Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files uploaded by Ajinrajs7273 (talk · contribs)
[edit]film poster
Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/User:Shouravakbar1 Commons:Deletion requests/User:Yesenia Natali
Fehler sollte Kategorie werden Ramsch (talk) 17:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: User intended to create a category. --Achim (talk) 20:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
own work claim but taken from internet: https://twitter.com/witteginger, https://www.youtube.com/c/witteg Agora (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: blatant copyright violation. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
https://www.kantiana.ru/news/149/159981/ Petrov Victor (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Copyright violation: https://www.kantiana.ru/news/149/159981/
Fake logo of fake contest - derivative of copyrighted Eurovision 2015 logo 147.134.100.54 19:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:V. --Sealle (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yunyichong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement.
- File:云易充智能充电站产品检测报告.jpg
- File:云易充智能充电站V6版.png
- File:第二代云易充智能充电站.jpg
- File:第一代云易充智能充电站.jpg
- File:云易充智能充电站设备图.png
Wcam (talk) 12:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yunyichong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement
Wcam (talk) 02:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:14, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Bad upload (testing importing old Wikimania videos) Asaf (WMF) (talk) 14:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: test upload. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WintYeeShunn (talk · contribs)
[edit]not user's own work. Photos are taken from Wyne Lay's Facebook page.
- File:Wyne Lay.jpg and File:Wyne Lay Selfie.jpg are copyrighted album covers.
- File:Nga wyne.jpg
- File:MWM 2014.jpg
- File:Miss Myanmar World 2014.jpg
- File:Wyne Lay.jpg
- File:WyneLay.jpg
- File:Wyne Lay Selfie.jpg
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 02:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per nom. --rubin16 (talk) 13:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
The same picture in higher quality https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vihorlat_008.JPG CaptainClawHE (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
The same picture in higher quality https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vihorlat_008.JPG CaptainClawHE (talk) 16:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality image, have tons of Category:Cyclohexane with various levels of detail DMacks (talk) 13:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: No license since 17 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
personnel delete Hadil Diaf (talk) 13:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
rename of the file UY4Xe8VM5VYxaQQ (talk) 18:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Chemical mistake. Per doi:10.1039/J39710002566, should be another methyl group not OH in upper-right corner. Credit to en:User:EdChem for noticing--see en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#DDQ aromatisation. Replaced by File:DDQ aromatization rearrangement.png. DMacks (talk) 07:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Are the other user uploads all correct? --Leyo 10:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- They look reasonable. DMacks (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 16:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality, better alternatives available in Category:Furazabol. Leyo 22:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 16:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Elisfkc (talk) 03:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
probably not own work: same as http://www.siumed.edu/news/Photos-Graphics/Buildings-logo/MMC.jpg Closeapple (talk) 00:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of some studio in Israel. Out of scope. -- Geagea (talk) 02:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 05:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-USGov-VOA after 2013 year Kencola (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, unless the uploader is an astronaut. Image appears to be a photograph of a book or magazine page. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion/user has many other contributions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion/user has many other contributions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion/user has many other contributions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion/user has many other contributions. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. Several pictures from same uploader have been tagged "otherwise no contribution" most of these are in use for several years. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 18 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 18 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 18 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 18 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Looking at the file name and the image here, User:Rberchie appears to be the subject of this file. This is certainly not their own work as they claim because the user is not the photographer. Idiot Guruman (talk) 11:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well I may be oblivion of certain rules and I stand to be corrected.It is a picture of me I made someone take it using my Ipad. Does that mean the person who took it owns the copyright?Please advice me--Rberchie (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- As can be seen from the Exif file in almost all uploads of Rberechie, it really is his Ipad. There is no copyright violation involved here. A release with a free license from the photographer should be easy to obtain from Rberchie. --Gereon K. (talk) 17:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- I took this photo for Rberchie and gave him my express rights to publish the picture in question under the said license in commons. Flixtey (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 06:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
File:2010 07 15160 6292 Donghe Township, Bridges in Donghe Township, Information boards in Donghe Township Mawuku River Taiwan.JPG
[edit]no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 07:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 07:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 07:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation, metadata shows image was edited with ACDSee Pro 6 and created on 3 December, 2013.--Liji (talk) 08:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Is edited with ACDSee Pro 6 and created on 3 December, 2013 proof of copyvio? --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 08:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:15, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
File:2010 07 22170 6924 Xinyi District, Taipei, Buildings, Xinyi Road, Taipei 101, Observation towers, Memorial Halls, Railways, Yangmingshan, Arenas, Airports, Taiwan.JPG
[edit]no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 09:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF info, no proof that the picture is in PD.--Liji (talk) 15:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
