Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Jack Sparrow & girlfriend.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I do not believe the pirate costume passes the threshold of originality but the Darth Vader and Storm Troopers do. Move to separate the deletion requests. -Nard 14:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's not generic pirate costume, but precise (in some degree) imitation of Jack Sparrow character. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. If we'll go with your logic that all Category:Cosplay should be deleted because the main idea of this movement is to copy some popular (usually copyrigthed) characters... Electron (talk) 07:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment On the other hand Jack Sparrow character and "The Carribean Pitates (move)" are based on the Carribean Pirates world previous intoduced in Disneyland so they are Commons:Derivative works, too. Many of the main stream of the modern arts are based on previous works, too - we should say... So it is very dificult to say what is the orgin of something and what is not... Electron (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is a Disney movie, so I would bet money that the movie producers are licensed to use the designs from the amusement park. --InfantGorilla (talk) 15:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest merging this deletion request there. Electron <Talk?> 07:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be making a cosplay policy proposal quite soon. Please leave this open until then. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. MBisanz talk 23:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]