This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just came here by chance. I haven't edited here for a long while, so just chose something out of my head.
I think it should be pointed out that Koestler's fallacy was not what poor old Art said, in fact the opposit, that he pointed out that coincidences don't happen all the time. For RS I think this is mentioned in Clive James and Alan Bennett mentions it somewhere, but it would take me a while to trawl through my books of either, as in both cases it is just an aside. I think it worth at least footnoting, that Koestler pointed out the phenomenon, but was not a victim of that fallacy-- that other people were.
Were I a regular I would take this under WP:BOLD and the usual edit, revert, discuss, but coming back after a long absence from acctive editing, I take the second first.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am in the process of expanding the information on this page. If anyone has any information they think would be appropriate to add please let me know. Thanks!VaDawn (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply