YanikB

Learn more about this page

File by user

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour, Tu n'as pas mis de bandeau de licence, il est nécessaire pour spécifier le statut de l’"œuvre" dérivée.

Soit tu considères que tes modifications sont triviales et tu peux alors utiliser la même licence que l’œuvre originale, et il te faudra alors rajouter {{PD-Art|PD-old-100-1923}} dans la zone appropriée.

Soit tu considères que tes modifications ne sont pas triviales et tu devrais utiliser une licence compatible (au choix, WTFPL, CC0 ou bien CC-BY-SA (...)) avec l'hébergement sur Commons.

Esby (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Au niveau de la procédure de suppression, cela devrait être bon.

je te conseille de catégoriser ces fichiers dans une catégorie utilisateur, et de ne pas les catégoriser au niveau des catégories topologiques (cad ne pas les mettre au même niveau que l’œuvre originale, histoire de ne pas induire les ré-utilisateurs en erreur).

Au niveau de la catégorie utilisateur tu peux utiliser un Category:Files by User:YanikB ou bien Category:User:YanikB, selon ton choix, que tu pourras remplir avec le code suivant:

{{user category|YanikB}}

Même remarque concernant l'usage de tels fichiers: tant que c'est au niveau des pages de discussions et de tes pages propres (ici par exemple), l'usage est ok, mais par contre, ne pas utiliser sur l'espace principal d'une quelconque wikipédia, cela pourrait être perçu comme du vandalisme.

Si tu as des questions quelconques, tu n'hésites pas.

Esby (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

J'ai corrigé votre catégorisation, le user category doit être sur une catégorie, pas sur les médias. Si vous préferez un autre nom pour votre catégorie, vous pouvez le changer, j'effacerai au besoin l'ancienne.

Esby (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Hasan-Abad-Téhéran.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hasan-Abad-Téhéran.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Ichelladhen.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ichelladhen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Diouloulou CR.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Diouloulou CR.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ilytch.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ilytch.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ilytch.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Egray-Germond-Rouvre.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Egray-Germond-Rouvre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Temis CH.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

File:Temis CH.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 12:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Owner of this file "Sophie Cléroux" asked me to upload it. Since she is mentionned I don't see any copyright problem. Tell me what to do to restore. thx --YanikB (talk) 15:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.

The photo appears at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10202435777668944 without any mention of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license. If you do have the copyright holder's permission to publish the photo under that license or any other license allowing anyone to use, modify and redistribute the photo for any purpose, including commercial purposes, please follow these instructions. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, if she removes the file from her Facebook will it be OK?

I see that Paranomio sources are not valid too. Too bad. --YanikB (talk) 16:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

No, that's not what I said. Since it's a photo from a third-party source with no evidence that the copyright holder has agreed to publication under a free license, you'll need to provide such evidence.

The same thing applies to files from Panoramio. For example, File:Dyas Home in Hinsdale, IL - panoramio.jpg is fine, because it's clearly marked "

Attribution-Share Alike by ingawh" with a link to the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license at its source page. The files you uploaded were marked "© All Rights Reserved" at their original sources. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK got it. Is there a way to do the same as Panoramio in FaceBook? — Preceding unsigned comment added by YanikB (talk • contribs) 18:55, 22 March 2015‎ (UTC)Reply

There is no license selection like that on Facebook, but the copyright holder could still mention the license in the description. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

God kväll Alex, det är bra med dig?

What happend if it is me that modified the photo for her [1] ? --YanikB (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

If a work has multiple authors (such as one person creating a photo and one person making significant creative modifications to it), all authors have to agree to release it under a free license (and you'd need to provide evidence of that as well). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK, She will put the copyright Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license on her side. Thank you and sorry for the bad translation.

--YanikB (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Julie Saint-Pierre.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Julie Saint-Pierre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cohentracht (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Food

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, we are going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up as a volunteer or sign up on behalf of your affiliate here.--Abhinav619 (talk) 05:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, vous êtes un éditeur aussi en français, l’article Distribution aux consommateurs sur Wikipédia français, j’ai trouvé quatre petites choses à corriger:

Dans l’infobox, j’ai fouillé les plus récentes pub de la compagnie sur YouTube et le plus récent slogan était et devrait être écrit ainsi dans l’infobox: DAC a tout pour vous !

La couleur de l’infobox serait mieux adapté au logo avec le code de couleur boîte: 003399

À la référence à la fin de la section Histoire, il manque un e au mot Gouvernement du Canada.

À la section Modèle d’affaire au deuxième paragraphe, la section de la première phrase:...ou le transfert magasin à magasin..., ce devrait être écrit:...ou le transfert de magasin à magasin..., il manque le mot de à la phrase, ce serait mieux lisible.

Aussi, pour l’article Shopping TVA, toujours sur Wikipédia français, l’année de fondation de la chaîne dans les catégories en bas de page de l’article est écrit 1998, qui n’est pas la bonne, ce devrait être 1995.

J’ai voulu faire ces corrections mais un cadenas aux articles m’en empêche, vous pourrez le faire car vous avez un compte, vous connaissez sûrement ces articles vu que vous êtes du Québec comme moi, j’espère que vous corrigerez ces petites erreurs! Merci encore!✋🙂--185.92.26.8 09:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fait. Quelle curieuse idée que de me faire cette demande ici plutôt que sur WP. Comme tu contribues sous IP, je ne peux te notifier. D'ailleurs ce serait plus simple pour tous si tu avais un pseudo, avec trois mois et 50 contributions, tu pourrais faire les modifications toi-même.

--YanikB (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merci

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Merci pour les petites corrections sur Distribution aux consommateurs, n’oublie pas que la couleur de l’infobox serait mieux avec le code couleur: 003399, et je suis un peu capricieux mais le slogan devrait avoir un ! après le mot vous avec un espace après le mot vous comme ceci: DAC a tout pour vous !, ce serait plus beau aussi d’enlever aussi les symboles «» autour du slogan. Dans l’infobox, la ligne logo 2 est inutile, elle pourrait être effacer.

Tu n’a qu’à voir les plus récentes pubs sur YouTube avec Denis Bernard, une d’entre elle on voit le slogan écrit dans une bulle bleue sur une TV, et les autres on voit parfois la bande bleu (code 003399 que j’ai mentionné) en bas de l’écran: Pub 1, Pub 2, Pub 3

Encore pour cette article, cette référence dont tu peux copier le texte source sur cette page de discussion :^[1], tu pourrais le mettre dans l’article à la section Histoire juste après la phrase : Dans les années 1990, Distribution aux consommateurs a eu du mal à rivaliser avec Zellers puis Walmart Canada.

Aussi finalement, le texte source Ici, ce serait bien si tu sélectionnerais tout le texte source, le copier et le remplacer au texte source de l’article: Le SuperClub Vidéotron français, car se serait à jour pour les logos etc... présentement le résultat n’est pas bon car c’est un texte source adapté pour Wikipédia français, tu va le constater...

Je n’ai pas de comptes car je ne suis pas un gros éditeur, j’aime seulement faire des mises à jour sur ce que je connais. J’espère que tu n’est pas trop découragé par ces demandes, prends ton temps, c’est quand-même facile.

Merci encore😉👍--185.92.26.127 21:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

↑ (August 9, 1996). "Consumers Distributing closes the book on catalogue shopping". CBC News.

[1] (August 9, 1996). "Consumers Distributing closes the book on catalogue shopping". CBC News.

[1]