HandThatFeeds
This is HandThatFeeds's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
|
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
HandThatFeeds is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Lexington edit revert
editI just added a topic in the Lexington, Kentucky talk page concerning an edit you made. Isaac rowe1 (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Regarding the edit you reverted about EFF supporting those harassed by Appin.
editYou requested secondary sources regarding my edit about the EFF supporting those harassed by Appin. I found them, listed below. If these are okay, let me know, and I'll update the edit, or you can do it yourself.
1. https://www.wired.com/story/appin-training-centers-lawsuits-censorship/
3. https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2024/feb/01/global-censorship-appin-reuters/ HARRISONSST (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- None of those are specifically about the EFF's actions, the EFF barely gets a passing mention. That wouldn't work for the paragraph you wanted to add. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is a story from Slashdot, which is specifically about the EFF's actions.
- https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/02/10/0732205/eff-challenges-legal-bullying-of-sites-reporting-on-alleged-appin-hacking-for-hire HARRISONSST (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- Slashdot is definitely not a reliable source IMO. It's an aggregator. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is not about my paragraph, but I accidentally clicked on a link on the Appin page, and it looks like someone has deliberately messed up the paragraphs and links.
- Check out -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appin_(company)#cite_note-11
- Looks like "Biden vs. Haley on abortion" was introduced by the guy below, along with a number of bad edits:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Samuelanderson90 HARRISONSST (talk) 23:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this on the article's talk page, please. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'll do it, but posting on that Talk page just draws unnecessary attention. This is why I post on your page or @Oblivy's page. HARRISONSST (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- the entire point is to draw attention to the problems on the Talk page and work them out there. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'll do it, but posting on that Talk page just draws unnecessary attention. This is why I post on your page or @Oblivy's page. HARRISONSST (talk) 23:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this on the article's talk page, please. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 23:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Slashdot is definitely not a reliable source IMO. It's an aggregator. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 15:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
closing discussion on talk page
edithttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:September_11_attacks
hello - you closed my talk page discussion as malformed RFC - Its not a RFC just a talk page discussion Gsgdd (talk) 00:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- You formed it as an RfC, without following the proper format or process. Therefore I closed it so you can start over. I see you've reverted me. Well, if you're determined to dig a hole, I'm going to offer you an extra shovel. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 00:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- there is lot of discussion already. An id is not generated - i removed rfc tag well before that. so its not a problem Gsgdd (talk) 00:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)