefaces for writing systems; rather, they are artistic images. --benlisquareTalkContribs 21:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Seems to mostly the same as in Category:SVG smilies from Emojione. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: This design (symbols + UI) is copyrighted by Apple (see https://emojipedia.org/apple/ios-10.0/ for reference). ~ nicolas (talk) 16:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promoting screenshot shows email address and facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Ronhjones: sock of User:Ayoubayoubmbnjlkkjvvvv -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screen shot of no particular educational value. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted by Ronhjones: sock of User:Ayoubayoubmbnjlkkjvvvv -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Персона скончалась в 1991 г. Старое изображение переснято камерой современного телефона Dogad75 (talk) 06:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not an own work by the uploader. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: в метаданных автором указан Лазаренко Леонид, необходимо пояснение через OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Leonid Lazarenko's permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор фото неизвестен, фото 1967 года, установить лицензионный статус невозможно Dogad75 (talk) 12:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license status is unverifiable. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a personal album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:54, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal foto, out of scope, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wikimedia Commons is not a wedding album. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cnavarroahicart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3 files already deleted (copyvios), three more files, 2 different cameras, one without any exif data. Unlikely to be own work, given the track record of the uploader.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cnavarroahicart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Pdf file+likely copyright issues Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayouballoum123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope Pdf files+maybe copyright issues

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ayouballoum123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination I tagged the logo on FA-wiki with NowCommons, so this should be kept. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS IS A COMPANY LOGO [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 16:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In other words: We lack evidence for the logo being licensed under {{CC-BY-SA 4.0}} and it seems to be above the threshold of originality in Iran and therefore not eligible for {{PD-textlogo}}. TilmannR (talk) 21:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per TilmannR. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CreiterAdam45z (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious derivative works (see first upload in any file, flash light is still viewable). They seem to be contemporary paintings exhibited inside the college for which a picture has been taken. No authorship information has been provided to assert public domain and therefore, IMHO, precautionary principle applies. Taking pictures from anywhere and claiming "unknown" author is simply licensy washing.

Discasto talk 08:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The main subject here is background banner, which requires a permission. Yann (talk) 08:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

above Com:TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright website Pitpisit (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private pic, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ankeetkumar9530 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused selfies, private snapshots.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadjmee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frany90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frany90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has been grabbing images from the web, mostly Twitter and Facebook and adding them here, a few were deleted, then he went on to upload the same at en.wiki (now deleted) and one has even found its way back here via anohter user based on en.wiki to commons transfer!

SpacemanSpiff 07:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HILARIO MOLINARI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photos of unidentified insects.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Duck is not identifiable. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by By official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these small photos of men.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of user's own work on this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hhcp.0.5.8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of project scope, no educational value.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 03:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hhcp.0.5.8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons isn't a place to upload a pile of selfies. Try Facebook or Instagram for that "the world can see me" rush, but please don't upload another pile to here.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hhcp.0.5.8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More selfies uploaded days after first batch was nominated for deletion. Commons isn't your social media site.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salar Sarky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is not a selfie, yet claimed as own work. User has only created self-promotional page and had no other contributions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zivili24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work, small images from social media... one is "signed", two others are letterboxed. Appears to be promotional or self=promotional uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source Photographie Author Sandra Pointet", uploader has no right to license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source Photographie Author Sandra Pointet" - no indication that uploader has any rights to image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source Photographie Author Sandra Pointet" - no indication that uploader has any rights to image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source Photographie Author Sandra Pointet" - no indication that uploader has any rights to image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goughie1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication that uploader has rights to upload these images, claimed as "own work".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on large logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/179581103871952261/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, Commons is not the place to upload handwritten happy cards. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Iqbal Dar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not the place to store homework, class notes, personal diagrams, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MPhilMKBielicky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by contemporary artist, without COM:OTRS permission from the artist.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshow with camera logos, not own work, same situation with File:Up_.png. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, yet claimed as own work by person depicted. Looks more like self-promotionalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, yet claimed as own work by person depicted. Looks more like self-promotionalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, yet claimed as own work by person depicted. Looks more like self-promotionalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, yet claimed as own work by person depicted. Looks more like self-promotionalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, yet claimed as own work by person depicted. Looks more like self-promotionalism. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, doesn't appear educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on http://www.myliverpool.ru/forum/44-725-2 older & larger. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suleman12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small pictures of soccer players, playing and playing around. All smaller than facebook and unlikely to be own work due to different styles, some obviously use very long lenses, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover - out o scope, unused, as wel as File:2015 cover.jpg, File:2014 cover.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - photo with inscription Pibwl (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfies of anonymous firemen before an obscured fire engine, without a real educational use, as well as