[[:File:]]
[edit]no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 15:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- crop image from own work photo. 1,578KB , 2560x1440, ASUS,Z800D, 1/451, F/2, 1/455, ISO-50, 2016/1/24 08:35 Ianbu (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Image was missing source information from en-wiki and was deleted. No source here either.--Liji (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose EXIF info just EXIF info.Ianbu (talk) 15:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF info, no proof that the picture is in PD.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
No EXIF info, no proof that the picture is in PD.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Part of apparent deletion nomination binge without cause. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stefana Petrovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works, DW of various artworks, photo montage, photos coming from Facebook ("FBMD" in the metadata), some over can be found with google search, small/middle sizes without EXIF
- File:Nagost.jpg
- File:Tim Walker.jpg
- File:Die Gedichtauswahl.jpg
- File:Gedichtauswahl.jpg
- File:Izbor iz poezije.jpg
- File:Oci coveka sa istoka.jpg
- File:Bec wien.jpg
- File:Pancevo.jpg
- File:Promocija u Zenici.jpg
- File:Nemanja Dragas Zenica.jpg
- File:Beograd bluz.jpg google
- File:Син мог оца - Copy.jpg
- File:Svemir.jpg
- File:Okovani satima.jpg
- File:Obecani svemir.jpg
- File:Dodela Vidovdanske nagrade Akademije umetnosti.jpg
- File:11066789 10205246378012104 712760050784373587 n - Copy.jpg previously published there
- File:Nemanja D.jpg
- File:Neca Dragas.jpg
- File:Nemanja Dragas.jpg
- File:Nemanja Dragaš.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete all per nom. OTRS permission is needed for all these images. --★ Poké95 03:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stefana Petrovic (talk · contribs) – 2
[edit]Unlikely to be own works, DW of various artworks, photo montage, photos coming from Facebook ("FBMD" in the metadata), some over can be found with google search, small/middle sizes without EXIF
- File:Син мог оца.jpg
- File:Obucen u nagost.jpg
- File:Vreme.jpg
- File:Furehling in A.jpg
- File:Dodela.jpg
- File:Mali-princ-620x350.jpg
- File:Literarisches Gut.jpg
- File:Pancevo knjiga.jpg
- File:Knjizevno vece.jpg
- File:Dragas Nemanja.jpg
DCB (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Realdoll
[edit]While I'm not 100% on this, I think that the realdolls are eligible for copyright, which makes all these images derivative works. If we accept that realdolls are copyrightable, then they fail COM:FOP on the grounds of not being permanently installed.
- File:Alektra Blue Doll AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010 (1).jpg
- File:Alektra Blue Doll AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010 (2).jpg
- File:Alektra Blue Doll AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010 (3).jpg
- File:Alektra Blue Doll AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010 (4).jpg
- File:Alektra Blue Doll AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010.jpg
- File:Cyber Kowloon Walled City - 08. Kowloon nymph rests in apartment - Warehouse Kawasaki, 2014-06-02 (by Ken OHYAMA).jpg
- File:Jessica Drake Real Doll AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010.jpg
- File:RealDoll example.jpg
- File:Realdoll, AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010 (1).jpg
- File:Realdoll, AVN Adult Entertainment Expo 2010.jpg
- File:Roxanne1 for Wiki.jpg
- File:Roxanne2 for Wiki.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 05:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 06:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation. Scroll down on http://www.brandonheath.net/ (http://static1.squarespace.com/static/54aad4fbe4b0631d0c58fd25/t/551c4e33e4b0d5e6433d8457/1427918394963/ ) Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC) Sorry I didn't recognize it when I uploaded the picture.I just thought maybe it will need a new picture to polish the entry.I will accept it if the picture's deleted and value this problem next time. Chuangxinke
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Keine Freigabe durch den Fotografen ersichtlich (Copyrighted work) Jbergner (talk) 06:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
bad photoshop, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 06:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:47, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Almost certainly copyvio, looks like a scanned image with incorrect sourcing. MKFI (talk) 07:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, derivate work. --Wdwd (talk) 12:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo without educational value, out of scope. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Source (en-wiki) says this is non-free picture Seegge (talk) 02:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
The composite picture which is not educational. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 03:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: possible copyvio (com:pcp). --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This is a promotional image and we have no release. See http://btsystemband.tumblr.com/image/144428895474 and notice the publication's name in the top left corner Also, the photographer was mentioned in band's article on the English project: Blind 7 Photography https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beat_the_System_%28band%29&diff=720607778&oldid=718711092 Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Picture belongs to the band and Blind 7 Photography was hired to do the photoshoot
- You realize that if you sign over the rights to the photo, if it's used in the future, all attribution belongs to Wikimedia and not the photographer, whom you named in the edit, or to the band. They relinquish rights based on the copyright you applied when uploading it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, no prmission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Image has been used previously in net: http://www.festivals.fi/festivaalit/hangon-musiikkijuhlat-2/. According to image description the photographer is Virpi Velin. OTRS permission is needed. MKFI (talk) 06:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, suspected web grab. MKFI (talk) 08:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Most likely copyvio; one of the images in this montage has been published previously: http://onehallyu.com/topic/311426-meet-ncts-well-take-it-slow-aka-doyoung/. MKFI (talk) 08:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Used in an attack page on the English Wikipedia. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Used in an attack page on the English Wikipedia. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 14:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
wrong image uploaded Ringlander1968 (talk) 16:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
This document is a well used industry reference document used by over 50 insurance and asset management companies worldwide with strict ORIC International copyrights, which are stated on the inside cover of the document.
