Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 38.JPG

File:Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 38.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2012 at 11:05:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 38.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Universidad de Coímbra, Portugal, 2012-05-10, DD 38.JPG

•  Info all by Poco a poco -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment The picture is dark and has low contrast. Try to adjust the contrast of the sky, the wall and the stairs separately from each other in Photoshop or similar program. / Achird (talk) 11:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

• Picture is brigther now and goes over the whole dynamic range Poco a poco (talk) 16:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support -- I like the simplicity and symmetry (which is not strictly observed, look at the stairway!). Maybe the color saturation could be a bit increased, as it might have been affected by the brightness adjustment. Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Done, thanks for the hint! Poco a poco (talk) 00:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I like the composition and lighting. --Kadellar (talk) 15:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- JDP90 (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support The Wisdom built it ! please correct the little tilt, the picture looks a bit leaning to the left, see the two decorative "balls", not horizontal --Jebulon (talk) 09:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Done, tilt corrected Poco a poco (talk) 00:17, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Tomer T (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Support and the seventh. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 08:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm sorry, but imho the sky looks now unnatural (too much contrast or color saturation) and image has less sharpness than first version. --Ivar (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

• A loss of sharpness is rare because I always develop it new from the RAW file. I uploaded a new version with the hope to meet everybody's expectations, Poco a poco (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose unsharp, overexposed, oversaturated and too much sky. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:16, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose, my eyes … too bright and too satured. It isn't sharp either, and the whole composition with too much sky and the cropped staircase does not convince me. Sorry, —DerHexer (Talk) 13:46, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

• If somebody still cares I fixed the sharpness problem. It was affecting all my edited pictures of the last days and was related to my work flow. Regarding saturation / exposure I also made an update, but will not change the composition. Poco a poco (talk) 16:16, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects