Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 08 2015
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Lutheran parish church on Tschoeraner Weg in Tschoeran, Steindorf, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exteriour middle avant-corps at the west wing of the monastery, Ossiach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumnal orchard, Am Kåte at Winklern, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kriegerdenkmal, Schönwies in Tirol --Hubertl 00:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of St. Joseph, parish church Transfiguració del Senyor, Artà, Mallorca (The picture is not centered, for then the lamp would have obscured the central statue) --Llez 21:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Monument a Colom (Barcelona) --Ralf Roletschek 21:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 23:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Monument a Colom (Barcelona) --Ralf Roletschek 21:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 23:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pitzenhof bridge, Jerzens, Tyrol --Hubertl 21:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Hochfinstermünz, Nauders, Tyrol --Hubertl 21:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tower of the Old Church of Santa María, Alcalá de Henares, Spain --Poco a poco 18:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 21:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St John of Busa, Oliván, Huesca, Spain --Poco a poco 18:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Clemens Stockner 19:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Remains of St Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, Spain --Poco a poco 18:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Palace, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 18:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Laitche 19:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portrait of the photographer António Novais (1855-1940), by José Malhoa. Museum José Malhoa, Caldas da Rainha, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 18:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Croatia, Fažana seen from the ferry to Brijuni --Berthold Werner 18:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ajepbah 20:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fontanka Embankment in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 17:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture on the Domplatzmauer in Bamberg --Ermell 17:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture on the Domplatzmauer in Bamberg --Ermell 17:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture on the Domplatzmauer in Bamberg --Ermell 17:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculptures on the Domplatzmauer in Bamberg --Ermell 17:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of templar sarcophagus in Santa María la Blanca church in Villalcázar de Sirga. By User:Ochoytres --Kadellar 17:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farm Arpisson (2327 m.) Above Gimillan Cogne Valley (Italy). Calf (Beef) at the farm.
Famberhorst 16:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support QI. --SKas 16:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Farm Arpisson (2327 m.) Above Gimillan Cogne Valley (Italy). Calf (Beef) at the farm.
-
- Nomination Laudakia stellio, Natural History Museum of Crete. --C messier 15:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Einserkofel from Altensteintal. --Clemens Stockner 14:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Älvsborgsbron (Älvborg bridge), Gothenburg, Sweden. View from the sea. --ArildV 13:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Order of the Sword from Sweden --Pudelek 12:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Order of the Vasa, Sweden --Pudelek 12:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pasture in mountains near Krasnaya Polyana, Sochi. --SKas 10:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The minaret of mosque Zitouna Tunis with lightening --IssamBarhoumi 08:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp at all. --Cccefalon 09:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 14:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 11:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4-6 Grunwaldzka Street in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The fountain at railway station the Olympic Park in Sochi.--SKas 07:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kira Grünberg, one of Austrias Sportspersonalities od the Year --Tsui 07:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jasmin Ouschan, nominee for Austrias Sportspersonalities of the Year --Tsui 07:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Unique by tides ever-changing marsh area. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
Agnes Monkelbaan 06:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawn.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC) - Withdrawn {{{2}}}
- Nomination Unique by tides ever-changing marsh area. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.
-
- Nomination Detail of Tropeninstitut building in Hamburg. --Ajepbah 06:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gimillan (1805m.) In Cogne Valley (Italy). View from the balcony of hotel Grauson in the early morning.
Famberhorst 05:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Gimillan (1805m.) In Cogne Valley (Italy). View from the balcony of hotel Grauson in the early morning.
-
- Nomination Morning fog hangs over 'It Wikelslân. Location, De Alde Feanen in Friesland.
Famberhorst 05:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Morning fog hangs over 'It Wikelslân. Location, De Alde Feanen in Friesland.
-
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens, Valle d'Aosta. View Valle d'Aosta from the mountain path.
Famberhorst 05:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain hike from Homene Dessus to Vens, Valle d'Aosta. View Valle d'Aosta from the mountain path.
-
- Nomination Château de La Peyrade. Frontignan, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint-Félix, Loupian, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne, Germany: Rodenkirchener Autobahnbrücke --Cccefalon 05:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion I think a little crooked, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cologne-Weiden, Germany: Roman catholic church "Heilig Geist" --Cccefalon 05:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cloister of Laon Cathedral Notre-Dame, Picardy, France --Uoaei1 04:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inner courtyard in the cloister and façade of the south church transept at Zwettl Abbey, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support good quality, though maybe a bit satured/contrasted --Christian Ferrer 06:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination North wing of the cloister at Zwettl Abbey, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Inner courtyard and lavatorium in the cloister of Zwettl Abbey, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 04:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Poplar trees on the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island") and the Pyramid Ballon in the background, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks, Christian, for reviewing. You must have eagles` eyes. The spot is gone. --Johann Jaritz 07:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC) Support thank you :) --Christian Ferrer 12:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Houseboat", Hotel Astoria`s beach cafe, Johannes-Brahms-Promenade #10, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gazebo on the peninsula, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parkhotel (view from the Werzer beach), Hans-Pruscha-Weg #5, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion A lot of water but good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Lower Gloriette at the central part of Poertschach and the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island") in the background, Poertschach am Woerther See, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park Sentmaring in autumn, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn in the hamlet Börnste, Krichspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 01:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice.--Famberhorst 06:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain on the Domplatzmauer in Bamberg --Ermell 22:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fuchsia 'Santa Paula'.
Famberhorst 16:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC) - Decline Oppose Clipped reds on the flower, unfortunately. --C messier 14:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Fuchsia 'Santa Paula'.
-
- Nomination Timber framed building in the hamlet Dernekamp, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Comment
Tree on the left is leaning in.--Ermell 07:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC) - Promotion Support I regard the comment by User:Ermell as joke, as the house is straigt, so the tree is obviously leaning in reality --Uoaei1 09:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Support
You have to look at the hedge trees as well.--Ermell 08:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Fixed I think there was a perspective issue. It's fixed now. Thanks for your advice. --XRay 16:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Good now.--Ermell 22:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination Timber framed building in the hamlet Dernekamp, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Comment
-
- Nomination London Overground train approaches Kew Gardens station --Daniel Case 16:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Holländermühle Catharina in Oldenswort. By User:Agnete --Atamari 00:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Magenta CA --Cccefalon 07:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Not done --Cccefalon 05:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Markersbacher Viadukt von unten. Markersbach. Sachsen. Erzgebirge. By User:Kora27 --Atamari 00:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Chromatic aberrations. --Cccefalon 07:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Not done --Cccefalon 05:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Montage of stained-glass windows in Claredon Street Church (St Teresa's), Dublin -- Alvesgaspar 14:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 15:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cathedral of St. Peter, Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany --XRay 04:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Double shrine to the Lady Chapel in Visbeck in the hamlet Dernekamp, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination The Museum aan de stroom (MAS) in Antwerp. Alvesgaspar 23:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline Stitching error. --Cccefalon 05:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Trek on the GR20 footpath, Corsica. --Borvan53 21:41, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: War Memorial Complex at Veteranov Avenue in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 18:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hamburg-Winterhude, commercial area City Nord, central zone at the Mexicoring --Dirtsc 17:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ripollet, una vila i municipi de la comarca del Vallès Occidental (Catalunya) --Ralf Roletschek 14:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Porte (vieille ville de Béja) Tunisie --El Golli Mohamed 13:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Notre-Dame del Prat, Argelès-sur-Mer, France.--Palauenc05 12:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Weimar, Platz der Demokratie 1, Herzogin-Anna-Amalia-Bibliothek „Rokokosaal”. By User:NoRud --Atamari 22:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion I am lenient to promote the photo, but the QIC description is not about the content of the photo but a "please promote me, I am a WLM photo" appeal. --Cccefalon 05:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
oh sorry, is a mistake of the QInominator tool. --Atamari 23:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Done
Thank you. Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Royal Palace, Madrid, Spain --Poco a poco 19:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --C messier 16:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St Franciscus Monastery, Santiago de Compostela, Spain --Poco a poco 19:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me, but not the sharpest possible. --C messier 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Road view of Gdów Cemetery and Chapel --Scotch Mist 15:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI for me. --C messier 16:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A path in North Shore of Neva Gulf nature reserve territory, St. Petersburg, Russia. --ViseMoD 10:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion 4 MPix out of a 16 MPix camera for a landscape shot is too low resolution. Can you please provide a higher resolution? --Cccefalon 10:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Not done --Cccefalon 06:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC) Done