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johannawandelt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:21, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Stock photos on poster unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 22 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
間違えてアップロードしてしまいました。 Center village (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded by mistake; uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
EXIF lists the copyright holder as "Pete Astles - [email protected]". No evidence that this is the uploader. Additionally, there's EXIF telling that the file comes from Facebook, so we need evidence of permission from the Facebook source. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Pete Astles should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Loveyoureyes00 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising account. One of the images has been published previously: https://www.yell.com/biz/ambleside-opticians-ambleside-901326037/. Ambleside Opticians has been nominated for speedy deletion.
- File:Ambleside Opticians Interior.jpg
- File:Ambleside Opticians Reception.jpg
- File:Ambleside Opticians.png
MKFI (talk) 10:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Creative sound and vision (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Creative sound and vision).
- File:The little mermaid theme with baloons.jpg
- File:The lawn of flowers.jpg
- File:Gate decor with jafri style in barasat on 24th january 2015.jpg
- File:Dream wedding Concept in 2015 on Puja & Sourish Reception party.jpg
- File:Creative sound and vision.png
MER-C 12:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allschools (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of software of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Taher lebachi ben kamel (talk · contribs)
[edit]a lot of photos of this user are copyvio, maube this one are too. Out of scoop. personel photos
- File:Me and my fre.jpg
- File:Morocco 2016 yes.jpg
- File:My lettle bro svcsd.JPG
- File:Shcool bro.JPG
- File:Algeria 2015 sdvv.JPG
- File:Algeia.JPG
- File:Me in algeria.JPG
- File:Me in the hod.JPG
- File:My lettle bro fs.JPG
- File:Algeria agan.JPG
- File:Home 2015.JPG
- File:Yes algeira.JPG
- File:My lettle bro s s.JPG
- File:My lettle bro.JPG
- File:Yes vs s.JPG
- File:My pc.JPG
- File:Algeria 2015 s.JPG
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 20:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope: no educational use; likely copyvio, ostensibly from the video game w:Little Big Planet 3, based on user's other uploads czar 20:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:55, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Takli el kable (talk · contribs)
[edit]uploaded for the WLE in Algeria. its not a photos but a audio. this file are unused. out of scoop
- File:1-il ya 7 ans ...... Albin.ogg
- File:5- les interogatoires...peuple.ogg
- File:2-la journée......en ce moment.ogg
- File:6-monsieurs... la coupé.ogg
- File:3-en ce moment...la prière.ogg
- File:4-toute attendait ... coeur.ogg
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Sourendra Kumar Das
[edit]- File:Sou Boyy (Sourendra Kumar Das), Fashion Blogger.JPG
- File:Sourendra Das, Writer and Activist.jpg
- File:Sourendra Kumar Das.jpg
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion, low quality footage, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Jotzet (talk) 23:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personnal photo without educational value, out of scope. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personnal photo without educational value, out of scope. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
a violation of Commons' policies and guidelines: personal attacks/harassment Wieralee (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 10:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of focus, low educational value Syced (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: sufficient quality, no other pics of Fiat Panda mirror. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:"15 - ITALY - wine and Food (Refosco and gorgonzola) .jpg Syced (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not an exact duplicate. And this one is better than the over-exposed File:"15 - ITALY - wine and Food (Refosco and gorgonzola) .jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of "The Car Wash" Fountain, Portland, Oregon (2013) - 2.jpg Syced (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is not an exact duplicate of the above mentioned photo. --Mjrmtg (talk) 12:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- But it is not a duplicate... -Another Believer (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not a duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of "The Car Wash" Fountain, Portland, Oregon (2013) - 2.jpg Syced (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is not an exact duplicate of the above mentioned photo. --Mjrmtg (talk) 12:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- But it is not a duplicate... -Another Believer (talk) 15:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not a duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Not useful until the picture is georeferenced. Syced (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in scope, geo-reference not a must. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 11:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 11:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 11:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
