Chi-ymru
Welcome!
editTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of The Teahouse (Anglican Network) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Teahouse (Anglican Network) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks for your contributions to Mark Nam. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because Extensive use of external links in the body of the article WP:EL. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 07:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is considered disruptive to use external links in the main body of the article. Please remove them and ping me when your finished. Don't use them again. scope_creepTalk 07:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the message. New to Wikipedia and didn't realise the issue with External links in the main body of articles, but now as I think about it, it does make sense that they would be disruptive in terms of navigating around the rest of Wikipedia. Thanks for the guidance and will ping you when I've removed them and/or put them in an 'External Links' section. 92.236.93.228 (talk) 07:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is considered disruptive to use external links in the main body of the article. Please remove them and ping me when your finished. Don't use them again. scope_creepTalk 07:55, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of The Teahouse (Anglican Network) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Teahouse (Anglican Network) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
September 2023
editHello Chi-ymru. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Mark Nam, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chi-ymru. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Chi-ymru|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creepTalk 07:58, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Scope Creep, I am certainly not being paid to or indirectly compensated for anything I do on Wikipedia. Doing this completely in my free time and at no-one else's request either. Chi-ymru (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- What about the image you upload that states its your own work? That indicates a WP:COI? scope_creepTalk 08:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't quite understand? Yes, I own the picture, but can't see how that means a financial stake? Very willing to learn what the issue is and take the whole page down. Thanks. Chi-ymru (talk) 11:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- What about the image you upload that states its your own work? That indicates a WP:COI? scope_creepTalk 08:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Nomination of The Teahouse (Anglican Network) for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Teahouse (Anglican Network) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Concern regarding Draft:Mark Nam
edit Hello, Chi-ymru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mark Nam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)