 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
DYK for What a Devastating Turn of Events
editOn 28 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article What a Devastating Turn of Events, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rachel Chinouriri decided to include the English flag on the cover art of What a Devastating Turn of Events to celebrate her Black British identity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/What a Devastating Turn of Events. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, What a Devastating Turn of Events), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
A cup of tea for you!
edit| thanks for your contributions! :) xRozuRozu (t • c) 06:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Mid Air (Romy album)
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mid Air (Romy album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Bruzz -> BRUZZ
editHi, could you move the page Bruzz back to BRUZZ. The name is all-caps and not in lower-caps.
Source:
https://www.bruzz.be/over-bruzz Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 07:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @JhowieNitnek Unless the name is an acronym, which it does not appear to be from what I can see (the page you linked certainly doesn't say so), MOS:TITLECAPS applies. I will not be undoing my page move, and I would request that you undo your most recent edit. If you really think you have a case then take it to requested moves, and if you do so please notify me of the discussion so that I may contribute. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 09:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- It may not be a acronym but it is written in all-caps. All-caps is not something reserved only for acronyms... Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 09:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @JhowieNitnek on Wikipedia it is. That's why I linked MOS:TMSTYLE for my move reason; as it says, you can leave a note at the top of the article that says "stylized in all caps", but the rest of the article must follow capitalization standards for titles of works, as should any mention in any other article. There are certain exceptions, but I see no reason why this should be one of them. Again, you can argue your case at requested moves, but you won't be changing my mind. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 09:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- @JhowieNitnek in case you haven't seen yet, just letting you know that I undid your edit and added a "stylised in all caps" note to the lead. I hope you are satisfied with this conclusion. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @JhowieNitnek on Wikipedia it is. That's why I linked MOS:TMSTYLE for my move reason; as it says, you can leave a note at the top of the article that says "stylized in all caps", but the rest of the article must follow capitalization standards for titles of works, as should any mention in any other article. There are certain exceptions, but I see no reason why this should be one of them. Again, you can argue your case at requested moves, but you won't be changing my mind. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 09:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- It may not be a acronym but it is written in all-caps. All-caps is not something reserved only for acronyms... Jhowie_Nitnek (talk) 09:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mid Air (Romy album)
editThe article Mid Air (Romy album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mid Air (Romy album) and Talk:Mid Air (Romy album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 03:03, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Mid Air (Romy album)
editThe article Mid Air (Romy album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mid Air (Romy album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Inappropriate source
editRe: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burnout_(EP)&diff=next&oldid=1233604805, this is not a reliable source. Please remove it. If you think it should be added to the list, please bring this up at WT:ALBUM. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:49, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Koavf the list doesn't even mention Spectrum Culture. Not being mentioned doesn't make it unreliable, just that it doesn't have consensus to be listed at all. Undiscussed ≠ unreliable. This is no reason to remove. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly: it doesn't mention it. There are a lot of websites that give reviews of music out there. Please undo this and add a discussion about Spectrum Culture if you want to include it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are a lot of such websites, and many of which aren't on that list, but that doesn't mean we can't use them. If you think it's unreliable, you should start that discussion and provide evidence that it needs to be removed, but I disagree and will not be removing it based on your demand without any such evidence. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- There was discussion about Spectrum Culture and there was no consensus to include it and in fact, a consensus that it was not an appropriate source: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_62#OndaRock_and_Spectrum_Culture. In fact, I personally suggested it being added and there was no consensus to add it: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_67#Proposed_reliable_sources_for_Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- No consensus is still not a definite no. That may as well be undiscussed because it didn't change the status of anything. And I was in that latter discussion calling Spectrum Culture reliable which you didn't disagree with at the time. I'm still unconvinced this is grounds for removal. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to bring this to WikiProject Albums just to ease your mind because this discussion between the two of us won't go anywhere. If there is consensus found there, then I'm fine with it being removed. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- No consensus is still not a definite no. That may as well be undiscussed because it didn't change the status of anything. And I was in that latter discussion calling Spectrum Culture reliable which you didn't disagree with at the time. I'm still unconvinced this is grounds for removal. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- There was discussion about Spectrum Culture and there was no consensus to include it and in fact, a consensus that it was not an appropriate source: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_62#OndaRock_and_Spectrum_Culture. In fact, I personally suggested it being added and there was no consensus to add it: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_67#Proposed_reliable_sources_for_Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Sources―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are a lot of such websites, and many of which aren't on that list, but that doesn't mean we can't use them. If you think it's unreliable, you should start that discussion and provide evidence that it needs to be removed, but I disagree and will not be removing it based on your demand without any such evidence. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly: it doesn't mention it. There are a lot of websites that give reviews of music out there. Please undo this and add a discussion about Spectrum Culture if you want to include it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross
editThe article My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:My Back Was a Bridge for You to Cross for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:03, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Regarding a recently redirected article
editHello! I just wanted to reach out and let you know that I restored the page Neil Young Archives Volume III: 1976–1987 from a redirect, as I added more content that makes me think it should be considered as notable. My apologies if I wasn't supposed to do this and acted too bold, but that's why I wanted to get your opinion and see if it should go back to a redirect until the possibility that it gets more coverage. Thank you! Jacubepedia (talk) 23:49, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Jacubepedia you're perfectly within your right to revert my changes. I took another look, and I'm still not personally convinced, but I will hold off from further action until the album is released to see if there is more coverage at that time. The prerelease coverage isn't much, but I've seen album articles let go with less in prerelease and I'm not opposed to some amount more leniency. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thanks for your input! Jacubepedia (talk) 00:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
CN
editYears are nonstandard for bands
[citation needed] — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- @GhostInTheMachine for short descriptions, I have never seen another for a band article that included the years of the band. I see 'em all the time for individuals' birth/death years, but not for a band's foundation/disbandment years. Seems less essential to me than the genre, and there's only so much room to work with. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK, so there is no actual policy about this, just common usage. Sometimes the active years do make sense — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- @GhostInTheMachine as far as I'm aware, there are no policies about shortdesc content. There are guidelines, but they don't appear to be super specific. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- OK, so there is no actual policy about this, just common usage. Sometimes the active years do make sense — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)