If really own work, please describe and tag the file Syced (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution, no focus Syced (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 12:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution Syced (talk) 12:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, sufficient quality. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie? Uncategorized for too long, please categorize or delete Syced (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per User:Amitie. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Whole pic is blurry Syced (talk) 12:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unusable, plenty of better ones at Category:Transport in Dhaka. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Near duplicate of Back view of teen boys head - 1.jpeg Syced (talk) 12:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Antigng (talk) 12:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie (or uploaded without permission), non notable? Syced (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not selfie, but most likely no permission either. Personality rights issue. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 12:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, not notable? Syced (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, not notable? Syced (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, not notable? Syced (talk) 12:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, not notable? Syced (talk) 12:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, not notable? Syced (talk) 12:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
selfie, not notable? Syced (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
probably copyrighted background Syced (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Self nomination of low quality Flickr file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:Tuned Mazda RX-7 (Les chauds vendredis '12).JPG (and other files within Category:Mazda RX-7 (FB/SA)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. OSX II (talk) 13:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Alvin Mambele is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Alvin Mambele is the full name of the user A Black-man, and also I'm new I do not know how to assign rights to my own pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ablack-man (talk • contribs)
- The photo has also other problem: there's nothing to do with it. Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo without educational value, out of scope. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 14:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EscapeGames (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
How the image is in project scope? Taivo (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Reverting vandalism
I kindly ask to delete my own page created by the vandal. Vasyatka1 (talk) 19:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
File:THANKSGIVING DAY DINNER (held by) ST. CHARLES HOTEL (at) "MILWAUKEE, WI" (HOTEL;) (NYPL Hades-275140-4000011620).jpg
[edit]Image of a blank page. Worthless. ~~ ∫uℂρЭℝ0υĜe (ㅜαλ2𐤊) 23:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IM-yb as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|Official logo of basketball team, © 2016 - Alba Berlin. Maybe uploader is copyright holder, but OTRS-permission is still needed. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Aidyn Aimbetov
[edit]The cosmonaut's photos are from Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center and not free! E.g. see here.
Ras67 (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Did not realise it has faces of friends/people in the photo. preach of personal privacy Aziz1005 (talk) 02:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
photo of headstone that incorporates nonfree sculpture; no freedom of panorama in US. should be cropped to eliminate nonfree part. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
auteursrecht PBBfotografie 07:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
auteursrecht schoentas PBBfotografie 07:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. It's a derivative work by an unknown author from a family archive. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#China.2C_People.27s_Republic_of, someone has to name "the name of the author and the title of the work"; being CC in Flickr will not extempt the image from FOP requirements. Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:PCP -- Who is the city planner? What's the copyright status of the model? Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ronald Stretch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Sara, chalk white, sap green, oil on canvas, 54 x 72 inches ©2014.pdf
- File:Roma white no.181, oil on canvas, 48 x64 inches, ©2013.pdf
- File:Roni Stretch .jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused simple logo of non-notable thing, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Calligraphy artwork shows originality thus copyrightable. Per {{PD-China}} unpublished work enters the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator, and Chiang Kai-shek died in 1975. Wcam (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Promotional. Image on poster unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
File:STUDY MEDICINE IN UKRAINE ADMISSION 2016 - 2017-2018 for MBBS, BDS,PHD ,MSC MA NURSING,.png
[edit]Promotional. Image on poster unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:58, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Looks like not own work, but screenshot of copyrighted content. Spanish speaker is needed to read file description. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Taiwan does not allow FOP for artworks. Chiang Kai-shek's personal calligraphic work (as opponent to official documents issued by him) is copyrightable. Wcam (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- My reason for deletion still holds for this photo. --Wcam (talk) 11:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