Pibwl (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ot of scope, along with File:20140501163224544pic5 Page 2 (14110103166).jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, metadata "Bruce Wayne", but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE - unused, low quality image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 16:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Flippin egg (talk) 02:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 20:19, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blakedude1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 18:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Howa hadak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 18:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Find A Grave-no licensing shown there and not taken by uploader. We hope (talk) 18:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Find A Grave. Not enough information there re: photo and none provided by uploader here. We hope (talk) 18:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos from a blog, believe they're from a British film likely still copyrighted. Uploader has no authority to issue license; blog has issued none. We hope (talk) 18:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ItsDimaYeah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 18:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bleoue koutoua marc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 18:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo again taken from Find A Grave-no licensing there and uploader here has no authority to license someone else's work. We hope (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Daphne Lantier 18:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1943 film by UK's Ealing Studios. Uploader can't grant license to someone else's work, which is likely still copyrighted, though he claims it's his. We hope (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of an old photo -- possible copyvio Daphne Lantier 18:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Geudy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT

Daphne Lantier 18:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image as [[File:Rsz 150728183414 leytonstone london underground central line.jpg Oxyman (talk) 18:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same image as File:Rsz 150728183414 leytonstone london underground central line.jpg but with a watermark and lower resolution Oxyman (talk) 18:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Daphne Lantier 18:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 18:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:ADVERT/bandspam Daphne Lantier 18:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashieshshah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 18:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arec Nowak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 18:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 18:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FrancisC23 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope — unused personal images

Daphne Lantier 19:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlekseyArh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT

Daphne Lantier 19:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted person isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aristas ofiacial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per COM:ADVERT

Daphne Lantier 19:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 19:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 19:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 19:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO? 1989 20:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable band. 1989 20:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TRSEAlex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

May not be own work. COM:DW

1989 20:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable group. 1989 20:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). 1989 20:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beeboobeep (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable product.

1989 20:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not be own work. COM:DW 1989 20:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miroslav1984 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; Personal image(s).

1989 20:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable group. 1989 20:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dolanp2011 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

May not be own work. COM:DW

1989 20:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused logo of non-notable company. 1989 20:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). 1989 20:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person. 1989 20:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kenny610610 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; Personal image(s).

1989 20:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TBT Iran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

May not be own work. COM:DW

1989 20:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 03:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. Very small size, no EXIF, several web hits. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, usually the photographer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. It would also be good if the photographer uploaded a version at full camera resolution. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeNumber as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As a logo, this is unlikely to be Own Work/CC and too complex for PD. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

INHO a PD-Textlogo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We are dealing with New Zealand standards here, where "The threshold test for originality is not high." --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 19:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE: advert? Unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 03:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#United States Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magog the Ogre, whatever you think should be done is fine with me. Kalbbes (talk) 10:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facts and data, such as a calendar, are not copyrightable in Ukraine, but the drawings inside of a calendar almost certainly are. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex; see COM:TOO#Common law countries Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:2degrees Logo.svg Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:26, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex; see COM:TOO#Common law countries Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:2mm radio logo.png Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:26, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex; see COM:TOO#Australia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:3AW693logo.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronhjones (talk • contribs) 2017-06-21T19:28:05‎ (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex; see COM:TOO#Common law countries Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex; see COM:TOO#Common law countries Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC) If so, please change itvin english wiki.*angys* (talk) 07:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, unclear scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Woman in hijab (or like) looking right at viewer: how common is this?199.7.157.51 04:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good argument! I still have my doubts regarding the own work claim, tho. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm never really sure either, but whoever uploaded it just uploaded this one pic--so far.199.7.157.51 06:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Less than 10 days after upload?199.7.157.51 07:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? More than enough to discover if there were an actress like this one. --E4024 (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, user uploaded 5 more files. All copyvios. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For me the image itself seems to have a value beyond if she's an actress or not.199.7.157.51 09:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here we try not to keep unused personal files; but of course you are free to make your own Commons. --E4024 (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes I'm tempted.   :-/
I got the pic downloaded, so I won't terribly grieve a possible deletion. But could you pick a better image in Category:Chador?199.7.157.51 09:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex; see COM:TOO#Australia Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki en:File:DigitalMediaDivision.jpg Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license. Doubtful this was published with no copyright formalities. If they expired, the uploader needs to provide proof. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Mengchao1220 (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Mengchao1220 (talk) 06:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo found on the internet, likely not an own work. B dash (talk) 06:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo found on the internet, likely not an own work. B dash (talk) 06:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, should be in wikitext if useful. Poyekhali 06:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

and:

Before deleting, check if the user uploaded even more files. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, Commons is not for self-promotion. Poyekhali 07:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pic. E4024 (talk) 07:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of Category:Coca-Cola paper cups, it's one of the better ones. The one with Sarah Palin looks like it ciould be product placement.   ;-)   199.7.157.51 09:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a third party logo, non trival, not own work as claimed, equivalent media at English Wikipedia is non-free fair use w:File:BBC One circle.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a third party logo/titlecard, Non trival. Not own work as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphisme obsolète Ouam93 (talk) 08:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphisme obsolète Ouam93 (talk) 08:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphisme obsolète Ouam93 (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphisme obsolète Ouam93 (talk) 08:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphisme obsolète Ouam93 (talk) 08:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 08:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphisme obsolète Ouam93 (talk) 08:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a website, copyright information for the website is located here, stating "Those images labelled with "Copyright: MFO" can be used on the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany". However, the photo does not have this mark and is labeled "Copyright George M. Bergman, Berkeley". It is apparently not available with a CC license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo found on the internet, likely not an own work. B dash (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake image, out of scope Berthold Werner (talk) 09:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1944 photograph, unknown if (when) the photographer died. The PD-old license can't be valid without more information about the photographer. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio; see this blog. acagastya 09:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (ac cobra 427) can be seing in much better quality under this url (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_Cobra#/media/File:Shelby_AC_427_Cobra_vl_blue.jpg) and is to find at the beginning of the main article about this car (Ac cobra) in most languages on wikipedia. Enthusiast (talk) 10:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not the same image. The cars are different. // Liftarn (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for 2-dimensional art. The photo violates mural author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (Bugatti type 30/35) can be seing for example in much better quality under this url (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bugatti_Type_30#/media/File:Bugatti_35_B,_Bj._1925,_S%C3%BCdschleife_(2008-06-28).jpg) and is to find in the main article about this car (Bugatti Type 30) in all languages on wikipedia Enthusiast (talk) 10:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same image. // Liftarn (talk) 11:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (De Tomaso Pantera GT5) can be seing in much better quality for example under this url (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Tomaso_Pantera#/media/File:De_Tomaso_Pantera_GT5.jpg). This model can be find of the main article about this car (De Tomaso Pantera) in most languages on wikipedia. Enthusiast (talk) 11:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same image. Notice that the cars are of different colour. // Liftarn (talk) 11:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are other "De Tomaso Pantera-GT5" photos which are uploaded in much better quality. Enthusiast (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Low quality is rarely a good reaon for deletion (unfortunately), but per COM:INUSE, this file cannot be deleted right now. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No better version of the same photo exists. // Liftarn (talk) 05:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 00:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from the internet. See Crunchroll Forum. E4024 (talk) 11:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Appears to be taken from [1] this article at Time Inc; the cropping is identical. Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Speedy. Per nom. Missvain (talk) 18:36, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The article in question has the URL http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1658545_1658533_1658043,00.html (emphasis mine). The image in question was uploaded in 2006. How did the uploader take an image from an article published the year after the upload? Need evidence that the time image wasn't just taken from commons. Monty845 (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure the article isnt using commons image? this is translated image description:

"Image Description: Ferrari Mondial 8 rear, taken in Swansea, Wales Source: A. Wart (user, enthusiast, own photo) Photo: A. Wart Datum: 23.06.1997 Miscellaneous: JPEG image, Dimensions, 572 x 250, 54kb License: I agree the public domain and license to publish the image." Typ932 (talk) 18:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Obviously a case of re-use of this image in Time magazine. Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (Ferrari Mondial 8) can be seing in much better quality under this url (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ferrari_Mondial_8_front_left.jpg). Other images of this car (Ferrari Mondial) in much better quality can also be seen under wiki.commons and articles in most languages on wikipedia. Enthusiast (talk) 11:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion --MB-one (talk) 17:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Takkuchan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted character https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doraemon

