Talk:Miniopterus mahafaliensis

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Wilhelmina Will in topic Untitled
Good articleMiniopterus mahafaliensis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 24, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that recent molecular and morphological research has led to the identification of five species within the Malagasy bat species Miniopterus manaviM. aelleni, M. brachytragos, M. griveaudi, M. mahafaliensis, and M. manavi itself?

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Miniopterus mahafaliensis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Twilight Helryx 16:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking up this review. I just applied a series of changes per the previous GANs for species of this group. Ucucha 17:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
  1. B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  1. Is it broad in its coverage?
  1. A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  1. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
  1. A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have

fair use rationales:  

  1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  2. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
  • Congratulations! This article passed!

Untitled

edit
Wonderful! My first GA nomination, and it passed! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply