Six-banded armadillo has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 8, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Six-banded armadillo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Per WP:ENGVAR, this edit established the usage of this page as American English. Kindly maintain it, pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 14:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, forgot it. Will remember. Thanks, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 00:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Six-banded armadillo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 15:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Comments by Dunkleosteus77
edit- remove the refs from the lead
- No idea who added them. Removed
- countries are not supposed to be wikilinked
- Done
- expand IUCN on first use
- Done
- ref no. 10 has an ISSN: 1537-1719
- I prefer not to use ISSNs, there may be ISSNs for other refs as well so better be consistent in not using them.
- It might be better to use imperial units and have metric units in parentheses since this article is written in American English
- I don't have experience with American English articles, so I looked up the FA Cougar. It seems to stick to metric units.
- I'll ask the teahouse User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 21:27, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Euphractinae is wikilinked three times
- Fixed
Thanks for taking this, I will get to the issues soon. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Refs that have an ISSN:
- ref no. 10: 1537-1719
- ref no. 14: 1545-1542
- ref no. 17: 1413-4411
- ref no. 18: 0066-7870
- ref no. 22: 1572-9710
OK added all now. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:00, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Ears
editAre the ears as long as the article says? That seems a bit unbelievable, perhaps there was a problem with the units...
68.47.30.107 (talk) 14:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, you're absolutely right. I found the source at this archived link and it says millimeters not centimeters. I have fixed the description accordingly. --Pithon314 (talk) 16:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)