These were uploaded by Mayad (talk · contribs) to Wikipedia under the same name but were not properly tagged as such by the user who moved them here. See w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 18#Files uploaded by Mayad.C2.A0.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29. Commons uploader not notified because he has fully protected his talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Incompatible licence: http://www.faridehcadot.com/histoire-farideh-cadot/ "© 2016 Farideh Cadot Associés All Rights Reserved." Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pokéfan95 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Recreation of deleted content: File:N-storm-logo.png. Actually the deleted file is totally different. You can see deleted logo in background of file:AlexAnderson.jpg. But maybe this logo surpasses also threshold of originality? Taivo (talk) 16:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Tavio. Sorry I'm pretty confused of how communications work here (hope I'm doing something right now and you will read this). Anyway, I originally uploaded this logo a while ago, it was deleted because it may cause the copyright issues. I couldn't figure out how to make something about it and tried to re-upload it. That's it for the story. Now, about logo itself - I represent Northern Storm Wrestling, all the media and graphic that I post here is made by us and we're the copyright owners of it. Therefore I assure you that Wikipedia will get in no problems by using this, or any other image uploaded in Northern Storm Wrestling article by me. VSBroN
Deleted: Above com:TOO imho. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia. Building by architect Aleksandr Vladovski, d. 1950, hence copyright vio. Pildirüüstaja (talk) 16:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Evidence is needed, that the screenshot was free. Source site is down. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Lepakshi Temple - 7 Headed Snake Statue.jpg rather small-format image and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Lepakshi Temple - 7 Headed Snake Statue.jpg and üüFile:Lepakshi Temple - Sita Devi's Foot Imprint.jpg]] et al: rather small-format image and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Lepakshi Temple - 7 Headed Snake Statue.jpg and üüFile:Lepakshi Temple - Sita Devi's Foot Imprint.jpg]] et al: rather small-format image and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Lepakshi Temple - 7 Headed Snake Statue.jpg and üüFile:Lepakshi Temple - Sita Devi's Foot Imprint.jpg]] et al: rather small-format image and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR as per File:Lepakshi Temple - 7 Headed Snake Statue.jpg and üüFile:Lepakshi Temple - Sita Devi's Foot Imprint.jpg]] et al: rather small-format image and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as it seems a rather 'professional' CAD-drawing that may have copyright issues, Roland zh (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that the photo was produced solely by NASA; the copyright is probably held by Roscosmos instead. Keilana (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- File:Arjuna Harjai.jpg - copyvio source: [2]
- File:Arjuna harjai composer.jpg - copyvio source: [3]
Falsified licensing data provided by uploader. Images were obtained from the internet from various websites without authorization, there is no indication that the images have since been released as {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} as claimed. EXIF data has been removed. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-free software, inaccurate portrayal ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality too poor, not usable WQUlrich (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
from Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ForcatArmatosura/photos/pb.285217081613725.-2207520000.1463609947./621939764608120/?type=3&theater & also here: http://www.aaf.mil.al/index.php/komanda-e-faj/145-stervitjet-dhe-aktivitete-te-faj/3202-64-vjet-aviacion-shqiptar –– unclear license Albinfo (talk) 22:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
taken from Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ForcatArmatosura/photos/pb.285217081613725.-2207520000.1463610293./584832391652191/?type=3&theater Albinfo (talk) 22:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
taken from Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ForcatArmatosura/photos/pb.285217081613725.-2207520000.1463610459./584832648318832/?type=3&theater Albinfo (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
from Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ForcatArmatosura/photos/pb.285217081613725.-2207520000.1463610615./552212031580894/?type=3&theater Albinfo (talk) 22:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
from Facebook or so: https://www.facebook.com/ForcatArmatosura/photos/pb.285217081613725.-2207520000.1463610459./588621967939900/?type=3&theater Albinfo (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Licence incompatibility with https://www.encg-settat.ma/beta/mentions-legales/ and "2016 © ENCG DE SETTAT. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
This is not the work of a US Government employee, but part of the National Register of Historic Places nomination process. It is, therefore, a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Бумбаприпацум (talk · contribs)
[edit]spamer's contribution, not in use
