Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autignac, Hérault 01.jpg

File:Autignac, Hérault 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2013 at 15:27:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Autignac, Hérault 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autignac, Hérault 01.jpg

•  Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

   Comment here are the colors strange too for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

You mean there is too much saturation? What shocks you exactly? general tint? WB? I've only put a little less blue tint but the colors, although clearer, are very similar than the raw file. There is less saturation than in the original file, I only played on the vibrancy. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Done New version with less vibrancy, if you have an idea to do better, please say it to me. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Nice golden hour and diagonal line. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Halavar (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, there is decent light and there is good use of diagonals. But what's special about the subject ? The scene looks commonplace and I am unable to find much "wow" --Dey.sandip (talk) 06:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 10:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support per King & I like the landscape. --A.Savin 12:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Fabulous mountains! ArionEstar (talk) 14:48, 9 December 2013 (UTC) Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits. JKadavoor Jee 16:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Dey.sandip. Boring. --Kikos (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Dey. --Pava (talk) 03:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 19:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --ArildV (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Question Have you increased clarity in Lightroom? For me it is overdone and the photo has to much microcontrast and black. IMHO the photo lacks the typical soft light of the golden hour. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done Tuxyso, you were right I increased clarity and now I uploaded a new version with little less clarity and little less microcontrast but it's the evening, the sun is very close to the horizon, and all is very contrasted at this hour. What do you think now? -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
    • Christian, the difference is subtle, but it is imho definitely better (especially the grass in the foreground). At the moment I still hesitate to support because the motive is not that spectacular and outstanding - but you have just enough support for this image. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support St1995 12:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 19:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 23:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places