EvergreenFir
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
2600:1700:5AED:1000:0:0:0:0/64
That IP range you blocked last month is trying to use talk page as a blog while being blocked. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- @FilmandTVFan28 blocked further. Thanks! EvergreenFir (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
Miscellaneous
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Wolf salute
Could you please take a look of the edit by IR-TheFirstSoldier? Trade (talk) 20:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
About your edit to Studio Ghibli
Hey EvergreenFir, I don't believe this revert was appropriate. The anonymous editor was, as far as I can tell, simply changing the information in this article to reflect what's mentioned in the Ocean Waves article. I verified with the film's credits that one "Kaoru Nakamura" was a writer on the film. I have undone your revert with that in mind. Additionally, I don't believe your use of a no-summary rollback was consistent with the guidelines on its usage — I would ask that you leave an explanation for reverts of this kind where the content of the edit is not obviously vandalism. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Suggestion
I'd like to suggest deleting or revdeling some edits in that sandbox, to not give people ideas. – 2804:F1...83:85D6 (talk) 07:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. – 2804:F1...83:85D6 (talk) 07:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
About your revert at Talk:Attempted assassination of Donald Trump
I'm not sure WP:NOTFORUM is the best revert reason here. It is a comment about the talk page, and I think reverting it will just annoy the poster. I thought it might to let it lie and not feed the troll – reverting can be seen by the OP as censorship or something, because they don't know how WP works; letting everyone ignore them might be better, IMHO. Cremastra (talk) 07:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- I was on the fence about it but invoking "Trump derangement syndrome" makes the preponderance of evidence that the user is a troll. IMO. Feel free to revert me EvergreenFir (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)