Talk:Mendor
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
copyvio concerns
editThe page text has now been modified and also a citation added to avoid the copyright infringement claim by the bot.
- A few minor changes in wording don't really change the essence of the copyright infringement claim. Worse, given that the only information in the article is derived from the company website, and since I can find no other references (using Google News) that establish the company's notability, I am going to tag it for speedy deletion, A7, non-notable company or organization. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Several additional citations to this subject have now been added to this article.
Will keep on adding additional references and information.
Texts have also been significantly reformatted. User:ihqkristian 18:30 30 June 2010 (EEST)
Now also Google news gives a result: http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&pz=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=mendor User:ihqkristian 18:40 30 June 2010 (EEST) —Preceding undated comment added 15:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC).
- I don't know how many of those citations provide significant coverage of the company as required to establish Notability for a business, but I have removed the speedy deletion tag, as there is at least alot of coverage. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, no, there is not "alot of coverage." There is one single article, as pointed out above, in a newspaper that according to their media kit is little more than an advertising site. Drmies (talk) 16:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Note: I hadn't seen the additional references added--but I can't find a single one in there from what counts as a reliable source. Without such reliable references AfD might well be the next step. Drmies (talk) 16:10, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I haven't checked them all for reliability and AfD may very well be called for, but I figured speedy deletion was overkill. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Not at the time I applied the tag. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- I haven't checked them all for reliability and AfD may very well be called for, but I figured speedy deletion was overkill. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mendor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100702105111/http://www.kauppalehti.fi/5/i/yritykset/yritysuutiset/?oid=2010061751 to http://www.kauppalehti.fi/5/i/yritykset/yritysuutiset/?oid=2010061751
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720175346/http://www.biobusiness.fi/portal/news/news?bid=328 to http://www.biobusiness.fi/portal/news/news?bid=328
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)