Talk:Waste Siege
Waste Siege is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) at 23:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: 2019 book by Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
A fact from Waste Siege appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Waste Siege: The Life of Infrastructure in Palestine is based on 10 years of field research in the Israeli-occupied West Bank?
- ALT1: ... that a class on Foucault and Gramsci led Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins to write Waste Siege: The Life of Infrastructure in Palestine?
- ALT2: ... that Waste Siege links the construction of landfills to the Palestinian state-building project?
Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 20:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Waste Siege; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- This is new enough, long enough, and impressive, extensive work, written in a careful, encyclopaedic style.
I will review in more detail when I finish reading.Neutrality of a potentially controversial topic is handled very well. The only text matches caught by Earwig are publication titles or properly attributed quotations. I think the first hook is the most interesting option and makes it abundantly clear what the article is about. The hook is suitably phrased, succinct, and appears in the article with a suitable source. QPQ done: the nomination was made before 8 March, so the double QPQ requirement does not apply. This is really admirable work: well done! MartinPoulter (talk) 15:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)