Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 14 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Harmukh_Mountain.jpg

[edit]

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Peru_-_Colca_Canyon_-_Andean_condor_(Vultur_gryphus)_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) - Colca Canyon in Peru --Snowmanstudios 18:14, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Oppose Sorry! Both wings cutted and only the head is really sharp. --Steindy 18:42, 3 June 2022 (UTC) @Steindy: Thank ya for the helpful feedback! Obviously it was the purpose of this shot, to get the focus on the eyes and the head. The wingspan is so hugh, it just didn´t fit into this frame. I´d love to get a positve vote from you for this image Snowmanstudios 15:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

 Support This is a great shot. The oppose vote is unreasonable. Charlesjsharp 11:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

  •  Support Good picture, very nice the focus on the head, it would have been impossible to get that detail if the whole wings were in the frame.--Wanax01 13:16, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support If you look at it as a portrait, it's very good. The sharpness and the image resolutions are even sufficient for a very strong crop. --Smial 08:48, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unfavorable cut --Milseburg 19:47, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Considering how big this bird is (the largest or one of the largest in the world), this crop to focus on the head is reasonable. -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
     Comment The crop is irresolute. Too narrow for the whole bird. If the head is to be the subject, it is too wide. --Milseburg 13:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment That's certainly a reasonable point of view. -- Ikan Kekek 15:19, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Making an image from above a condor, is impressive. The cropping is not a problem for me. --GRDN711 03:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

File:AUT_vs._LIE_2015-10-12_(078).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Video wall in Vienna's Happel Stadium. --Steindy 15:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Moiré pattern see comment --Smial 11:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
    @Smial: Can you mark it up please? --Steindy 15:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
    This is not moire, but a pattern in the image that can be seen on the video wall. After Smial does not give an answer I would like to hear other users. --Steindy 23:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, images like this are often projected on big screens at stadiums. I've seen similar-looking images at the Major League baseball stadiums in New York. The dark area is pretty noisy, but I don't think that matters very much. Good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 15:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 Comment It may be that my small screen at work misled me about the moireé, but even otherwise the photo is far from a QI. Despite the rather low image resolution of under 4 MPixels for a static object, nothing is really in focus, the red colour channel clips, the image hangs crooked and the noise in the dark areas of the image is really remarkable. --Smial 10:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry,  Oppose per Smial for the reasons they gave in their last comment. Particularly the noise in the crowd below the screen. Mike Peel 18:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)