Bilderling (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by P199. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Image is not realistically useful for an educational purpose and appears to serve only as personal advertising. Rebbing 15:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Likely not own work: user uploaded other images from same website. Nominating in case User:Dilophosaurus can explain the source of this photograph. Closeapple (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment: User uploaded smaller or equal versions of other photos from http://www.siumed.edu/news/BuildingPage.htm but this image happens to be larger than the version (at least now) on http://www.siumed.edu/news/BuildingPage.htm so I'm nominating it for deletion discussion instead of speedy copyright violation. --Closeapple (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
![153 File:"13 - ITALY - Brera in the mirror.jpg](#File:"13_-_ITALY_-_Brera_in_the_mirror.jpg){kind=link}
![154 File:"15 - ITALY - wine and cheese Refosco gorgonzola e noci .jpg](#File:"15_-_ITALY_-_wine_and_cheese_Refosco_gorgonzola_e_noci_.jpg){kind=link}
![155 File:"The Car Wash" Fountain, Portland, Oregon (2013) - 1.jpg](#File:"The_Car_Wash"_Fountain,_Portland,_Oregon_(2013)_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
![156 File:"The Car Wash" Fountain, Portland, Oregon (2013) - 3.jpg](#File:"The_Car_Wash"_Fountain,_Portland,_Oregon_(2013)_-_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_ST._CHARLES_HOTEL_(at)_"MILWAUKEE,_WI"_(HOTEL;)_(NYPL_Hades-275140-4000011620).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![247 File:" 13 - ITALY - italian cherry - ciliegie.jpg](#File:"_13_-_ITALY_-_italian_cherry_-_ciliegie.jpg){kind=link}
![248 File:" 13 - made in Italy - diciture.jpg](#File:"_13_-_made_in_Italy_-_diciture.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![11:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrz5o2rCbteQatoTajsTatFsati6aNa6ajmSajmQqE1gMqPByEnPJq90yNiNpO1HurvlthBHbr9kKArOor9XLB90MgrHLqBOKA9ObAXQnQ%3D%3D##c-Syced-2016-05-18T11:33:00.000Z-File:"13_-_ITALY_-_Brera_in_the_mirror.jpg){kind=link}
![18:20, 7 June 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrmPytCTaDmPzE0QzE0Qz1wPyjYOajYQak4QajlMbsnXLgs6dZh1L3w7atzHbr9drihaqr8Tp0dOnpdFp2BSp3vYnr9TMpdOL3eSMZlZ##c-P199-2016-06-07T18:20:00.000Z-File:"13_-_ITALY_-_Brera_in_the_mirror.jpg){kind=link}
![11:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrz5o2rCbteQatoTajsTatFsati6aNw6ajmSajmQqE1gMqPByEnPJq90yNi1pO1HurvlthBHbr93Mq5Bp2hSnh9DMgrBK2rHsArAL3zDL19ZL3dZL256L2PFp2rHLA9DMr8SMZlZ##c-Syced-2016-05-18T11:34:00.000Z-File:"15_-_ITALY_-_wine_and_cheese_Refosco_gorgonzola_e_noci_.jpg){kind=link}
![18:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrmPytCTaDmPzE0QzE0Qz1wPyjYOaNYQak4QajlMbsnXLgs6dZh1L3w7atrHbr9drihaqr8Tp3JXLArHoq5Cp2zYnqrNnr9unqnRK2zRp2JRKAJRLZXRLghHnr9SL2zXpO5WKgK%3D##c-P199-2016-06-07T18:23:00.000Z-File:"15_-_ITALY_-_wine_and_cheese_Refosco_gorgonzola_e_noci_.jpg){kind=link}
![11:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrz5o2rCbteQatoTajsTatFsati6aNo6ajmSajmQqE1gMqPByEnPJq90y1vYnr9jopdHr2hNMknPJq90y19gL3rSJghXLEPHsg9OJgPFLAwUp09OnqJRLB8YaDmPaOBHbr8PbAXQnQ%3D%3D##c-Syced-2016-05-18T11:36:00.000Z-File:"The_Car_Wash"_Fountain,_Portland,_Oregon_(2013)_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
![18:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrmPytCTaDmPzE0QzE0Qz1wPyjYOztYQak4QajlMbsnXLgs6dZh1L3w7rgFBp0zFKB9popzYdZh1L3w7p0nRJq50oqBSbh9wL3d0LghSnkPHt3dBn29SpOGOajiNcr8TpNiSMZlZ##c-P199-2016-06-07T18:25:00.000Z-File:"The_Car_Wash"_Fountain,_Portland,_Oregon_(2013)_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
![11:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrz5o2rCbteQatoTajsTatFsati6aNo6ajmSajmQqE1gMqPByEnPJq90y1vYnr9jopdHr2hNMknPJq90y19gL3rSJghXLEPHsg9OJgPFLAwUp09OnqJRLB8YaDmPaOBHbr8NbAXQnQ%3D%3D##c-Syced-2016-05-18T11:36:00.000Z-File:"The_Car_Wash"_Fountain,_Portland,_Oregon_(2013)_-_3.jpg){kind=link}
![18:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrmPytCTaDmPzE0QzE0Qz1wPyjYOzDYQak4QajlMbsnXLgs6dZh1L3w7rgFBp0zFKB9popzYdZh1L3w7p0nRJq50oqBSbh9wL3d0LghSnkPHt3dBn29SpOGOajiNcr8TpNaSMZlZ##c-P199-2016-06-07T18:26:00.000Z-File:"The_Car_Wash"_Fountain,_Portland,_Oregon_(2013)_-_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJO9XLAvBIk5QMfm%2FJgB0Lgs9w29TLq9SKNXrLAvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0z1KZdBLZvHKArPJqrNJfaAoq1Qy29UngBCxtKOzjoPyta2aEzgMqPByBvFLgPXLA4Up0TFLghToqXFp3zFJq4UpNi5aDGSMZlZ##File:Tallinn,_Kalamaja_saun,_1928.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 18:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Also uploaded to w:File:Aunt Lillie.png where it is sourced to a third-party website. No evidence of permission. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Missing source, Self-promotion Dianakc (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as rather small and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Bogus license, listed author isn't the uploader and bigger version elswhere. Also, small size, low res and no valid EXIF Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
I just read the policy that photographs of 3d objects are not in the public domain. This photograph is authorized only for non commercial use (http://www.metmuseum.org/about-the-met/policies-and-documents/image-resources/frequently-asked-questions) and therefore should be deleted. My bad ! Skimel (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started for File:MEA-Engineering-College 01.png and File:MEA-Engineering-College 02.png : im rather of promotional use (address and coord), and also not in at Wikimedia projects, as well as of rather doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
File:MEA-Engineering-College 01.png and File:MEA-Engineering-College 02.png : im rather of promotional use (address and coord), and also not in at Wikimedia projects, as well as of rather doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