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial publicity. E4024 (talk) 11:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, YouTube spam, no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is some 40...60 years old. So it probably wasn't taken by the uploader and copyright hasn't expired either. If the author is known then one's permission or permission from author's heir should be acquired via COM:OTRS. 62.65.58.38 11:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Sgpanicker

[edit]

Unused personal images, Photoshop practice by an inactive user, no potential educational value; out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (Lotus Elan) can be seing in much better quality under this url (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Elan#/media/File:Lotus_Elan_M100_Fed.jpg) and is to find for example in the main article about this car (Lotus Elan) in most languages on wikipedia Enthusiast (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this picture the car is red, in the one you suggest it is blue. Clearly not the same image. Please just stop. // Liftarn (talk) 12:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (Lotus Elan) can be seing in much better quality under this url (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sarlat-la-Can%C3%A9da,_Dordogne_-_France_(4005423146).jpg) and is to find for example in the main article (Lotus Elan) in most languages on wikipedia Enthusiast (talk) 11:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image you suggest don't even exist. // Liftarn (talk) 12:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор неизвестен, лицензионный статус установить невозможно (хотя на самом потолне присутствует какая то надпись, неразборчивая, возможно подпись художника) Dogad75 (talk) 12:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (De Tomaso Mangusta) can be seing in much better quality under this url (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Paris_-_RM_auctions_-_20150204_-_De_Tomaso_Mangusta_-_1969_-_003.jpg). Other photos in much better qualitiy of this car can be find at the beginning of the main article (De Tomaso Langusta) in most languages on wikipedia Enthusiast (talk) 12:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Different angles and not even the same colour. // Liftarn (talk) 12:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded: The same model (De Tomaso Deauville) can be seing in much better quality under this url (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Tomaso_Deauville#/media/File:Deauville2124.jpg) and is to find at the beginning of the main article about this car (De Tomaso Deauville) in most languages on wikipedia Enthusiast (talk) 12:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

One is a rear angle, one is a front angle. Clearly not an equivalent image. // Liftarn (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from http://www.kolowrat.cz/cs/jan-vilem-vojtech-hrabe-kolowrat-liebsteinsky Leome323 (talk) 12:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali jafari 1997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical text published in Germany. {{PD-UA-exempt}} is not applicable. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected Anton_Zemanek

Author (w:uk:Антипенко Іван Якович) died in 1980. {{PD-old}} is definitely wrong. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lisence violation. iwaim (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep nonsense claim. this file is successfully license-reviewed (archived

) (According to the source page, this file is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) (click "SHOW MORE")). also Creative Commons-licensed files are not only for youtube. once a file is published under creative commons-license, it will be pernamently available under the license --Puramyun31 (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly freely licensed on youtube and license reviewed. Tm (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/867277081884995584/XP7xkd5i.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Belived7666 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement 2604:6000:140E:A054:6081:C4E8:C532:D2F7 14:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this as my own work. It is not. Jkolarac (talk) 14:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work, looks like a screen grab: small size, fuzzy edges, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this personal image apparently rephotographed from unnamed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO Obviously taken from http://worldcupballs.info/world-cup-balls/1998-france/adidas-avance-1998-france-test-ball.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photocopies of books are not own work, even if you copied them from the internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this small black and white head shot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; the user made a collage of images he does not own. One image, for example, is from here. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This person died in 1923. No source other than own work is given. Seems impossible to be own work dated 1923, but no reason why this would be able to be licensed - and no source - was given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is of an architectural model from an exhibition, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is my own work - I did not built the house either - so what? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hobusch (talk • contribs)
The copyright on the model belongs to the creator of the model not to the photographer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graduation pictures are not "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from www.flytap.com, but no permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos not created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it but do not now think it is in the public domain, the College of Arms retains a copyright claim and there is no way of showing this with the image as hosted here 86.168.128.77 15:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Game screen, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Game screen, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video game images, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image pas libre de droit. https://www.lequipe.fr/Athletisme/Actualites/Ce-qu-il-faut-retenir-du-meeting-de-stockholm-andre-de-grasse-regale-sandra-perkovic-battue/811664 Selligpau (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piyush 1218 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No authorship information, no information at all. Ony one has EXIF, some have watermarks. Probably not own work.

