Lexington edit revert

edit

I just added a topic in the Lexington, Kentucky talk page concerning an edit you made. Isaac rowe1 (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the edit you reverted about EFF supporting those harassed by Appin.

edit

You requested secondary sources regarding my edit about the EFF supporting those harassed by Appin. I found them, listed below. If these are okay, let me know, and I'll update the edit, or you can do it yourself.

1. https://www.wired.com/story/appin-training-centers-lawsuits-censorship/

2. https://www.techdirt.com/2024/02/23/maybe-your-lawyers-shouldnt-tell-reporters-you-did-not-engage-in-conspiracy-to-or-complicity-in-murder-when-no-one-was-claiming-otherwise/

3. https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2024/feb/01/global-censorship-appin-reuters/ HARRISONSST (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

None of those are specifically about the EFF's actions, the EFF barely gets a passing mention. That wouldn't work for the paragraph you wanted to add. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is a story from Slashdot, which is specifically about the EFF's actions.
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/02/10/0732205/eff-challenges-legal-bullying-of-sites-reporting-on-alleged-appin-hacking-for-hire HARRISONSST (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Slashdot is definitely not a reliable source IMO. It's an aggregator. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
This is not about my paragraph, but I accidentally clicked on a link on the Appin page, and it looks like someone has deliberately messed up the paragraphs and links.
Check out -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appin_(company)#cite_note-11
Looks like "Biden vs. Haley on abortion" was introduced by the guy below, along with a number of bad edits:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Samuelanderson90 HARRISONSST (talk) 23:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Discuss this on the article's talk page, please. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'll do it, but posting on that Talk page just draws unnecessary attention. This is why I post on your page or @Oblivy's page. HARRISONSST (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
the entire point is to draw attention to the problems on the Talk page and work them out there. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

closing discussion on talk page

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:September_11_attacks

hello - you closed my talk page discussion as malformed RFC - Its not a RFC just a talk page discussion Gsgdd (talk) 00:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

You formed it as an RfC, without following the proper format or process. Therefore I closed it so you can start over. I see you've reverted me. Well, if you're determined to dig a hole, I'm going to offer you an extra shovel. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 00:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
there is lot of discussion already. An id is not generated - i removed rfc tag well before that. so its not a problem Gsgdd (talk) 00:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)Reply