101.98.138.184

April 2024

Hello, I'm Seventh Ward Dragon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Greg Fleming (politician) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SWDG 02:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Greg Fleming (politician), you may be blocked from editing. SWDG 02:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Greg Fleming

I have reviewed the source material and have determined that the article did not misrepresent his quoted statement. His statement was made in support of keeping the laws intact barring homosexual marriage. In making this statement, he argued that, if we're going to drop the rules for homosexual marriage, why don't we just go ahead and drop the rules for polygamy and incest while we're at it? While you may not agree with this, the article represents the factual information and should remain as it is. If you want to correct the information to your standards, please do so while leaving the refrenced cited sources intact. You have now deleted the one pertaining to the statement in question, and another one because of an "error".aaaaaaaa SWDG 02:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

---