Jcb (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, unused, unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I followed the link given, I got (C) Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

but it just a post on Facebook YuChien Tu (talk) 10:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I follow the link given for source, I see (C) Twitter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But this pic is took by "정세운의 꿈‏" on Twitter , not took by Twitter!!! don't delete this picture plz! YuChien Tu (talk) 10:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I visit the source, I see a (C) symbol at bottom of page and nothing about this 2.0 license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:Fullsizeoutput 43.jpeg identical but larger image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fullsizeoutput 43.jpeg is just a test. but I don't know how to delete it. maybe you can help to delete it? and what's 2.0 license? YuChien Tu (talk) 10:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Mauro Albert

[edit]

Photos of the uploader. The metadata states they are copyrighted by a photographer. There is no evidence that the uploader has permission to license and distribute the photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this map, which has email contact for creator in legend. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this transit map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: This design is copyrighted by Facebook (see https://emojipedia.org/facebook/ for reference). Though simple, the design is my opinion characteristic and recognisable enough to exceed the threshold of originality. ~ nicolas (talk) 16:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a map copied from the internet, but claimed as "own work." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, blurry personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Njzjz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING

Wcam (talk) 16:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. These are not "artistic work located or on display in an outdoor public place". --Wcam (talk) 18:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters are not own work and cannot be uploaded as "own work." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: These designs are copyrighted by Facebook (see https://emojipedia.org/facebook/1.0/ for reference). ~ nicolas (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image with no credit for base image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: These designs are copyrighted by Facebook (see https://emojipedia.org/facebook/1.0/ for reference). ~ nicolas (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: These designs are copyrighted by Facebook (see https://emojipedia.org/facebook/1.0/ for reference). ~ nicolas (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copying from a book doesn't make "own work" true. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious rephotograph, check out the blazing flash artefact in center of image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with illustration, not used, and apparently not own work either. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in meta shows this was in and out of facebook before being here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Larger and older #25 in slideshow at http://academiasexologia.org/academicos-3/academicos-2/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, unidentified and probably not own work on this logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use 3 years before this upload at http://eltemplodelmonjemiroku.blogspot.com/2012/02/copa-cosplay-sur-sureste-2012-tuxtla.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a book, cd or other published cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources for any image in this collage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, also notice that it appears to be a scan. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NSFW... Found this same image apparently older at http://www.i-professionnel.com/sante/subincision-encyclopedie-medicale-6871.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some kind of screen capture of multiple images, none with sources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a professional shot for a cd/music cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File copied from http://www.wojciechwojdak.com Fallaner (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, possibly not created by uploader as it is a collage, without attributions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears promotional, not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused twitter screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not actually "Beyonce performing" but "four women in hats with upraised fingers". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused twitter screenshot Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused twitter screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was unable to confirm the license given here as correct following the link to twitter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to personal security concerns and the fact that my image is not being used in an article, I request that it be deleted. If an image like this is needed, I would be happy to upload a cleaned-up version for general use. McChizzle (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no realistic security issue, license plate is unreadable in all file versions - Jcb (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - Coordinates have been pulled and prominently displayed on the page of a private location of an individual that doesn't want to be associated. Dispit having removed the coordinates from the page and the image, the history of that location is still visible in the page history and the older versions of the image. If there is a desire to keep this image, the history and previous image versions need to be purged. --McChizzle (talk) 11:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I went ahead and I have hiden the previous revision of the file. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was unable to confirm the license for this image at the source which is Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unable to confirm license stated at site given as source, which is Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused band image from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" in meta shows this was in and out of facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a duplicate of File:Valmara69_AP-mine.JPEG. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is work of Canadian government. Canadian government work is protected with copyright and can be restored in 2052 after copyright expiring. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing by apparently living artist (born 1944), but not uploaded by the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing by apparently living artist (b. 1944), but uploaded by someone else from facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, apparently copied from Facebook. Might be a CD or music cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is claimed to be "from his Facebook page" followed by a copyleft license. However, with no source URL and the only info being Facebook source, it's unlikely to be a free image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says (c) Instagram at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, very blurry image of downtown Chicago River. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

