March 2010

edit

Your edits to April 20

edit

Dear Robs.1986,
  Some of your edits on the page April 20 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 05:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Saar Kashyap

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saar Kashyap requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —0xF8E8 (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Saar Kashyap for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saar Kashyap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saar Kashyap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk) 16:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robs.1986 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand the value that Wiki provides, and I am proud that I am one of the many who contribute towards Wiki. I have been contributing to Wiki since long time. I have seen that my IP 69.142.248.157 has been misused by many others. I am the only user who is supposed to use this IP. I am in the US, and location is NJ. Request you to kindly guide me on how to get this issue resolved.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Now directly blocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robs.1986 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes. I have two accounts; however I do not use the other account "Robz22". I use this account (Robs.1986) only for editing purposes. If there is any way to delete the other account "Robz22", please do it, or tell me the steps to delete it. Please do not penalize me just because I have/had two accounts.

Decline reason:

You knew perfectly well about our policy on multiple accounts. It's unclear to me why you were continuing to use multiple accounts after previously being blocked for it. You'll need to directly address this. Yamla (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.