repleced by a better version of the same image PA (talk) 21:15, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Source and permission missing Gyrostat (talk) 21:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
logo probablement sous droit d'auteur Olivier Tanguy (talk) 22:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Image non libre Habertix (talk) 22:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Not high-quality resolution Syced (talk) 11:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
![11:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrz5o2rCbteQatoTajsTatFsati6aNm6ajmSajmQqE1gMqPByEnPJq90y18Pa18Tp0BswsPnpO1HMpvFLgBFLB9DMgrOKZBHbr9DMqPXnqJXnu5WKgK%3D##c-Syced-2016-05-18T11:30:00.000Z-File:"_13_-_ITALY_-_italian_cherry_-_ciliegie.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
![19:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbsXDoE0Oaji2btm2bte5rji5yDw4yDmQbDmQahYTvABUntYAKprRJjTHatzHbr9drihaqr8Tp2B0oqPXoq5Ho2FBKZd5pO1Ho2BUMqrZMqsSMZlZ##c-Jcb-2016-06-29T19:48:00.000Z-File:"_13_-_ITALY_-_italian_cherry_-_ciliegie.jpg){kind=link}
Not high-quality resolution Syced (talk) 11:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
![11:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbrz5o2rCbteQatoTajsTatFsati6aNe6ajmSajmQqE1gMqPByEnPJq90y18Pa18Tp21FngrHMq5HupvFLfBHbr9CMqzXJfrOnu5WKgK%3D##c-Syced-2016-05-18T11:32:00.000Z-File:"_13_-_made_in_Italy_-_diciture.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
![19:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)](https://amansaja.com/index.php?q=Mfv0Kfa6bO9DL21TL25NbZJXM2BTnqvXou5RKAKRJ2BVMu9jL21TL25NyCvBLgr0Mq9Sp3dBKprBK3vNb0hOo2FXJAsRaDmPzE8Qzu8PykzDbsXDoE0Oaji2btm2bte5rji5yDw5yDmQbDmQahYTvABUntYAKprRJjTHatzHbr9ToqvBp2BSp0B0oqP5pO1HngBDMpv1KAsSMZlZ##c-Jcb-2016-06-29T19:49:00.000Z-File:"_13_-_made_in_Italy_-_diciture.jpg){kind=link}
Near duplicate of Agricultura a la Ribera - 30.jpeg Syced (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Near duplicate doesn't means "same".--Coentor (talk) 14:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not duplicates. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
According to the EXIF, this comes from Facebook. Evidence of permission is needed from the Facebook user. Stefan2 (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Technical addendum that an enwiki file shadows this file on enwiki and is tagged as such, if this file is deleted that file can be de-tagged. NO opinion on the merits of this deletion request, but I wonder if there is a way to trace which Facebook account.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be out of scope. See also w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 May 18#File:Anti mind virus.png. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Copied from my messed-up file-for-discussion on Wikipedia (I really shouldn't try to do stuff like this):
- [T]his image is originally created by Randall Munroe for xkcd, see here. The uploader, however, claimed it is their work, which is highly unlikely. However, I do want to posit that it may be possible to list this file as copyright illegible, as the image could be broken down to a simple string of text anyone could think up. Thoughts? ~Mable (chat) 17:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Mention de copyright Copyleft (talk) 14:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Mention de copyright Copyleft (talk) 14:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case.
I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like a smaller version of File:Sir Anold Hodson.png, which is claimed by another user as his own work too (not more plausibly). -- Asclepias (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- This picture (and those listed below) were taken by Raphael and the Ghana group as part of a pilot of a GLAM project (see m:Grants:PEG/Wikimedia Ghana User Group/GLAM GHANA. They were allowed to take pictures of the original documents in the museum itself. Images were modified in photoshop and the modified versions uploaded (I am reporting what Raphael just explained me face to face). I do not know if this explains the loss of meta data. Raphael told me that they still have the original pictures they took (non improved on photoshop). I suggested that he also upload the original pictures (expecting that those would have the meta data info). I also recommended that he improved the description the images (to facilite reuse...), add categories whenever possible, and to credit the GLAM institution. I would advise that admins give him time AND also support if needed to fix the situation. Anthere (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- LOL, c'mon Anthere who'd ever travel to a museum, take pictures, then does photoshop treatments afterwards with such results and - as a cream topping - take screenshots of the "own work" to publish such cruel tiny images for educational purpose?! just waitin' for User:Flixtey coming along to read his assertion... --Jotzet (talk) 17:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Don't agree Asclepias, that's obviously the screenshot of a different copy of the same image and so a further case of copyvio. --Jotzet (talk) 17:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, given that Felix and Raphael are 2 different people (I met them both...they ARE two different people) and both worked together on that glam project... I am NOT surprised that you would find copy of the same work in two different pictures. I was with Raphael in a photo hunt just a few days ago in Joburg, and everyone was taking pictures, some with good cameras, others with cell phones. I can perfectly see how it would happen.
- The one thing I do not get... is how the meta data could disappear.
- I am NOT saying what they did is ok. I explained last Thursday to Raphael what wrong they did. The author name is not the right one. The source should be the museum. An OTRS permission should have been sent. They did it wrong. This is something that do happen with newbies. They did it completely wrong, but I do believe it was done in good faith. Anthere (talk) 18:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- This picture (and those listed below) were taken by Raphael and the Ghana group as part of a pilot of a GLAM project (see m:Grants:PEG/Wikimedia Ghana User Group/GLAM GHANA. They were allowed to take pictures of the original documents in the museum itself. Images were modified in photoshop and the modified versions uploaded (I am reporting what Raphael just explained me face to face). I do not know if this explains the loss of meta data. Raphael told me that they still have the original pictures they took (non improved on photoshop). I suggested that he also upload the original pictures (expecting that those would have the meta data info). I also recommended that he improved the description the images (to facilite reuse...), add categories whenever possible, and to credit the GLAM institution. I would advise that admins give him time AND also support if needed to fix the situation. Anthere (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's my own work I have however updated the source which I had wrongly made my own.--Rberchie (talk) 12:42, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator. Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is my own work please give me sometime to upload the original versions alongside and work on getting the OTRS from the source.--Rberchie (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is my own work please give me some time to work on the OTRS and also upload the original picture alongside.
--Rberchie (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please this is my own work I have however modified the source please give me some tjme to upload the original alongside and the OTRS from the Institution.--Rberchie (talk) 20:19, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This my own work please if there is any advice please let me know.--Rberchie (talk) 08:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Rberchie has now admitted the real source of the image. However there is no proof the stated license is valid.
- Rberchie has now admitted the real source of the image. However there is no proof the stated license is valid.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:39, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is my own work a derivative of the original picture I took please do not delete give me some time to get the OTRS from the Organisation and also upload the original one alongside.--Rberchie (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is my own work please give me time to get the OTRS from the source and upload the original version here. I have however reviewed the source fromits wrongful wording.--Rberchie (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". I am struggling to see how this is the case. I am not convinced that the image uploader is the owner of this work. The uploader seemed to have taken another photographer image. How on earth will this be their own work? This user is a serial copyright violator Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is my own work--Rberchie (talk) 18:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Is it really? It's a photo of the Ghanaian declaration of independence which happened in 1957. From this picture of you you look relatively young. You certainly do not look 60+ years old, which you would have to be to have been at the declaration to take a picture. Are you aware that taking your own picture of someone else's picture is a derivative work and doesn't grant you copyright over it? It's certainly not "own work, September 2015" as you claim in the file information template.
- SorryI meant to say I took the picture I made a mistake with the wording in terms of the source.I have however modified it.I will work on getting the OTRS from the Institution and also upload the original picture I modified in due time.I am still open for advice so if there is anything please let me know.--Rberchie (talk) 20:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Is it really? It's a photo of the Ghanaian declaration of independence which happened in 1957. From this picture of you you look relatively young. You certainly do not look 60+ years old, which you would have to be to have been at the declaration to take a picture. Are you aware that taking your own picture of someone else's picture is a derivative work and doesn't grant you copyright over it? It's certainly not "own work, September 2015" as you claim in the file information template.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". The user is a copyright violator. This is a copyrighted image taken in 2012 Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Idiot GurumanThat is my own work.--Rberchie (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". The user is a copyright violator. This is a copyrighted image taken in 2012 Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- This is mine own work.--Rberchie (talk) 18:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by User:Rberchie as "Own work". The user is a copyright violator. This is a copyrighted image taken in 2012. I am not convince that the uploader is the copyright holder Idiot Guruman (talk) 10:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please I am not a copyright violator I personally took this picture in 2014.I am just realizing the camera had a wrong date.--Rberchie (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
nombre erroneo Rafadesantiago (talk) 06:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
동일 사진의 중복으로 삭제 요청 Timoteon (talk) 12:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Modification of File:Giftige_edderkopper_i_Lørenskog-distriktet..jpg, also violating its license! Mhohner (talk) 12:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear picture of an insect Brunei (talk) 12:52, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
extremely low quality, no identification, no educational value. Stas (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2016 (UTC)