Talk:Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)/GA1
Latest comment: 26 days ago by Pollosito in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 12:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Hi, @LunaEclipse. I think I'll be reviewing the article at the end of the month, although I want that to happen sooner. My apologies for that. Best, Santi (talk) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pollosito, take your time, I won't mind at all. — 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Lead
edit- I suggest you move the present source to the body of the article. Refs in this section only apply if it's too short or one paragraph long. Santi (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Done 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- As "Wilburn Holding Co." isn't an alternative name for the song, please remove bold text. Santi (talk) 04:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Background
edit- It seems absurdly short to me. Could you put information about the album it belongs to? In articles about songs they usually do that. Santi (talk) 13:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done. 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ref 2 doesn't mention that "First Person Shooter" is part of For All the Dogs. Although I know it is out of a sense of logic, at least I would prefer to verify those specific details. Santi (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Done 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Record producer Metro Boomin announced a collaborative album with rapper Future in an interview by Flaunt Magazine, set to release in 2023. He had saved a few tracks he produced for the latter for the album.
First, I see in the reference that it says only "collaboration", not "collaborative album". Second, I don't see any mention of saved tracks, or I got lost from reading so much (I almost fell asleep, in fact, I'm not in my season of wanting to read LOL). Santi (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Done 🌙Eclipse (talk) (contribs) 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Pollosito: I have addressed your comments, you may continue with the review. lunaeclipse (talk) 20:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- @LunaEclipse: Thank you for remembering. I will address the article at the same time as the other one I am reviewing, but not today, because I am on my cell phone, and it is hard for me to manage Wikipedia with that and that is why I hate it. Santi (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a better reference to confirm the trailer other than the trailer itself? Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- It would be a good idea to put information about the tracklist and what position it was there. Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- In progress lunaeclipse (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Archiving mising: ref 1, 4, 5, 6 and 8. Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Pipe Revolt to Revolt (TV network). Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
@Pollosito: I apologize for not addressing these earlier. Was busy reading Homestuck. lunaeclipse (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- @LunaEclipse: No problem. I'm also busy, but in finishing high school and in this FAC LOL. Santi (talk) 23:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Comments
edit- @LunaEclipse: I believe in you. However, this article really has many problems with original research covered by a misleading prose. Sorry, but I don't think it should be a good item under the state it is in. I prefer to give you a month to base yourself on other new GAs to improve this one, and then you ping me and we continue with the review. Santi (talk) 03:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pollosito, shouldn't you fail the nom then? — lunaeclipse (talk) 01:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LunaEclipse: I think so, only if you're not available to fix in the way mentioned above. I don't want to do that, but, if it's the best decision... Santi (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LunaEclipse: Seriously I don't want to do this, but since neither the reviewer nor the nominator apparently are interested in working on this, I'll close the review as Failed. Santi (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LunaEclipse: I think so, only if you're not available to fix in the way mentioned above. I don't want to do that, but, if it's the best decision... Santi (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pollosito, shouldn't you fail the nom then? — lunaeclipse (talk) 01:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)