Talk:Ardipithecus ramidus
Ardipithecus ramidus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 15, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirect
editDo not delete this redirect again. Thank you. Badagnani (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ardipithecus ramidus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130228131344/http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/ardipithecus/ardipithecus.html to http://dsc.discovery.com/tv/ardipithecus/ardipithecus.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ardipithecus ramidus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413081635/http://www2.ku.edu/~lba/courses/articles/White%20ramadis94.pdf to http://www2.ku.edu/~lba/courses/articles/White%20ramadis94.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ardipithecus ramidus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 17:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be reviewing this article for the next few days. starsandwhales (talk) 17:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
- It's great that you put the name of the period and the numerical range in the taxobox.
- as is standard for tree of life articles User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've seen a fair amount of fossil articles that only do one or the other. starsandwhales (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- as is standard for tree of life articles User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- In the description, I think you should link to or explain these units of measurements.
- That sounds like WP:OVERLINK User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's fair, but I still don't know what cc and cu in are. I'm assuming cubic centimeters and cubic inches? But I've never seen those measurements written like that. starsandwhales (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- I mean, have you not watched a hospital drama where they were like "I need 300 cc stat!" User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 03:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, fair.
- I mean, have you not watched a hospital drama where they were like "I need 300 cc stat!" User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 03:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's fair, but I still don't know what cc and cu in are. I'm assuming cubic centimeters and cubic inches? But I've never seen those measurements written like that. starsandwhales (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- That sounds like WP:OVERLINK User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- The point about self domestication in the paleobiology section is a bit unclear. What does this mean? What specifically does this have to do with vocalizations?
- added explainer “... due to a process of self domestication (becoming more and more docile which allows for a more gracile build)” and this gracile build includes changes to the skull (which are already specifically mentioned) which could potentially have increased their vocal repertoire User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is much clearer! starsandwhales (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- added explainer “... due to a process of self domestication (becoming more and more docile which allows for a more gracile build)” and this gracile build includes changes to the skull (which are already specifically mentioned) which could potentially have increased their vocal repertoire User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Is there any information about predators? Do we know if they lived in groups? Can we infer anything else about their social behavior?
- I mean, the part about being in a society would imply they lived in groups, and I’m sure leopards were a problem but no one’s really talking about predators; in Palaeoecology, I listed the predator finds in the area User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 02:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)