autopromo, sole upl Pibwl (talk) 17:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

group selfie, along with File:2014년 9월 15일 방배119안전센터 1팀 위험예지훈련16.jpg superfluous to best of them File:2014년 9월 15일 방배119안전센터 1팀 위험예지훈련15.jpg (which might be lacking a real educational use anyway). Uncategorized, no English description. Pibwl (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pure advertising for north korea 188.108.101.20 17:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Previous deletion overturned. --Nick (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needless low-quality duplicate of the files already in Category:Valley of the Shadow of Death. Wrong date, false copyright claims. LX (talk, contribs) 17:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pure advertising for north korea where no bookstore can grant "great guidance"! 188.108.101.20 17:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Previous closure overturned. --Nick (talk) 12:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising for north korea, no information 188.108.101.20 17:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Previous deletion overturned. --Nick (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work-taken from the 1936 film 'Windbag the Sailor". We hope (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caption at en:WP page is "Marriott as Harbottle in Windbag the Sailor (1936)". Windbag the Sailor was produced in 1936 by the UK studio Gainsborough Pictures. Certainly not uploader's own work. We hope (talk) 18:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image serves no educational purpose and is only being used in multiple attempts to spam an autobiography on enwiki. - MrX 19:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from copyrighted image. Uncopped version can be found at https://www.pinterest.com/pin/228698487299317462 with a clear copyright mark. TheFarix (talk) 19:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photos File:New York City Transit Authority Service Adjustment Poster 1977.jpg and File:Service Adjustment on BMT and IND Lines Effective 1 A.M. Monday, Aug. 30.jpg require two copyright tags: one for the photograph and one for the underlying document. The source in each case is an eBay listing. The status of the underlying document is probably PD-US-no notice as stated, but whoever took the photos and uploaded them to eBay is the copyright holder of the photographs. Diannaa (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not clear that the image is copyright free Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader alleges that this image was released under a copyright free license. The only reference or link here is to the SAG-AFTRA website. A look at their copyright page does not state that the images on their website are copyright free and instead states that they respect the copyright state of the copyright owner. I cannot find any evidence elsewhere that would show that this is a copyright free image. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark photo ; unidentified and unidentifiable location in the museum ; unclear description and file name Tangopaso (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I identified the room (salle du manège) because there are 11 quasi similar photos of these columns !. Beside these 11 photos, the present one has no encyclopedic value and has to be deleted. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 17:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern architecture, no FoP for interior spaces in Switzerland. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded as advertising by a single-purpose account; the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from this online newspaper, which has copyright information. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted professional headshot; the metadata contains information about the author and copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 22:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation... 2405:3800:280:7ABC:B5A1:69B6:368A:B56F 23:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Pinterest, not own work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete |reason=dark, blurry |subpage= |day=19 |month=June |year=2017 }} Joanbanjo (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sourced as from rap-up.com, no indication uploader have permission or is the photographer. TherasTaneel (talk) 23:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even simple lettering is too complex when a filter is applied; see COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a 3D object requires a copyright release from the photographer. See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katiecpy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images credited to "The Sea Group" not own work of uploader. Spot searching found these have been used by "SEA Group" in advertising.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 2017062110006331. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Katiecpy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are small, unsharp, and have no useful categories. They will be lost in our 40 million images.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: junk + possible copyvios. Daphne Lantier 01:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. Someone entered Commons, uploaded this file and disappeared. E4024 (talk) 07:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if the uploader has her own cat.Category:Lauren Abraham199.7.157.51 09:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The woman is, indeed, probably the one in the category, but this image appears all over the Web. There's no EXIF here and no evidence the uploader has the rights. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the file is out of project scope due to low educational value. But if you find here some kind of value, that's OK for me. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The title can be changed, and the absence of a pen is not fatal to its future here. It's a typical scene at an agricultural show and may therefore have educational value as such. However, that value is severely diminished when Flickr tags are applied, leading to miscategorisation, and I have removed them and the erroneous categories. I will continue to do this whenever and wherever I see them causing problems, because I think quality of images should trump quantity any day. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Jcb, do you care to explain whay do you think that this image is out of scope, in more than a common, generic and abstract comment? Tm (talk) 23:59, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - reasonable quality. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo found on the internet, likely not an own work. B dash (talk) 12:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: It's my own work. The only place that I have uploaded to is wikimedia. \--No1lovesu (talk) 12:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It appears elsewhere on th Web, but not at this size. However, it infirnges on the copyright for the photograph on the left. It is too blurry to be cropped to eliminate that or to provide a good image of Maria Cordero, so it cannot be kept. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller, but visually duplicates File:Огтай_Самедов_и_сотрудники_лаборатории_в_процессе_исследования.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this rephotograph of an older picture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete this photo: Please, I'm the great grandchild or Romolo Carpi, please do not delete this photo! Thanks a lot for your attention! Lorenzo.carpi (talk) 20:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC) We have got only this photo of him... it's very important for us! Thanks! Lorenzo.carpi (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It may be important, but you likely do not have the right to freely license it. That right almost certainly belongs to the photographer or his heirs. Unless you can show that its copyright has expired for some reason, it cannot be kept here. THe general rule for Italian portraits is that copyright lasts 70 years after the photographer's death, so a photo taken in the 20th century is probably still under copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BrianPaes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs: rephotographed images credited to "Dr. Vinayshil Gautam - Dr. Vinayshil Gautam, M.A., Ph.D., FRAS serves as Professor of Department of Management Studies of Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi. Author Dr. Vinayshil Gautam"

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from discussion page The images are owned by Dr Vinayshil Gautam, son of Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma. Since the images are pretty old they are only available as physical copies. Dr Vinayshil Gautam has provided us to scanned copy of the photographs to get them uploaded for wikipedia. Please let us know how can we resolve this copyright violation issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianPaes (talk • contribs) 11:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ping BrianPaes: What is needed is who created the original images, when and where that occurred at a minimum to have any idea what kind of license they might have. Dr. Gautam did not create the images so he can't license them. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: Dr. Gautam has not licenses these photographs. He has not taken any initiative in this matter. These were provided by us because they were in public domain like the blue photo of Acharya Devendra Nath Sharma which is in a published brochure. (17:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Most of these photographs are over 40 years old. They were taken by people who were interested to photograph the VIPs.

However, the names of respectable people are involved. These images are showing up in Google Search Results with nomination for deletion message. It is important to avoid unnecessary controversy.

Kindly delete the image files and image pages which are showing.

Early help will be highly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianPaes (talk • contribs)

@BrianPaes: The age of the photographers has nothing to do with the licenses of the images, nor does their interest or lack thereof have anything to do with licenses. You have not provided any information to support your claim that "they were in public domain". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: Ok Ellin, could I request you to please have images deleted and image pages deleted, as the names of respectable people are involved, and these images are showing up in Google Search Results with nomination for deletion message ? Can I delete this page and all the images uploaded? Thank you (BrianPaes (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)) @Ellin Beltz: Further to above request, kindly note that we wish to withdraw the nomination of these photographs for uploading in Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Accordingly, they may please be deleted forthwith. (BrianPaes (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: I don't much like deleting these, but since we inexplicably no longer have the cooperation of the uploader, we can't get dates to prove whether or not they are PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising for "young pionerr tours", no information 188.108.101.20 17:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This appears to be a frame from a video made by the tour organizers, not own work. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: Clearly not a frame from a promotional video, so restored as a mistaken deletion, despite the obvious good faith on the part of @Jameslwoodward. Feel free to revert this undeletion if you disagree, and I'm happy to continue through an UDR if needed/requested. Thanks, odder (talk) 21:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising for a tailor, no information 188.108.101.20 17:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The advertising element is actually for a tour company in North Korea, but that could be suitably toned down. However, little information comes out of North Korea, so that which does has some educational merit insofar as it reflects working conditions in that country, or at least what the ruling regime is prepared to release to the rest of the world. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: image itself doesn't show advertising and is in scope. P 1 9 9   14:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information Carolinechang (talk) 17:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: licensing was fixed. P 1 9 9   14:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image (per Commons:Deletion policy#Not educationally useful) Delta 51 (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please also consider deleting all other images uploaded by User:Meshak Lalzawmthanga, for the same reason. Delta 51 (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]