Higher resolution is uploaded. --ViseMoD 10:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dining room Grand Hotel Europe in Saint Petersburg 1905. --Moroder 09:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment I would correct the perspective and I'm missing the bottom of the art work. --C messier 19:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the hint. I corrected the geometry but could not do anything with the bottom crop since I had disturbing elements in the composition. Be attention: only full size uploades show the modifications --Moroder 18:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Support OK (any idea why it appears correctly only in full size?) --C messier 15:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Comment I guess it's a Commons bug appearing from time to time. Cheers --Moroder 00:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Frohnleiten Altstadt.JPG
[edit]- Nomination View over Mur river to the old town of Frohnleiten. --Clemens Stockner 14:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Hubertl 14:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed, very strong jpeg artifacts. --Kadellar 17:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This was chosen as a top 50 image at WLM Austria 2015, I guess the jury knows a bit about photos. --Clemens Stockner 17:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment This was chosen as a top 50 image at WLM Austria 2015, I guess the jury knows a bit about photos. --Clemens Stockner 17:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Kadellar. This is QIC and not WLM. The review follows the criterias of the Image Guidelines. The jury of WLM has their own ideas. --Cccefalon 18:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment WLM winners seldom succeed in QIC or FPC because or 1-we are too perfeccionist? or 2-WLM juries are often not so strict or not even open the images to 100% full res; and as Cccefalon says, this is QIC, there are some guidelines. People here also might know a bit about pictures, quite a few have been jury, I myself have been jury three times, and I can tell there was always something to improve. --Kadellar 22:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Heavy artifacts (especially in the darker areas, like the water and the bridge) and CAs. --Tsungam 08:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I'll try to remove the artifacts with some Photoshopping and get it nominated again later. But may I ask where's the CA? --Clemens Stockner 23:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose A very nice composition and a very poor image quality. I don't think Photoshopping this version will help. You will have to work on the original image taken out of the camera -- Alvesgaspar 13:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose With opposers. And I strongly agree with the WLM comments.--Jebulon 23:41, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 21:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Siskonmakkarakeitto.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Soup made of siskonmakkara saucissons. –Kotivalo 08:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Maybe some posterisation, but QI for me. --C messier 14:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- OpposeThe plate should be round--Ermell 14:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support very nice photo, the plate appears to be round --Ezarate 13:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Unusual but good composition. I like it as well. Alvesgaspar 13:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support unusual? --Ralf Roletschek 23:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Why not ? QI.--Jebulon 23:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 21:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
File:ChevroletCorsa-Tandil.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chevrolet Corsa parked in Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 20:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment Too much contrast, IMHO, wb is wrong, and too noisy (for ISO 100). All fixable. --C messier 15:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Done --Ezarate 16:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment White balance still looks off IMHO (too purple). Play with green-purple bar. --C messier 17:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose see Nissan Tiida --Ralf Roletschek 21:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment RAW file reprocessed, see now please Ezarate 16:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose see Nissan Tiida --Ralf Roletschek 21:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment White balance still looks off IMHO (too purple). Play with green-purple bar. --C messier 17:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Done --Ezarate 16:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Too soft, dumb lighting. Alvesgaspar 14:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon 23:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 21:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Mothers and children eating ice cream at Kew Gardens.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Mothers and children having ice cream at Kew Gardens --Daniel Case 16:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)}
- Decline
