User talk:Goldsztajn/Archives/2020/May
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to the top half of Africa, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Comments on Italian resistance movement 1943-45 navbox
Thanks in advance, regards--Goldsztajn (talk) 10:19, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Remove Unofficial Stats
Hi @Goldsztajn:, Please remove the unofficial "Metro GDP/PPP" numbers from the infobox and from the main article both in lead/economy section of the respective Indian cities: Kolkata, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Bangalore and Delhi. All the source are unofficial; none of them from Govt of India or State Govts source. So please remove those figures.--103.218.236.58 (talk) 04:56, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Goldsztajn: Please remove those unofficial data.--103.218.236.58 (talk) 03:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi - not sure what to call you... I haven't done these. I agree that the numbers are mostly meaningless, the trouble is I expect a lot of editors have a an interest in maintaining them. I think the best thing would be to try and establish the (un)reliability of the sources first, rather than trying to get into an edit conflict. You could make a request for comment here Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:02, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Goldsztajn: Please remove those unofficial data.--103.218.236.58 (talk) 03:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Respected Sir/Mam
Thanks for your comment on Abhinit gupta previously it was fully promotional but am working on it and tried to remove the promotional sentence It will be your help Ifyou please guide me where I can improve the article thanks Easytostable (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Easytostable: I'm sorry, but I do not think the article can be improved; it is not a problem of editing, he just does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO (none of the claimed awards are considered notable). --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- But the awards are not in the article Easytostable (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- WP:ANYBIO indicates what is necessary for a person to be an article on wikipedia. Abhinit Gupta does not meet these criteria, I mentioned the awards because one of the criteria is an award, but the award has to be recognised, not an industry/PR award (which is what he has). --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- But the awards are not in the article Easytostable (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Probably I am not able anything moreEasytostable (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)thanks cheers
Probably I am not able to add anything moreEasytostable (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2020 (UTC)thanks cheers Easytostable (talk) 21:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Should we put speedy deletion tag over itEasytostable (talk) 21:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- I suggest just leaving it alone, an admin will make a decision soon enough. --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Template editor granted
Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your rights log.
- Useful links
- All template-protected pages
- User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
- Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection
Happy template editing! — xaosflux Talk 14:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- This has been granted on a "trial" basis with some restrictions, please see Special:PermaLink/957777162#User:Goldsztajn for details. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 14:21, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi
Hello. I saw you sent me an email, but I can only see the first 16 characters. The email address I had associated with Wikipedia is long dormant. If you'd like to leave a message on my talk page, I'll check back later. If it happens to be about deletion of content, just go ahead - I'm long past caring. Best HausTalk 12:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
A delayed reaction on my part, after realizing you are actually a gem of an editor on Wikipedia. Just now realized your real value as a rescuer of articles when I reviewed and looked at something...My appreciation!... Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2020 (UTC) |
DYK nomination of Walkiria Terradura
Hello! Your submission of Walkiria Terradura at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 09:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)