Talk:Peter, King of Hungary/Archive 1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move
Archive 1

Untitled

this is incorect to include female line in dynastic tree.

May be this is not entirely correct, but it corresponds to the traditions.

Not necessarily. Some female line descendants are considered to be part of the dynasty/house from that female ancestors. --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move. The article on Samuel Aba, King of Hungary will need its own discussion.Cúchullain t/c 14:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


Peter Orseolo, King of HungaryPeter, King of Hungary or, alternatively, Peter Orseolo - The article should be consistent with articles about other kings of Hungary. The article about King Coloman is not titled Coloman Arpad, King of Hungary, the article about Queen Mary is not titled Mary the Angevin, Queen of Hungary, etc. In case one would prefer his surname instead of the title, there is John Zápolya, who is not called John Zápolya of Hungary, and Matthias Corvinus, who is not called Matthias Corvinus of Hungary. Anyway, having both the surname and the title is unneccessary and looks sloppy and inconsistent. For example, hu.wiki calls him Péter magyar király. I would also suggest moving Samuel Aba, King of Hungary to either Samuel Aba or Samuel, King of Hungary. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 11:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC) Surtsicna (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.