- Comment Do you have the permission from these two families to publish this picture? --Hubertl 17:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- See the {{Consent}} tag ... it was in a public place where there was no expectation of privacy. Daniel Case 03:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment sorry, you are wrong IMO! These people have separated themself, they didn´t expect to be fotographed, additionaly, there are children too. Altogheter, this people are the main subject of this shot, not de minimis. You were very close to this people, why do you didn´t ask them for permission as you always should, when taking pictures from people? It´s also a matter of respect to do this!--Hubertl 07:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with --Hubertl. Not appropriate to publish and promote this image. And just think - if you asked the parents, would they say yes? Charlesjsharp 12:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- We have approved many similar images in the past with no indication of consent. Further, the children's faces are for the most part not visible. I would prefer to see some sort of consensus of more than just two users on this. --Daniel Case 16:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Hubertl. The picture should be deleted. According to the laws of - AFAIK - every european country this photo is clearly illegal. --Code 11:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I think we need permission per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#United_Kingdom. :( Jkadavoor 14:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- English law is not European law. From the Urban75 page on "Photographers Rights - Street shooting, people, privacy & children": "There are no laws against taking photos of children ...". From another UK photographer's website on "Photographing People and Children in Public Places": "Is it illegal to take photographs of children? No, there are no separate laws for minors. [While private properties may restrict photography], no such restrictions could normally be imposed or enforced in a public location. Can I publish photographs containing people and children? Of course you can. For images captured in locations where there can be no reasonable expectation of privacy, the photographer does not need the permission of the individual(s) who appear in that photograph in order to publish it online, in a newspaper, textbook or in a magazine." So don't say the image was illegal in the country where it was taken. Daniel Case 15:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- I also commend this Telegraph article to everyone's attention: "...I rang the Home Office. They assured me that there is no law against taking photographs of other people's children, provided you do not harass or harm them." Daniel Case 16:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Did you tell the Home Office you were going to seek to have an image rated as QI on Wikimedia? Also, you appear to have no evidence they are mothers or the mothers of the children. Charlesjsharp 16:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- I also commend this Telegraph article to everyone's attention: "...I rang the Home Office. They assured me that there is no law against taking photographs of other people's children, provided you do not harass or harm them." Daniel Case 16:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- FP/QI has no separate rules. So I started a DR. Let us see the outcome. Jkadavoor 16:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- I was unaware there was any responsibility to inform the Home Office of a country I'm not a citizen of and don't reside in of my intentions with the image. Next, I suppose, you're going to say I should have informed the Palace as well :-/. As for whether or not those women are the children's mothers, OK, maybe they're Daddy's mistresses, then? And frankly I don't see how either of those responses is relevant to the original argument, so I think we can assume you've conceded on that point. Daniel Case 18:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Well, article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights is valid in England as well. And we have some rulings of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the question of photographing persons in public space. In the case Hannover v. Germany the court decided that there "is therefore a zone of interaction of a person with others, even in a public context, which may fall within the scope of "private life”." Taking photographs of people in the public is not simply allowed because it takes place in the public. Even if your outside your house you might have a legitimate expectation of privacy as long as you're not a person of public interest. And as we know of the decision cited before, even people of public interest do have a right of privacy outside their homes. It depends on what they are doing and on the context the pictures are published later on. It can't be seriously questioned that eating ice cream with your children in a public park is more or less the definition of a private activity. Nobody must expect to be photographed in such a situation. --Code 19:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- See my reply at the deletion discussion. Daniel Case 21:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose not for quality reasons, more for legal reasons. --Hubertl 20:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose +1 --Ralf Roletschek 20:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Call them moral reasons if you must, but they're not based in law. Daniel Case 21:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- What can you tell us about Common European Union Laws and decicions of the European Court of Human Rights, Case? It seems maybe strange to you as an american citizen, but its really a great thing to have something like that. You can understand it as an achievement of civilization.--Hubertl 21:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Who died and made you the EU's privacy cops? Actually, I understand them as a great reason to give money to the United Kingdom Independence Party. But maybe soon enough that will be moot. Daniel Case 21:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Also, Hubert, Germany and Austria kind of lost their chance to have English courts bend to their will about seven decades ago. Daniel Case 21:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- If this is your last argument, we can stop the discussion right now. Germany has enough to do handling their Pegida-movement, we really don't need some Tea-party-yakety yak blah blah here. Google it. --Hubertl 23:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Actually it wasn't, but you had to admit that some comment on those lines was inevitable. I refer you to Diliff's arguments at the deletion nomination, where he makes the point I want to make (that, absent an act of Parliament or a decision of a court of law in England or Wales to the effect that this sort of picture is against the law, simply citing EU law does not justify deleting this pictures since cultural expectations of privacy in public places has been historically different in Britain. That would be my last argument. Daniel Case 07:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Is it really so hard to understand that the European Convention on Human Rights actually is law in Great Britain because it was incorporated into UK law by an act of Parliament? --Code 09:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Actually it wasn't, but you had to admit that some comment on those lines was inevitable. I refer you to Diliff's arguments at the deletion nomination, where he makes the point I want to make (that, absent an act of Parliament or a decision of a court of law in England or Wales to the effect that this sort of picture is against the law, simply citing EU law does not justify deleting this pictures since cultural expectations of privacy in public places has been historically different in Britain. That would be my last argument. Daniel Case 07:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- If this is your last argument, we can stop the discussion right now. Germany has enough to do handling their Pegida-movement, we really don't need some Tea-party-yakety yak blah blah here. Google it. --Hubertl 23:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- What can you tell us about Common European Union Laws and decicions of the European Court of Human Rights, Case? It seems maybe strange to you as an american citizen, but its really a great thing to have something like that. You can understand it as an achievement of civilization.--Hubertl 21:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Call them moral reasons if you must, but they're not based in law. Daniel Case 21:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
No, I understand that alright. But my understanding is that Article 8 is seen as open-ended enough (another way, from my perspective as a photographer here, of calling it overbroad, for each member nation to interpret it, within limits, differently in regard to their own culture. I confess to not knowing if the Hannover decision makes its interpretation of German law in the area binding in full on the UK. But a fair amount of the legal advice from UK photographers that I quoted and linked to above postdates that decision, and does not seem to reflect any change in the understanding of the legality of photographing children in public on their part, much less mention that decision. Can I be allowed to reasonably conclude that what is not permitted in Germany is permitted (currently) in the UK? Daniel Case 19:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- I'm en-0, sorry. In Europa gelten die Caroline-Urteile vom Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte, diese räumen Kindern besondere Rechte ein. Wenn keine ausdrückliche Genhmigung vorliegt, sind solche Fotos nicht zulässig. --Ralf Roletschek 21:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 15:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Goose May 2010-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Domestic goose -- Alvesgaspar 23:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Not sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 12:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree Alvesgaspar 13:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Sharp enough. --C messier 19:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Its not sharp enough even for that older camera, it can be better. --PetarM 16:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Mah...For me is accetable...--Livioandronico2013 20:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Not bad --Billy69150 21:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Σπάρτακος 07:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 15:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Nictea July 2015-2.jpg
[edit]- Nomination A Snow Owl in Antwerp Zoo -- Alvesgaspar 23:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose chest feathers over-exposed. Can you fix? Charlesjsharp 12:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Obviously untrue in all colour channels. An easy fact to confirm. Alvesgaspar 13:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Clearly QI. A crop that puts the "dominant eye" in the vertical center supposedly makes it appear that the subject is looking at the viewer. -- RaboKarbakian 00:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI for me.--Ermell 14:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support QI. --Kadellar 15:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 23:49, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Chicken March 2010-1.jpg
[edit]- Nomination: Domestic chicken -- Alvesgaspar 23:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Review
- Comment Not sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 12:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree -- Alvesgaspar 13:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Need location categories and/or geo codes. I know QI is just QI; but an image is more valuable when information as much as possible is added. Just my thoughts. Jkadavoor 05:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Done You are right, thanks. Alvesgaspar 10:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Alves. Jkadavoor 02:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Done You are right, thanks. Alvesgaspar 10:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Need location categories and/or geo codes. I know QI is just QI; but an image is more valuable when information as much as possible is added. Just my thoughts. Jkadavoor 05:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I disagree -- Alvesgaspar 13:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Charlesjsharp 10:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The neck of the hen is blurred. --C messier 19:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Motion blur but good enough for me.--Ermell 14:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Hubertl 15:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Nottuln,_Appelhülsen,_Schulze-Frenkings-Hof_--_2015_--_5478.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Schulze-Frenkings-Hof, Appelhülsen, Nottuln, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose the sky is partly overexposed. --Iifar 06:41, 30 October 2015 (UTC) - Comment IMO the sky is bright but not really overexposed. I've check this with the histogram too. Sometimes the sky is with bright white and gray parts.--XRay 11:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the sky is covered sometimes with clouds. What a pity... --Hubertl 12:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment Histogram of this image has a huge spike on the right side - some clouds have lost the details. This is not good quality. --Iifar 12:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC) - Oppose Too imposing geometric distortion, looking unnatural. Alvesgaspar 10:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Good photo.--Ermell 14:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Sky may be a bit overexposed, but it's the building that matters. --Clemens Stockner 18:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per opposers. We judge a whole picture, not only the main subject !!!--Jebulon 23:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Main object is fine. --Ralf Roletschek 23:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted --Hubertl 23:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)